Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(43): 1509-1512, 2021 Oct 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710078

RESUMEN

The negative impact of lead exposure on young children and those who become pregnant is well documented but is not well known by those at highest risk from this hazard. Scientific evidence suggests that there is no known safe blood lead level (BLL), because even small amounts of lead can be harmful to a child's developing brain (1). In 2012, CDC introduced the population-based blood lead reference value (BLRV) to identify children exposed to more lead than most other children in the United States. The BLRV should be used as a guide to 1) help determine whether medical or environmental follow-up actions should be initiated for an individual child and 2) prioritize communities with the most need for primary prevention of exposure and evaluate the effectiveness of prevention efforts. The BLRV is based on the 97.5th percentile of the blood lead distribution in U.S. children aged 1-5 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. NHANES is a complex, multistage survey designed to provide a nationally representative assessment of health and nutritional status of the noninstitutionalized civilian adult and child populations in the United States (2). The initial BLRV of 5 µg/dL, established in 2012, was based on data from the 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 NHANES cycles. Consistent with recommendations from a former advisory committee, this report updates CDC's BLRV in children to 3.5 µg/dL using NHANES data derived from the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 cycles and provides helpful information to support adoption by state and local health departments, health care providers (HCPs), clinical laboratories, and others and serves as an opportunity to advance health equity and environmental justice related to preventable lead exposure. CDC recommends that public health and clinical professionals focus screening efforts on populations at high risk based on age of housing and sociodemographic risk factors. Public health and clinical professionals should collaborate to develop screening plans responsive to local conditions using local data. In the absence of such plans, universal BLL testing is recommended. In addition, jurisdictions should follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requirement that all Medicaid-enrolled children be tested at ages 12 and 24 months or at age 24-72 months if they have not previously been screened (3).


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Plomo/epidemiología , Plomo/sangre , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Intoxicación por Plomo/prevención & control , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Int J Environ Health Res ; 27(4): 276-292, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661191

RESUMEN

Previously, we reported the development of a Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability plume dispersion model of the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, USA accidental release of chlorine. Here, we assess this model by spatial and statistical comparison with post-incident observed environmental indicators of exposure and other types of observations. Spatial agreement was found when the model was compared to phytotoxic bleaching and corrosion events observed in 2 km radius around the release site. When spatially compared to locations of injured or killed animals, model predictions of the plume footprint were in relatively good agreement. Model-predicted human casualties differed from observed casualty counts primarily due to the shielding effect of buildings. A statistical comparison of observed dog health outcome-derived exposure vs. model predicted exposure showed relatively good agreement, particularly when a subcohort of indoor dogs was excluded. Evaluation and assessment of the building infiltration effect would further improve the model prior to application in epidemiologic study.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Cloro/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Irritantes/análisis , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , South Carolina
4.
Int J Environ Health Res ; 26(1): 58-74, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772143

RESUMEN

Plume dispersion modeling systems are often used in assessing human exposures to chemical hazards for epidemiologic study. We modeled the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, 54,915 kg railcar chlorine release using both the Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres and Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) plume modeling systems. We estimated the release rate by an engineering analysis combining semi-quantitative observations and fundamental physical principles. The use of regional meteorological conditions was validated by comparing concentration estimates generated by two source-location weather data-sets. The HPAC model estimated a chlorine plume with 20 ppm outdoor concentrations up to 7 km downwind and 0.25 km upwind/downgrade. A comparative analysis of our two models showed that HPAC was the best candidate for use as a model system on which epidemiologic studies could be based after further model validation. Further validation studies are needed before individual exposure estimates can be reliable and the chlorine plume more definitively modeled.


Asunto(s)
Cloro/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Sustancias Peligrosas/análisis , Modelos Teóricos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Gases/análisis
5.
Rural Remote Health ; 16(3): 3906, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27690516

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2005, a train derailment and subsequent chlorine spill ravaged the rural town of Graniteville in South Carolina, resulting in one of the worst chlorine gas exposures in US. HISTORY: Significant health and economic challenges persist in the community more than a decade later. Healthcare providers offered healthcare services to community members in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, and many still live in the community and continue to provide healthcare services. As such, healthcare professionals provide a unique and important perspective to help understand the impact of the disaster on the community's health. The purpose of this study was to explore healthcare providers' perspectives about the long-term effects of the disaster on community health, healthcare access, and wellbeing. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 healthcare providers who treated survivors of the Graniteville train disaster. A qualitative, essentialist, inductive thematic analytic approach was used to analyze study data. RESULTS: Four themes emerged regarding the disaster's long-term impact: effects of chlorine exposure on physical health, issues with healthcare access, residual effects of the disaster on personal and community wellbeing, and improving health and community wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Disaster recovery should not be considered solely an acute event; agencies must be prepared for long-term, potentially chronic ailments, particularly in underserved, rural communities. Efforts to address the long-term health needs of communities post-disaster should consider the perspectives of healthcare providers to offer a well-rounded assessment of community needs. Study findings can help inform future disaster response strategies in communities locally and globally.


Asunto(s)
Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Cloro/efectos adversos , Desastres , Personal de Salud/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Vías Férreas , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , South Carolina , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Crit Care ; 19: 46, 2015 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25888424

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroids are used empirically in influenza A (H1N1) treatment despite lack of clear evidence for effective treatment. This study aims to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids treatment for H1N1 infection. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were used to estimate the efficacy of corticosteroids for the prevention of mortality in H1N1 infection. Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and so on, and bibliographies of retrieved articles, from April 2009 to October 2014. We included both cohort studies and case-control studies reported in English or Chinese that compared treatment effects between corticosteroids and non-corticosteroids therapy in inpatients with H1N1 virus infection. Cohort studies employed mortality as outcome, and case-control studies employed deaths as cases and survivors as controls; both were assessed in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: In total twenty-three eligible studies were included. Both cohort studies (nine studies, n = 1,405) and case-control studies (14 studies, n = 4,700) showed a similar trend toward increased mortality (cohort studies relative risk was 1.85 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46 to 2.33; case-control studies odds ratio was 4.22 with 95% CI 3.10 to 5.76). The results from both subgroup analyses and sensitive analyses were consistent with each other, showing that steroid treatment is associated with mortality. However, considering the fact that corticosteroids were tend to be used in sickest case-patients and heterogeneity was observed between studies, we cannot make a solid conclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence did not support the use of corticosteroids as standard care for patients with severe influenza. We conclude that further research is required.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Gripe Humana/terapia , Oportunidad Relativa , Respiración Artificial
7.
J Asthma ; 52(7): 647-52, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539024

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relationship between antibiotic use and asthma in the children with a higher risk of allergic sensitization. We examine the association between the use of specific therapeutic antibiotics in the first year of life and development of wheezing by 36 months among children with a higher risk of allergic sensitization. METHODS: A multi-center prospective cohort study was conducted among children at high risk for allergic sensitization. A validated questionnaire was used to prospectively collect information on antibiotic use and potential risk factors for wheezing from parents or guardians of 606 children from three European countries at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of age. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders and effect modifiers and to estimate the association of antibiotic use with the development of early childhood wheezing. RESULTS: Of the antibiotics assessed, only macrolide use in the first year of life was associated with increasing risk for wheezing by 36 months, after adjusting for gender, socioeconomic status, breast feeding >6 months, tobacco smoke exposure, family history of asthma, and respiratory infection (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.05-1.13). To avoid a bias by indication, we analyzed children with and without respiratory infection separately. Similar associations were observed for macrolides use in children who had no respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: In European children with a familial risk for allergic sensitization, we found a positive association between macrolide use in the first year of life and wheezing until 36 months old which was independent of the effect of respiratory infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiología , Lactancia Materna , Preescolar , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Environ Health ; 14: 94, 2015 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following the Chernobyl nuclear disaster of 1986, vast areas of Ukraine became contaminated with radionuclides. We examined health effects of school-based food intervention for children in a rural region Narodichi, Ukraine, exposed to low-level radiation through diet of locally produced foods. Until 1995, children received three daily meals with low content of artificial radionuclides which were subsequently reduced to two. METHODS: Annual health screening data (1993-1998) were examined using a quasi-experimental regression discontinuity analysis (n = 947 children; 3,573 repeated measurements). Generalized Estimating Equation models evaluated effect of the food supplementation reduction on hematologic measures and prevalence of anemia, acute respiratory illnesses and diseases of immune system. RESULTS: Prior improvement of several hematologic parameters diminished after food supplementation was reduced. From 1995 to 1996, levels of hemoglobin and erythrocytes decreased from 12.63 (95% CI: 12.56-12.71) to 12.46 g/dL (% CI: 12.39-12.52) and from 4.10 (95% CI: 4.07-4.12) to 4.02 (95% CI: 4.00-4.04) × 10(12)/L, respectively. In agreement, the prevalence ratio (PR) of previously declining anemia increased from 0.57 to 1.31 per year (p(interaction )< .0001). The relation between food supplementation and hemoglobin levels was modified by residential (137)Cs soil levels. After food supply reduction, PR of common cold and bronchitis increased from 1.27 to 2.32 per year (p(interaction) = 0.01) and from 1.09 to 1.24 per year (p(interaction) = 0.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Food supplementation provided by the Ukrainian government likely prevented development of anemia in many of the children residing in the contaminated district. Food supplementation after the community exposure to radioactivity through a diet of locally grown foods should be considered as an effective approach to reduce adverse health effects of radiation.


Asunto(s)
Radioisótopos de Cesio/efectos adversos , Accidente Nuclear de Chernóbil , Dietoterapia/métodos , Contaminación Radiactiva de Alimentos , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Adolescente , Anemia/etiología , Anemia/prevención & control , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/sangre , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/prevención & control , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/sangre , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/sangre , Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ucrania
10.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 945, 2013 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24107111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We implemented a community based interventional health screening for individuals located within one mile of a 54 metric tons release of liquid chlorine following a 16 tanker car train derailment on 6 January, 2005 in Graniteville, South Carolina, USA. Public health intervention occurred 8-10 months after the event, and provided pulmonary function and mental health assessment by primary care providers. Its purpose was to evaluate those exposed to chlorine for evidence of ongoing impairment for medical referral and treatment. We report comparative analysis between self-report of respiratory symptoms via questionnaire and quantitative spirometry results. METHODS: Health assessments were obtained through respiratory symptom and exposure questionnaires, simple spirometry, and physical exam. Simple spirometry was used as the standard to identify continued breathing problems. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were applied to evaluate the validity of the respiratory questionnaire. We also identified the direction of discrepancy between self-reported respiratory symptoms and spirometry measures. Generalized estimation equations determined prevalence ratios for abnormal spirometry based on the presence of participant persistent respiratory symptoms. Covariate adjustment was made for participant age, sex, race, smoking and educational status. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine people participated in the Graniteville health screening; 53 children (mean age = 11 years, range: <1-16), and 206 adults (mean age = 50 years, range: 18-89). Of these, 220 (85%) performed spirometry maneuvers of acceptable quality. Almost 67% (n = 147) displayed abnormal spirometry, while 50% (n = 110) reported persistent new-onset respiratory symptoms. Moreover, abnormal spirometry was seen in 65 participants (29%) who did not report any discernible breathing problems. This represented a net 16.8% underreporting of symptoms. Sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire self-report of symptoms were low at 55.8% and 61.6%, respectively. Persistent cough (41%) and shortness of breath (39%) were the most frequently reported respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Eight to ten months after acute chlorine exposure, the Graniteville health screening participants under-reported respiratory symptoms when compared to abnormal spirometry results. Sensitivity and specificity were low, and we determined that relying upon the self-report questionnaire was not adequate to objectively assess the lung health of our population following irritant gas exposure.


Asunto(s)
Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Cloro/efectos adversos , Trastornos Respiratorios/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vías Férreas , South Carolina , Espirometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
11.
South Med J ; 106(1): 74-81, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23263318

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the aftermath of an environmental public health disaster (EPHD) a healthcare system may be the least equipped entity to respond. Preventable visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be used as a population-based indicator to monitor health system access postdisaster. The objective of this study was to examine whether ACSC rates among vulnerable subpopulations are sensitive to the impact of a disaster. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on the 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina using a Medicaid claims database. Poisson regression was used to calculate change in monthly ACSC visits at the disaster site in the postdisaster period compared with the predisaster period after adjusting for parallel changes in a control group. RESULTS: The adjusted rate of a predisaster ACSC hospital visit for the direct group was 1.68 times the rate for the control group (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.93), whereas the adjusted ACSC hospital rate postdisaster for the direct group was 3.10 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.97-5.18). For ED ACSC visits, the adjusted rate among those directly affected predisaster were 1.82 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.61-2.08), whereas the adjusted ACSC rate postdisaster was 2.81 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.92-5.17). CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed that an increased demand on the health system altered health services delivery for vulnerable populations directly affected by a disaster. Preventable visits for ACSCs may advance public health practice by identifying healthcare disparities during disaster recovery.


Asunto(s)
Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Planificación en Desastres , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Poblaciones Vulnerables , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cloro , Desastres , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
12.
Public Health Rep ; 138(2): 241-247, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: High-quality scientific evidence underpins public health decision making. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agency provides scientific data, including during public health emergencies. To understand CDC's contributions to COVID-19 science, we conducted a bibliometric evaluation of publications authored by CDC scientists from January 20, 2020, through January 20, 2022, by using a quality improvement approach (SQUIRE 2.0). METHODS: We catalogued COVID-19 articles with ≥1 CDC-affiliated author published in a scientific journal and indexed in the World Health Organization's COVID-19 database. We identified priority topic areas from the agency's COVID-19 Public Health Science Agenda by using keyword scripts in EndNote and then assessed the impact of the published articles by using Scopus and Altmetric. RESULTS: During the first 2 years of the agency's pandemic response, CDC authors contributed to 1044 unique COVID-19 scientific publications in 208 journals. Publication topics included testing (n = 853, 82%); prevention strategies (n = 658, 63%); natural history, transmission, breakthrough infections, and reinfections (n = 587, 56%); vaccines (n = 567, 54%); health equity (n = 308, 30%); variants (n = 232, 22%); and post-COVID-19 conditions (n = 44, 4%). Publications were cited 40 427 times and received 81 921 news reports and 1 058 893 social media impressions. As the pandemic evolved, CDC adapted to address new scientific questions, including vaccine effectiveness, safety, and access; viral variants, including Delta and Omicron; and health equity. CONCLUSION: The agency's COVID-19 Public Health Science Agenda helped guide impactful scientific activities. CDC continues to evaluate COVID-19 priority topic areas and contribute to development of new scientific work. CDC is committed to monitoring emerging issues and addressing gaps in evidence needed to improve health.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Salud Pública , Bibliometría , Pandemias/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
13.
Am J Epidemiol ; 176 Suppl 7: S131-41, 2012 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23035137

RESUMEN

Investigators examined 5,654 children enrolled in the El Paso, Texas, public school district by questionnaire in 2001. Exposure measurements were first collected in the late fall of 1999. School-level and residence-level exposures to traffic-related air pollutants were estimated using a land use regression model. For 1,529 children with spirometry, overall geographic information system (GIS)-modeled residential levels of traffic-related ambient air pollution (calibrated to a 10-ppb increment in nitrogen dioxide levels) were associated with a 2.4% decrement in forced vital capacity (95% confidence interval (CI): -4.0, -0.7) after adjustment for demographic, anthropomorphic, and socioeconomic factors and spirometer/technician effects. After adjustment for these potential covariates, overall GIS-modeled residential levels of traffic-related ambient air pollution (calibrated to a 10-ppb increment in nitrogen dioxide levels) were associated with pulmonary function levels below 85% of those predicted for both forced vital capacity (odds ratio (OR) = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.65, 5.78) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.38, 4.01). For children attending schools at elevations above 1,170 m, a 10-ppb increment in modeled nitrogen dioxide levels was associated with current asthma (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.50) after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and parental factors and random school effects. These results are consistent with previous studies in Europe and California that found adverse health outcomes in children associated with modeled traffic-related air pollutants.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Sistemas de Información Geográfica , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Vehículos a Motor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/efectos adversos , Oportunidad Relativa , Espirometría , Texas/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Am J Public Health ; 102(12): e24-32, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23078479

RESUMEN

Disasters create a secondary surge in casualties because of the sudden increased need for long-term health care. Surging demands for medical care after a disaster place excess strain on an overtaxed health care system operating at maximum or reduced capacity. We have applied a health services use model to identify areas of vulnerability that perpetuate health disparities for at-risk populations seeking care after a disaster. We have proposed a framework to understand the role of the medical system in modifying the health impact of the secondary surge on vulnerable populations. Baseline assessment of existing needs and the anticipation of ballooning chronic health care needs following the acute response for at-risk populations are overlooked vulnerability gaps in national surge capacity plans.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Desastres/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Capacidad de Reacción/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Poblaciones Vulnerables
15.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 47(9): 1441-8, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22072223

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Relatively little is known about psychological effects of environmental hazard disasters. This study examines the development of posttraumatic stress (PTS) and tendency to limited panic attack after a large chlorine spill in a community. METHODS: In January 2005, a large chlorine spill occurred in Graniteville, SC. Acute injuries were quantified on an ordinal severity scale. Eight to ten months later, participating victims completed the Short Screening Scale for PTSD (n = 225) and the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI) (n = 193) as part of a public health intervention. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity were likewise measured via spirometry. Two sets of univariate logistic regression models were fit to detect independent effects of each potential covariate and risk factor on PTS score and tendency to panic. A supplemental analysis examined whether poor lung function may be a confounder and/or effect modifier of the effect of acute injury on PTS score and panic. RESULTS: Of those who completed psychological screening, 36.9% exhibited PTS symptoms. FEV(1), acute injury, and the HPSI psychiatric subscale were independently associated with increased PTS score. Acute injury severity scale and female sex were associated with tendency to panic. Immediate acute injury severity and poor lung function later were independently associated with PTS symptomotology. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of PTS and endorsement of tendency to panic within our sample show a need for mental health treatment after a chemical hazard disaster. Mental health personnel should be considerate of those with serious physical injuries.


Asunto(s)
Cloro/toxicidad , Desastres , Pánico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología , Adulto , Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inventario de Personalidad , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , South Carolina/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
16.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(7): 1203-1212, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35073249

RESUMEN

Rationale: Avoiding excess health damages attributable to climate change is a primary motivator for policy interventions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the health benefits of climate mitigation, as included in the policy assessment process, have been estimated without much input from health experts. Objectives: In accordance with recommendations from the National Academies in a 2017 report on approaches to update the social cost of greenhouse gases (SC-GHG), an expert panel of 26 health researchers and climate economists gathered for a virtual technical workshop in May 2021 to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis and recommend improvements to the estimation of health impacts in economic-climate models. Methods: Regionally resolved effect estimates of unit increases in temperature on net all-cause mortality risk were generated through random-effects pooling of studies identified through a systematic review. Results: Effect estimates and associated uncertainties varied by global region, but net increases in mortality risk associated with increased average annual temperatures (ranging from 0.1% to 1.1% per 1°C) were estimated for all global regions. Key recommendations for the development and utilization of health damage modules were provided by the expert panel and included the following: not relying on individual methodologies in estimating health damages; incorporating a broader range of cause-specific mortality impacts; improving the climate parameters available in economic models; accounting for socioeconomic trajectories and adaptation factors when estimating health damages; and carefully considering how air pollution impacts should be incorporated in economic-climate models. Conclusions: This work provides an example of how subject-matter experts can work alongside climate economists in making continued improvements to SC-GHG estimates.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Cambio Climático , Salud Global , Humanos , Modelos Económicos
17.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260264, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879071

RESUMEN

Many areas of the United States have air pollution levels typically below Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory limits. Most health effects studies of air pollution use meteorological (e.g., warm/cool) or astronomical (e.g., solstice/equinox) definitions of seasons despite evidence suggesting temporally-misaligned intra-annual periods of relative asthma burden (i.e., "asthma seasons"). We introduce asthma seasons to elucidate whether air pollutants are associated with seasonal differences in asthma emergency department (ED) visits in a low air pollution environment. Within a Bayesian time-stratified case-crossover framework, we quantify seasonal associations between highly resolved estimates of six criteria air pollutants, two weather variables, and asthma ED visits among 66,092 children ages 5-19 living in South Carolina (SC) census tracts from 2005 to 2014. Results show that coarse particulates (particulate matter <10 µm and >2.5 µm: PM10-2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) may contribute to asthma ED visits across years, but are particularly implicated in the highest-burden fall asthma season. Fine particulate matter (<2.5 µm: PM2.5) is only associated in the lowest-burden summer asthma season. Relatively cool and dry conditions in the summer asthma season and increased temperatures in the spring and fall asthma seasons are associated with increased ED visit odds. Few significant associations in the medium-burden winter and medium-high-burden spring asthma seasons suggest other ED visit drivers (e.g., viral infections) for each, respectively. Across rural and urban areas characterized by generally low air pollution levels, there are acute health effects associated with particulate matter, but only in the summer and fall asthma seasons and differing by PM size.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Asma/epidemiología , Material Particulado/análisis , Adolescente , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Asma/inducido químicamente , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Cruzados , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Material Particulado/administración & dosificación , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Estaciones del Año , South Carolina/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
18.
Health Place ; 66: 102426, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011491

RESUMEN

Asthma disparities have complex, neighborhood-level drivers that are not well understood. Consequently, identifying particular contextual factors that contribute to disparities is a public health goal. We study pediatric asthma emergency department (ED) visit disparities and neighborhood factors associated with them in South Carolina (SC) census tracts from 1999 to 2015. Leveraging a Bayesian framework, we identify risk clusters, spatially-varying relationships, and risk percentile-specific associations. Clusters of high risk occur in both rural and urban census tracts with high probability, with neighborhood-specific associations suggesting unique risk factors for each locale. Bayesian methods can help clarify the neighborhood drivers of health disparities.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Características de la Residencia , Asma/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Análisis Espacio-Temporal
19.
Environ Health ; 8: 55, 2009 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19995440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of migration to the USA-Mexico border city of El Paso, Texas (USA), parental language preference, and Hispanic ethnicity on childhood asthma to differentiate between its social and environmental determinants. METHODS: Allergy and asthma prevalence was surveyed among 9797 fourth and fifth grade children enrolled in the El Paso Independent School District. Parents completed a respiratory health questionnaire, in either English or Spanish, and a sub-sample of children received spirometry testing at their school. Here we report asthma and allergy outcomes across ethnicity and El Paso residency duration. RESULTS: Asthma and allergy prevalence increased with longer duration of El Paso residency independent of ethnicity and preferred language. Compared with immigrants who arrived in El Paso after entering first grade (18%), lifelong El Paso residents (68%) had more prevalent allergy (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.32 - 2.24), prevalent asthma (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.24 - 2.46), and current asthma (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.37 - 2.95). Spirometric measurements (FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75) also declined with increasing duration of El Paso residency (0.16% and 0.35% annual reduction, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a community-wide environmental exposure in El Paso, delayed pulmonary development, or increased health of immigrants may be associated with allergy and asthma development in children raised there.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Asma/etnología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Emigración e Inmigración/tendencias , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etnología , Lenguaje , Masculino , Prevalencia , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Texas
20.
Front Public Health ; 7: 112, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31134174

RESUMEN

Background: On January 6, 2005, a train derailed in Graniteville, South Carolina, releasing nearly 60,000 kg of toxic chlorine gas. The disaster left nine people dead and was responsible for hundreds of hospitalizations and outpatient visits in the subsequent weeks. While chlorine gas primarily affects the respiratory tract, a growing body of evidence suggests that acute exposure may also cause vascular injury and cardiac toxicity. Here, we describe the incidence of cardiovascular hospitalizations among residents of the zip codes most affected by the chlorine gas plume, and compare the incidence of cardiovascular discharges in the years leading up to the event (2000-2004) to the incidence in the years following the event (2005-2014). Methods: De-identified hospital discharge information was collected from the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office for individuals residing in the selected zip codes for the years 2000 to 2014. A quasi-experimental study design was utilized with a population-level interrupted time series model to examine hospital discharge rates for Graniteville-area residents for three cardiovascular diagnoses: hypertension (HTN), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and coronary heart disease (CHD). We used linear regression with autoregressive error correction to compare slopes for pre- and post-spill time periods. Data from the 2000 and 2010 censuses were used to calculate rates and to provide information on potential demographic shifts over the course of the study. Results: A significant increase in hypertension-related hospital discharge rates was observed for the years following the Graniteville chlorine spill (slope 8.2, p < 0.001). Concurrent changes to CHD and AMI hospital discharge rates were in the opposite direction (slopes -3.2 and -0.3, p < 0.01 and 0.14, respectively). Importantly, the observed trend cannot be attributed to an aging population. Conclusions: An unusual increase in hypertension-related hospital discharge rates in the area affected by the Graniteville chlorine spill contrasts with national and state-level trends. A number of factors related to the spill may be contributing the observation: disaster-induced hypertension, healthcare services access issues, and, possibly, chlorine-induced susceptibility to vascular pathologies. Due to the limitations of our data, we cannot determine whether the individuals who visited the hospital were the ones exposed to chlorine gas, however, the finding warrants additional research. Future studies are needed to determine the etiology of the increase and whether individuals exposed to chlorine are at a heightened risk for hypertensive heart disease.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA