Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Today ; 51(1): 1-31, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33320283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infections (SSIs) were published in Japanese by the Japan Society for Surgical Infection in 2018. This is a summary of these guidelines for medical professionals worldwide. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenterological SSIs, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Modifications were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the general public and relevant medical societies. RESULTS: There were 44 questions prepared in seven subject areas, for which 51 recommendations were made. The seven subject areas were: definition and etiology, diagnosis, preoperative management, prophylactic antibiotics, intraoperative management, perioperative management, and wound management. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information. The final version of the recommendations was published in 2018, in Japanese. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese Guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological SSI were published in 2018 to provide useful information for clinicians and improve the clinical outcome of patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Japón , Atención Perioperativa , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología
2.
Surg Today ; 50(1): 56-67, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31399783

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We herein report the findings of the Japan Postoperative Infectious Complication Survey in 2015 (JPICS'15), which evaluated the rate of post-operative infections and colonization due to antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria after digestive tract surgery. METHODS: This survey by the Japan Society of Surgical Infection included patients undergoing digestive tract surgery at 28 centers between September 2015 and March 2016. Data included patient background characteristics, type of surgery, contamination status, and type of post-operative infections, including surgical site infections (SSIs), remote infections (RIs), and colonization. RESULTS: During the study period, 7,565 surgeries (of 896 types) were performed; among them, 905 cases demonstrated bacteria after digestive tract surgery. The survey revealed that post-operative infections or colonization by AMR bacteria occurred in 0.9% of the patient cohort, constituting 7.5% of post-operative infections, including 5.6% of SSIs and 1.8% of RIs. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant AMR bacteria isolated from patients after digestive tract surgery. Patients infected with AMR bacteria had a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that 7.5% of the post-operative infections were due to AMR bacteria, indicating the need for antibacterial coverage against AMR bacteria in patients with critical post-operative infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estudios de Cohortes , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Pronóstico , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Surg Today ; 49(10): 859-869, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31030266

RESUMEN

PURPOSES: This study compared the effectiveness of 1-day vs 3-days antibiotic regimen to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in open liver resection. METHOD: We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in 480 patients at 39 hospitals across Japan (registered as UMIN000002852). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma scheduled to undergo resection were randomly assigned to receive either a 1-day regimen for antimicrobial prophylaxis, or a 3-day regimen. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI. RESULTS: Among 480 randomized patients, 232 assigned to the 1-day regimen and 235 to the 3-day regimen were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. SSI was diagnosed in 22 patients (9.5%) in the 1-day group vs 23 patients (9.8%) in the 3-day group (difference, - 0.30; 90% CI - 4.80 to 4.19% [95% CI - 5.66% to 5.05%]; one-sided P = 0.001 for non-inferiority), meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. In both groups, remote site infection (16 [6.9%] vs 22 [9.4%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) and drain-related infection (5 [2.2%] vs 4 [1.7%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) were comparable. CONCLUSION: To prevent SSI in liver cancer surgery, a 1-day regimen of flomoxef sodium is recommended for antimicrobial prophylaxis because of confirming the non-inferiority to longer usage.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
J Infect Chemother ; 24(5): 330-340, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555391

RESUMEN

The principle of empirical therapy for patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAI) should include antibiotics with activity against Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides fragilis group species. Coverage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, and Enterococcus faecalis is also recommended for hospital-associated IAI. A nationwide survey was conducted to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens isolated from postoperative IAI. All 504 isolates were collected at 26 institutions and referred to a central laboratory for susceptibility testing. Lower susceptibility rates to ciprofloxacin and cefepime were demonstrated in Escherichia coli. Among E. coli, 24.1% of strains produced extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL). Carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, cephamycins/oxacephem, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline had high activity against E. coli, including ESBL-producing isolates. Among E. cloacae, low susceptibility rates to ceftazidime were demonstrated, whereas cefepime retained its activity. P. aeruginosa revealed high susceptibility rates to all antimicrobials tested except for imipenem. Among B. fragilis group species, low levels of susceptibility were observed for cefoxitin, moxifloxacin, and clindamycin, and high susceptibility rates were observed for piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and metronidazole. Ampicillin, piperacillin, and glycopeptides had good activity against E. faecalis. Imipenem had the highest activity against E. faecalis among carbapenems. In conclusion, we suggested the empirical use of antimicrobials with the specific intent of covering the main organisms isolated from postoperative IAI. Piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, or doripenem, are appropriate in critically ill patients. Combination therapy of cefepime (aztreonam in patients with ß-lactam allergy) plus metronidazole plus glycopeptides, imipenem/cilastatin or cephamycins/oxacephem plus ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole are potential therapeutic options.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Peritonitis/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Quimioterapia Combinada , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecalis/enzimología , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Japón , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
5.
J Infect Chemother ; 23(6): 339-348, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28391954

RESUMEN

A nationwide survey was conducted in Japan from 2014 to 2015 to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens isolated from surgical site infections (SSI). The resulting data were compared with that obtained in an earlier survey, conducted in 2010. Seven main organisms were collected, and 883 isolates were studied. A significant reduction in methicillin resistance was observed among Staphylococcus aureus isolates, dropping from 72.5% in 2010 to 53.8% in 2014-2015 (p < 0.001). MRSA isolates with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 µg/mL accounted for 1.2% of all MRSA isolates, which was significantly lower than in 2010 (9.7%, p = 0.029). Of the Escherichia coli isolates, 23.0% produced an extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) in the 2014-2015 survey, which was a significant increase from 9.5% in 2010 (p = 0.011). The geometric mean MICs for ESBL-producing isolates were 0.07 µg/mL for meropenem, 9.51 µg/mL for tazobactam/piperacillin, 0.15 µg/mL for flomoxef, and 1.56 µg/mL for gentamycin. There was a significant increase in the isolation rate of non-fragilis Bacteroides among Bacteroides fragilis group species between the two study periods (35.2% vs. 53.1%, p = 0.007). More than 90% of isolates belonging to the B. fragilis group remained susceptible to tazobactam/piperacillin, meropenem, and metronidazole. In contrast, lower levels of susceptibility were observed for cefmetazole (49.6%), moxifloxacin (61.9%), and clindamycin (46.9%). Non-fragilis Bacteroides isolates had lower rates of antibiotic susceptibility compared with B. fragilis. Overall, the surveillance data clarified trends in antimicrobial susceptibility for organisms commonly associated with SSI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
6.
Surg Today ; 45(4): 422-8, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24973059

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) increases medical costs and prolongs hospitalization; however, there has been no multicenter study examining the socioeconomic effects of SSI after cardiovascular surgery in Japan. METHODS: A retrospective 1:1 matched, case-controlled study on hospital stay and health care expenditure after cardiovascular surgery was performed in four hospitals. Patients selected for the study had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery between April, 2006 and March, 2008. Data were obtained for 30 pairs of patients. RESULTS: The mean postoperative stay for the SSI group was 49.1 days, being 3.7 times longer than that for the non-SSI group. The mean postoperative health care expenditure for the SSI group was ¥ 2,763,000 (US$27,630), being five times higher than that for the non-SSI group. Charges for drug infusion and hospitalization for inpatient care were significantly higher for the SSI group than for the non-SSI group. The increased health care expenditure was mainly attributed to the cost of antibiotics and antimicrobial agents. CONCLUSION: SSI after cardiovascular surgery not only prolonged the length of hospital stay, but also increased medical expenditure. Thus, the prevention of SSI after cardiovascular surgery is of great socioeconomic importance.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo
9.
J Infect Chemother ; 18(2): 152-9, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22009525

RESUMEN

Therapeutic options for postoperative infection in gastrointestinal surgery are limited. To identify new treatment alternatives, the Japan Society for Surgical Infection conducted a multicenter prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy of intravenous ciprofloxacin (CIP IV) and intravenous meropenem (MEM IV). Between July 2005 and May 2008, the trial recruited patients who developed postoperative infection or had suspected infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome after elective clean-contaminated gastrointestinal surgery. All patients had received prophylactic postoperative antibiotic treatment. Patients received either intravenous CIP IV 300 mg b.i.d. or MEM IV 500 mg b.i.d. A total of 205 patients from 31 institutions were enrolled. Of these, 101 were randomized to CIP IV and 104 to MEM IV. There were 100 and 102 in the intent-to-treat (ITT)/safety population and 75 and 77 in the per-protocol (PP) population. There was no significant difference between CIP IV and MEM IV in terms of clinical efficacy, bacteriological efficacy, incidence of adverse drug reactions, duration of antimicrobial treatment, or relapse/reactivation. Overall clinical success PP population) was high in both treatment groups: 85.3% (64/75) for CIP IV and 89.6% (69/77) for MEM IV, although the non-inferiority of CIP IV was not demonstrated (difference -4.3%, 95% CI -14.8, 6.2). In patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal surgery, success was 88.5% (23/26) for CIP IV and 85.2% (23/27) for MEM IV. Intravenous ciprofloxacin is as effective as intravenous meropenem in the empiric therapy of postoperative infection after gastrointestinal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciprofloxacina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tienamicinas , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Japón , Masculino , Meropenem , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Tienamicinas/administración & dosificación , Tienamicinas/efectos adversos , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Infect Chemother ; 18(6): 816-26, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23143280

RESUMEN

To investigate the trends of antimicrobial resistance in pathogens isolated from surgical site infections (SSI), a Japanese surveillance committee conducted the first nationwide survey. Seven main organisms were collected from SSI at 27 medical centers in 2010 and were shipped to a central laboratory for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. A total of 702 isolates from 586 patients with SSI were included. Staphylococcus aureus (20.4 %) and Enterococcus faecalis (19.5 %) were the most common isolates, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.4 %) and Bacteroides fragilis group (15.4 %). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus among S. aureus was 72.0 %. Vancomycin MIC 2 µg/ml strains accounted for 9.7 %. In Escherichia coli, 11 of 95 strains produced extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (Klebsiella pneumoniae, 0/53 strains). Of E. coli strains, 8.4 % were resistant to ceftazidime (CAZ) and 26.3 % to ciprofloxacin (CPFX). No P. aeruginosa strains produced metallo-ß-lactamase. In P. aeruginosa, the resistance rates were 7.4 % to tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), 10.2 % to imipenem (IPM), 2.8 % to meropenem, cefepime, and CPFX, and 0 % to gentamicin. In the B. fragilis group, the rates were 28.6 % to clindamycin, 5.7 % to cefmetazole, 2.9 % to TAZ/PIPC and IPM, and 0 % to metronidazole (Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron; 59.1, 36.4, 0, 0, 0 %). MIC90 of P. aeruginosa isolated 15 days or later after surgery rose in TAZ/PIPC, CAZ, IPM, and CPFX. In patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa to TAZ/PIPC and CAZ were higher than in patients with ASA ≤2. The data obtained in this study revealed the trend of the spread of resistance among common species that cause SSI. Timing of isolation from surgery and the patient's physical status affected the selection of resistant organisms.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
11.
Surg Today ; 42(7): 639-45, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22286573

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To clarify the impact of surgical site infection (SSI) after colorectal surgery on the length of hospital stay and medical expenditure in Japan. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective-matched case-control study. RESULTS: The total number of patients enrolled was 334 (167 case/control pairs). The average hospital stay after surgery was prolonged by 17.8 days (95% CI 11.9-23.5) and the average medical cost after surgery was increased by $5,938 (95% CI 3,610-8,367) in the SSI group versus the non-SSI group. Hospital charges comprised the largest among all cost categories and accounted for 53% of the additional cost. The hospital stay and medical costs both increased proportionately to the depth of the SSI, from 4.4 days and $608 for superficial incisional SSI, to 39.2 days and $14,448 for organ/space SSI. SSI caused by MRSA prolonged the hospital stay by 19.3 days and incurred an additional cost of $7,015. CONCLUSIONS: SSI clearly prolonged the hospital stay and increased medical costs. The numerical values revealed by this study reinforce the medical-economic importance of instigating preventive measures against SSI.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Recto/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Japón , Laparoscopía , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Reoperación/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología
12.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(5): 1096-9, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21393125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Clostridium difficile produces toxins and is an aetiological organism of pseudomembranous colitis. Immunoglobulin is one of the treatment strategies against fulminant C. difficile infections, but the clinical evidence is still limited. We examined the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in C. difficile toxin (CDT)-mediated lethality and cellular injury in mice. METHODS: Mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.2 mL of filter-sterilized C. difficile culture supernatant (CDT preparation). The IVIg preparation was intravenously administered at several timepoints. We also examined alteration of intestinal permeability and an apoptosis marker in the gut. In in vitro experiments, HEp-2 cells were incubated with a CDT preparation in the presence or absence of the IVIg preparation, after which cell viability and lactate dehydrogenase release were examined. RESULTS: All control mice died by day 2 after injection of the CDT preparation. The maximum effects of IVIg (100% survival) were observed when the mice were treated with IVIg at the same time as injection of the CDT preparation. The IVIg effects were closely associated with improvement of intestinal vascular permeability and mucosal damage in the gut. In addition, reduction of an apoptosis marker (histone-associated DNA fragments) was demonstrated in the mice treated with IVIg. Interestingly, a smaller increase in histone-associated DNA fragments was observed in FasL-deficient mice treated with the CDT preparation compared with wild-type. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that IVIg may be protective against CDT-mediated lethality, when administered at the appropriate time. The present data also suggest an increase in intestinal permeability, probably through exaggeration of Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis, as a key mechanism of C. difficile-mediated diseases.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxinas/administración & dosificación , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Animales , Línea Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hepatocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Surg Today ; 41(10): 1363-9, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21922358

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) can reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in gastroenterological surgery; however, in Japan its use was not fully recognized before 2000. The first nationwide guideline was published in 2001, since when the use of AMP has improved gradually. We conducted this study to investigate the current implementation of AMP in colorectal surgery and adherence to recommended practices for preventing SSI in Japan. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was sent to hospitals accredited by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection (JSSI). The questionnaire focused on the AMP regimen used for colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Responses were received from 721 (58%) of the 1249 hospitals that were sent the survey. The initial AMP dose was administered within 1 h before incision at 94% of the responding institutions. AMP was discontinued within 24 h of surgery at only 10% of institutions. Second-generation cephalosporins were administered at 84% of the institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate use of AMP in colorectal surgery is incomplete in certified institutions in Japan. The fact that many institutions administer AMP for longer than recommended is a problem that needs to be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Catárticos/administración & dosificación , Cirugía Colorrectal/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Certificación , Colon/cirugía , Esquema de Medicación , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Japón , Recto/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Crit Care ; 14(4): R159, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20731880

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a serious medical condition that requires rapidly administered, appropriate antibiotic treatment. Conventional methods take three or more days for final pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We organized a prospective observational multicenter study in three study sites to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical utility of the SeptiFast system, a multiplex pathogen detection system used in the clinical setting to support early diagnosis of bloodstream infections. METHODS: A total of 212 patients, suspected of having systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) caused by bacterial or fungal infection, were enrolled in the study. From these patients, 407 blood samples were taken and blood culture analysis was performed to identify pathogens. Whole blood was also collected for DNA Detection Kit analysis immediately after its collection for blood culture. The results of the DNA Detection Kit, blood culture and other culture tests were compared. The chosen antimicrobial treatment in patients whose samples tested positive in the DNA Detection Kit and/or blood culture analysis was examined to evaluate the effect of concomitant antibiotic exposure on the results of these analyses. RESULTS: SeptiFast analysis gave a positive result for 55 samples, while 43 samples were positive in blood culture analysis. The DNA Detection Kit identified a pathogen in 11.3% (45/400) of the samples, compared to 8.0% (32/400) by blood culture analysis. Twenty-three pathogens were detected by SeptiFast only; conversely, this system missed five episodes of clinically significant bacteremia (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1; Klebsiella spp, 1; Enterococcus faecium, 1). The number of samples that tested positive was significantly increased by combining the result of the blood culture analysis with those of the DNA Detection Kit analysis (P = 0.01). Among antibiotic pre-treated patients (prevalence, 72%), SeptiFast analysis detected more bacteria/fungi, and was less influenced by antibiotic exposure, compared with blood culture analysis (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This rapid multiplex pathogen detection system complemented traditional culture-based methods and offered some added diagnostic value for the timely detection of causative pathogens, particularly in antibiotic pre-treated patients. Adequately designed intervention studies are needed to prove its clinical effectiveness in improving appropriate antibiotic selection and patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/sangre , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , ADN Bacteriano/sangre , ADN de Hongos/sangre , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Micosis/sangre , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/sangre , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/sangre , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/microbiología
15.
Masui ; 59(1): 36-45, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20077769

RESUMEN

Infectious diseases, surgical site infections (SSI) in particular are the most popular perioperative complications, and not only the treatment but also prevention is extremely important. The inappropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients accelerated the development of drug-resistant strains such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or multiple-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP) infections. With this as a turning point, improvements in the choice and the usage of prophylactic antibiotic agents are being discussed in Japan. The importance of the preservation of the normal intestinal bacterial flora and the proper usage of the antibiotics became clear and guidelines have been established. It is important to make a distinction between prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic administration in the perioperative period. The anti-cross infection measure with the observance of Standard Precautions is also important in infection control.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
16.
Virus Res ; 139(1): 131-4, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19010363

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophage (phage) is one of the most taxonomically and genetically diverse phages. Although phage D3 is one of well-studied P. aeruginosa phages, no D3-related P. aeruginosa phage has been reported. We report a novel P. aeruginosa siphovirus, PAJU2, which is genetically related to but morphology distinct (highly elongated head) from phage D3. A PAJU2 capsid protein, Orf3, is thought to be synthesized as a protein fused to a prohead protease and is autocatalytically cleaved, which may form the head chain mail. Despite such morphological differences, PAJU2 is expected to be a useful genetic reference for phage D3.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos/genética , Genoma Viral/genética , Fagos Pseudomonas/genética , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Secuencia de Bases , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Sistemas de Lectura Abierta/genética , Fagos Pseudomonas/ultraestructura , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/virología , Alineación de Secuencia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Proteínas Virales/genética
17.
Dig Surg ; 25(3): 198-201, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18577864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare intra-abdominal remnant bacterium between laparotomy and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: 72 patients with nonobstructive colorectal cancer were divided into two groups: laparotomy (47 cases) and laparoscopic surgery (25 cases). At the beginning of the operation just after the laparotomy incision was made or the trocars were inserted, 10 ml saline was irrigated into the Douglas pouch and collected through Nelaton's catheter. Just before closing the wound, 10 ml saline was collected in the same way as the initial lavage in both groups. The collected saline as a specimen was determined to obtain the number of surviving bacterium. RESULTS: No growth of bacteria was observed at the beginning of both operations. The remnant bacterial detection rates from the lavage fluid collected just before closing the wound were 23 of 47 cases (49%) in the laparotomy group and 7 of 25 cases (28%) in the laparoscopic surgery group; higher detection was observed in the laparotomy group. The mean bacteria cell counts after lavage were 4.6 x 10(6) CFU/ml of aerobic bacteria and 1.9 x 10(3) CFU/ml of anaerobic bacteria in the laparotomy group and 1.8 x 10(4) CFU/ml of aerobic bacteria and 1.6 x 10(2) CFU/ml in the laparoscopic surgery group: the laparotomy group demonstrated an apparently higher number of remnant bacterium. CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal resections, laparoscopic surgery demonstrated a lower incidence of intra-abdominal contamination than laparotomy.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Bacterias Aerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Anaerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Anciano , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 25(1): 17-30, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032610

RESUMEN

Although the diagnostic and severity grading criteria on the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) are used worldwide as the primary standard for management of acute cholangitis (AC), they need to be validated through implementation and assessment in actual clinical practice. Here, we conduct a systematic review of the literature to validate the TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC and propose TG18 criteria. While there is little evidence evaluating the TG13 criteria, they were validated through a large-scale case series study in Japan and Taiwan. Analyzing big data from this study confirmed that the diagnostic rate of AC based on the TG13 diagnostic criteria was higher than that based on the TG07 criteria, and that 30-day mortality in patients with a higher severity based on the TG13 severity grading criteria was significantly higher. Furthermore, a comparison of patients treated with early or urgent biliary drainage versus patients not treated this way showed no difference in 30-day mortality among patients with Grade I or Grade III AC, but significantly lower 30-day mortality in patients with Grade II AC who were treated with early or urgent biliary drainage. This suggests that the TG13 severity grading criteria can be used to identify Grade II patients whose prognoses may be improved through biliary drainage. The TG13 severity grading criteria may therefore be useful as an indicator for biliary drainage as well as a predictive factor when assessing the patient's prognosis. The TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC can provide results quickly, are minimally invasive for the patients, and are inexpensive. We recommend that the TG13 criteria be adopted in the TG18 guidelines and used as standard practice in the clinical setting. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.


Asunto(s)
Colangitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangitis/patología , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Aguda , Biopsia con Aguja , Colangitis/mortalidad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tokio , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler/métodos
19.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 24(10): 537-549, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834389

RESUMEN

The Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) include new topics in the biliary drainage section. From these topics, we describe the indications and new techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis with videos. Recently, many novel studies and case series have been published across the world, thus TG13 need to be updated regarding the indications and selection of biliary drainage based on published data. Herein, we describe the latest updated TG13 on biliary drainage in acute cholangitis with meta-analysis. The present study showed that endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage regardless of the use of nasobiliary drainage or biliary stenting, should be selected as the first-line therapy for acute cholangitis. In acute cholangitis, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is not routinely required for biliary drainage alone because of the concern of post-EST bleeding. In case of concomitant bile duct stones, stone removal following EST at a single session may be considered in patients with mild or moderate acute cholangitis except in patients under anticoagulant therapy or with coagulopathy. We recommend the removal of difficult stones at two sessions after drainage in patients with a large stone or multiple stones. In patients with potential coagulopathy, endoscopic papillary dilation can be a better technique than EST for stone removal. Presently, balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BE-ERCP) is used as the first-line therapy for biliary drainage in patients with surgically altered anatomy where BE-ERCP expertise is present. However, the technical success rate is not always high. Thus, several studies have revealed that endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) can be one of the second-line therapies in failed BE-ERCP as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage where EUS-BD expertise is present.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colangitis/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Aguda , Colangitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 33(10): 1461-3, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17033238

RESUMEN

A 65-year-old man underwent distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Histological examination revealed that a lymph node metastasis extended to the para-aortic nodes. After operation, he was treated with TS-1 as first-line chemotherapy. After 10 months of the first-line chemotherapy, the lymph node swelling increased in size, and new lesions were detected. Then, the patient was treated by combination therapy of doxifluridine and weekly paclitaxel. Weekly paclitaxel administration (PTX 80 mg/m(2), 2 consecutive weeks, 1 week break) and oral administration of doxifluridine (600 mg/m(2), 14 consecutive days) were performed as the second-line chemotherapy. After 2 courses, abdominal CT scan showed a remarkable reduction of the para-aortic lymph nodes. The second-line chemotherapy was continued until the 7th course, then stopped without progression of the disease, and the patient maintained good quality of life. PTX/5'-DFUR combination therapy was thought to be an effective chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Aorta , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicación , Floxuridina/administración & dosificación , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Inducción de Remisión , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA