Predictive Value of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of preoperative inflammatory markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients with HCC who underwent TACE combined with RFA were enrolled in this retrospective study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to decide the cutoff value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The relationship between preoperative NLR, LMR, PLR, PNI, and survival outcomes was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The cutoff value of NLR for the best discrimination of HCC prognosis was 2.95. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the low NLR (≤2.95) group was longer than that of the high NLR (>2.95) group (29 months vs. 20 months, p = 0.013). The median overall survival (OS) of the low NLR group was longer than that of the high NLR group (60 months vs. 38 months, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor size (≤3 cm vs. >3cm), tumor number (single vs. multiple), and NLR (≤2.95 vs. >2.95) were independent predictors of the PFS and OS. LMR, PLR, and PNI did not have any prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: NLR was confirmed as an independent predictive biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis after TACE combined with RFA.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (DEB-TACE+ICIs) versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine+cisplatin) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included unresectable iCCA patients treated with DEB-TACE+ICIs or chemotherapy between May, 2019 and August, 2021. The differences in tumor responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between the 2 groups. Patient baseline characteristics, PFS, and OS were compared among 2 groups before and after propensity score-matching (PSM). Factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Results: The study included 49 patients with unresectable iCCA patients, 20 in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group and 29 in the chemotherapy group. PSM analysis created 20 pairs of patients in 2 groups. The patients in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (55.0% vs. 20.0%, P=0.022), higher PFS (median, 7.2 vs. 5.7 months, P=0.036), and higher OS (median, 13.2 vs. 7.6 months, P=0.015) than those in the chemotherapy group. Multivariate analyses suggested that chemotherapy, tumor size >5cm, and multiple tumors were the independent risk factors for PFS and OS. The incidence of TRAEs was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Compared to chemotherapy, DEB-TACE plus ICIs improved survival and was well-tolerated in patients with unresectable iCCA.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combining sorafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (T+S+ICIs) and TACE plus sorafenib (T+S) when treating patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have previously received locoregional treatment. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C HCC from May 2019 to December 2020. These patients were treated with locoregional therapy and showed radiographic progression after the treatment. Patients received either T+S+ICIs or T+S. The outcomes, including disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety, were compared. The propensity score matching (PSM) methodology was used to reduce the influence of confounding factors on the outcomes. Results: Forty-three patients were included in the T+S group and 33 in the T+S+ICI group. After PSM (n = 29 in each group), patients who received T+S+ICIs had a higher DCR (82.8% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.043), longer median PFS (6.9 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.003), and longer median OS (12.3 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.008) than those who underwent T+S. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was an independent predictor of PFS, and age was an independent predictor of OS. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events in T+S+ICIs was well controlled. Conclusions: Compared with TACE combined with sorafenib, TACE combined with sorafenib plus ICIs is a potentially safe and effective treatment regimen for patients with advanced HCC who previously received locoregional treatment.

Vesselplasty using the Mesh-Hold™ bone-filling container for the treatment of pathological vertebral fractures due to osteolytic metastases: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefits and complications of vesselplasty using the Mesh-Hold™ bone-filling container in the treatment of vertebral osteolytic fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with vertebral osteolytic pathological fractures treated by vesselplasty at Sichuan Cancer Hospital between 09/2014 and 01/2018. VAS1 (Visual analog scale) scores and ODI2 (Oswestry disability index) were recorded routinely 1 day preoperative, at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperation, and at the last follow-up. V13 (The of bone cement injection volume) and V24 (vertebral body osteolytic volume) were evaluated, and the R5 (ratio) of bone cement filling was obtained according to the V1/V2. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included (105 segments with osteolytic fractures). The amount of bone cement for each vertebra was 2.4-5.2 ml (3.1 ± 0.7 ml). The ratio (R) of bone cement filling was not related to pain relief or functional recovery (all P > 0.05).The VAS scores and ODI at different time points after surgery were decreased compared with before surgery (all P < 0.05). The bone cement leakage rate was 16.2 % (17/105). The follow-up was 4-30 months (mean of 13 ± 6 months). Thirty patients had died by the last follow-up, all from their cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The Mesh-Hold™ bone-filling container in the treatment of vertebral fractures induced by osteolytic metastases could reduce pain, improve function, and reduce the bone cement leakage rate in the process of vesselplasty.

[Protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning against focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. METHODS: Seventy male SD rats were randomly divided into seven groups (n=10 for each): (1) CONTROL GROUP: animals were subjected to I/R. (2)RIPC groups: RIPC was performed by 3 cycles of occlusion/reperfusion of bilateral femoral arteries for 5 minutes/5 minutes. According to the different intervals between RIPC and middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), 6 RIPC subgroups were established: RIPC 30 minutes, 1, 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours subgroups, with intervals between RIPC and cerebral I/R of 30 minutes, 1, 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours respectively. The duration of MCAO was 120 minutes and reperfusion for 24 hours. The neurological dysfunction score (NDS) was evaluated at 24 hours after reperfusion. The infarction volume was then assessed with tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. RESULTS: The NDSs of RIPC 1, 2 and 24 hours groups were significantly lower than that of control group (all P<0.05), while with no significant differences of RIPC 30 minutes, 12 and 48 hours groups (all P>0.05). The area percentage of infarction in RIPC 1 hour [(17.9+/-7.5)%, P=0.016], RIPC 2 hours [(18.3+/-11.2)%, P=0.019] and RIPC 24 hours [(20.2+/-11.9)%, P=0.047] groups was significantly smaller than that in control group [(30.5+/-9.8)%], while no significant differences were observed in RIPC 30 minutes, 12 and 48 hours groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The RIPC the brain against focal cerebral I/R injury in rats, and the protection window is 1 to 2 hours after pretreatment and resumes after 24 hours.