RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Benign anastomotic stricture is a recognized complication following esophagectomy. Laparoscopic gastric ischemic preconditioning (LGIP) prior to esophagectomy has been associated with decreased anastomotic leak rates; however, its effect on stricture and the need for subsequent endoscopic intervention is not well studied. METHODS: This was a case-control study at an academic medical center using consecutive patients undergoing oncologic esophagectomies (July 2012-July 2022). Our institution initiated an LGIP protocol on 1 January 2021. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stricture within 1 year of esophagectomy, while secondary outcomes were stricture severity and frequency of interventions within the 6 months following stricture. Bivariable comparisons were performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable regression controlling for confounders was performed to generate risk-adjust odds ratios and to identify the independent effect of LGIP. RESULTS: Of 253 esophagectomies, 42 (16.6%) underwent LGIP prior to esophagectomy. There were 45 (17.7%) anastomotic strictures requiring endoscopic intervention, including three patients who underwent LGIP and 42 who did not. Median time to stricture was 144 days. Those who underwent LGIP were significantly less likely to develop anastomotic stricture (7.1% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.048). After controlling for confounders, this difference was no longer significant (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.82; p = 0.29). Of those who developed stricture, there was a trend toward less severe strictures and decreased need for endoscopic dilation in the LGIP group (all p < 0.20). CONCLUSION: LGIP may reduce the rate and severity of symptomatic anastomotic stricture following esophagectomy. A multi-institutional trial evaluating the effect of LGIP on stricture and other anastomotic complications is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Estenosis Esofágica , Esofagectomía , Precondicionamiento Isquémico , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estómago/cirugía , Estómago/irrigación sanguínea , Pronóstico , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Social media has become omnipresent in society, especially given that it enables the rapid and widespread communication of news, events, and information. Social media platforms have become increasingly used by numerous surgical societies to promote meetings and surgical journals to increase the visibility of published content. In September 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology (ASO) established its Social Media Committee (SMC), which has worked to steadily increase the visibility of published content on social media platforms, namely X (formerly known as Twitter). The purpose of this review is to highlight the 10 ASO original articles with the most engagement on X, based on total number of mentions, since the founding of the SMC. These articles encompass a wide variety of topics from various oncologic disciplines including hepatopancreatobiliary, breast, and gynecologic surgery.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) may be a meaningful biomarker for potential benefit from immunotherapy. Further investigation is needed to characterize the immune landscape of EBVaGC. We assessed our institutional frequency of surgically treated EBVaGC and analyzed the immunologic biomarker profile and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) phenotypes of a series of EBVaGC compared to non-EBVaGC cases. METHODS: Available tissue samples from all patients with biopsy-confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent resection with curative intent from 2012 to 2020 at our institution were collected. In situ hybridization was used to assess EBV status; multiplex immunohistochemistry was performed to assess mismatch repair status, Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and phenotypic characterization of TILs. RESULTS: Sixty-eight samples were included in this study. EBVaGC was present in 3/68 (4%) patients. Among all patients, 27/68 (40%) had positive PD-L1 expression; two of three (67%) EBVaGC patients exhibited positive PD-L1 expression. Compared to non-EBVaGC, EBV-positive tumors showed 5-fold to 10-fold higher density of TILs in both tumor and stroma and substantially elevated CD8+ T cell to Tregulatory cell ratio. The memory subtypes of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were upregulated in EBVaGC tumors and stromal tissue compared to non-EBVaGC. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of surgically resected EBVaGC at our center was 4%. EBVaGC tumors harbor elevated levels of TILs, including memory subtypes, within both tumor and tumor-related stroma. Robust TIL presence and upregulated PD-L1 positivity in EBVaGC may portend promising responses to immunotherapy agents. Further investigation into routine EBV testing and TIL phenotype of patients with gastric cancer to predict response to immunotherapy may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Herpesvirus Humano 4/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 4/metabolismo , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our institution began performing laparoscopic gastric ischemic preconditioning (LGIP) with ligation of the left gastric and short gastric vessels prior to esophagectomy in all patients presenting with resectable esophageal cancer. We hypothesized that LGIP may decrease the incidence and severity of anastomotic leak. METHODS: Patients were prospectively evaluated following the universal application of LGIP prior to esophagectomy protocol in January 2021 until August 2022. Outcomes were compared with patients who underwent esophagectomy without LGIP from a prospectively maintained database from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: We compared 42 patients who underwent LGIP followed by esophagectomy with 222 who underwent esophagectomy without LGIP. Age, sex, comorbidities, and clinical stage were similar between groups. Outpatient LGIP was generally well tolerated, with one patient experiencing prolonged gastroparesis. Median time from LGIP to esophagectomy was 31 days. Mean operative time and blood loss were not significantly different between groups. Patients who underwent LGIP were significantly less likely to develop an anastomotic leak following esophagectomy (7.1% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.038). This finding persisted on multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.42, p = 0.029]. The occurrence of any post-esophagectomy complication was similar between groups (40.5% vs. 46.0%, p = 0.514), but patients who underwent LGIP had shorter length of stay [10 (9-11) vs. 12 (9-15), p = 0.020]. CONCLUSIONS: LGIP prior to esophagectomy is associated with a decreased risk of anastomotic leak and length of hospital stay. Further, multi-institutional studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Precondicionamiento Isquémico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Estómago/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Laparoscopía/métodos , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/efectos adversos , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients newly diagnosed with cancer often seek information prior to being seen by a specialist. Little is known about the type of information desired and the sources used. We asked how patients find information about their new cancer diagnoses to improve information provision. METHODS: An anonymous seven-question survey was provided to new patients in the surgical and medical oncology clinics at a comprehensive cancer center from February 2021 to June 2021. RESULTS: Of 503 consecutive patients, 405 (81%) returned surveys; 49% female, 57% aged 51-75 y, and 71% Caucasian. Many (74%) sought information before their visit. Most (57%) relied on prior medical providers and 77% reported them as a trusted source. Nearly 80% of patients used at least one nonvalidated resource; 21% friends and relatives, 20% nongovernment or hospital resources, and 12% social media. Importantly, 23% found conflicting information. Respondents desired information on cancer treatment (58%), alternative therapies (35%), and nutrition and supplements (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer trust information from medical providers but seek information from a variety of sources that can provide conflicting information. These data support encouraging patients to use validated sources, providing robust organization-based resources, and engaging patients on topics such as alternative therapies and nutrition.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Oncología Quirúrgica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Oncología Médica , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) was the standard treatment for patients with melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) until 2017 when data from the DeCOG-SLT and MLST-2 randomized trials challenged the survival benefit of this procedure. We assessed the contribution of patient, tumor and facility factors on the use of CLND in patients with surgically resected Stage III melanoma. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, patients who underwent surgical excision and were found to have a positive SLN from 2012 to 2017 were included. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept for the facility was used to determine the effect of patient, tumor, and facility variables on the risk of CLND. Reference effect measures (REMs) were used to compare the contribution of contextual effects (unknown facility variables) versus measured variables on the variation in CLND use. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, the overall use of CLND decreased from 59.9% to 26.5% (p < 0.0001). Overall, older patients and patients with government-based insurance were less likely to undergo CLND. Tumor factors associated with a decreased rate of CLND included primary tumor location on the lower limb, decreasing depth, and mitotic rate <1. However, the contribution of contextual effects to the variation in CLND use exceeded that of the measured facility, tumor, time, and patient variables. CONCLUSIONS: There was a decrease in CLND use during the study period. However, there is still high variability in CLND use, mainly driven by unmeasured contextual effects.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many states have legalized medical cannabis with various reported therapeutic benefits. However, there is little data assessing the effects of cannabis on surgical outcomes. We sought to compare post-operative pancreatic resection complications between cannabis users and non-users. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients who underwent Whipple or distal pancreatectomy from 1/2017-12/2020. The primary outcome was any in-hospital complication, using Clavien-Dindo. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 486 patients who underwent Whipple (n=346, 71.2%) or distal pancreatectomy (n=140, 28.8%). Overall, 21.4% (n=104) reported cannabis use, of whom 80.8% were current users. Cannabis users were younger (60 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001), and more likely to have smoked tobacco (p=0.04), but otherwise had similar demographics as non-users. There were 288 (59.3%) patients who developed an in-hospital complication (grade 1-2, 75.3%; grade 3-5, 24.7%). A trend towards increased complications was observed with tobacco smoking (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.91-1.94, p=0.14), but no association of cannabis use with complications was observed (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58-1.47, p=0.74). DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection report cannabis use. These results suggest that there was no association between cannabis use and post-operative complications, future prospective evaluation is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that professional forms of address in speaker introductions were inconsistently used at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2018 and 2019 annual meetings, suggesting unconscious bias in speaker introductions. We sought to better understand how speakers would like to be introduced, and if guidelines could improve consistency in speaker introductions. METHODS: SSO 2021 abstract submitters received a survey regarding demographics and preferred form of address at the meeting. Respectful discourse guidelines were developed and distributed to meeting moderators. Speaker introductions were reviewed for the 2021 SSO annual meeting and were compared with the 2018 and 2019 meetings. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 183/347 (53%) abstract submitters, most of whom (143/183, 78%) indicated preference for a professional form of address (Doctor/Professor) during speaker introductions, which was significantly greater than those who were introduced with a professional form of address during the 2018 and 2019 meetings (351/499, 70%; Chi-square = 4.08, p = 0.043). There was no difference in speaker introduction preference based on gender or race/ethnic identification. Respectful discourse guidelines were developed and distributed to meeting moderators. During the 2021 SSO annual meeting, professional forms of address were used for 104 (84%) speakers, significantly greater than during the 2018 and 2019 meetings (Chi-square = 9.23, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: More survey respondents preferred speaker introductions with a professional form of address than were used in prior meetings. This preference was similar across all demographic groups evaluated. Professional addresses during speaker introductions increased significantly after the distribution of guidelines encouraging consistency to decrease unconscious bias and promote an inclusive environment.
Asunto(s)
Oncología Quirúrgica , Sesgo Implícito , Humanos , Sexismo , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: For patients with stage III melanoma with occult lymph node metastasis, the use of adjuvant therapy is increasing, and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is decreasing. We sought to evaluate the use of modern adjuvant therapy and outcomes for patients with stage III melanoma who did not undergo CLND. METHODS: Patients with a positive SLNB from 2015 to 2020 who did not undergo CLND were evaluated retrospectively. Nodal recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and melanoma-specific survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 90 patients, 56 (62%) received adjuvant therapy and 34 (38%) underwent observation alone. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were younger (mean age: 53 vs. 65, p < 0.001) and had higher overall stage (Stage IIIb/c 75% vs. 54%, p = 0.041). Disease recurred in 12 of 34 patients (35%) in the observation group and 11 of 56 patients (20%) in the adjuvant therapy group. The most common first site of recurrence was distant recurrence alone (5/34 patients) in the observation group and nodal recurrence alone (8/90 patients) in the adjuvant therapy group. Despite more adverse nodal features in the adjuvant therapy group, 24-month nodal recurrence rate and RFS were not significantly different between the adjuvant and observation cohorts (nodal recurrence rate: 26% vs. 20%, p = 0.68; RFS: 75% vs. 61%, p = 0.39). Among patients with stage IIIb/c disease, adjuvant therapy was associated with a significantly improved 24-month DMFS (86% vs. 59%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this early report, modern adjuvant therapy in patients who forego CLND is associated with longer DMFS among patients with stage IIIb/c disease.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of prospective data related to surgeon ergonomics, which affects career longevity. Robotic surgical systems may mitigate pain and workload. We hypothesized that ergonomic outcomes would vary based on surgeon height and gender, and the relative benefit of robotic surgery would vary based on these demographics. METHODS: Surgeons received questionnaires to fill out immediately before and after surgery to enable calculation of pain scores and task load. Surgeons who were ≤ 66 inches tall were considered "short". Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed where appropriate using Stata-MP version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). RESULTS: There were 124 questionnaires given to 20 surgeons; 97 (78%) were returned, and 12 (12%) laparoscopic operations were excluded, leaving 85 (69%) questionnaires for further analysis: 33 (38%) from short surgeons, and 24 (28%) from women, for 30 (35%) robotic and 55 (65%) open operations. There were 44/85 (52%) surgeons who reported worse pain after surgery. Overall pain scores (1.1 ± 2.6 vs 1.5 ± 2.6, p = 0.70) were similar for robotic and open operations. In multivariable analysis, greater surgeon pain scores were significantly associated with short surgeons (p < 0.001), male surgeons (p < 0.001), and long operative times (p = 0.03). Physical demand was lower for robot vs open operations (median 10 vs 13, p = 0.03). When short surgeons (p = 0.04) and male surgeons (p = 0.03) were examined as sub-groups, lower physical demand during robotic operations persisted, but was lost when only examining tall surgeons (p = 0.07) and female surgeons (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Short surgeons and male surgeons reported significantly more pain after both open and robotic operations but had less physical demand when using the robotic system. Future work should focus on mitigation of surgeon height-related factors and seek to understand ergonomic gender differences beyond height.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirujanos , Ergonomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that OR airborne PM was different in quantity and mutagenic potential than office air and cigarette smoke. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exposure to surgical smoke has been equated to cigarette smoking and thought to be hazardous to health care workers despite limited data. METHODS: PM was measured during 15 operations in ORs with 24.8â±â2.0 air changes/h, and in controls (cigarettes, office air with 1.9-2.9 air changes/h). Mutagenic potential was assessed by gamma Histone 2A family member X staining of DNA damage in small airway epithelial cells co-cultured with PM. RESULTS: Average PM concentration during surgery was 0.002â±â0.002âmg/m3 with maximum values at 1.08â±â1.30âmg/m3. Greater PM correlated with more diathermy (ρ = 0.69, P = 0.006). Values were most often near zero, resulting in OR average values similar to office air (0.002â±â0.001âmg/m3) (P = 0.32). Cigarette smoke average PM concentration was significantly higher, 4.8â±â5.6âmg/m3 (P < 0.001). PM collected from 14 days of OR air caused DNA damage to 1.6%â±â2.7% of cultured cells, significantly less than that from office air (27.7%â±â11.7%, P = 0.02), and cigarette smoke (61.3%â±â14.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The air we breathe during surgery has negligible quantities of PM and mutagenic potential, likely due to low frequency of diathermy use coupled with high airflow. This suggests that exposure to surgical smoke is associated with minimal occupational risk.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Lesión por Inhalación de Humo/etiología , Humo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , Material Particulado/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The advantages of robotic liver surgery are strongest for minor resections, where incision size drives recovery time, but cost remains a concern. We hypothesized that patients who underwent robotic minor liver resections would have superior peri-operative outcomes resulting in decreased cost. METHODS: We queried the medical record and cost data for patients who underwent open or robotic minor (1-2 segment) liver resection from 1/2016-8/2019. Financial data were normalized to Medicare reimbursements. RESULTS: There were 87 patients who underwent minor liver resections (robotic n = 46, open n = 41). Specimen size (173 ± 203 vs 257 ± 481 cm3), surgical duration (233 ± 87 vs 227 ± 83 min), estimated blood loss (187 ± 236 vs 194 ± 165 mL), and margin status (89% vs 93% R0) were similar for robotic and open resections respectively, yet complications (3/46, 7% vs 10/41, 24%, p = 0.02) and length of stay (2.2 ± 2.2 vs 6.2 ± 2.9, p < 0.001) were significantly lower for patients who underwent robotic resection. These factors contributed to minor robotic liver resections costing $534 less than open resections ($3597 ± 1823 vs $4131 ± 1532, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing robotic minor hepatectomy had superior peri-operative outcomes resulting in lower total cost of care when compared to open minor hepatectomy. Financial considerations should not adversely influence selection of a robotic approach for minor hepatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anciano , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Medicare , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
: There is a long history of personal protective equipment (PPE) used by the surgeon to minimize the transmission of various pathogens. In the context of the present coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic there is significant controversy as to what forms of PPE are appropriate or adequate. This review aims to describe the pathogenic mechanism and route of spread of the causative virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, as it pertains to accumulated published data from experienced centers globally. The various forms of PPE that are both available and appropriate are addressed. There are options in the form of eyewear, gloves, masks, respirators, and gowns. The logical and practical utilization of these should be data driven and evolve based on both experience and data. Last, situations specific to surgical populations are addressed. We aim to provide granular collective data that has thus far been published and that can be used as a reference for optimal PPE choices in the perioperative setting for surgical teams.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Cirujanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent reviews of medical conferences have shown that women were less likely to receive a formal introduction compared with men. We examined speaker introductions at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) annual meeting to determine whether similar biases exist within our organization. METHODS: An observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at the 2018 and 2019 SSO annual meetings was conducted. Professional address was defined as professional title followed by full name or last name. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with form of address. RESULTS: There were 499 speaker introductions reviewed. Speakers included 290 (58%) men and 238 (49%) post-graduate trainees (residents and fellows). A non-professional form of address was used to introduce 148 (30%) speakers and was most often used for post-graduate trainees (33%). Full professors were more likely than junior faculty to introduce speakers with a non-professional form of address (37% of full professors vs 18% of assistant professors, p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis these findings persisted. Trainees were 2.8 times more likely to receive a non-professional form of address (p = 0.003). Use of a non-professional introduction did not significantly vary by the speaker's nor the introducer's gender. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and fellows were more likely to receive a non-professional form of address, and the likelihood of this increased with rising seniority of the introducer. The manner of speaker introduction did not vary by gender in our organization. More research is needed to explore the influence of these disparities on academic advancement for the next generation of surgical oncologists.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Sexismo , Oncología Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Intraoperative hyperglycemia is associated with infectious complications in general surgery patients. This study aimed to determine if the use of lactated Ringer's (LR) carrier solution during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) would lower the incidence of intraoperative hyperglycemia and improve postoperative outcomes when compared with a standard 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate carrier solution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 134 patients who underwent HIPEC at the University of Colorado. Perioperative glucose levels and outcomes were compared between patients who were perfused with 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate carrier solution (n = 68) versus LR carrier solution (n = 66). RESULTS: The study population consisted of patients undergoing HIPEC for appendiceal (50%), colorectal (34%), mesothelioma (8%), and ovarian cancer (5%). Intraoperative severe hyperglycemia (glucose ≥ 180 mg/dL) was significantly more common among patients perfused with a dextrose-containing carrier solution versus those perfused with LR (88% vs. 21%; p < 0.001). Patients in the dextrose cohort had significantly more severe complications (39% vs. 12%; p = 0.034), infectious complications (35% vs. 15%; p = 0.011), and organ space infections (18% vs. 5%: p = 0.026) than the LR cohort. On multivariable analysis, dextrose-containing carrier solution was significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications (HR 5.16; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative hyperglycemia is common when dextrose-containing carrier solution is used during HIPEC, and severe intraoperative hyperglycemia is strongly associated with an increased risk for infectious of complications following HIPEC. LR carrier solution should be routinely used to reduce intraoperative hyperglycemia and its associated risks.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Glucosa , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/etiología , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is preferred for distal pancreatectomy but is not always attempted due to the risk of conversion to open. We hypothesized that the total cost for MIS converted to open procedures would be comparable to those that started open. METHODS: A prospectively collected institutional registry (2011-2017) was reviewed for demographic, clinical, and perioperative cost data for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: There were 80 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy: 41 open, 39 MIS (11 laparoscopic and 28 robotic). Conversion to open occurred in 14 of 39 (36%, 3 laparoscopic and 11 robotic). Length of stay was shorter for the MIS completed (6 days; range, 3-8), and MIS converted to open (7 days; range, 4-10) groups, compared with open (10 days; range, 5-36; P = .003). Laparoscopic cases were the least expensive (P = .02). Robotic converted to open procedures had the highest operating room cost. However, the total cost for robotic converted to open cohort was similar to the open cohort due to cost savings associated with a shorter length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher intraoperative costs of robotic surgery, there is no significant overall financial penalty for conversion to open. Financial considerations should not play a role in selecting a robotic or open approach.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía/economía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/economía , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/métodos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess postbiopsy pigmentation (PBP) as a prognostic feature in patients with cutaneous head and neck (H&N) melanoma. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for H&N melanoma (1998-2018). PBP was defined as visible remaining pigment at the scar or biopsy site that was documented on physical exam by both a medical oncologist and a surgeon at initial consultation. Variables associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 300 patients, 34.3% (n = 103) had PBP and 44.7% (n = 134) had microscopic residual disease on final pathology after wide local excision. Prognostic factors associated with DFS included advanced age, tumor depth, ulceration, PBP, and positive SLNB (p < 0.05). Patients with PBP fared worse than their counterparts without PBP in 5-year DFS [44.1% (31.1-56.3%) vs. 73.0% (64.1-80.0%); p < 0.001] and 5-year OS [65.0% (50.0-76.6%) vs. 83.6% (75.7-89.2%); p = 0.005]. After multivariable adjustment, PBP remained associated with shorter DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.93; p = 0.047], but was not prognostic of OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with H&N melanoma, PBP is associated with significantly shorter DFS. Patients with PBP may warrant greater consideration for SLNB and closer postoperative surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Melanoma/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Pigmentación de la Piel , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is offered at most major medical institutions. The extent of its use within general surgical oncology, however, is poorly understood. We hypothesized that robotic surgery adoption in surgical oncology is increasing annually, that is occurring in all surgical sites, and all regions of the US. STUDY DESIGN: We identified patients with site-specific malignancies treated with surgical resection from the National Inpatient Sample 2010-2014 databases. Operations were considered robotic if any ICD-9-CM robotic procedure code was used. RESULTS: We identified 147,259 patients representing the following sites: esophageal (3%), stomach (5%), small bowel (5%), pancreas (7%), liver (5%), and colorectal (75%). Most operations were open (71%), followed by laparoscopic (26%), and robotic (3%). In 2010, only 1.1% of operations were robotic; over the 5-year study period, there was a 5.0-fold increase in robotic surgery, compared to 1.1-fold increase in laparoscopy and 1.2-fold decrease in open surgery (< 0.001). These trends were observed for all surgical sites and in all regions of the US, they were strongest for esophageal and colorectal operations, and in the Northeast. Adjusting for age and comorbidities, odds of having a robotic operation increased annually (5.6 times more likely by 2014), with similar length of stay (6.9 ± 6.5 vs 7.0 ± 6.5, p = 0.52) and rate of complications (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-1.01, p = 0.08) compared to laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery as a platform for minimally invasive surgery is increasing over time for oncologic operations. The growing use of robotic surgery will affect surgical oncology practice in the future, warranting further study of its impact on cost, outcomes, and surgical training.