Hip Pain in Adolescent Patients.

Hip pain is a common complaint in adolescents. There are several causes for hip pain in this population, with dysplasia and impingement being the most common; however, other conditions such as extra-articular impingement, torsional disorders, labral tears, and osteochondral lesions also require consideration. Many of these conditions are related to underlying anatomic abnormalities and increased activity in this age group. An understanding of the common pathologies of the adolescent hip is integral to the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of these patients.

Assessing Correlations and Demographic Interactions Between PROMIS25 and SRS30 in Pediatric Patients With Spinal Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been measured using anatomy-specific instruments. However, these instruments may be influenced by the presence of concomitant illnesses not associated with the orthopaedic condition. As such, standardized PROM tool, such as PROMIS25, have been developed to assess patient outcomes. In this study, we aim to compare the correlation and association between 2 common PROMs used for pediatric patients with spinal deformity. METHODS: This study included patients younger than 21 years who were indicated for spinal deformity surgery at our institution. All patients were invited to complete SRS-30 and PROMIS-25 instruments through an automated, electronic patient-reported outcome platform before surgery. Patient demographics were recorded and Spearman correlations were calculated between the various PROMIS and SRS domains. Correlations were compared between different baseline characteristics and demographics using a rho-to-z transformation method. Ceiling and floor effects were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of PROMIS and SRS domains had moderate to strong correlations, with higher correlations observed when each instrument tried to capture the same construct. For example, there was strong correlation between PROMIS raw pain and SRS pain (ρ=-0.86, P<0.01), and PROMIS Depression and SRS Mental Health (ρ=-0.76, P<0.01). Ceiling effects ranged from 1.0 to 16.9% in SRS and 0.5 to 28.5% is PROMIS. Floor effects ranged from 0.5 to 1.5% in SRS and 0.5 to 29.0% in PROMIS. There were significant differences in the correlation between SRS Mental Health and PROMIS Depression when comparing between different sexes (male: ρ=-0.74, female: ρ=-0.59, P=0.04). In addition, there were significant differences in the correlation between SRS Mental Health and PROMIS Anxiety when comparing between different insurance payors (commercial: ρ=-0.86, female: ρ=-0.75, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong correlation between SRS and PROMIS domains in pediatric patients with spinal deformity. These correlations can differ by baseline characteristics and demographics. Providers should consider these differences when interpreting PROMs in diverse patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective comparative study.

Don't Throw Away the Handout: Efficacy of Patient Education in Pediatric Orthopaedic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Printed educational materials (PEMs) have been used for patient education in various settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability, understandability, and actionability of trauma-related educational material from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA, Orthokids), as well as determine its efficacy in educating pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients and caregivers. METHODS: The readability, understandability and actionability of PEMs was assessed using the Patient Education materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Five reviewers ranging in experience independently evaluated the educational materials. The efficacy of PEMs was assessed prospectively by randomizing patients into 2 groups. The first group (Education) received the OrthoKids educational material related to the patient's fracture. The second group (No Education) did not receive the educational material. At the first follow-up visit, parents/guardians in both groups completed surveys. Statistical analyses included descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: The understandability of PEMs was similar (68% to 74%); however, the educational materials had varying actionability scores ranging from 20% for femoral shaft fractures to 60% for elbow fractures. In total, 101 patients were randomized to assess the efficacy of educational materials (Education=51, No Education=50). There were no significant differences in sex, age, race/ethnicity, and level of education between caregivers in both groups ( P > 0.05). Only 61% (31/51) participants in the Education group reported using the educational material; however, 67% to 68% of participants in either group reported wanting PEMs. Participants in the group that did not receive PEMs were significantly more likely to use the internet to find more information (74% vs. 51%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that participants that did not receive PEMs were significantly more likely to search the internet for more information. Improving the quality and actionability of educational resources on electronic platforms is needed to improve patient education. A multi-modal approach using PEMs that includes a list of high-quality online sources would likely be most effective in educating pediatric trauma patients and caregivers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Automating Patient-reported Data Collection: Does it Work?

OBJECTIVE: There are several electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) vendors that are being used at institutions to automate data collection. However, there is little known about their success in collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and it is unknown which patients are more likely to complete these surveys. In this study, we assessed rates of PRO completion, as well as determined factors that contributed to the completion of baseline and follow-up surveys. METHODS: We queried our ePRO platform to assess rates of completion for baseline and follow-up surveys for patients from October 2019 to June 2022. All baseline surveys were administered before pediatric orthopaedic procedures, and follow-up surveys were sent at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery to patients with baseline data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in patients who did and did not complete surveys. RESULTS: This study included 1313 patients during the study period. Baseline surveys were completed by 66% of the cohort (n = 873 patients). There was a significant difference in race/ethnicity and language spoken in the patients who did and did not complete baseline surveys ( P < 0.01) with lower rates of completion in African American, Hispanic, and Spanish-speaking patients. At least one follow-up was obtained for 68% of patients with baseline surveys (n = 597 patients). There were significant differences in completion rates based on race/ethnicity ( P = 0.03) and language spoken ( P = 0.01). There were lower rates of baseline completion for patients with government insurance in our multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 0.6, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Baseline and follow-up PRO data can be obtained from the majority of patients using automated ePRO platforms. However, additional focus is needed on collecting data from traditionally underrepresented patient groups to better understand outcomes in these patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Variations in the Management of Closed Salter-Harris II Distal Tibia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: There are no formal practice guidelines for the surgical management of closed, Salter-Harris (SH) II distal tibia fractures. The purpose of this study was to survey the indications for operative and nonoperative management of this injury across pediatric tertiary care centers. METHODS: We surveyed pediatric orthopedic surgeons at 20 tertiary care level-1 pediatric trauma centers. Surgeons were provided with 16 clinical scenarios that varied based on patient age and sex, and highlighted the following surgical indications: translation <3 mm, translation ≥3 mm, sagittal plane angulation >5 degrees, and coronal plane angulation >5 degrees. Each case's scenario and radiographs after closed reduction were presented in a randomized manner. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. RESULTS: In total, 33 of 37 surgeons completed the survey (89% response rate). All surgeons took trauma call at a level-1 pediatric trauma center and had an average of 8.8 years (SD: 6.5 y) of experience. Consensus was reached in 4 of 16 scenarios. Specifically, nonoperative management was recommended for all scenarios showing <3 mm of translation after closed reduction. The majority of surgeons recommended operative management in scenarios showing coronal plane angulation after closed reduction, but none of these scenarios reached consensus. There was a near-equal split in operative and nonoperative management in 8 of 16 scenarios. These scenarios showed ≥3 mm translation after closed reduction and sagittal plane angulation after closed reduction. Surgeons with 6 to 10 years in practice were the most likely to recommend surgery, especially in the case of >5 degrees coronal plane angulation postreduction ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation regarding the indications for operative and nonoperative management of closed, SHII distal tibia fractures. Consensus was reached for nonoperative management in patients with <3 mm of translation after closed reduction; however, with greater deformity consensus regarding optimal treatment was unable to be achieved. The variation in the management of distal tibia SHII fractures is significant, suggesting that perhaps clinical equipoise exists between operative and nonoperative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Rate of Refracture After Removal of Hardware in Pediatric Femur Fractures.

PURPOSE: Both flexible intramedullary nails (FINs) and plate osteosynthesis are commonly used for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the refracture rate after hardware removal in pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that utilized the Pediatric Health Information System database to determine the number of pediatric patients ages 4 to 10 who underwent surgical fixation of a femur fracture and subsequent hardware removal between the years 2015 and 2019. All patients had a minimum of a 2-year follow-up to assess for refracture. Patients with metabolic bone disease, neuromuscular conditions, bone fragility disorders, nutritional deficiencies, and pathologic fractures were excluded. RESULTS: Of the total, 2805 pediatric patients with 2881 femoral shaft fractures who underwent FIN (48.4%), plate fixation (36.1%), splinting/casting (14.9%), or external fixation (0.6%) were included. The mean age of patients with index fracture was 7.2 years (SD, 2.1) and 69% were males. Eight hundred eighty patients (60%) in the FIN group had their hardware removed compared with 693 patients (68%) in the plate fixation group ( P = 0.07), at an average of 287 ± 191 days versus 320 ± 203 days ( P = 0.03). Refracture occurred in 13 patients (1.5%) who had their hardware retained and in 21 patients (1.4%) who had their hardware removed ( P = 0.732). Among 65% of patients who underwent hardware removal, refracture occurred in 7 patients with FIN (0.8%) and 14 patients with plate fixation (2.2%) ( P = 0.04). Refracture occurred within 365 days from hardware removal in 1 patient with FIN (0.1%) and 7 patients with plate fixation (1%) ( P = 0.01). In logistic regression, patients with FIN fixation had lower odds of refracture after hardware removal compared with plate fixation (adjusted odds ratio: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15-0.97). Age and payor status did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of refracture after hardware removal for pediatric patients with a femoral shaft fracture was similar between patients with hardware retained and removal. However, patients with FIN had a lower rate of refracture AFTER hardware removal compared with plate fixation. This information can be helpful for advising families regarding the risks of refracture after hardware removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective cohort study.

Intraoperative Antibiotic Use in Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis: Current Practices and Trends.

BACKGROUND: Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients were published in September 2019. Recommendations included using intravenous cefazolin and topical vancomycin for all index procedures, plus gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular patients. Guideline adherence is unknown. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures and assess changes in practice patterns over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review of data collected through a multicenter study group included EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures between January 2018 and March 2021, excluding revisions, lengthenings, and tetherings. Demographics, clinical measurements, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications were recorded. Descriptive and univariate statistics were utilized. Antibiotic prophylaxis from April 2018 through September 2019 and October 2019 through March 2021 were compared with evaluate change after BPG publication. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients undergoing growth-friendly procedures were included. The most common scoliosis types included neuromuscular (167, 29.7%), syndromic (134, 23.8%), and congenital (97, 17.3%). Most index procedures involved magnetically controlled growing rods (417, 74%) followed by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib or traditional growing rods (105, 19%). Most patients received cefazolin alone at index procedure (310, 55.2%) or cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (113, 20.1%). Topical antibiotics were used in 327 patients (58.2%), with most receiving vancomycin powder. There was increased use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication (16% vs. 25%) ( P =0.01). Surgical site infections occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) within 90 days of index procedure, 10 pre-BPGs (3%), and 2 post-BPGs (0.9%), with no significant difference in surgical site infection rate by type of antibiotic administered ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Historical variability exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS. There continues to be variability following BPG publication; however, this study found a significant increase in antibiotic prophylaxis against gram-negative bacteria after BPG publication. Overall, greater emphasis is needed to decrease variability in practice, improve compliance with consensus guidelines, and evaluate BPG efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective.

Return to the Operating Room for Unplanned Pin Removal After Percutaneous Pinning of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Pin migration is a common complication associated with closed reduced and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) in children. Though this complication occurs frequently, little work has been done to elicit circumstances surrounding this complication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with SCHF treated with percutaneous pins who needed to return to the operating room for pin removal. METHODS: This was a multicenter study involving children treated at 6 pediatric tertiary care centers between 2010 and 2020. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify children aged 3 to 10 years of age with a diagnosis of a SCHF. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients who underwent CRPP of their injuries. CPT codes for deep hardware removal requiring procedural sedation or anesthesia were used to identify patients who needed to return to the operating room for hardware removal. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, 15 out of 7862 patients who were treated for SCHF at our 6 participating study centers experienced pin migration requiring a return to the operating room for pin removal, yielding a complication rate of 0.19%. Twelve (80%) of these injuries were Wilkins modification of the Gartland classification Type III, while the remaining injuries were Type II. 2-pin fixation constructs were used in nine (60%) children; 3-pin fixation constructs were used in 6 (40%) children. Pin migration was noted 23.2±7.0 days postoperatively at clinic follow-up. Four patients were noted to have multiple pins buried at follow-up. Four patients required 1-centimeter incisions for exposure of the buried pins, while surgeons were able to remove the buried pin with just a needle driver and blunt dissection in the remainder of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pin migration is a common complication of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of SCHF. There is variation in pin site management to prevent migration in the absence of underlying risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Issues With Big Data: Variability in Reported Demographics and Complications Associated With Posterior Spinal Fusion in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and administrative registries provide large volumes of data that can be used for clinical research. However, there are several limitations relating to the quality, consistency, and generalizability of big data. In this study, we aim to compare reported demographics and certain outcomes in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), neuromuscular scoliosis (NS), and Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) between 3 commonly utilized databases in pediatric orthopaedic research. METHODS: We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), and Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) between the ages of 10 to 18 that underwent PSF for AIS, SK, and NS from 2012 to 2015. We compared various demographic factors, such as sex, race/ethnicity, age, and rates of postsurgical infection and 30-day readmissions. Data was analyzed with descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: We identified 9891 patients that underwent PSF in NSQIP, 10,771 patients in PHIS, and 4335 patients in HCUP over the study period. There were significant differences in patient demographics, readmission rates, and infection rates between all patients that underwent PSF across the databases (P<0.01), as well as specifically in patients with AIS (P<0.01). HCUP had the highest proportion of Hispanic patients that underwent PSF (13.5%), as well as patients who had AIS (13.3%) or NS (17.9%). The PHIS database had the highest proportion of patients undergoing PSF for SK. Among patients with NS, there were significant differences in race across the databases (P<0.01), but no significant differences in sex, ethnicity, or readmission (P>0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in race (P=0.04) and readmission (P=0.01) across databases for patients with SK, but no differences in sex or ethnicity (P>0.05). NSQIP reported the highest rate of 30-day readmissions for patients undergoing PSF (17.9%) compared with other databases (HCUP 4.1%, PHIS 12.1%). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in patient demographics, sample sizes, and rates of complications for pediatric patients undergoing PSF across 3 commonly utilized US administrative databases. Given the variability in reported outcomes and demographics, generalizability is difficult to extrapolate from these large data sources. In addition, certain databases should be selected to appropriately power studies focusing on particular patient populations or outcomes.

Trends in Management of Pediatric Distal Radius Buckle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius buckle fractures (DRBFx) represent nearly half of the pediatric wrist injuries. DRBFx are stable injury patterns that can typically be successfully managed with brief immobilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate opinions and preferences of pediatric orthopaedic specialists regarding the management of DRBFx. METHODS: The POSNA Trauma Quality, Safety, and Value Initiative (QSVI) Committee developed a 20-question survey regarding the treatment of DRBFx in children. The survey was sent twice to all active and candidate POSNA members in June 2020 (n=1487). Questions focused on various aspects of treatment, including type and length of immobilization, follow-up, and radiographs and on potential concerns regarding patient/family satisfaction and pain control, medicolegal concerns, misdiagnosis, and mismanagement. RESULTS: A total of 317 participants completed the survey (response rate=21.3%). In all, 69% of all respondents prefer to use a removable wrist splint, with 76% of those in practice <20 years preferring removable wrist splints compared with 51% of those in practice >20 years (χ 2 =21.7; P <0.01). Overall, 85% of participants utilize shared decision-making in discussing management options with patients and their families. The majority of participants felt that the risk of complications associated with DRBFx was very low, but concern for misdiagnosis and mismanagement have required some respondents to perform closed or open reductions. CONCLUSIONS: In 2020, the majority of respondents treat DRBFx with removable splints (69%) for 3 or fewer weeks (55%), minimal follow-up (85%), and no reimaging (64%). This marks a dramatic shift from the 2012 POSNA survey when only 29% of respondents used removable splinting for DRBFx. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Does the Deformity Index Reliably Predict the Shape of the Femoral Head at Healing of Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease?

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) aims to preserve the spherical shape of the femoral head. The deformity index (DI) <0.3, measured 2 years from disease onset, is a surrogate measure that predicts that the femoral head will be Stulberg class I or II at skeletal maturity. There is no study that compares the predictive value of DI against a quantitative measure of the shape of the femoral head when the disease heals. We undertook this study to assess the reproducibility of a new method of measurement of DI and see if DI could predict the shape of the femoral head when the disease healed. METHODS: DI was measured 2 years after disease onset and the Sphericity Deviation Score (SDS) was measured at healing of LCPD on radiographs of 43 children. Reproducibility of measurement was tested. Each healed femoral head was classified as spherical or aspherical based on subjective visual assessment. The DI values were compared with SDS values. RESULTS: The reproducibility of measurement of SDS was excellent and superior to that of DI. The mean duration of disease was 3.97±0.96 years. Only 17 of 32 hips with DI values <0.3 at 2 years had spherical femoral heads at healing (SDS <10). Three hips with SDS values <10 had DI values >0.3. The positive and negative predictive values of a DI <0.3 in predicting if the femoral head will be spherical (SDS <10) when the disease healed were 53% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Though DI can be reproducibly measured the predictive value of a DI <0.3, to accurately identify hips that are likely to heal with spherical femoral heads, is not sufficiently high to justify its use as an outcome measure.

Impact of growth friendly interventions on spine and pulmonary outcomes of patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

PURPOSE: Patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are often treated with growth friendly devices such as vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib(VEPTR) and magnetically controlled growing rods(MCGR) to correct spinal deformity and improve pulmonary function. There is limited data on this topic, and the purpose of this study was to assess the effect of these constructs and the addition of chest wall support (CWS) on spinal deformity, thorax morphology and pulmonary outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients with chest wall deformity and scoliosis secondary to SMA who were treated with growth friendly interventions and had two-year follow-up. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: This study included 66 patients (25% MCGR, 73% VEPTR, 2% unknown). Approximately 23% of constructs included CWS. The average Cobb angle improved from 67° (SD: 27°) to 50° (SD: 26°) at 2 years in patients with CWS (p = 0.02), and from 59° (SD: 20°) to 46° (SD: 15°) at 2 years in patients without CWS (p < 0.01). Hemithorax height improved in patients treated with and without CWS (p = 0.01), but hemithorax width only improved in patients with CWS (p = 0.01). One patient with CWS and two patients without CWS required additional respiratory support at 2 years. The rates of postoperative complications were not significantly different in patients treated with and without CWS (p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Growth friendly constructs improve spinal deformity and may be effective in altering the progression toward respiratory failure in patients with SMA. Patients treated with CWS have significant improvements in thorax morphology compared to patients without CWS.

Venous Thromboembolism After Pelvic Osteotomy in Adolescent Patients: A Database Study Characterizing Rates and Current Practices.

BACKGROUND: Current risks and practices in medical prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major elective lower extremity surgeries such as pelvic osteotomies have not been well-defined in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate population rates of VTE in adolescents undergoing pelvic osteotomies, and (2) characterize current practices on types of VTE prophylaxis being utilized after pelvic osteotomies. METHODS: The study evaluated the Pediatric Health Information System database between October 1, 2015 and January 1, 2020 for patients between 10 and 18 years of age meeting selected ICD-10 procedure and diagnosis codes relating to pelvic osteotomies. The rate of VTE was calculated within 90 days of index procedure. Types of pharmacologic prophylaxis were characterized. Continuous variables were compared with 2-sample t tests; proportions and categorical variables were compared with Fisher exact or χ2 tests, all with 2-tailed significance <0.05. RESULTS: Of 1480 included patients, 9 were diagnosed with VTE within 90 days of surgery (VTE rate: 0.61%). Four of 9 (44.4%) had received pharmacologic prophylaxis postoperatively. There were no differences in baseline demographics or length of stay between patients that did or did not develop VTE (P>0.05). Overall, 52.0% received at least one form of pharmacologic prophylaxis postoperatively. The most common pharmacologic prophylaxis used was aspirin (47.6%), of which 64.4% received 81 mg dosing. There was no difference in VTE rates in those with or without prophylaxis (0.52% vs. 0.70%, P=0.75). However, those prescribed prophylaxis were significantly older (15.2±2.3 vs. 13.6±2.4 y, P<0.0001) and had a higher proportion of females (71.8% vs. 54.6%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of VTE in pediatric patients after pelvic osteotomies is non-negligible. There is heterogeneity in the type of anticoagulant utilized; however, VTE prophylaxis is most commonly prescribed in older adolescents and female patients. Guidelines for medical prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the pediatric population are warranted after hip preservation surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Part-time Abduction Bracing in Infants With Residual Acetabular Dysplasia: Does Compliance Monitoring Support a Dose-dependent Relationship?

INTRODUCTION: Residual acetabular dysplasia is often seen after successful Pavlik treatment or during follow-up for infants with risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. A previous study supported the effectiveness of part-time abduction bracing for treating this residual dysplasia. However, the relationship between time in the brace and acetabular improvement was not established given the lack of compliance data. The purpose of this prospective study was to validate the effect of part-time bracing on acetabular dysplasia and determine if a dose-dependent relationship exists. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included infants ~6 months of age with an AP pelvic radiograph demonstrating acetabular dysplasia, defined as an acetabular index (AI) ≥30 degrees. After obtaining informed consent, a rigid abduction orthosis was prescribed with a thermal compliance sensor. Patients were instructed to wear the brace for nights/naps and follow-up at 1 year of age for repeat radiograph. AIs were measured by the senior author who was blinded to the compliance data. Hours of wear were compared with changes in AI over the study period using descriptive statistics and a generalized estimating equation model. RESULTS: Our series consisted of 26 infants (36 hips) with a mean age at enrollment of 5.9 months (range, 4.9 to 7.9); 84.6% were female individuals. At a mean follow-up of 6 months (range, 5.1 to 8.2), average wear time/day was 11.5 hours (range, 1.3 to 21.7), and total time in brace averaged 1698 hours (range, 218 to 3244 hours). The mean improvement in AI over the study period was 4.8 degrees (95% confidence interval, 3.9-5.5 degrees). The authors found a significant correlation between average hours of brace wear per day and improvement in AI (r=0.36, P<0.05), a relationship that remained significant in our multivariate model after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Part-time abduction bracing is effective for treating residual dysplasia, with the degree of improvement in AI correlating with hours of brace wear per day. Given this dose-dependent relationship, the optimal hours of wear may depend on the severity of residual dysplasia and the tolerance of the child and family to bracing.

Opioid Prescriptions After Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery: Analyzing Rates of Unfilled Prescriptions.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of nonmedical use of prescription opioids among American teenagers is staggering. Reducing the quantity of postoperative opioid prescriptions can help address this epidemic by decreasing the availability of opioids. As the fourth most common opioid prescribers, orthopaedic surgeons are primed to lead efforts to reverse this crisis. The purpose of this study was to determine patient factors associated with filling opioid prescriptions after pediatric orthopaedic surgery and to recommend potential methods to limit excess opioid prescriptions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1413 patients who were prescribed opioids upon discharge after an orthopaedic surgical procedure at a single urban children's hospital from 2017 to 2018. The state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program was used to determine which patients filled their opioid prescriptions. Comparisons of demographic, clinical, and surgical factors were made between patients that filled their opioid prescription upon discharge and those that did not. Statistical analysis included λ2, Mann-Whitney U, and binary logistic regression for significant factors from bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Nine percent (n=127) of patients did not fill their opioid prescriptions after discharge. Those who filled and did not fill prescriptions were similar in terms of sex, ethnicity, race, insurance type, and age at surgery (P>0.05). Patients who did not fill their opioid prescriptions received significantly fewer opioids during their postoperative hospital course (5.3 vs. 7.7 mg oxycodone, P=0.01). Not receiving oral oxycodone during postoperative hospitalization (odds ratio=2.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.49-3.14) and undergoing upper extremity surgery (odds ratio=2.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.37-2.91) were independently associated with not filling opioid prescriptions after surgery in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a subset of pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients who were prescribed opioids upon discharge but did not fill those prescriptions. Factors that increased the likelihood that patients did not fill their prescriptions upon discharge included fewer postoperative hospital course opioids, no oral oxycodone, and surgery on the upper extremity. Future studies must be performed to help decrease the number of opioids prescribed unnecessarily. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic cohort study.

Refilling Opioid Prescriptions After Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Understanding which pediatric patients seek opioid refills is crucial as prescription opioid use in childhood is associated with an increased risk of future opioid misuse. Orthopaedic surgeons are optimally positioned to lead the charge in addressing the opioid epidemic. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of and risk factors associated with requiring opioid refills after pediatric orthopaedic surgery in children. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 1413 patients aged 0 to 18 years that underwent orthopaedic surgery at a single tertiary care children's hospital and were prescribed opioids at discharge. Using the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database, we determined which patients filled additional opioid prescriptions within 6 months following an orthopaedic procedure. Comparisons were made between patients that sought additional opioids and those that did not use bivariate analysis and binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 31 (2.2%) patients sought additional opioid prescriptions a median 41 days postoperatively (range, 2 to 184). Nearly half of these patients obtained refills from providers outside of our institution, suggesting that previous reports using hospital records may underestimate its prevalence. Factors associated with requiring opioid refills included receiving hydromorphone [odds ratio (OR)=3.04, P=0.04] or methadone (OR=38.14, P<0.01) while inpatient, surgery on the axial skeleton (OR=5.42, P=0.01) or lower extremity (OR=2.49, P=0.04), and nonfracture surgery (OR=3.27, P=0.01). Patients who obtained additional opioids received significantly more opioids during their inpatient recovery (32.9 vs. 11.1 morphine equivalents, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 2% of children and families obtain additional opioids within 6 months of orthopaedic surgery. The volume of opioids during inpatient hospitalization may predict the need for opioid prescription refills after discharge. Clinicians should maximize efforts to achieve pain control with multimodal analgesia and opioid alternatives, and use caution when administering high-dose opioids during postoperative hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

Outcomes After Surgical Fixation of Posterior Sternoclavicular Physeal Fractures and Dislocations in Children.

BACKGROUND: Acute sternoclavicular fractures and dislocations (SCFDs) are a rare but important injury in pediatric patients. SCFDs are either true dislocations, or more commonly, physeal fractures in children. The reduction is advised given the proximity to surrounding vascular structures, and some authors advocate for routine fixation given rates of redisplacement after closed reduction. The purpose of the current study was to provide validated long-term functional outcome data following open reduction and surgical fixation of pediatric SCFDs, as well as provide injury and demographic information. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study with a subset of patients reporting functional outcomes. Patients under the age of 18 that had surgically managed acute posterior SCFD from 1990 to 2018 were included. A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain demographic, clinical, and surgical details. Patients with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were contacted to assess outcomes. Functional outcomes of interest included QuickDash, Visual Analog Scale pain rating, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation of shoulder function, and PROMIS Upper Extremity questionnaire. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients that sustained an acute posterior SCFD during the study period were included. The average age at the time of injury was 15.2±2.1 years and 89% were male. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained for 14 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. The mean QuickDash score was 5.1/100 with 0 being normal, and the mean Visual Analog Scale pain rating was 0.7/10. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 96% with 100% being completely normal. The mean PROMIS score was 55 with 50 being the mean of the relevant reference population. Approximately 29% (4/14 patients) stated that their injury negatively affected their ability to participate in sports. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature on functional outcomes after surgical management of pediatric acute posterior SCFD. Functional outcomes after surgery were satisfactory in this cohort with most patients being able to perform major activities of daily living. Additional future studies with larger cohorts and comparative groups are needed to better understand outcomes in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Predictors of patient satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to determine patient satisfaction and to identify predictors of satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We hypothesized that the majority of patients would be satisfied after RSA and that patients with worse preoperative mental and physical health would be less satisfied. METHODS: Satisfaction was assessed 2 years after primary RSA with domains for pain, work, activities, quality of life, and overall satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported factors were measured using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Shoulder Activity Scale score, Short Form 12 (SF-12) mental and physical component summary scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain, fatigue, and general health scores. Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between patient-reported factors and satisfaction. Multivariate regression was performed to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were evaluated at 2 years postoperatively. Patients were "very satisfied" in an average of 3.3 of the 5 domains. Improvements in ASES, Shoulder Activity Scale, VAS pain, and SF-12 physical component summary scores were associated with higher satisfaction, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.27 to 0.49. On multivariate analysis, patients with higher preoperative ASES scores were less satisfied after surgery (P = .005). In addition, patients with worse VAS fatigue (P = .011) and SF-12 mental (P = .034) and physical (0.011) component summary scores preoperatively had lower satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Improvements in pain and outcome scores are associated with increased satisfaction. Patients with higher shoulder function, worse physical health, and worse mental health prior to surgery are more likely to have lower satisfaction after RSA.

Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Weighing ≥40 kg: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric femur fractures are commonly treated with flexible intramedullary nails (FIN). However, there is controversy regarding the effect of patient weight on outcomes and complications. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to review the literature and describe implant choice, analyze complication, and reoperation rates; as well as the report clinical and radiographic outcomes of FIN in pediatric patients weighing ≥40 kg with femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of all retrospective and prospective studies focusing on the use of FIN in heavy children in Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Data extraction was performed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed for complications using pooled data from included studies. RESULTS: The initial search strategy yielded 177 references, and after exclusions, 5 studies were included. The majority of studies were retrospective, and the most commonly used implants in heavier patients were titanium FIN and stainless steel Enders FIN. There were higher rates of radiographic nonunion and malunion, complications, and reoperations for refracture; and nonunion in heavier children treated with FIN. Meta-analysis performed on 4 applicable studies showed the overall complication rate was higher in the heavier patients compared with lighter patients (30.6% vs. 11.1%) with a relative risk of 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.41]. Heavier patients also had higher rates of major complications (relative risk, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03-1.69) but similar minor complications (relative risk, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Heavier children have worse radiographic outcomes and higher complication rates with the use of FIN for femoral shaft fractures. Additional research is needed to determine the effect of FIN material on clinical outcomes in heavier children, and the relationship between weight and other known risk factors for poor outcome in FIN, such as length stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-systematic review of level-III studies.

Risk Factors for Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Meta-analysis of Cohort and Case-control Studies.

BACKGROUND: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is an important cause of hip pain and disability in pediatric patients. SCFE occurs bilaterally in 12% to 80% of cases, and the risk of contralateral SCFE is noted to be 2335 times higher than the index SCFE. Several studies have reported risk factors for contralateral SCFE; however, these studies have not been systematically analyzed. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review and analyze risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE and identify the strongest risk factors for a subsequent slip. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of all observational studies focusing on risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE indexed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Data extraction was performed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Meta-analysis was performed for risk factors with sufficient constituent study data. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and funnel plots were generated to assess publication bias. RESULTS: The initial search strategy identified 226 references, and after exclusions, 20 studies were included in this analysis. Demographic risk factors included age, sex, weight, body mass index, ethnicity, and urban/rural residence; clinical risk factors included endocrine abnormality, duration of symptoms, slip stability, and slip chronicity; and radiographic risk factors included slip angle, triradiate cartilage, alpha angle, posterior sloping angle (PSA), physeal sloping angle, modified Oxford score, and bone age. Younger patient age, body mass index≥95th percentile, presence of an endocrine abnormality, higher PSA of the unaffected hip, and lower modified Oxford score have been noted to be significant risk factors for contralateral SCFE. Meta-analysis showed that younger age (-0.9; confidence interval, -1.1, -0.6), and higher PSA (4.7 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-6.2 degrees) of the unaffected hip were predictive of subsequent contralateral SCFE. The majority of studies were of good quality. CONCLUSION: There are several risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE. On the basis of the available data, younger patients with a high PSA of the unaffected hip would most likely benefit from prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.