RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Decreased apical extrusion of debris and apical one third debris have strong implications for decreased incidence of postoperative inflammation and pain. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess quantitatively the apical extrusion of debris and intracanal debris in the apical third during root canal instrumentation using hand and three different types of rotary instruments. METHODOLOGY: Sixty freshly extracted single rooted human teeth were randomly divided into four groups. Canal preparation was done using step-back with hand instrumentation, crown-down technique with respect to ProTaper and K3, and hybrid technique with LightSpeed LSX. Irrigation was done with NaOCl, EDTA, and normal saline and for final irrigation, EndoVac system was used. The apically extruded debris was collected on the pre-weighed Millipore plastic filter disk and weighed using microbalance. The teeth were submitted to the histological processing. Sections from the apical third were analyzed by a trinocular research microscope that was coupled to a computer where the images were captured and analyzed using image proplus V4.1.0.0 software. The mean weight of extruded debris for each group and intracanal debris in the root canal was statistically analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The result showed that, hand instrumentation using K files showed the highest amount of debris extrusion apically when compared to ProTaper, K3 and LightSpeed LSX. The result also showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in relation to presence of intracanal debris in the apical one third. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, all instrumentation techniques produced debris extrusion. The engine driven Ni-Ti systems extruded significantly less apical debris than hand instrumentation. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in relation to presence of intracanal debris in the apical one third.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Microleakage continues to be a main reason for failure of root canal treatment where the challenge has been to achieve an adequate seal between the internal structure and the main obturating material. The objective of this study is to compare the sealing ability of 3 newer obturating materials GuttaFlow, Resilon/Epiphany system (RES) and Thermafil, using silver nitrate dye and observing under stereomicroscope. METHODOLOGY: Thirty single rooted teeth were divided into following groups. Group I : GuttaFlow ;Group II : Resilon /Epiphany sealer Group III : Thermafil with AH-Plus sealer. Teeth were decoronated and instrumented with profile rotary system and obturated with specified materials. Apical seal was determined by dye penetration method using silver nitrate. Then the specimens were transversely sectioned at each mm till 3 mm from the apex. Dye leakage was determined using stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using Kruskall-Wallis test. RESULTS: The results showed that Group II i.e., Resilon with Epiphany sealer showed the least amount of microleakage when compared to Group I i.e., GuttaFlow and Group III i.e., Thermafil with AH-plus sealer. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that RES had higher sealing ability followed by Thermafil and GuttaFlow in vitro but further studies have to be carried out to make a direct correlation between these results and invivo situation. How to cite this article: Bhandi S H, Subhash T S. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Newer Root Canal Obturating Materials Guttaflow, Resilon and Thermafil: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(1):54-65.