A score for predicting colchicine resistance at the time of diagnosis in familial Mediterranean fever: data from the TURPAID registry.

OBJECTIVES: Colchicine forms the mainstay of treatment in FMF. Approximately 5-10% of FMF patients are colchicine resistant and require anti-IL-1 drugs. We aimed to compare the characteristics of colchicine-resistant and colchicine-responsive patients and to develop a score for predicting colchicine resistance at the time of FMF diagnosis. METHODS: FMF patients (0-18 years) enrolled in the Turkish Paediatric Autoinflammatory Diseases (TURPAID) registry were included. The predictive score for colchicine resistance was developed by using univariate/multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses. RESULTS: A total of 3445 FMF patients [256 (7.4%) colchicine-resistant and 3189 colchicine-responsive) were included (female:male ratio 1.02; median age at diagnosis 67.4 months). Colchicine-resistant patients had longer, more frequent attacks and were younger at symptom onset and diagnosis (P < 0.05). Fever, erysipelas-like erythema, arthralgia, arthritis, myalgia, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, chest pain, comorbidities, parental consanguinity and homozygosity/compound heterozygosity for exon 10 MEFV mutations were significantly more prevalent among colchicine-resistant than colchicine-responsive patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training cohort (n = 2684) showed that age at symptom onset, attack frequency, arthritis, chest pain and having two exon 10 mutations were the strongest predictors of colchicine resistance. The score including these items had a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 49.1%. In the validation cohort (n = 671), its sensitivity was 93.5% and specificity was 53.8%. CONCLUSION: We developed a clinician-friendly and practical predictive score that could help us identify FMF patients with a greater risk of colchicine resistance and tailor disease management individually at the time of diagnosis.

Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis on anti-interleukin-1 or -6 therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anti-interleukin (IL)-1/-6 biologics on systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA)-associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients followed up with a diagnosis of sJIA-associated MAS assessed from sixteen pediatric rheumatology centers across the country. The clinical and laboratory features of MAS developing while on biological drugs were compared with those without this treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in the study. 45 of the MAS events were detected under the effect of anti-IL-1/-6 biologics, while the patients experiencing the remaining 155 events have not received biological treatment in the last three months. Platelet count [128 (72-232) vs 199 (130-371) 109/l], ferritin level on admission [1107 (676-2050) vs 2863 (1193-9562) ng/ml], C-reactive protein level [15.4 (2.9-56) vs 90 (32-160) mg/l], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [13 (3-36) vs 43.5 (13-77) mm/h] and fever duration [5 (4-7.5) vs 10 (7-14.3) days] were found lower in the group under the impact of anti-IL-1/-6 biologics. Among patients treated with biologics, 26.6% did not meet the published 2016 MAS classification criteria at presentation. The rates of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were relatively lower in the canakinumab-treated group when compared with those receiving other biologicals or to patients, not on biologicals. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-1/-6 therapies can mask the clinical and laboratory features of MAS, and proposed guidelines for MAS classification criteria may not be met.

Rhupus syndrome in children: A multi-center retrospective cohort study and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of pediatric rhupus patients including all the related series in the literature. METHODS: Thirty pediatric patients with rhupus syndrome from 12 different centers in Turkey were included in this study. The literature was also reviewed for pediatric patients with rhupus syndrome. RESULTS: The most prominent phenotype of these 30 patients was juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (60%) at the disease onset and SLE (73.3%) at the last visit. Major SLE-related organ involvements were skin (80%), hematological system (53.3%), and kidney (23.3%). Arthritis was polyarticular (73.3%), asymmetric (66.7%), and erosive (53.3%) in most patients. Hydroxychloroquine (100%), glucocorticoids (86.7%), and mycophenolate mofetil (46.7%) were mostly used for SLE, while glucocorticoids (76.6%), methotrexate (73.3%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (57.6%) were mainly preferred for JIA. Our literature search revealed 20 pediatric patients with rhupus syndrome (75% were RF positive). The most prominent phenotype was JIA (91.7%) at the disease onset and SLE (63.6%) at the last visit. Major SLE-related organ involvements were skin (66.7%), hematological system (58.3%), and kidney (58.3%). Arthritis was polyarticular (77.8%), asymmetric (63.6%), and erosive (83.3%) in most patients. Glucocorticoid (100%), hydroxychloroquine (76.9%), and azathioprine (46.2%) were mostly used for SLE, while methotrexate (76.9%) and NSAIDs (46.2%) were mainly preferred for the JIA phenotype. CONCLUSION: Our study is the largest cohort in the literature evaluating pediatric rhupus cases. Most of the pediatric patients had polyarticular, asymmetric, and erosive arthritis, as well as organ involvements associated with SLE, including the skin, hematological system, and kidney.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Juvenile Localized Scleroderma: Enhancing Objectivity in Diagnosis and Management.

BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment has historically been the primary method used for pediatric localized sclerosis (LS) diagnosis and staging, highfrequency ultrasonography (HFUS) is being investigated as a more accurate evaluation method for lesion. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess, compare dermal and subcutaneous tissue characteristics and enhance enhance lesion staging in pediatric LS patients using HFUS. METHODS: Twenty two LS patients were cross-sectionally evaluated with B-mode ultrasonography. Lesions were clinically staged, and dermal and subcutaneous tissue characteristics were compared with healthy tissue using HFUS. RESULTS: Among 55 lesions, 27 were active/new (49.1%), and 28 were atrophic/old (50.9%). Active lesions typically had increased dermal thickness in 66.6% of cases, while atrophic lesions often showed decreased dermal thickness (78.5%), with significant differences (p<0.05). Dermal echogenicity decreased in 40.7% of active lesions but remained largely unchanged in atrophic lesions (82.1%) (p<0.05). Subcutaneous tissue thickness significantly decreased in atrophic lesions (78.5%) and increased in 59.2% of active lesions, with a significant difference (p = 0.002). Subcutaneous tissue echogenicity increased in 44.4% of active lesions and remained mostly unchanged in atrophic lesions (67.8%). Importantly, a considerable proportion of lesions diagnosed as active through physical examination were actually inactive on HFUS evaluation (55.6%), while a significant portion of lesions categorized as atrophic on physical examination displayed areas of inactivity upon ultrasonographic assessment (35.7%). These findings highlight HFUS's potential as a valuable diagnostic tool and reveal discordances between clinical and HFUS staging. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography offers an objective LS lesion evaluation, especially in pediatrics.

A rare complication of IgA vasculitis: renal and intestinal ischemia successfully treated with plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: IgA vasculitis (IgAV) is a multisystemic small vessel vasculitis and is the most common vasculitis in childhood. The characteristic findings of IgAV are palpable purpuric rash, abdominal pain, arthralgia or arthritis, and hematuria. Ischemic complications are very rare in IgAV. Thrombotic complications can be observed after a COVID-19 infection. Also in the presence of familial Mediterranean fever, IgAV may have an atypical or more severe course. CASE: We present a case of IgAV complicated with renal infarction and intestinal ischemia. There was no recent or distant history of COVID-19 in the patient or family members, but the patient`s COVID-19 antibody was positive. In addition, MEFV gene analysis of the patient showed homozygous M694V mutation. The patient did not respond to enoxaparin, pulse methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), iloprost, and cyclophosphamide treatments. She was successfully treated with six sessions of plasmapheresis. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmapheresis seems to be an effective treatment option in IgAV-related ischemic findings that do not respond to intensive immunosuppressive therapy.

The assessment of autoinflammatory disease classification criteria (Eurofever/PRINTO) in a real-life cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity rates of Eurofever/PRINTO autoinflammatory recurrent fever classification criteria with real-life data in patients with an autoinflammatory disease. METHODS: A total of 119 patients were included in the study. Based on clinical symptoms, they were divided into four subgroups: cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF) using the Eurofever/PRINTO clinical classification criteria. In the last step, the patients were re-evaluated in the light of genetic results and their final diagnosis was reached. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients, including 37 CAPS, 13 TRAPS, 8 MKD, 39 SURF, 14 NLRP12-related autoinflammatory disease (NLRP12-AID), and 8 familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients were evaluated in the study. While the sensitivity of the new clinical Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 48% for CAPS, 77% for TRAPS, 87.5%for MKD, and the specificity of the clinical criteria was 86% for CAPS, 85% for TRAPS, and 60% for MKD. The sensitivity of the new mixed (genetic plus clinical variables) Eurofever/PRINTO criteria was 27% for CAPS, 61% forTRAPS, 85% for MKD, and the specificity of the mixed criteria for each group was 100%. CONCLUSION: We found the sensitivity of the Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria to be low as genotypic changes between populations cause phenotypic differences. For this reason, we think that patient-based evaluation is correct rather than standard classification criteria in real life. Key-points • In systemic autoinflammatory diseases, common variants in the populations may alter the phenotype, and making it difficult to classify some patients with the current classification criteria. • In populations with common genetic variants, the classification criteria should be modified according to the clinical phenotype.