Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 17(3): 551-556, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502473

RESUMEN

A 45-year-old man who was regularly followed up for Crohn's disease (CD) and maintained clinical remission with vedolizumab (VDZ). At 37 years old, he was diagnosed CD from longitudinal ulcers in the distal ileum by balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE). During the follow-up, liver enzyme elevation, splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia were in progress. Esophagogastric varices suggested chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) showed liver stiffness of 3.4 kPa and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of 1.86%. He was diagnosed with granulomatous hepatitis based on a liver biopsy. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was mildly elevated at 7 mmHg, consistent with the pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension due to granulomatous hepatitis. We report a rare case with granulomatous hepatitis diagnosed from liver injury and portal hypertension, despite the stable intestinal symptoms of CD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Granuloma , Hipertensión Portal , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Granuloma/etiología , Granuloma/patología , Hepatitis/etiología
2.
Intest Res ; 22(3): 369-377, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Although, a series of reports with real-world evidence of its short-term efficacy and safety profiles have already been published, reports of long-term real-world data have been limited. We aimed to show our 3-year evidence on the clinical use of tofacitinib for the treatment of UC, focusing on its efficacy and safety profiles. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who started tofacitinib for active refractory UC at our hospital. The primary outcome was the retention rate until 156 weeks after initiating tofacitinib. The secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; long-term efficacy at 52, 104, and 156 weeks; prognostic factors related to the cumulative retention rate; loss of response; and safety profile, including adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-six patients who were able to be monitored for up to 156 weeks after tofacitinib initiation, were enrolled in this study. Continuation of tofacitinib was possible until 156 weeks in 54.3%, with > 50% response rates and > 40% remission rates. Among patients in whom response or remission was achieved and tofacitinib was deescalated after 8 weeks of induction treatment, 54.3% experienced relapse but were successfully rescued by and retained on reinduction treatment, except for 1 patient. No serious AEs were observed in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib is effective and safe as long-term treatment in a refractory cohort of UC patients in real-world clinical practice.

3.
Inflamm Intest Dis ; 9(1): 1-10, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298887

RESUMEN

Introduction: Whether white blood cell (WBC) counts are predictors for the effectiveness of thiopurine treatment in ulcerative colitis (UC) has been inconclusive in previous studies with small sample sizes. We investigated the association between WBC counts and future relapses in UC patients in a large-scale multi-center study. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled a total of 723 UC patients in remission from 33 hospitals and followed up for 3 years. Relapse was defined as a need for treatment intensification. The risk of relapse was compared among patients with the baseline WBC counts <3,000/µL (N = 31), 3,000-4,000/µL (N = 167), 4,000-5,000/µL (N = 241), and ≥5,000/µL (N = 284) using a Cox regression model analysis. Moreover, exploratory analyses were conducted to identify other factors predicting relapse. Results: During a median follow-up period of 1,095 (interquartile range, 1,032-1,119) days, relapse occurred in 17.2% (125/723). In a crude analysis, WBC counts were not associated with relapse; hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 1.50 (0.74-3.06), 1.02 (0.66-1.59), and 0.67 (0.43-1.05) in WBC <3,000/µL, 3,000-4,000/µL, and 4,000-5,000/µL groups, respectively (WBC ≥5,000/µL group, as reference). Multivariable-adjusted analyses showed similar results; HRs (95% CI) were 1.21 (0.59-2.49), 1.08 (0.69-1.69), and 0.69 (0.44-1.07), in <3,000/µL, 3,000-4,000/µL, and 4,000-5,000/µL groups, respectively. In the exploratory analyses, thiopurine use <1 year and a mean corpuscular volume <90 fL were predictors for relapse. Discussion/Conclusion: WBC counts were not predictors for future relapses in patients with UC treated with thiopurine as a maintenance therapy.

4.
J Crohns Colitis ; 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828734

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is the most popular endoscopic disease activity measure of ulcerative colitis (UC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy is expected to reduce diagnostic variability among endoscopists. However, no study has been conducted to ascertain whether AI-based MES assignments can help predict clinical relapse, nor has AI been verified to improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists. METHODS: This open-label, prospective cohort study enrolled 110 patients with UC in clinical remission. The AI algorithm was developed using 74713 images from 898 patients who underwent colonoscopy at three centers. Patients were followed up after colonoscopy for 12 months, and clinical relapse was defined as a partial Mayo score >2. A multi-video, multi-reader analysis involving 124 videos was conducted to determine whether the AI system reduced the diagnostic variability among six non-specialists. RESULTS: The clinical relapse rate for patients with AI-based MES = 1 (24.5% [12/49]) was significantly higher (log-rank test, P = 0.01) than that for patients with AI-based MES = 0 (3.2% [1/31]). Relapse occurred during the 12-month follow-up period in 16.2% (13/80) of patients with AI-based MES = 0 or 1 and 50.0% (10/20) of those with AI-based MES = 2 or 3 (log-rank test, P = 0.03). Using AI resulted in better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility than endoscopists alone. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy using the AI-based MES system can stratify the risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC and improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA