Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Technol Transf ; : 1-11, 2023 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37359816

RESUMEN

Analysis of international public-sector contributions to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and vaccines allows for a more thorough examination of the global biomedical innovation ecosystem by institution of origin. Using new and existing methods, we have identified 364 FDA-approved drugs and vaccines approved from 1973 to 2016 discovered in whole or in part by Public Sector Research Institutions (PSRIs) worldwide. We identified product-specific intellectual property contributions to FDA-approved small molecule and biologic drugs and vaccines from the FDA Orange Book, our peer network, published studies, and three new sources: reports of medical product manufacturers' payments to physicians and teaching hospitals under The Sunshine Act of 2010, a paper by Kneller and 64 royalty monetization transactions by academic institutions and/or their faculty that one of us (AS) maintains. We include a total of 293 drugs discovered either wholly by a US PSRI or jointly by a U.S. and a non-U.S. PSRI. 119 FDA-approved drugs and vaccines were discovered by PSRIs outside the U.S. Of these, 71 were solely discovered outside the US, while 48 also involved intellectual property contributions by US PSRIs. In the context of the global public sector landscape, the US dominates drug discovery, accounting for two-thirds of these drugs and many of the important, innovative vaccines introduced over the past 30 years. Contributions by Canada, UK, Germany, Belgium, Japan, and others each amount to 5.4% or less of the total. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10961-023-10007-z.

2.
N Engl J Med ; 364(6): 535-41, 2011 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21306239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Historically, public-sector researchers have performed the upstream, basic research that elucidated the underlying mechanisms of disease and identified promising points of intervention, whereas corporate researchers have performed the downstream, applied research resulting in the discovery of drugs for the treatment of diseases and have carried out development activities to bring them to market. However, the boundaries between the roles of the public and private sectors have shifted substantially since the dawn of the biotechnology era, and the public sector now has a much more direct role in the applied-research phase of drug discovery. METHODS: We identified new drugs and vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that were discovered by public-sector research institutions (PSRIs) and classified them according to their therapeutic category and potential therapeutic effect. RESULTS: We found that during the past 40 years, 153 new FDA-approved drugs, vaccines, or new indications for existing drugs were discovered through research carried out in PSRIs. These drugs included 93 small-molecule drugs, 36 biologic agents, 15 vaccines, 8 in vivo diagnostic materials, and 1 over-the-counter drug. More than half of these drugs have been used in the treatment or prevention of cancer or infectious diseases. PSRI-discovered drugs are expected to have a disproportionately large therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Public-sector research has had a more immediate effect on improving public health than was previously realized.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Descubrimiento de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Público , Transferencia de Tecnología , Vacunas , Investigación Biomédica/historia , Investigación Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aprobación de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Descubrimiento de Drogas/historia , Descubrimiento de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Propiedad Intelectual , Sector Público/historia , Sector Público/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Healthc Policy ; 17(4): 26-36, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686822

RESUMEN

This paper reviews the response by public sector research organizations and their technology transfer offices to the COVID-19 pandemic. It shows that leading universities and technology transfer associations quickly enacted licensing principles for the duration of the pandemic to maximize availability and minimize delays in translating public sector research institutes' (PSRIs') COVID-19 inventions to the public - in both the developed and the developing world - while waiving payment of royalties. It discusses examples of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics and personal protective equipment that were developed in PSRIs and swiftly deployed throughout the world on socially responsible terms. It reviews the case cited by Herder et al. (2022) and concludes that their proposed mandates are unnecessary and may inhibit the free flow of healthcare innovation from bench to bedside.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Transferencia de Tecnología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias , Pandemias/prevención & control , Universidades
6.
Nat Biotechnol ; 35(7): 608-613, 2017 07 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28700555
7.
Sci Transl Med ; 2(52): 52cm27, 2010 Oct 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926832

RESUMEN

On 12 December 1980, in the waning days of the lame duck session of the 96th Congress, the U.S. Senate passed the University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act, now known as the Bayh-Dole Act, a seemingly obscure act that allowed universities to claim title to inventions that had been made with federal funding. It is unlikely that many present that day realized what a dramatic impact that act would have. Data clearly show that it played a critical role in rejuvenating the entire U.S. economic system, transforming it from a manufacturing base to an innovation base. Yet ironically, the act has passionate critics.


Asunto(s)
Gobierno Federal , Patentes como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Universidades , Humanos , Patentes como Asunto/ética , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/ética , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pequeña Empresa/economía , Pequeña Empresa/legislación & jurisprudencia , Transferencia de Tecnología , Estados Unidos , Universidades/economía , Universidades/ética , Universidades/legislación & jurisprudencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA