Semi-automated quantification of vitreal hyperreflective foci in SD-OCT and their relevance in patients with peripheral retinal breaks.

BACKGROUND: Retinal breaks (RB) are emergencies that require treatment to prevent progression of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Vitreal hyperreflective foci (VHF) representing migration of RPE cell clusters or interphotoreceptor matrix from the RB are potential biomarkers. The aim of this study is to investigate VHF in RB-patients using SD-OCT. METHODS: The retrospective cross-sectional study included RB patients from our Department of Ophthalmology, HSK Wiesbaden who underwent macular SD-OCT (SPECTRALIS®, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) on both eyes. VHF, defined and quantified as foci that differ markedly in size and reflectivity from the background speckle pattern, were assessed for presence and frequency. The RB-affected eyes were the study group (G1), the partner eyes the control group (G2). RESULTS: 160 consecutive patients with RB were included. Age was 60 ± 10.2 years (52% female). 89.4% of G1 and 87.5% of G2 were phakic (p = 0.73). 94.4% (n = 151) were symptomatic. Symptom duration was 8.0 ± 10.1 days in G1, 94.4% (n = 151) showed VHF versus 5.6% (p < 0.0001) in G2, of which 75% (n = 6) showed asymptomatic lattice degenerations. Detectable VHF showed a strong association of OR = 320 (95% CI, 110-788, p < 0.0001)) with respect to symptomatic RB. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 94.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most eyes with symptomatic RB show vitreal VHF in SD-OCT. Detected VHF are strongly associated with RB, and our semi-automated greyscale reflectivity analysis indicates that VHF likely originate from photoreceptor complexes torn out of the RB area that migrate into the vitreous cavity. The presence of VHF may indicate RB and should lead to a thorough fundus examination in both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases.

Exact matching of trabectome-mediated ab interno trabeculectomy to conventional trabeculectomy with mitomycin C followed for 2 years.

PURPOSE: We used exact matching for a highly balanced comparison of ab interno trabeculectomy (AIT) with the trabectome to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (TRAB). METHODS: A total of 5485 patients who underwent AIT were exact-matched to 196 TRAB patients by baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and glaucoma type. Nearest-neighbor-matching was applied to age. Success was defined as a final IOP of less than 21 mmHg, IOP reduction of at least 20% reduction from baseline, and no secondary surgical interventions. Outcomes were measured at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 165 AIT could be matched to 165 TRAB. The mean baseline IOP was 22.3 ± 5.6 mmHg, and the baseline number of glaucoma medications was 2.7 ± 1.1 in both groups. At 24 months, IOP was reduced to 15.8 ± 5.2 mmHg in AIT and 12.4 ± 4.7 mmHg in TRAB. IOP was lower than baseline at all visits (p < 0.01) and lower in TRAB than AIT (p < 0.01). Glaucoma medications were reduced to 2.1 ± 1.3 in AIT and 0.2 ± 0.8 in TRAB. Compared to baseline, patients used fewer drops postoperatively (p < 0.01) and more infrequently in TRAB than in AIT (p > 0.01). Secondary surgical interventions had the highest impact on success and became necessary in 15 AIT and 59 TRAB patients. Thirty-two challenging events occurred in TRAB and none in AIT. CONCLUSION: Both AIT and TRAB reduced IOP and medications. This reduction was more significant in TRAB but at the expense of four times as many secondary interventions.

[Glaucoma Drainage Devices: Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study]. / Glaukomdrainageimplantate und ihre Bedeutung: Tube-versus-Trabekulektomie-Studie.

While trabeculectomy with mitomycin C has previously been the gold standard in penetrating glaucoma surgery, glaucoma drainage implants used early within glaucoma surgery were examined in the course of the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study. Glaucoma drainage implants are now being used earlier, as materials are tissue-compatible and surgery has been improved. While in the past, the use of such implants was often carried out after multiple preoperations, implants are now being used at an earlier stage. Glaucoma drainage implants are typically still used in the pseudophakic eye, where 1-2 glaucoma preoperations (e.g. trabeculectomy) have already been performed.