[Work Participation after Multimodal Rehabilitation due to Cancer: Representative Analyses using Routine Data of the German Pension Insurance]. / Berufliche Teilhabe nach einer medizinischen Rehabilitation aufgrund von onkologischen Erkrankungen: Repräsentative Analysen auf Basis der Routinedaten der Deutschen Rentenversicherung.

PURPOSE: Cancer diseases are associated with multiple physical, psychosocial, and occupational burdens that jeopardize work participation and must be specifically addressed with rehabilitative interventions. This study addressed the following questions regarding cancer patients whose rehabilitation was covered by German Pension Insurance (GPI): (a) What socio-medical risks existed prior to rehabilitation, (b) how well persons were able to return to work after rehabilitation, and (c) what conditions determined work participation? METHODS: We used the rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance and included patients with completed medical rehabilitation due to cancer in 2017. Analyses were carried out for the entire group as well as for those differentiated according to their tumor sites (breast, prostate, colon and lung). Work participation was operationalized both via a monthly state up to 24 months after rehabilitation discharge and as a rate of all persons who were employed 12 or 24 months and the 3 preceding months (stable work participation). For the analysis of the influencing factors on stable work participation, multiple logistic regression models with stepwise inclusion were calculated separately for the rates after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 63,587 data sets were included in the analysis (breast cancer: n=20,545, 32%; prostate: n=6,434, 10%; colon: n=4,727, 7%; lung: n=2,866, 5%). Of the rehabilitation participants 55% (lung), 49% (colon), 46% (breast), and 13% (prostate) had sickness absences of six or more months in the year before rehabilitation. Two years after rehabilitation, return-to-work rates were 66% (breast), 54% (prostate), 50% (colon), and 24% (lung). The strongest factors influencing stable work participation were time of sick leave, wage before rehabilitation and age. CONCLUSION: Two years after cancer rehabilitation, 5 to 6 out of 10 persons returned to stable work participation. Relevant influencing factors were the length of sick leave and wages prior to cancer rehabilitation. The results suggest inclusion of more work-related aspects in cancer rehabilitation and greater suppor, especially in the first year post-rehabilitation.

A Mega-Ethnography of Qualitative Meta-Syntheses on Return to Work in People with Chronic Health Conditions.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to synthesize the findings of qualitative meta-syntheses (QMS) on return to work (RTW) of people with different chronic illnesses and to develop a generic RTW model that can provide advice on how to improve RTW interventions and strategies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Epistemonikos, CENTRAL, and PsycARTICLES to find relevant QMS, published in English or German between 2000 and 2021, and adapted the meta-ethnographic approach of Noblit and Hare to synthesize their findings. RESULTS: Nineteen QMS (five focusing on musculoskeletal disorders or chronic pain, four on acquired or traumatic brain injuries, four on cancer, two on mental disorders, one on spinal cord injury, and three on mixed samples) met our inclusion criteria for the meta-ethnographic synthesis. Through systematic comparison and reciprocal translation of the single QMS findings, we could identify a set of key cross-cutting themes/concepts, which formed the basis for four RTW principles and a generic RTW model. CONCLUSIONS: RTW is a multifactorial and highly interactive multistakeholder process, embedded in an individual's life and working history, as well as in a determined social and societal context. It runs parallel and interdependently to the process of coping with the disease and realigning one's own identity, thus emphasizing the significance of RTW for the person. Besides symptoms and consequences of the disease, individual coping strategies, and RTW motivation, the course and success of RTW are strongly affected by the adaptability of the person's working environment and the social support in their private and working life. Thus, RTW is not only a problem of the individual, but also a matter of the social environment, especially the workplace, requiring a holistic, person-centered, and systemic approach, coordinated by a designated body, which considers the interests of all actors involved in the RTW process.

Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our analyses examined the extent to which the use of rehabilitation for patients with mental disorders decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. METHODS: We used monthly cross-sectional administrative data on rehabilitation utilisation due to mental disorders in 2019 and 2020 and estimated a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation utilisation attributable to the pandemic. RESULTS: We included 151,775 rehabilitations in 2019 and 123,229 rehabilitations in 2020 in our analysis. The number of rehabilitations decreased from April to December by 14.2% due to the pandemic (March to December: 21.8%). The decline was more pronounced for women than for men and varied regionally. Temporal and regional differences in utilisation were moderately associated with the decrease in mobility in the pandemic year. In the first phase of the pandemic, i.e., March and April 2020, the decline was strongly associated with the regional incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Due to the pandemic, significantly fewer rehabilitations due to mental disorders occurred in Germany in 2020 than in 2019. The likely increasing need for rehabilitation for people with mental disorders should be addressed by making rehabilitation access and delivery more flexible.

[Work Participation after Multimodal Rehabilitation due to Cardiovascular Diseases - Representative Analyses using Routine Data of the German Pension Insurance]. / Berufliche Teilhabe nach einer medizinischen Rehabilitation aufgrund von kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen ­ Repräsentative Analysen auf Basis der Routinedaten der Deutschen Rentenversicherung.

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular diseases represent a large proportion of the disease burden of the adult population in Germany. Their importance in rehabilitation has increased continuously in recent years. Several studies have investigated return to work of cardiac patients after rehabilitation, which is relevant from the perspective of pension insurance. However, there is a lack of representative findings for the German region on employment trajectories and their influencing factors. METHODS: The rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance (GPI) was used for this study. Subjects were patients with cardiovascular diseases undergoing rehabilitation in 2017. Analyses were performed for the total group and differentiated by relevant diagnosis groups. Occupational participation was operationalized via a monthly state variable up to 24 months after rehabilitation and the rate of all persons who were employed at the 12- and 24- month follow-up and in the 3 months before, respectively. Multiple logistic regression models were calculated to analyze the influencing factors. RESULTS: The total sample comprised 59,667 patients. The average age in all groups was between 53 and 56 years. Men were disproportionately represented; 70% of the services were provided as follow-up rehabilitations and 88% in the inpatient setting. Stable employment rates were 66% after one year and 63% after two years in the overall group (disease groups: 49% to 71%). The strongest influencing factors were the amount of pay and the number of sickness absence days before rehabilitation, active employment before rehabilitation, and age. CONCLUSION: For the first time, representative data on occupational participation following rehabilitation on behalf of the GPI are available for the disease groups considered. The analyses underline the need to focus on occupational perspectives already in medical rehabilitation or directly thereafter.

[Work Participation after Multimodal Rehabilitation due to Neurological Diseases - Representative Analyses Using Routine Data of the German Pension Insurance]. / Berufliche Teilhabe nach einer medizinischen Rehabilitation aufgrund neurologischer Erkrankungen.

PURPOSE: There is little representative evidence for the German rehabilitation system on occupational reintegration after medical rehabilitation. For persons who have undergone rehabilitation on behalf of the German Pension Insurance (GPI) due to a neurological disease, it is therefore important to determine (a) what socio-medical risks exist prior to rehabilitation, (b) how well persons were able to participate in working life after rehabilitation, and (c) what conditions determine the work participation. METHODS: The study is conducted on the basis of the GPI's database of rehabilitation statistics. Included were all persons, who completed medical rehabilitation in 2016 due to a neurological disease. The analyses were carried out for the entire group and also in a differentiated manner for the 2 main diseases, cerebrovascular diseases (CD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Work participation was operationalized both via a monthly status variable until 24 months after rehabilitation and as a rate of all persons who were employed at the 12 and 24 months follow up and in the 3 months before, respectively. To analyse the factors influencing stable work participation, multiple logistic regression models with stepwise inclusion were calculated separately for the rates after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 42,230 data sets were included in the analysis (CD: n=18,368, 44%; MS: n=6,343, 15%). Patients with neurological diseases were 50 years old on average, 43% were female. We found that approximately15% of patients reported no absenteeism, whereas 17% stated an absence leave of six months or more in the year prior to rehabilitation. Mental and cardiovascular comorbidity was documented in 31 and 44% of the cases respectively. Nearly 48% of patients with CD returned to work two years after rehabilitation. For MS patients, the percentage was slightly higher at 54%. The amount of sick leave of the rehabilitated individual, their gross/net income prior to rehabilitation as well their work capacity prior to admission were the three strongest influencing factors on their return to the labour market. CONCLUSION: About half of all persons with neurological diseases return to sustainable work after medical rehabilitation in Germany. The amount of sick leave and the income before rehabilitation are determining factors as to whether the person will return to work. The analysis provides representative data on occupational reintegration after medical rehabilitation due to a neurological disease for the first time.

[Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Utilization of Cancer Rehabilitation: a Difference-in-Differences Analysis]. / Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie auf die Inanspruchnahme der onkologischen Rehabilitation: eine Difference-in-Differences-Analyse.

PURPOSE: Restricted access to rehabilitative care due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may affect the participation of cancer survivors and risks progression of the underlying disease. The aim of our analyses was to examined the extent to which cancer rehabilitations in Germany decreased due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the German Pension Insurance which is the main provider for medical rehabilitation in Germany. We used monthly cross-sectional data on the utilization of cancer rehabilitation (Ca-rehab-services according to section 15 for working-aged people or section 31 social security code VI for pensioners) in 2019 and 2020. We used a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation utilization attributable to the pandemic and reported incidence rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS: We included 146,924 cancer rehabilitations in 2019 and 113,117 cancer rehabilitations in 2020. Compared to the previous year, the nationwide decline in cancer rehabilitations was greatest in April 2020 (63.2%). Utilization of cancer rehabilitation was reduced by 11.5% for benefits according to section 15 social security code VI (IRR=0.885; 95% CI: 0.864 to 0.906) and by 26.5% for benefits according to section 31 (IRR=0.735; 95% CI: 0.717 to 0.754) due to the pandemic. For pensioners the decline in utilization was more pronounced in Western Germany than in Eastern Germany and greater for non-post-acute rehabilitations than for post-acute rehabilitations. CONCLUSION: The analyses show a pandemic-related decline in cancer rehabilitations, especially in cancer rehabilitation services for pensioners. Failure to seek medical rehabilitation, through which physical and psychological recovery and relief from disease and treatment side effects can be achieved, will have a lasting impact on the participation for many cancer survivors. Repeated monitoring of work ability and health of chronically ill people could generate necessary data to clarify why people in need of rehabilitation have avoided seeking medical rehabilitation and how they can be supported.

[Work Participation after Multimodal Rehabilitation due to Diseases of the Digestive System. Representative Analyses using Routine Data of the German Pension Insurance]. / Berufliche Teilhabe nach einer medizinischen Rehabilitation aufgrund von Erkrankungen des Verdauungssystems. Repräsentative Analysen auf Basis der Routinedaten der Deutschen Rentenversicherung.

PURPOSE: Diseases of the digestive system such as Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated with problems in occupational participation, but they only make up a very small part of all rehabilitation services provided by the German Pension Insurance. Rehabilitation is a very good treatment option, but its effectiveness is largely unclear. So far, several studies exist on the return to work after medical rehabilitation. However, representative findings and the relevant influencing factors are still lacking. This is the aim of the present analysis. METHODS: We used the rehabilitation statistics database of the German Pension Insurance. Patients were included with completed medical rehabilitation due to a disease of the digestive system in 2017. The analyses were carried out for the entire group as well as differentiated according to the diagnosis groups CD, UC, diverticular diseases (DI) as well as pancreatic diseases (PA). Occupational participation was operationalised both via a monthly information up to 24 months after rehabilitation and as a rate of all persons who were employed after 12 or 24 months in the survey month and the 3 preceding months. For the analysis of the influencing factors on stable occupational participation, multiple logistic regression models with stepwise inclusion were calculated separately for the rates after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 8,795 data sets were included in the analysis (CD: n=1,779, 20%; UC: n=1,438, 16%; DI: 1,282, 15%; PA: n=761, 9%). The average age in the groups ranged from 44 (CD) to 54 (DI) years; the proportion of women ranged from 28% (PA) to 57% (CD). Between 16% (DI) and 32% (PA) of the rehabilitation participants had sickness absences of 6 or more months in the year before rehabilitation. Two years after rehabilitation, the return-to-work rates were 69% (CD), 71% (UC), 68% (DI) and 58% (PA). The strongest influencing factors on stable occupational participation were time of sick leave and wage before rehabilitations well as work ability at admission. CONCLUSION: Two years after gastroenterological rehabilitation in Germany, 6 to 7 out of 10 affected persons return to stable work participation. Relevant influencing factors are the time of sick leave and the level of remuneration. The results support an expansion of rehabilitation concept to include work-related aspects.

Reduced Requests for Medical Rehabilitation Because of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which medical rehabilitation requests decreased because of the pandemic in Germany. DESIGN: Data were retrieved from the German Pension Insurance, which is the main provider for rehabilitation of working-age people in Germany. Our data represented all medical rehabilitation requests in 2019 and 2020. These requests have to be approved to use a rehabilitation program. We used a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation requests attributable to the pandemic. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: We included 1,621,840 rehabilitation requests from working-age people across Germany in 2019 and 1,391,642 rehabilitation requests in 2020 (N=3,013,482). INTERVENTION: Medical rehabilitation in inpatient or outpatient facilities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of medical rehabilitation requests. RESULTS: The number of medical rehabilitation requests decreased by 14.5% because of the pandemic (incidence rate ratio, 0.855; 95% confidence interval, 0.851-0.859). The decline in requests was more pronounced among women and in Western Germany than among men and in Eastern Germany. The reduction in requests affected non-postacute rehabilitations more clearly than postacute rehabilitation services. After the pandemic declaration by the German Bundestag in March 2020, the reduction in requests was initially strongly associated with the regional incidence of infection. This association weakened in the following months. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in requests will have a significant effect on the number of completed rehabilitation services. For many people with chronic diseases, failure to provide medical rehabilitation increases the risk of disease progression.

Do patient characteristics affect the predictive validity of Functional Capacity Evaluations?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify patient-related characteristics that affect the predictive validity of the FCE assessment ELA. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted on 303 patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) recruited from eleven rehabilitation centers. The ELA-based estimation of the participants' ability to cope with physical work demands was considered valid if RTW was paired with a positive ELA outcome (≥ moderate) as well as if non-RTW was accompanied by a negative ELA outcome (rather or very poor). In the remaining cases, the ELA result was judged as non-valid. To reduce the risk of false conclusions, the rating was performed inversely in participants that (1) reported severe limitations regarding their productivity at work, (2) attributed RTW to a change in job resp. a reduction of their physical work demands and in those that (3) attributed non-RTW to non-physical reintegration barriers only. Using questionnaires, 28 patient-related characteristics were collected. Logistic regression models were calculated to identify characteristics that affected the predictive validity of ELA. RESULTS: ELA was considered valid in 208 of 303 (69%) participants. A moderate and strong pain-related disability at work were associated with a 0.15-fold (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.05-0.46), respectively, 0.19-fold (95% CI 0.05-0.72) chance for a valid outcome. In addition, a negative influence was found in participants that reported psychosocial distress (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; 95% CI 0.15-0.82), a native language different from the national language (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.05-0.56) as well as in those that expected to return to work, but not within one month (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06-0.46). Further variables-including age, employment status, fear-avoidance beliefs and the level of physical work demands-did not affect the predictive validity of ELA. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the predictive validity of ELA is primarily limited by patients that report a moderate or strong pain-related disability at work, psychosocial distress as well as the expectation to return to work, but not within one month. Furthermore, a negative influence can be assumed for language barriers.

Matching Perceived Physical Capacity and Work Demands: A New Classification of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS).

Purpose The aims of this study were (1) to develop a new classification for the scores of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS) which is related to the level of physical work demands and (2) to test the predictive value of the M-SFS classification. Methods The classification was carried out in 194 subjects with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) attending a work-related medical rehabilitation from four rehabilitation centers. External criterion was a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE)-based work capacity estimation according to the classification used in Germany ("REFA") which differentiates between light, light to medium, medium and heavy work. The optimal cut-offs for the M-SFS were allocated using the Youden index. Logistic regression models were calculated based on 147 subjects who participated in the follow-up survey to evaluate the predictive validity of the M-SFS classification with regard to sustainable return to work (RTW; employment at the 3-month follow-up combined with a low level of sick leave). Results Cut-offs for M-SFS scores were 44 (light work), 54 (light to medium work), 62 (medium work) and 73 (heavy work). A match between the M-SFS category and the level of physical work demands was associated with a more than threefold higher RTW chance compared to subjects with a negative discrepancy. In case the M-SFS category was above the physical demand level the RTW-chance was more than 13-fold higher. Conclusions M-SFS scores can be classified into four levels of physical work demands. If the perceived work capacity matches or exceeds the level of physical work demands patients with MSD have a substantially higher probability to return to work after rehabilitation. More studies are needed to confirm or reject our findings and overcome some of the weaknesses of this study.

[Questionnaire to Assess the Work-Related Orientation of Medical Rehabilitation from the Perspective of the Rehabilitants (WMR-R): Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Short and Long Versions]. / Fragebogen zur Erfassung der medizinisch-beruflichen Orientierung der Rehabilitation aus der Perspektive der Rehabilitanden (MBOR-R): Querschnittsstudie zum Vergleich der Kurz- und Langversion.

BACKGROUND: The user perception of the work-related treatment is of great importance for the further development and success of work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR). The German Pension Insurance Fund (Deutsche Rentenversicherung DRV Bund) has therefore supported the development of the questionnaire WMR-R that can be used to assess the quality of the structure, process and results of work-related rehabilitation treatment from the patient's point of view. This paper presents a short version and compares it with the long version. METHODS: Based on a representative sample stratified by indication, employed rehabilitants up to the age of 65 were randomly selected to be questioned 6 months after their rehabilitation with a long version (N=28276) or a short version (N=6611) of WMR-R. In addition, routine data of the German Pension Insurance Fund were included. 27 items each of the long version and 8 items of the short version are added up to a total score and compared with regard to test statistical quality criteria and sample sensitivity. RESULTS: Participation rates were slightly higher in the short version (31%, N=2115) than in the long version (28%, N=8019). The processing quality in both versions is comparable. The short and long versions correlate with each other at r=0.96 (p<0.01). Both versions have similar validity characteristics and separate well between WMR and standard rehabilitation. Both versions are robust to demographic, disease-related and socio-medical risk factors. Rehabilitants with addiction and psychosomatic as well as neurological diseases rate their rehabilitation as significantly more work-oriented compared to other indications, especially pneumology. DISCUSSION: Due to the low survey effort and the simple evaluation and interpretation, the short version is particularly suitable for routine surveys of WMR care quality. The long version allows a differentiated recording of the WMR offer of rehabilitation facilities in the sense of strength/weakness analyses.

[Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation (WMR) Care in Psychosomatic Medicine in Comparison with Other Indications]. / Medizinisch-berufliche Orientierung (MBOR) in der Psychosomatischen Rehabilitation im Vergleich zu somatischen Indikationen.

BACKGROUND: So far, there is little data on the quality of work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR)-care in the routine, including from a user perspective. The best data are still available for orthopedic rehabilitation. For psychosomatic rehabilitation, a special need for WMR is known due to the long periods of inability to work and the frequent early retirements. It is unclear how precisely and to what extent WMR services are provided in routine care. METHODS: In 2019, a representative sample (N=34.887) of employed insured persons up to 65 years old, stratified by indication, was surveyed by the German Pension Insurance fund six months after their rehabilitation with the self-assessment tool MBOR-R. In addition, standard data of the rehabilitation provider (RSD) were collected, from which WMR-related therapeutic offer data (KTL) could be taken. Rehabilitants were asked about their return to work as part of the catamnesis. RESULTS: The participation rate in the survey is 29%, complete survey and RSD data are available after exclusion of addiction rehabilitation and post-operative-procedures from a total of 6.128 rehabilitants, of which N=1.460 after psychosomatic rehabilitation. The comparison of indications shows that 37% of the rehabilitation patients need WMR, which is by far the highest rate. WMR care in psychosomatic rehabilitation is still the best developed and most targeted, but still far from the standards required by the pension insurance. More than 50% of the rehabilitants, even after WMR, rate their employment-related treatment offer as too low. These subjective rehabilitation assessments in the MBOR-R questionnaire prove to be a relevant factor for the prognosis of the return to work quotes, in contrast to the documented KTL services, in addition to the need indicators of WMR and the implementation of WMR. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that in the field of psychosomatic rehabilitation, too, increased efforts should be made in the future to offer and expand basic WMR services for all rehabilitants and core and special services for rehabilitants with poor work ability and an increased risk of permanent work disability (BBPL) in routine care. The scope and design of MBOR measures should also be quality-optimized from the user's perspective in order to achieve the greatest possible effects.Limitations of the results result from the restriction to rehabilitants of the German Federal Pension Insurance, to limited participation rates, Limitations of the interpretability of the therapy documentations and due to the study design with a one-point measurement and remembered pre-values.

Conflicting demands, coping, and adjustment: A grounded theory to understand rehabilitation processes in long-term breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: This study explores rehabilitation processes in long-term cancer survivors (CSs) and explains the causes, contexts, and consequences under which decisions related to rehabilitation are made. METHODS: Within the mixed-methods Breast Cancer Patients' Return to Work (B-CARE) project, conducted from 2018-2020, data were collected through a written survey and semi-structured interviews with CSs 5-6 years after their diagnosis. In total, 184 female CSs participated in the survey, and 26 were interviewed. A qualitative grounded theory approach was applied. RESULTS: The 26 interviewees were 57 years old on average, 70% were married, and 65% had children. The participants experienced incompatibilities caused by the cancer disease in their areas of life and the demands that arose from it. To reconcile demands from the areas family, work, leisure time, household, and disease, the interviewed CSs used different coping mechanisms and adjusted their lives by prioritizing certain areas as a consequence. This prioritizing was often to the detriment of work and rehabilitation. Furthermore, it worked as a barrier for participation in rehabilitation programs and explains why CSs experienced job changes after their return to work. CONCLUSIONS: Physical and mental long-term effects were observed in the interviewees' lives 5-6 years into survival. The study results stress the importance of individualized and needs-oriented survivorship care.

Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study.

Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a random and stratified 1% sample of individuals aged 18-65 years paying pension contributions. From administrative records, we extracted sociodemographic data and data about employment and welfare benefits covering 2010-2012. Our outcome was a pension due to work disability that was requested between January 2013 and December 2017. We developed a comprehensive logistic regression model and used the model estimates to determine the risk score. Results We included 352,140 individuals and counted 6,360 (1.8%) disability pensions during the 5-year follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.839 (95% CI 0.834 to 0.844) for the continuous risk score. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 points (20.2% of all individuals), we correctly classified 80.6% of all individuals (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 80.8%). Using ≥ 60 points (9.9% of all individuals), we correctly classified 90.3% (sensitivity: 54.9%; specificity: 91.0%). Individuals with 50 to < 60 points had a five times higher risk of a disability pension compared to individuals with low scores, individuals with ≥ 60 points a 17 times higher risk. Conclusions The risk score offers an opportunity to screen for people with a high risk of permanent work disability.

[Work Participation after Multimodal Rehabilitation due to Respiratory Diseases - Representative Analyses using Routine Data of the German Pension Insurance]. / Berufliche Teilhabe nach einer medizinischen Rehabilitation aufgrund pneumologischer Erkrankungen.

PURPOSE: For the German rehabilitation system there are only few representative findings on occupational reintegration after medical rehabilitation. For persons who have undergone rehabilitation on behalf of the German Pension Insurance (GPI) due to a respiratory disease, it is therefore needed to determine (a) what socio-medical risks exist prior to rehabilitation, (b) how well persons were able to participate in working life after rehabilitation, and (c) what conditions determine the work participation. METHODS: The study is conducted on the basis of the GPI's database of rehabilitation statistics. Included were all persons, who completed medical rehabilitation in 2016 with a main discharged diagnosis from chapter J of the ICD-10. The analyses were carried out for the entire group and also in a differentiated manner for the the 2 main diseases bronchial asthma and COPD. Work participation was operationalized both via a monthly status variable until 24 months after rehabilitation and as a rate of all persons who were employed at the 12 and 24 months follow up and in the 3 months before, respectively. To analyze the factors influencing stable work participation, multiple logistic regression models with stepwise inclusion were calculated separately for the rates after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 19,287 data sets were included in the analysis (bronchial asthma: n=9,108, 47%; COPD: n=6,215, 32%). Patients with respiratory diseases were 53 years old on average, both genders were equally distributed. 14% had no absenteeism, 11 % stated an absence leave 6 months or more in the year prior to rehabilitation. Mental and cardiovascular comorbidity was documented in 39 and 38% of the cases, respectively. Overall, patients with COPD had higher socio-medical risks before rehabilitation than asthma patients. Accordingly, only about half of the COPD patients remained in active employment, while about 80% of the asthma patients succeeded in this. The strongest influencing factors on stable work participation were the time of sick leave as well as income prior to rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: About two thirds of all persons with respiratory diseases are in stable employment after medical rehabilitation in Germany, with large differences between asthma bronchiale and COPD. In particular, the absenteeism as well as the wage before rehabilitation determine this. The analysis provides representative data on occupational reintegration after medical rehabilitation due to a respiratory disease for the first time.

Predictive validity of a customized functional capacity evaluation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

PURPOSE: To examine whether the performance-based work-related functional capacity evaluation (German title: Einschätzung körperlicher Leistungsfähigkeiten bei arbeitsbezogenen Aktivitäten-ELA) can predict return to work (RTW) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). METHODS: A multicenter cohort study was conducted on 162 employed or self-employed patients with various injury-related and chronic MSD, recruited from four outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Patient-reported data on health and work ability were collected at discharge. The FCE test was performed subsequently. The overall FCE-based estimation of the ability to cope with the physical demands of work (positive vs. negative) was used to predict RTW. Successful RTW was defined as a combination of (self-)employment at the 3-month follow-up and a low level of sick leave (< 1.5 weeks) due to MSD. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression models to evaluate the predictive validity of the adjusted FCE results. RESULTS: Based on the FCE test, 82% of the patients were estimated as being able to cope with the physical demands of work. 77% of the patients with a positive FCE outcome returned to work (positive predictive value) and 83% with a negative FCE outcome did not (negative predictive value). Patients whose functional capacity was estimated to match the job demands were associated with sixfold higher odds of returning to work after adjusting for patient-reported data on health and work ability. The agreement between the FCE result and RTW differed only on a low to moderate level between the therapists who administered the FCE (72-89%). CONCLUSION: The FCE test at discharge predicts RTW among patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

[Stay at Work - Feasibility and Acceptance of a Part-Time Medical Rehabilitation]. / Stay at Work ­ Machbarkeit und Akzeptanz einer berufsbegleitenden Form der medizinischen Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Back pain is associated with significant impairments of participation, which should be prevented by medical rehabilitation programs. The existing evidence shows that the German rehabilitation model is not effective for all target groups. In addition to intensified measures for patients with a high risk of failed return to work, a less intense rehabilitation form could be useful for patients with moderate disabilities. Therefore, in this study the feasibility of a part-time medical rehabilitation (German abbreviation: BbR) was examined. The BbR was designed as a closed group program with a therapy duration of 48 hours (2 appointments per week over 12 weeks). Furthermore, different access paths to BbR as well as the effects were focused. METHODS: Twelve groups with 6 to 12 participants each were planned in 3 outpatient rehabilitation centers. In addition to the regular application process, insured persons were recruited via the network of rehabilitation centers as well as the company service of the German Pension Insurance. The BbR focused on employed patients who were not on sick-leave and had the need for rehabilitation due to back pain. The evaluation was multi-perspective and multi-methodical. All participants completed questionnaires at admission, while and at discharge of the BbR. In addition, discussions in groups were conducted with representatives of the rehabilitation centers, the pension insurance and employers. RESULTS: In total, 7 groups with 56 participants could be realized in 2 rehabilitation centers. The typical BbR-participant was female, married, without children, 48 years old and working full for medium-sizes enterprise without shift work. The majority had no or minor no time of sick-leave in the year prior to rehabilitation. 59% of them were recruited by the rehabilitation centers; only few persons were assigned by the pension insurance. Two thirds would not have applied for a medical rehabilitation without the offer of BbR. Overall, the participants were very satisfied with the BbR. However, the compatibility of the BbR with the job and everyday life was perceived as a challenge. A pre-post comparison showed moderate to strong differences in self-rated health, pain, functional status and work ability. CONCLUSION: The BbR seems to be a useful additional concept in the German rehabilitation system for patients with moderate disabilities. Before dissemination, the identified challenges should be solved. This applies in particular to the recruitment and compatibility of rehabilitation with work and everyday life.

[Insurants' Views on Different Forms of Medical Rehabilitation - A Qualitative Study]. / Wie bewerten Versicherte unterschiedliche Ausgestaltungen der medizinischen Rehabilitation?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess insurants' views on various forms of medical rehabilitation of the German Federal Pension Insurance (DRV). METHODS: In ten focus groups, participants (n=78, 65% female, M=52.2 years) discussed the advantages and disadvantages of inpatient rehabilitation, outpatient rehabilitation, rehabilitation parallel to work, and case management. Central to discussion were treatment modalities such as setting, duration and cooperation with other actors in the health care system. The focus groups were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively (Mayring, 2008). RESULTS: Many participants expressed the need to be removed from their daily routine in order to concentrate on rehabilitative treatment. The perceived lower treatment intensity and double pressure of outpatient rehabilitation are feared to have a negative effect on treatment outcome. According to participants, the fit between the rehabilitation form and the needs of the rehabilitant is crucial. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data can be used to adjust rehabilitation treatment to insurants' needs.

Effects of nationwide implementation of work-related medical rehabilitation in Germany: propensity score matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2014, the Federal German Pension Insurance has approved several departments to implement work-related medical rehabilitation programmes across Germany. Our cohort study was launched to assess the effects of work-related medical rehabilitation under real-life conditions. METHODS: Participants received either a common or a work-related medical rehabilitation programme. Propensity score matching was used to identify controls that were comparable to work-related medical rehabilitation patients. The effects were assessed by patient-reported outcome measures 10 months after completing the rehabilitation programme. RESULTS: We compared 641 patients who were treated in work-related medical rehabilitation with 641 matched controls. Only half of the treated patients had high initial work disability risk scores and were intended to be reached by the new programmes. The dose of work-related components was on average in accordance with the guideline; however, the heterogeneity was high. Work-related medical rehabilitation increased the proportion of patients returning to work by 5.8 percentage points (95% CI 0.005 to 0.110), decreased the median time to return to work by 9.46 days (95% CI -18.14 to -0.79), and improved self-rated work ability by 0.38 points (95% CI 0.05 to 0.72) compared with common medical rehabilitation. A per-protocol analysis revealed that work-related medical rehabilitation was more effective if patients were assigned according to the guideline and the minimal mandatory treatment dose was actually delivered. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of work-related medical rehabilitation in German rehabilitation centres affected work participation outcomes. Improving guideline fidelity (reach and dose delivered) will probably improve the outcomes in real-world care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00009780.

Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study.

Purpose To examine factors associated with Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) results in patients with painful musculoskeletal conditions, with focus on social factors across multiple countries. Methods International cross-sectional study was performed within care as usual. Simple and multiple multilevel linear regression analyses which considered measurement's dependency within clinicians and country were conducted: FCE characteristics and biopsychosocial variables from patients and clinicians as independent variables; and FCE results (floor-to-waist lift, six-minute walk, and handgrip strength) as dependent variables. Results Data were collected for 372 patients, 54 clinicians, 18 facilities and 8 countries. Patients' height and reported pain intensity were consistently associated with every FCE result. Patients' sex, height, reported pain intensity, effort during FCE, social isolation, and disability, clinician's observed physical effort, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with lift. Patient's height, Body Mass Index, post-test heart-rate, reported pain intensity and effort during FCE, days off work, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with walk. Patient's age, sex, height, affected body area, reported pain intensity and catastrophizing, and physical work demands were associated with handgrip. Final regression models explained 38‒65% of total variance. Clinician and country random effects composed 1-39% of total residual variance in these models. Conclusion Biopsychosocial factors were associated with every FCE result across multiple countries; specifically, patients' height, reported pain intensity, clinician, and measurement country. Social factors, which had been under-researched, were consistently associated with FCE performances. Patients' FCE results should be considered from a biopsychosocial perspective, including different social contexts.