Mutational and transcriptional landscape of pediatric B-cell precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: Pediatric B-cell precursor (BCP) lymphoblastic malignancies are neoplasms with manifestation either in the bone marrow or blood (BCP acute lymphoblastic leukemia [BCP-ALL]) or are less common in extramedullary tissue (BCP lymphoblastic lymphoma [BCP-LBL]). Although both presentations are similar in morphology and immunophenotype, molecular studies have been virtually restricted to BCP-ALL so far. The lack of molecular studies on BCP-LBL is due to its rarity and restriction on small, mostly formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, to our knowledge, we present the first comprehensive mutational and transcriptional analysis of what we consider the largest BCP-LBL cohort described to date (n = 97). Whole-exome sequencing indicated a mutational spectrum of BCP-LBL, strikingly similar to that found in BCP-ALL. However, epigenetic modifiers were more frequently mutated in BCP-LBL, whereas BCP-ALL was more frequently affected by mutation in genes involved in B-cell development. Integrating copy number alterations, somatic mutations, and gene expression by RNA sequencing revealed that virtually all molecular subtypes originally defined in BCP-ALL are present in BCP-LBL, with only 7% of lymphomas that were not assigned to a subtype. Similar to BCP-ALL, the most frequent subtypes of BCP-LBL were high hyperdiploidy and ETV6::RUNX1. Tyrosine kinase/cytokine receptor rearrangements were detected in 7% of BCP-LBL. These results indicate that genetic subtypes can be identified in BCP-LBL using next-generation sequencing, even in FFPE tissue, and may be relevant to guide treatment.

Distinct pattern of genomic breakpoints in CML and BCR::ABL1-positive ALL: analysis of 971 patients.

BACKGROUND: The BCR::ABL1 is a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is also found in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most genomic breaks on the BCR side occur in two regions - Major and minor - leading to p210 and p190 fusion proteins, respectively. METHODS: By multiplex long-distance PCR or next-generation sequencing technology we characterized the BCR::ABL1 genomic fusion in 971 patients (adults and children, with CML and ALL: pediatric ALL: n = 353; pediatric CML: n = 197; adult ALL: n = 166; adult CML: n = 255 patients) and designed "Break-App" web tool to allow visualization and various analyses of the breakpoints. Pearson's Chi-Squared test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Detailed analysis showed a non-random distribution of breaks in both BCR regions, whereas ABL1 breaks were distributed more evenly. However, we found a significant difference in the distribution of breaks between CML and ALL. We found no association of breakpoints with any type of interspersed repeats or DNA motifs. With a few exceptions, the primary structure of the fusions suggests non-homologous end joining being responsible for the BCR and ABL1 gene fusions. Analysis of reciprocal ABL1::BCR fusions in 453 patients showed mostly balanced translocations without major deletions or duplications. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data suggest that physical colocalization and chromatin accessibility, which change with the developmental stage of the cell (hence the difference between ALL and CML), are more critical factors influencing breakpoint localization than presence of specific DNA motifs.

FDA-approved disulfiram as a novel treatment for aggressive leukemia.

Acute leukemia continues to be a major cause of death from disease worldwide and current chemotherapeutic agents are associated with significant morbidity in survivors. While better and safer treatments for acute leukemia are urgently needed, standard drug development pipelines are lengthy and drug repurposing therefore provides a promising approach. Our previous evaluation of FDA-approved drugs for their antileukemic activity identified disulfiram, used for the treatment of alcoholism, as a candidate hit compound. This study assessed the biological effects of disulfiram on leukemia cells and evaluated its potential as a treatment strategy. We found that disulfiram inhibits the viability of a diverse panel of acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemia cell lines (n = 16) and patient-derived xenograft cells from patients with poor outcome and treatment-resistant disease (n = 15). The drug induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in leukemia cells within hours of treatment and was able to potentiate the effects of daunorubicin, etoposide, topotecan, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone chemotherapy. Upon combining disulfiram with auranofin, a drug approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis that was previously shown to exert antileukemic effects, strong and consistent synergy was observed across a diverse panel of acute leukemia cell lines, the mechanism of which was based on enhanced ROS induction. Acute leukemia cells were more sensitive to the cytotoxic activity of disulfiram than solid cancer cell lines and non-malignant cells. While disulfiram is currently under investigation in clinical trials for solid cancers, this study provides evidence for the potential of disulfiram for acute leukemia treatment. KEY MESSAGES: Disulfiram induces rapid apoptosis in leukemia cells by boosting oxidative stress. Disulfiram inhibits leukemia cell growth more potently than solid cancer cell growth. Disulfiram can enhance the antileukemic efficacy of chemotherapies. Disulfiram strongly synergises with auranofin in killing acute leukemia cells by ROS induction. We propose testing of disulfiram in clinical trial for patients with acute leukemia.