Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 57(1): 10-30, 2023 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36504227

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated condition causing esophageal symptoms, particularly dysphagia. Despite the important progress in the treatment of EoE, a significant proportion of patients continue to report symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Esophageal manometry is used to assess motility and function, but is not routinely used in EoE. We aimed to systematically review and describe current literature evaluating esophageal manometry in EoE. Forty-eight studies meeting the criteria were identified, describing 802 patients. Using standard water swallow protocols, the proportion of abnormalities detected was not dissimilar to other populations, apart from disorders of esophago-gastric outflow, which were found in 5%. Twelve studies described pretreatment and posttreatment manometry, with motility normalization after pharmacological therapy reported in 20%. Early, brief panesophageal pressurization was described in a number of studies and was more prevalent in the few studies utilizing additional provocation testing. Reports in the literature regarding temporal relationships between manometric findings and symptoms are variable. Esophageal manometry may be capable of detecting clinically relevant changes to esophageal function in EoE. Possible mechanisms are altered neuromuscular function because of secretory products of EoE and/or fibroinflammatory processes, manifesting as pressurization because of altered esophageal compliance. Some changes may be reversible with therapy. Drawing strong conclusions from the literature is difficult, with bias toward case reports and retrospective observation. Adaptations to assessment protocols to include provocation testing may provide more robust evaluation and detect clinically relevant, subtle changes in esophageal function, earlier within the patient pathway.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Manometría , Cintigrafía
2.
Gut ; 71(8): 1459-1487, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606089

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE. METHODS: The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance. RESULTS: Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS: These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Gastroenterología , Adulto , Niño , Consenso , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Sociedades Médicas
3.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 38(4): 402-410, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762700

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Provocative tests have been advocated to address limitations of high-resolution manometry (HRM) with wet swallows. We describe the commonly used provocative manometric manoeuvres [rapid drink challenge (RDC), multiple rapid swallows (MRS), solid swallows and the solid test meal (STM)], compare their diagnostic yield and accuracy to wet swallows, and outline their role in directing clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: Provocative testing with RDC and STM identifies a proportion of achalasia cases missed by standard testing, and RDC can play a similar role to radiology in the evaluation of treatment response. In EGJOO, provocative testing with RDC and STM not only increase the diagnostic yield, but can also help differentiate between spurious cases and those representing true outflow obstruction likely to respond to achalasia-type therapies. MRS and STM can help determine the clinical relevance (or otherwise) of ineffective oesophageal motility, and in this setting, MRS may predict the likelihood of postfundoplication dysphagia. RDC and STM can help identify cases of postfundoplication dysphagia more likely to respond to dilatation. SUMMARY: Provocative testing has been shown to increase diagnostic yield of HRM, clarify inconclusive diagnoses, allows corroboration of dysmotility with patient symptoms and helps direct clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Acalasia del Esófago , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/terapia , Humanos , Manometría
4.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(2): 280-288, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136563

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) defined on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) poses a management dilemma given marked variability in clinical manifestations. We hypothesized that findings from provocative testing (rapid drink challenge and solid swallows) could determine the clinical relevance of EGJOO. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we included consecutive subjects between May 2016 and January 2020 with EGJOO. Standard HRM with 5-mL water swallows was followed by provocative testing. Barium esophagography findings were obtained. Cases with structural obstruction were separated from functional EGJOO, with the latter categorized as symptom-positive or symptom-negative. Only symptom-positive subjects were considered for achalasia-type therapies. Sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant EGJOO during 5-mL water swallows, provocative testing, and barium were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 121 EGJOO cases, 76% had dysphagia and 25% had holdup on barium. Ninety-seven cases (84%) were defined as functional EGJOO. Symptom-positive EGJOO subjects were more likely to demonstrate abnormal motility and pressurization patterns and to reproduce symptoms during provocative testing, but not with 5-mL water swallows. Twenty-nine (30%) functional EGJOO subjects underwent achalasia-type therapy, with symptomatic response in 26 (90%). Forty-eight (49%) functional EGJOO cases were managed conservatively, with symptom remission in 78%. Although specificity was similar, provocative testing demonstrated superior sensitivity in identifying treatment responders from spontaneously remitting EGJOO (85%) compared with both 5-mL water swallows (54%; P < 0.01) and barium esophagography (54%; P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Provocative testing during HRM is highly accurate in identifying clinically relevant EGJOO that benefits from therapy and should be routinely performed as part of the manometric protocol.


Asunto(s)
Deglución/fisiología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/fisiopatología , Unión Esofagogástrica/fisiopatología , Manometría , Adulto , Anciano , Compuestos de Bario , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(13): 2912-2919, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Wireless pH monitoring measures esophageal acid exposure time (AET) for up to 96 hours. We evaluated competing methods of analysis of wireless pH data. METHODS: Adult patients with persisting reflux symptoms despite acid suppression (n = 322, 48.5 ± 0.9 years, 61.7% women) from 2 tertiary centers were evaluated using symptom questionnaires and wireless pH monitoring off therapy, from November 2013 through September 2017; 30 healthy adults (control subjects; 26.9 ± 1.5 years; 60.0% women) were similarly evaluated. Concordance of daily AET (physiologic <4%, borderline 4%-6%, pathologic>6%) for 2 or more days constituted the predominant AET pattern. Each predominant pattern (physiologic, borderline, or pathologic) in relation to data from the first day, and total averaged AET, were compared with other interpretation paradigms (first 2 days, best day, or worst day) and with symptoms. RESULTS: At least 2 days of AET data were available from 96.9% of patients, 3 days from 90.7%, and 4 days from 72.7%. A higher proportion of patients had a predominant pathologic pattern (31.4%) than control subjects (11.1%; P = .03). When 3 or more days of data were available, 90.4% of patients had a predominant AET pattern; when 2 days of data were available, 64.1% had a predominant AET pattern (P < .001). Day 1 AET was discordant with the predominant pattern in 22.4% of patients and was less strongly associated with the predominant pattern compared with 48 hour AET (P = .059) or total averaged AET (P = .02). Baseline symptom burden was higher in patients with a predominant pathologic pattern compared with a predominant physiologic pattern (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The predominant AET pattern on prolonged wireless pH monitoring can identify patients at risk for reflux symptoms and provides gains over 24 hours and 48 hours recording, especially when results from the first 2 days are discordant or borderline.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Adulto , Monitorización del pH Esofágico , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Endoscopy ; 52(6): 498-515, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32375192

RESUMEN

ESGE recommends the use of a graded pneumatic dilation protocol in achalasia, starting with a 30-mm dilation and followed by a 35-mm dilation at a planned interval of 2 - 4 weeks, with a subsequent 40-mm dilation when there is insufficient relief, over both a single balloon dilation procedure or the use of a larger balloon from the outset.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends being cautious in treating spastic motility disorders other than achalasia with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).Strong recommendation, very low quality of evidence, level of agreement 87.5 %.ESGE recommends against the routine use of botulinum toxin injections to treat patients with non-achalasia hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders (Jackhammer esophagus, distal esophageal spasm). However, if, in individual patients, endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin is chosen, ESGE recommends performing injections into four quadrants of the lower esophageal sphincter and in the lower third of the esophagus.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence, level of agreement 78.6 %.ESGE recommends that endoscopic pylorus-directed therapy should be considered only in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis in combination with objective proof of delayed gastric emptying using a validated test, and only when medical therapy has failed.Strong recommendation, very low quality of evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends against the use of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of unselected patients with gastroparesis. Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence, level of agreement 92.9 %.ESGE recommends consideration of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in carefully selected patients only, because it is an emerging procedure with limited data on effectiveness, safety, and durability. G-POEM should be performed in expert centers only, preferably in the context of a clinical trial.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence, level of agreement 100 %.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Acalasia del Esófago/terapia , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior , Motilidad Gastrointestinal , Humanos
7.
Endoscopy ; 52(7): 600-614, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462649

RESUMEN

ESGE suggests flexible endoscopic treatment over open surgical treatment as first-line therapy for patients with a symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum of any size.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends that emerging treatments for Zenker's diverticulum, such as Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) and tunneling, be considered as experimental; these treatments should be offered in a research setting only.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends against the widespread clinical use of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) as an alternative to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy or antireflux surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), because of the lack of data on the long-term outcomes, the inferiority of TIF to fundoplication, and its modest efficacy in only highly selected patients. TIF may have a role for patients with mild GERD who are not willing to take PPIs or undergo antireflux surgery.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence, level of agreement 92.8 %.ESGE recommends against the use of the Medigus ultrasonic surgical endostapler (MUSE) in clinical practice because of insufficient data showing its effectiveness and safety in patients with GERD. MUSE should be used in clinical trials only.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends against the use of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) in routine clinical practice in the treatment of GERD because of the lack of data and its potential complications.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence, level of agreement 100 %.ESGE recommends endoscopic cecostomy only after conservative management with medical therapies or retrograde lavage has failed.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence, level of agreement 93.3 %.ESGE recommends fixing the cecum to the abdominal wall at three points (using T-anchors, a double-needle suturing device, or laparoscopic fixation) to prevent leaks and infectious adverse events, whatever percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy method is used.Strong recommendation, very low quality evidence, level of agreement 86.7 %.ESGE recommends considering endoscopic decompression of the colon in patients with Ogilvie's syndrome that is not improving with conservative treatment.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence, level of agreement 93.8 %.ESGE recommends prompt endoscopic decompression if the cecal diameter is > 12 cm and if the Ogilvie's syndrome exists for a duration of longer than 4 - 6 days.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence, level of agreement 87.5 %.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Fundoplicación , Motilidad Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares
8.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 22(10): 49, 2020 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767186

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the absence of mucosal or structural disease, the aim of investigating the oesophagus is to provide clinically relevant measurements of function that can explain the cause of symptoms, identify pathology and guide effective management. One of the most notable recent advances in the field of oesophageal function has been high-resolution manometry (HRM). This review explores how innovation in HRM has progressed and has far from reached a plateau. RECENT FINDINGS: HRM technology, methodology and utility continue to evolve; simple additions to the swallow protocol (e.g. eating and drinking), shifting position, targeting symptoms and adding impedance sensors to the HRM catheter have led to improved diagnoses, therapeutic decision-making and outcomes. Progress in HRM persists and shows little sign of abating. The next iteration of the Chicago Classification of motor disorders will highlight these advances and will also identify opportunities for further research and innovation.


Asunto(s)
Deglución/fisiología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/clasificación , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/fisiopatología , Manometría/métodos , Impedancia Eléctrica , Humanos , Posicionamiento del Paciente
9.
Gut ; 68(10): 1731-1750, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31366456

RESUMEN

These guidelines on oesophageal manometry and gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring supersede those produced in 2006. Since 2006 there have been significant technological advances, in particular, the development of high resolution manometry (HRM) and oesophageal impedance monitoring. The guidelines were developed by a guideline development group of patients and representatives of all the relevant professional groups using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. A systematic literature search was performed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of the recommendations made. Key strong recommendations are made regarding the benefit of: (i) HRM over standard manometry in the investigation of dysphagia and, in particular, in characterising achalasia, (ii) adjunctive testing with larger volumes of water or solids during HRM, (iii) oesophageal manometry prior to antireflux surgery, (iv) pH/impedance monitoring in patients with reflux symptoms not responding to high dose proton pump inhibitors and (v) pH monitoring in all patients with reflux symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned, but combined pH/impedance monitoring in those not responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Manometría/normas , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Reino Unido
10.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 89(2): 247-256.e4, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30291849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Seattle protocol for endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance samples a small portion of the mucosal surface area, risking a potentially high miss rate of early neoplastic lesions. We assessed whether the new iScan Optical Enhancement system (OE) improves the detection of early BE-associated neoplasia compared with high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in both expert and trainee endoscopists to target sampling of suspicious areas. Such a system may both improve early neoplasia detection and reduce the need for random biopsies. METHODS: A total of 41 patients undergoing endoscopic BE surveillance from January 2016 to November 2017 were recruited from 3 international referral centers. Matched still images in both HD-WLE (n = 130) and iScan OE (n = 132) were obtained from endoscopic examinations. Two experts, unblinded to the videos and histology, delineated known neoplasia, forming a consensus criterion standard. Seven expert and 7 trainee endoscopists marked 1 position per image where they would expect a target biopsy to identify dysplastic tissue. The same expert panel then reviewed magnification images and, using a previously validated classification system, attempted to classify mucosa as dysplastic or nondysplastic, based on the mucosal and vascular (MV) patterns observed on magnification endoscopy. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. Improvements in dysplasia detection in HD-WLE versus OE and interobserver agreement were assessed by multilevel logistic regression analysis and Krippendorff alpha, respectively. Improvements in diagnostic performance were expressed as an odds ratio between the odds of improvement in OE compared with the odds of improvement in HD-WLE. RESULTS: Accuracy of neoplasia detection was significantly higher in all trainees who used OE versus HD-WLE (76% vs 63%) and in 6 experts (84% vs 77%). OE improved sensitivity of dysplasia detection compared with HD-WLE in 6 trainees (81% vs 71%) and 5 experts (77% vs 67%). Specificity improved in 6 trainees who used OE versus HD-WLE (70% vs 55%) and in 5 experts (92% vs 86%). PPV improved in both an expert and trainee cohort, but NPV improved significantly only in trainees. By using the MV classification and OE magnification endoscopy compared with HD-WLE, we demonstrated improvements in accuracy (79.9% vs 66.7%), sensitivity (86.3% vs 83.4%), and specificity (71.2% vs 53.6%) of dysplasia detection. PPV improved (62%-76.6%), as did NPV (67.7%-78.5%). Interobserver agreement also improved by using OE from 0.30 to 0.55. CONCLUSION: iScan OE may improve dysplasia detection on endoscopic imaging of BE as well as the accuracy of histology prediction compared with HD-WLE, when OE magnification endoscopy is used in conjunction with a simple classification system by both expert and non-expert endoscopists.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Mucosa Esofágica/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Cuidados Posteriores , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Esófago de Barrett/terapia , Biopsia , Colorantes , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Imagen Óptica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Grabación en Video
12.
Endoscopy ; 49(12): 1219-1228, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28732392

RESUMEN

Background and study aims Enhanced endoscopic imaging with chromoendoscopy may improve dysplasia recognition in patients undergoing assessment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). This may reduce the need for random biopsies to detect more dysplasia. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of magnification endoscopy with I-SCAN (Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) and acetic acid (ACA) on dysplasia detection in BE using a novel mucosal and vascular classification system. Methods BE segments and suspicious lesions were recorded with high definition white-light and magnification endoscopy enhanced using all I-SCAN modes in combination. We created a novel mucosal and vascular classification system based on similar previously validated classifications for narrow-band imaging (NBI). A total of 27 videos were rated before and after ACA application. Following validation, a further 20 patients had their full endoscopies recorded and analyzed to model use of the system to detect dysplasia in a routine clinical scenario. Results The accuracy of the I-SCAN classification system for BE dysplasia improved with I-SCAN magnification from 69 % to 79 % post-ACA (P = 0.01). In the routine clinical scenario model in 20 new patients, accuracy of dysplasia detection increased from 76 % using a "pull-through" alone to 83 % when ACA and magnification endoscopy were combined (P = 0.047). Overall interobserver agreement between experts for dysplasia detection was substantial (0.69). Conclusions A new I-SCAN classification system for BE was validated against similar systems for NBI with similar outcomes. When used in combination with magnification and ACA, the classification detected BE dysplasia in clinical practice with good accuracy.Trials registered at ISRCTN (58235785).


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/clasificación , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico por imagen , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Mucosa Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Ácido Acético , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Mucosa Esofágica/irrigación sanguínea , Mucosa Esofágica/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Masculino , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 19(8): 40, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28730506

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to discuss the putative relationship between hiatus hernia and dysphagia. RECENT FINDINGS: Proposed mechanisms of dysphagia in patients with hiatus hernia are usually difficult to identify, but recent advances in technology (high-resolution manometry with or without concomitant impedance, ambulatory pH with impedance, videofluoroscopy, and the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP)) and methodology (inclusion of swallows of various consistencies and volumes or shifting position during the manometry protocol) can help induce symptoms and identify the underlying disorder. Chronic reflux disease is often associated with hiatus hernia and is the most common underlying etiology. Dysmotility because of impaired contractility and vigor can occur as a consequence of repeated acid exposure from the acid pocket within the hernia, and the resultant poor clearance subsequently worsens this insult. As such, dysphagia appears to be more common with increasing hiatus hernia size. Furthermore, mucosal inflammation can lead to fibrotic stricture formation and in turn obstruction. On the other hand, there appears to be a difference in the pathophysiology of smaller sliding hernias, in that those with dysphagia are more likely to have extrinsic compression at the crural diaphragm as compared to those with reflux symptoms only. Sliding hiatus hernia, especially when small, does not commonly lead to dysmotility and dysphagia; however, in those patients with symptoms, the underlying etiology can be sought with new technologies and, in particular, the reproduction of normal eating and drinking during testing.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Humanos , Manometría
14.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 19(6): 27, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28429200

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to shed light on subtleties of achalasia diagnosis, including potential pitfalls that may lead to errors. Optimal methods for assessment of disease severity and the relationship between achalasia and other motility disorders will also be reviewed with an emphasis on recent findings from the literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Adjunctive testing with viscous substances or larger water volumes should be used routinely as it improves the accuracy of achalasia diagnosis. Chronic opiate use can mimic achalasia. The timed barium swallow remains the best test for assessments of disease severity and prognostication, but the functional lumen-imaging probe, a newer tool which measures esophagogastric junction distensibility using impedance planimetry, is emerging as a potentially more powerful tool for these purposes. Functional esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction is possibly part of the achalasia spectrum. By addressing the potential pitfalls described, and through routine and standardized use of the diagnostic tools mentioned herein, the accuracy of diagnosis, severity assessment, and prognostication of achalasia can be improved.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Bario/administración & dosificación , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Impedancia Eléctrica , Unión Esofagogástrica , Humanos , Manometría , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 13(9): 1575-83, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25956839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of patients with dysphagia, regurgitation, and related symptoms after antireflux surgery is challenging. This prospective, case-control study tested the hypothesis that compared with standard high-resolution manometry (HRM) with single water swallows (SWS), adding multiple water swallows (MWS) and a solid test meal increases diagnostic yield and clinical impact of physiological investigations. METHODS: Fifty-seven symptomatic and 12 asymptomatic patients underwent HRM with SWS, MWS, and a solid test meal. Dysphagia and reflux were assessed by validated questionnaires. Diagnostic yield of standard and full HRM studies with 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring was compared. Pneumatic dilatation was performed for outlet obstruction on HRM studies. Clinical outcome was assessed by questionnaires and an analogue scale with "satisfactory" defined as at least 40% symptom improvement requiring no further treatment. RESULTS: Postoperative esophagogastric junction pressure was similar in all groups. Abnormal esophagogastric junction morphology (double high pressure band) was more common in symptomatic than in control patients (13 of 57 vs 0 of 12, P = .004). Diagnostic yield of HRM was 11 (19%), 11 (19%), and 33 of 57 (58%), with SWS, MWS, and solids, respectively (P < .001); it was greatest for solids in patients with dysphagia (19 of 27, 70%). Outlet obstruction was present in 4 (7%), 11 (19%), and 15 of 57 patients (26%) with SWS, MWS, and solids, respectively (P < .009). No asymptomatic control had clinically relevant dysfunction on solid swallows. Dilatation was performed in 12 of 15 patients with outlet obstruction during the test meal. Symptom response was satisfactory, good, or excellent in 7 of 12 (58%) with no serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MWS and a solid test meal increases the diagnostic yield of HRM studies in patients with symptoms after fundoplication and identifies additional patients with outlet obstruction who benefit from endoscopic dilatation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Manometría/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Endoscopy ; 47(11): 980-7, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26126159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Mucosal neoplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus can be successfully treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC) at baseline from the United Kingdom RFA registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prior to RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were removed entirely by EMR. Thereafter, patients underwent RFA every 3 months until all visible Barrett's mucosa was ablated or cancer developed (end points). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when end points were reached. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients, 384 with HGD and 131 with IMC, completed treatment. Prior to RFA, EMR was performed for visible lesions more frequently in the IMC cohort than in HGD patients (77 % vs. 47 %; P < 0.0001). The 12-month complete response for dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were almost identical in the two cohorts (HGD 88 % and 76 %, respectively; IMC 87 % and 75 %, respectively; P = 0.7). Progression to invasive cancer was not significantly different at 12 months (HGD 1.8 %, IMC 3.8 %; P = 0.19). A trend towards slightly worse medium-term durability may be emerging in IMC patients (P = 0.08). In IMC, EMR followed by RFA was definitely associated with superior durability compared with RFA alone (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Registry reports on endoscopic therapy for Barrett's neoplasia, representing real-life outcomes. Patients with IMC were more likely to have visible lesions requiring initial EMR than those with HGD, and may carry a higher risk of cancer progression in the medium term. The data consolidate the approach to ensuring that these patients undergo thorough endoscopic work-up, including EMR prior to RFA when necessary.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esófago/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Membrana Mucosa/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
19.
Postgrad Med J ; 90(1063): 273-81, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24664254

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is an immune/antigen mediated, chronic, relapsing disease characterised by dysphagia, food bolus impaction and a dense oesophageal eosinophilic infiltrate. Characteristic endoscopic features include corrugated rings, linear furrows and white exudates, but none are diagnostic. Despite its increasing prevalence, EO remains underdiagnosed. There is a strong association with other atopic conditions. Symptoms, histology and endoscopic findings can overlap with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Currently endoscopy and oesophageal biopsies are the investigation of choice. Oesophageal physiology studies, endoscopic ultrasound, impedance planimetry and serology may have a role in the diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy. Acid reducing medication is advocated as first line or adjuvant therapy. Dietary therapy is comprised of elimination diets or can be guided by allergen assessment. In adults, topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy. Endoscopic dilatation is safe and effective for the treatment of non-responsive strictures. Other therapeutic options (immunomodulators, biological agents, leukotriene receptor antagonists) are under investigation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/patología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/patología , Esofagoscopía , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Biopsia , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Ciclopropanos , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/inmunología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/inmunología , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Sulfuros
20.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 24(1): 100010, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38359665

RESUMEN

A woman in her early 60s was referred with dysphagia and chest pain to a tertiary referral centre specialising in oesophageal disorders. Cardiac symptom origin and sinister oesophageal pathology had been excluded at her local hospital in NHS Scotland. Under multidisciplinary team oversight, reinvestigation of mucosal pathology and oesophageal motility ultimately uncovered both Type III achalasia and eosinophilic oesophagitis. This case demonstrates the benefit of including provocative testing during high-resolution manometry to reproduce relevant dysphagia and the importance of stopping proton-pump inhibitors long enough to uncover excessive eosinophils which could otherwise be masked. Ultimately, tailored management for both conditions separately was required to achieve symptoms resolution.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/patología , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Eosinófilos/patología , Manometría/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA