RESUMEN
AIM: To clarify the diagnostic process of the causative disease of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in Japan according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics AUB diagnostic system. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AUB were included in a nationwide survey of AUB conducted during any 2-week period between December 2019 and January 2020. The second survey included information on patient background, AUB symptoms, examinations for diagnosing AUB, the order in which they were performed, and the causative diseases of AUB. RESULTS: Correspondence analysis showed an association between hormonal testing, hysterosalpingography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with amenorrhea, and heavy menstrual bleeding was strongly correlated with various examinations, such as coagulation tests, pelvic MRI, and endometrial cytology or biopsy. The results also indicated that each AUB causative disease can be diagnosed based on a specific examination profile. CONCLUSION: We clarified the process of diagnosing the causative disease of AUB in our country and determined that it was mainly diagnosed by imaging and pathological examination in cases of structural disease. The high rate of AUB-E and the low rate of AUB-C are possibly associated with specific examination trends in Japan. The results of this study will be useful for the development of a standard protocol for AUB diagnosis in our country.
RESUMEN
Fertility preservation such as sperm and oocyte cryopreservation are not covered by public medical insurance, and the financial burden on patients and their families has been a problem. Various public subsidy programs have been implemented at the local government level, and in April 2021, the Research Promotion of Fertility Preservation for Childhood and AYA Generation Cancer Patients was launched. This project provides uniform national public subsidies for various types of fertility preservation, but it is important to note that it is positioned as a research promotion project to establish evidence for fertility preservation, rather than a subsidy for therapies with established efficacy. Therefore, hospital and clinics that provide fertility preservation must participate in a oncofertility network of each prefecture and obtain institutional accreditation, as well as follow up patients over the long term and keep information on prognosis, pregnancy, and childbearing registered in the Japan Oncofertility Registry(JOFR). For this purpose, the understanding and cooperation of not only facilities that provide fertility preservation, but also cancer treatment facilities, patients, and their families are essential, and the expansion of systems and projects for this purpose is currently under consideration.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Masculino , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Niño , Japón , Semen , Hospitales , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most cases of traumatic injury during pregnancy involve blunt trauma, with penetrating trauma being uncommonly rare. In glass shard injuries, fragments often penetrate deeply, and multiple injuries may occur simultaneously; attention must be paid to the possibility of organ injury from the residual fragments. However, no case of this occurring during pregnancy has been reported yet. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 34-year-old pregnant Cameroonian woman who retained intraabdominal glass shards following a penetrating injury at 13 weeks gestation and not diagnosed until 22 weeks gestation. Notably, this patient continued the pregnancy without complications and gave birth via cesarean section at 36 weeks gestation. CONCLUSION: In pregnant women sustaining a penetrating glass trauma during pregnancy, careful attention should be paid to the fragments; in that case, computed tomography is a useful modality for accurately visualizing any remaining fragments in the body. Essentially, the foreign bodies in glass shard injuries during pregnancy should be removed immediately, but conservative management for term delivery is an important choice for patients at risk for preterm delivery.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Heridas Penetrantes , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Cesárea , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico por imagen , Mujeres Embarazadas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Although dietary potassium restriction is an acceptable approach to hyperkalemia prevention, it may be insufficient for outpatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Most outpatients with CKD use community pharmacies owing to the free access scheme in Japan. The MieYaku-CKD project included a community pharmacist-led nutritional intervention for dietary potassium restriction, with the goal of determining its efficacy for patients' awareness of potassium restriction and serum potassium levels in outpatients with CKD. This was a five-community pharmacy multicenter prospective cohort study with an open-label, before-and-after comparison design. Eligible patients (n = 25) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 received nutritional guidance from community pharmacists. The primary outcome was a change in serum potassium levels at 12 weeks post-intervention. The eligible patients' knowledge, awareness, and implementation of potassium restriction were evaluated using a questionnaire. The median value of serum potassium was significantly reduced from 4.7 mEq/L before to 4.4 mEq/L after the intervention [p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.156-0.500], with no changes in eGFR (p = 0.563, 95% CI: -2.427-2.555) and blood urine nitrogen/serum creatinine ratio (p = 0.904, 95% CI: -1.793-1.214). The value of serum potassium had a tendency of attenuation from 5.3 to 4.6 mEq/L (p = 0.046, 95% CI: 0.272-1.114) in the eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 group. A questionnaire revealed that after the intervention, knowledge and attitudes regarding dietary potassium restriction were much greater than before, suggesting that the decrease in serum potassium levels may be related to this nutritional guidance. Our findings indicate that implementing a dietary potassium restriction guidance program in community pharmacies is feasible and may result in lower serum potassium levels in outpatients with CKD.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Farmacéuticos , Potasio , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/dietoterapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Potasio/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón , Hiperpotasemia/prevención & control , Hiperpotasemia/sangre , Hiperpotasemia/dietoterapia , Potasio en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although pharmacists often identify numerous clinical questions, they face several barriers, including the lack of mentors for research activities in clinical settings. Therefore, a workshop for the appropriate selection of a study design, which is a fundamental first step, may be necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a workshop on study design for hospital and community pharmacists. Moreover, the characteristics of pharmacists with little involvement in research activities were extracted using decision-tree analysis to guide the design of future workshops. METHODS: A workshop was conducted on October 1, 2023. It comprised three parts: lectures, group work, and presentations. Questionnaire-based surveys were conducted with workshop participants regarding their basic information, their background that influenced research activities, their satisfaction, and their knowledge/awareness. For the questions on knowledge/awareness, the same responses were requested before and after the workshop using a five-scale scoring system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent factors influencing research activities. Decision tree analysis was performed to extract low-effort characteristics of the research activities. RESULTS: Of the 40 workshop attendees, the overall satisfaction score for the workshop was 4.38 of 5, and the score for each question was 4 or higher. Significant increases were observed in the scores of knowledge/awareness after the workshop. Moreover, 95% of the pharmacists answered that it would be highly useful to conduct a joint workshop between hospitals and community pharmacists. Although independent influencing factors were not detected in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the decision tree analysis revealed that pharmacists who were no member of an academic society (85%, 11/13) or members without any certifications or accreditations related to pharmacy practice (80%, 4/5) were the least active in clinical research. In contrast, those belonging to academic societies and holding certifications or accreditations related to pharmacy practice frequently conducted clinical research. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that a joint workshop on study design may have the potential to change pharmacists' knowledge and awareness of research activities. Moreover, future workshops should be conducted with pharmacists who do not belong to academic societies.