Videos to reduce racial disparities in ICD therapy Via Innovative Designs (VIVID) trial: Rational, design and methodology.

BACKGROUND: Despite a higher prevalence of sudden cardiac death (SCD), black individuals are less likely than whites to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted. Racial differences in ICD utilization is in part explained by higher refusal rates in black individuals. Decision support can assist with treatment-related uncertainty and prepare patients to make well-informed decisions. METHODS: The Videos to reduce racial disparities in ICD therapy Via Innovative Designs (VIVID) study will randomize 350 black individuals with a primary prevention indication for an ICD to a racially concordant/discordant video-based decision support tool or usual care. The composite primary outcome is (1) the decision for ICD placement in the combined video groups compared with usual care and (2) the decision for ICD placement in the racially concordant relative to discordant video group. Additional outcomes include knowledge of ICD therapy and SCD risk; decisional conflict; ICD receipt at 90 days; and a qualitative assessment of ICD decision making in acceptors, decliners, and those undecided. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to assessing the efficacy of decision support on ICD acceptance among black individuals, VIVID will provide insight into the role of racial concordance in medical decision making. Given the similarities in the root causes of racial/ethnic disparities in care across health disciplines, our approach and findings may be generalizable to decision making in other health care settings.

Racial differences in long-term outcomes among black and white patients with drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that black patients may have worse outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. There are limited data characterizing long-term outcomes by race. The objective was to compare long-term outcomes between black and white patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES implantation. METHODS: We analyzed 915 black and 3,559 white (n = 4,474) consecutive patients who underwent DES placement at Duke University Medical Center from 2005 through 2013. Over 6-year follow up, we compared rates of myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, revascularization, and major bleeding between black and white patients. A multivariable Cox regression model was fit to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Dual-antiplatelet therapy use over time was determined by patient follow-up surveys and compared by race. RESULTS: Black patients were younger; were more often female; had higher body mass indexes; had more diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal disease; and had lower median household incomes than white patients (P < .001). At 6 years after DES placement, black relative to white patients had higher unadjusted rates of MI (12.1% vs 10.1%, hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.57, P = .05) and major bleeding (17.8% vs 14.3%, hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, P = .01), but there were no significant differences in other outcomes. After multivariable adjustment, there were no statistically significant racial differences in any of these outcomes at 6 years. Similarly, dual-antiplatelet therapy use was comparable between racial groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unadjusted rates of MI and major bleeding over long-term follow up were higher among black patients compared to white patients, but these differences may be explained by racial differences in comorbid disease.

Representation of black patients in randomized clinical trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Black individuals have a disproportionately higher burden of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) relative to other racial and ethnic populations. We conducted a systematic review to determine the representation, enrollment trends, and outcomes of black patients in historic and contemporary randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for HFrEF. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for RCTs of patients with chronic HFrEF that evaluated therapies that significantly improved clinical outcomes. We extracted trial characteristics and compared them by trial type. Linear regression was used to assess trends in enrollment among HFrEF RCTs over time. RESULTS: A total of 25 RCTs, 19 for pharmacotherapies and 6 (n=9,501) for implantable cardioverter defibrillators, were included in this analysis. Among these studies, there were 78,816 patients, 4,640 black (5.9%), and the median black participation per trial was 162 patients. Black race was reported in the manuscript of 14 (56.0%) trials, and outcomes by race were available for 12 (48.0%) trials. Implantable cardiac defibrillator trials enrolled a greater percentage of black patients than pharmacotherapy trials (7.1% vs 5.7%). Overall, patient enrollment among the 25 RCTs increased over time (P = .075); however, the percentage of black patients has decreased (P = .001). Outcomes varied significantly between black and white patients in 6 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients are modestly represented among pivotal RCTs of individuals with HFrEF for both pharmacotherapies and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The current trend for decreasing black representation in trials of HF therapeutics is concerning and must improve to ensure the generalizability for this vulnerable population.

Review of venous thromboembolism and race: the generalizability of treatment guidelines for high-risk populations.

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has established guidelines for the treatment of VTE, but the generalizability to all populations is unclear. In this review we analyzed the rate of reporting and enrollment of blacks and women in clinical trials cited in the ACCP guidelines for treatment of unprovoked VTE. We extracted data from clinical trials cited by the ACCP that compared durations of anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of unprovoked VTE. We excluded trials that treated surgical or cancer patients. For trials that did not report race/ethnicity we contacted the primary investigators via email for enrollment data. The final analysis included 17 randomized clinical trials with a total patient population of N = 13,693. All trials reported data on sex; conversely, 2 trials (11.8 %) reported race/ethnicity within the primary manuscript. We ultimately acquired data on race/ethnicity from the primary investigator in 5 additional trials for a total race/ethnicity data from 7 trials. There were 7573 males (55.3 %) and 6120 females (44.7 %) enrolled in these studies. Among trials that reported race and ethnicity the total patient population was N = 5368; 5171 (96.3 %) white, 115 (2.1 %) black, 65 (1.4 %) Asian and 7 (0.25 %) Hispanic. Racial/ethnic minorities are underreported and under represented in clinical trials forming the cornerstone of ACCP guidelines for the optimal duration for VTE treatment. Conversely, the reporting and inclusion of women was substantive. The guidelines for unprovoked VTE treatment may not be generalizable to racially and ethnically diverse patient populations.

Research Participation of a Professional Organization in Clinical Trials: The Association of Black cardiologists Clinical Trial Investigator Identification Project.

INTRODUCTION: Black individuals continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials despite efforts by the National Institutes of Health and the Federal Drug Administration to increase their enrollment. Health care providers play a critical role in the recruitment of patients into clinical trials, as they have established relationships and are uniquely positioned to make referrals for participation. While prior initiatives have focused on training black physicians to conduct clinical research, we sought to determine the potential of utilizing a professional organization as a resource to identify established investigators to champion recruitment of underrepresented racial and ethnic populations. The Association of Black Cardiologists (ABC) is a non-profit organization with a mission to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease and may provide a conduit for recruiting investigators. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using the ABC membership to identify investigators with an established track record in clinical trials. METHODS/RESULTS: Utilizing a roster of ABC members, we searched Scopus to quantify ABC member publications from 1999 to 2015 and identify members who have been active in clinical trials. Within the membership of 2037 individuals, we identified 794 with peer-reviewed publications, and 109 who co-authored manuscripts involving randomized clinical trials. The manuscripts largely focused on hypertension and heart failure, conditions that have a disproportionately greater affect on black individuals. CONCLUSION: Members of the ABC have varied amounts of research productivity. We identified a group of experienced investigators to engage in efforts aimed at recruiting/enrolling underrepresented racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials of cardiovascular disease.