Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Circ J ; 87(5): 610-618, 2023 04 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36418111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is rare but has an extremely poor prognosis. Impella, a catheter-based heart pump, is a new therapeutic strategy, but reports regarding its health economics are lacking.Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study compared Impella treatment (Group I) with existing treatments (Group E) using medical data collected from October 2017 to September 2021, with a 1-year analysis period. Cost-effectiveness indices were life-years (LY; effect index) and medical fee amount (cost index). Results were validated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using quality-adjusted LY (QALY) and medical costs. Each group included 7 patients, and more than half (57.1%) received combined Impella plus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There was no significant difference between Groups I and E in 1-year mortality rates (28.6% vs. 57.1%, respectively) or LY (mean [±SD] 163.1±128.3 vs. 107.8±127.3 days, respectively), but mortality risk was significantly lower in Group I than Group E (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.96; P<0.05). Compared with Group E, Group I had higher total costs (9,270,597±4,121,875 vs. 6,397,466±3,801,364 JPY/year; P=0.20) and higher cost-effectiveness (32,443,987±14,742,966 vs. 92,637,756±98,225,604 JPY/LY; P=0.74), which was confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. ICER probability distribution showed 23.2% and 51.5% reductions below 5 million and 10 million JPY/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Impella treatment is more cost-effective than conventional FM treatments. Large-scale studies are needed to validate the added effects and increasing costs.


Asunto(s)
Miocarditis , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Japón/epidemiología , Miocarditis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 24(1): 135, 2023 05 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198559

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the constant need for technique improvement for ensuring correct diagnoses and precise treatment, imaging examinations that use contrast media have become unavoidable and indispensable. However, the long-term effects of contrast media on renal function remain unclear in populations with advanced renal failure. This study aimed to examine the relationship between contrast media exposure and long-term trends in renal function in patients with renal failure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with a definitive diagnosis of chronic kidney disease who visited medical institutions in Japan between April 2012 and December 2020. The cohort was divided into contrast agent therapy and non-contrast agent therapy groups. The assessment indices were the number of contrast exposures and renal function decline. Renal function decline was calculated based on observed chronic kidney disease stage trends and glomerular filtration rate correspondence tables sourced from various guidelines. A stratified analysis focusing on changes in renal function while accounting for the acceleration of chronic kidney disease progression was also performed. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient background with propensity score matching, 333 patients each were included in both groups. The observation period was 5.3 ± 2.1 and 4.9 ± 2.2 years per case in the contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced groups, respectively. The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate at the beginning of the observation period was 55.2 ± 17.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the contrast-enhanced groups (P = 0.65). Although only slightly different in both groups, the glomerular filtration rate change was 1.1 ± 3.3 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in the contrast agent therapy group and tended to be higher with contrast media exposure. Stratified analysis showed that the annual glomerular filtration rate changes in patients with more contrast media exposures and altered renal function were 7.9 ± 7.1 mL/min/1.73 m2/year and 4.7 ± 3.6 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in the contrast agent therapy and non-contrast agent therapy groups, respectively (1.69 times, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We were able to identify a clinical trend of successful measures for preventing adverse renal outcomes associated with contrast media exposure. However, increased frequency of contrast media exposure has a long-term effect on renal function in patients with altered it. Appropriate treatment choices related to contrast media may control chronic kidney disease.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riñón , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular
3.
Cancer Sci ; 113(2): 674-683, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34820994

RESUMEN

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is used as an advanced medical treatment regimen in Japan. Carbon-ion radiotherapy reportedly aids in achieving excellent treatment outcomes, despite its high medical cost. We aimed to compare CIRT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in terms of cost-effectiveness for treating clinical stage I NSCLC. Data of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with CIRT or SBRT at Gunma University between 2010 and 2015 were analyzed. The CIRT and SBRT groups included 62 and 27 patients, respectively. After propensity-score matching, both groups comprised 15 patients. Life year (LY) was used as an indicator of outcome. The CIRT technical fee was 3 140 000 JPY. There was no technical fee for the second CIRT carried out on the same organ within 2 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental LY for 5 years after treatment. Sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of LY or costs of each group on ICER. The ICERs were 7 491 017 JPY/LY and 3 708 330 JPY/LY for all patients and matched patients, respectively. Hospitalization and examination costs were significantly higher in the CIRT group, and the impact of the CIRT technical costs was smaller than other costs and LY. Carbon-ion radiotherapy is a cost-effective treatment approach. However, our findings suggest that reducing excessive costs by considering the validity and necessity of examinations and hospitalizations would make CIRT a more cost-effective approach.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Iones Pesados/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Japón , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 29(3): 1356-1369, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33462786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The procedural numbers and medical costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mainly elective PCI, have been increasing in Japan. Owing to increased interest in the appropriateness of coronary revascularization, we conducted this medical economics-based evaluation of testing and diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed patients' medical insurance data to identify stable CAD patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, coronary angiography, or fractional flow reserve. Subjects were divided into anatomical and functional evaluation groups according to the modality of testing, and background factors were matched by propensity score. The endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), life years (LYs), medical costs, and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The observations were performed for 36 months. MACE, medical costs, and CEA of the functional group in the overall category were trending to be better than the anatomical group (MACE, P = .051; medical costs: 3,105 US$ vs 4,430 US$, P = .007; CEA: 2,431 US$/LY vs 2,902 US$/LY, P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The functional evaluation approach improved long-term clinical outcomes and reduced cumulative medical costs. As a result, the modality composition of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation was demonstrated to offer superior cost-effectiveness in stable CAD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Isquemia Miocárdica , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Economía Médica , Humanos , Japón , Estudios Longitudinales , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 167, 2022 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35189825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been mainly transmitted through injection drug use, but recently, sexual transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM), which is also a major route of HIV transmission, is increasing. However, the prevalence of HIV and the incidence of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among HCV patients have been rarely reported. METHODS: Using a healthcare insurance claim data of employees and their dependents covering seven-million people in Japan, we evaluated HIV prevalence among HCV patients aged 20-59 years. Hemophilia patients were excluded. HIV and HCV were defined by registered diagnoses and receiving viral RNA testing. The time course of HCV and HIV infections was analyzed. Incidences of syphilis, amebiasis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis A, and hepatitis B were assessed. RESULTS: From April 2012 to August 2018, 6,422 HCV patients were identified. HIV prevalence was 0.48% (31/6422, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.33-0.68%). HIV was diagnosed after HCV in 3.2% (1/31), before HCV in 58.1% (18/31), and concurrently in 38.7% (12/31). Compared with HCV patients without HIV infection, HCV/HIV co-infected patients were younger (median age, 37 vs 51 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (30/31 [96.8%] vs 3059/6391 [47.9%], p < 0.001), more likely to have other STIs (38.7% [12/31] vs 0.9% [56/6391], p < 0.001), and live in Tokyo, the most populous capital city in Japan (67.7% [21/31] vs 11.6% [742/6391], p < 0.001). In Tokyo, the HIV prevalence among 20-30 s male with HCV was 18.6% (13/70; 95% CI, 10.3-29.7%). CONCLUSIONS: HIV prevalence among young male HCV patients was very high in Tokyo. HCV/HIV co-infected patients were more likely to acquire HIV before HCV, which is a known feature of MSM. They also had a higher incidence of STIs. These findings suggest that HCV might be prevalent as an STI among MSM particularly in Tokyo.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepacivirus/genética , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 15, 2021 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical costs and the burden associated with cardiovascular disease are on the rise. Therefore, to improve the overall economy and quality assessment of the healthcare system, we developed a predictive model of integrated healthcare resource consumption (Adherence Score for Healthcare Resource Outcome, ASHRO) that incorporates patient health behaviours, and examined its association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: This study used information from a large-scale database on health insurance claims, long-term care insurance, and health check-ups. Participants comprised patients who received inpatient medical care for diseases of the circulatory system (ICD-10 codes I00-I99). The predictive model used broadly defined composite adherence as the explanatory variable and medical and long-term care costs as the objective variable. Predictive models used random forest learning (AI: artificial intelligence) to adjust for predictors, and multiple regression analysis to construct ASHRO scores. The ability of discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were evaluated using the area under the curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. We compared the overall mortality of the two ASHRO 50% cut-off groups adjusted for clinical risk factors by propensity score matching over a 48-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Overall, 48,456 patients were discharged from the hospital with cardiovascular disease (mean age, 68.3 ± 9.9 years; male, 61.9%). The broad adherence score classification, adjusted as an index of the predictive model by machine learning, was an index of eight: secondary prevention, rehabilitation intensity, guidance, proportion of days covered, overlapping outpatient visits/clinical laboratory and physiological tests, medical attendance, and generic drug rate. Multiple regression analysis showed an overall coefficient of determination of 0.313 (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis with cut-off values of 50% and 25%/75% for medical and long-term care costs showed that the overall coefficient of determination was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The score of ASHRO was associated with the incidence of all deaths between the two 50% cut-off groups (2% vs. 7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ASHRO accurately predicted future integrated healthcare resource consumption and was associated with clinical outcomes. It can be a valuable tool for evaluating the economic usefulness of individual adherence behaviours and optimising clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Macrodatos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Inteligencia Artificial , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Pain Med ; 22(12): 3041-3050, 2021 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33377491

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess long-term comorbidity burden and pain management patterns among working-age patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) only without low back pain (LBP) (KOA-noLBP) and patients with KOA plus LBP (KOA+LBP) in Japan. METHODS: Retrospective claims data analyses were conducted on data from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database. Adult patients (≥40 years) with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) (January 1, 2011-December 31, 2012) and 5 years of follow-up were evaluated. The first claim with a KOA diagnosis defined the index date. Longitudinal pain management patterns were assessed in both cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 1,828 patients met study criteria (717 with KOA-noLBP; 1,111 with KOA+LBP). The mean age of patients with KOA-noLBP was 52.1 years, and that of patients with KOA+LBP was 53.1 years, with more females in the KOA+LBP cohort (49.4% vs. 55.0%). Regardless of cohort, >90% of patients received pharmacological intervention during the 5-year follow-up period. The most common regimen first received was either topical or oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A higher mean number of pharmaceutical treatments were received by patients in the KOA+LBP cohort (3.6) than by patients in the KOA-noLBP cohort (2.7) during the follow-up period. Regardless of cohort, most of the direct medical cost was derived from medication. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a greater proportion of the JMDC population of working individuals with KOA were comorbid with LBP and received pain-related treatment in the long-term perspective relative to patients with KOA without LBP. Appropriate pain management for both KOA and LBP would be key for effective resource utilization in an aging society facing socioeconomic burdens.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Orthop Sci ; 26(1): 92-102, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32122744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major cause of chronic pain with nociceptive, neuropathic or both pain components, and a leading cause of disability. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of background factors including previous use of drugs on outcomes of pharmacological therapy for CLBP in a nationwide multicenter prospective study. METHODS: The subjects were 474 patients (male: 41.9%, median age: 73.0) with CLBP. Background factors that could influence outcomes after pharmacological treatment for 6 months were examined: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of CLBP, osteoporosis, history of spinal surgery, history of malignant tumor, smoking habit, employment status (yes or no), exercise habit (frequency), number of live-in family members, having something to do for pleasure, Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale (CES-D) score, and medication at baseline. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), Short-form 8-item health survey (SF-8), and EQ-5D were used for evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Multivariate linear regression models were used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: Drugs for neuropathic pain at baseline (p < 0.001), Tramacet® at baseline (p < 0.05), weak opioids at baseline (p < 0.05), older age (p < 0.001), long disease duration (p < 0.005), history of spinal surgery (p < 0.001), and smoking habit (p < 0.001) had significant negative effects on outcomes. Employment (p < 0.05), exercise habit (p < 0.05), and CED-D at baseline (p < 0.001) had positive effects on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify significant prognostic factors for outcomes of pharmacological treatment of CLBP. The neuropathic pain component of CLBP at baseline is a major significant negative factor for most outcomes involving improved pain, activities of daily life, and quality of life. Treatment strategies developed with consideration of these factors may be advantageous for recovery from CLBP.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
9.
J Orthop Sci ; 24(5): 805-811, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31230950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a major health problem that has a substantial effect on people's quality of life and places a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. However, there has been little cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatments for it. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the pharmacological management of chronic low back pain. METHODS: A total of 474 patients received pharmacological management for chronic low back pain using four leading drugs for 6 months at 28 institutions in Japan. Outcome measures, including EQ-5D, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (BPEQ), the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes Study SF-8, and the visual analog scale, were investigated at baseline and every one month thereafter. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was calculated as drug cost over the quality-adjusted life years. An economic estimation was performed from the perspective of a public healthcare payer in Japan. Stratified analysis based on patient characteristics was also performed to explore the characteristics that affect cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICUR of pharmacological management for chronic low back pain was JPY 453,756. Stratified analysis based on patient characteristics suggested that the pharmacological treatments for patients with a history of spine surgery or cancer, low frequency of exercise, long disease period, low scores in lumbar spine dysfunction and gait disturbance of the JOA BPEQ, and low JOA score at baseline were not cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological management for chronic low back pain is cost-effective from the reference willingness to pay. Further optimization based on patient characteristics is expected to contribute to the sustainable development of a universal insurance system in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Honorarios Farmacéuticos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Anciano , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Circ J ; 82(10): 2602-2608, 2018 09 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30033948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The addition of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor to statin therapy reduces the rate of cardiovascular events. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor+statin compared with standard therapy (statin monotherapy) in the treatment of triple-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in Japan. Methods and Results: A Markov model was applied to assess the costs and benefits associated with PCSK9 inhibitor+statin over a projected 30-year period from the perspective of a public healthcare payer in Japan. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), was estimated. The effects on survival and numbers of events were based on the FOURIER trial and the CREDO Kyoto registry. The ICER of PCSK9 inhibitor+statin over standard therapy was 13.5 million (95% confidence interval 7.6-23.5 million) Japanese Yen (JPY) per QALY gained for triple-vessel CAD. The probability of the cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor+statin vs. standard therapy was 0.0008% at a cost-effectiveness threshold of 5 million JPY. In patients with poorly controlled familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with triple-vessel CAD, the ICER was 3.4 million JPY per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibitor plus statin did not show good cost-effectiveness for triple-vessel CAD; however, it showed good cost-effectiveness for patients with triple-vessel CAD and poorly controlled FH in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Value Health ; 20(3): 372-378, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In Japan, cost-effectiveness evaluation was implemented on a trial basis from fiscal year 2016. The results will be applied to the future repricing of drugs and medical devices. On the basis of a request from the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (Chuikyo), our research team drafted the official methodological guideline for trial implementation. Here, we report the process of developing and the contents of the official guideline for cost-effectiveness evaluation. METHODS: The guideline reflects discussions at the Chuikyo subcommittee (e.g., the role of quality-adjusted life-year) and incorporates our academic perspective. Team members generated research questions for each section of the guideline and discussions on these questions were carried out. A draft guideline was prepared and submitted to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and then to the subcommittee. The draft guideline was revised on the basis of the discussions at the subcommitte, if appropriate. RESULTS: Although the "public health care payer's perspective" is standard in this guideline, other perspectives can be applied as necessary depending on the objective of analysis. On the basis of the discussions at the subcommittee, quality-adjusted life-year will be used as the basic outcome. A discount rate of 2% per annum for costs and outcomes is recommended. The final guideline was officially approved by the Chuikyo general assembly in February 2016. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first officially approved guideline for the economic evaluation of drugs and medical devices in Japan. The guideline is expected to improve the quality and comparability of submitted cost-effectiveness data for decision making.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Guías como Asunto , Comités Consultivos , Equipos y Suministros/economía , Humanos , Japón , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía
14.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 27(6): 831-7, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26972615

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess cost-effectiveness of sclerotherapy for venous malformations (VMs) to improve patient quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 28 patients with symptomatic VMs who underwent sclerotherapy. EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey were used to measure health-related QOL. Questionnaires were collected before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after sclerotherapy. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using EQ-5D score as a measure of health utility. Medical costs obtained from the hospital accounting system and other costs of staff, drugs, materials, and angiographic equipment were calculated for each procedure. Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the medical cost/gain of QALYs. RESULTS: Median EQ-5D scores improved from 0.768 (range, 0.705-1) to 1 (range, 0.768-1) after 6 months (P = .023) and 1 (range, 0.768-1) after 12 months (P = .063). The gain of QALYs at 12 months was 0.043. The mean medical cost was ¥281,228 ($2,337). The pain group (baseline bodily pain scale of SF-36 score < 70) showed greater improvement in median EQ-5D score, from 0.705 (range, 0.661-0.768) to 0.768 (range, 0.705-1) after 6 months (P = .041) and 0.768 (range, 0.768-1) after 12 months (P = .049). ICER at 12 months was ¥6,600,483 ($54,840) in the overall group and decreased to ¥3,998,113 ($33,218) in the pain group, < ¥6,000,000 ($49,850), threshold for acceptance of a public health benefit in Japan, even accounting for 50% increase in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy was cost-effective for improving QOL for symptomatic VMs, especially for patients with moderate to severe pain.


Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/economía , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Escleroterapia/métodos , Venas/anomalías , Adolescente , Adulto , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
15.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 21(4): 633-641, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26667481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few reports have thus far discussed the influence of economic factors on treatment decision-making by patients. The objective of the present study was to clarify the awareness among oncologists of health economics in cancer treatment. METHODS: The present study was based on the questionnaire regarding health economics in cancer treatment carried out by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) in July 2013. The subjects were trustees registered with JSCO. The survey investigated the influence of medical expenses on patient access to and selection of medical treatment in order to clarify the primary attributes of the respondents and their awareness of economics. The study also investigated the maximum allowable public medical expenses to prolong the life expectancy of a cancer patient by 1 year and the factors that can influence treatment selection. RESULTS: The 172 respondents had completed a mean of 30.3 ± 6.2 postgraduate years, and the mean number of patients they treated annually was 1323 ± 1963. The degree of treatment accessibility among patients was perceived positively by 112 (71.3 %) and negatively by 49 (28.7 %) of the respondents, irrespective of medical expenses. Of the 172 respondents, 66 (41.0 %) believed that the maximum allowable medical expenses for cancer treatment should be ≤4 million yen/LY, with 62 (39.8 %) reporting a value of 4.01-8 million yen/LY. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that a certain range of medical expenses has come to be regarded as the standard range of medical expenses for cancer treatment among oncologists, with answers based on the premise that patients should have access to effective medical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Gastos en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Oncólogos/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Japón , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
J Artif Organs ; 19(1): 37-43, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26242357

RESUMEN

The aim of the present study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of ventricular assist devices (VAD) implantation surgery in the Japanese medical reimbursement system. The study group consisted of thirty-seven patients who had undergone VAD implantation surgery for dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 25; 67.6 %) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 4; 10.8 %), and others (n = 8; 21.6 %). Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the utility score and years of life. Medical reimbursement bills were chosen as cost indices. The observation period was the 12-month period after surgery. Then, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated according to the VAD type. In addition, the prognosis after 36 months was estimated on the basis of the results obtained using the Markov chain model. The mean preoperative INTERMACS profile score was 2.35 ± 0.77. Our results showed that the utility score, which indicates the effectiveness of VAD implantation surgery, improved by 0.279 ± 0.188 (ΔQALY, p < 0.05). The cost of VAD implantation surgery was 313,282 ± 25,275 (ΔUS$/year) on the basis of medical reimbursement bills associated with therapeutic interventions. The calculated result of CEA was 364,501 ± 190,599 (ΔUS$/QALY). The improvement in the utility score was greater for implantable versus extracorporeal VADs (0.233 ± 0.534 vs. 0.371 ± 0.238) and ICER was 303,104 (ΔUS$/ΔQALY). Furthermore, when we estimated CEA for 36 months, the expected baseline value was 102,712 (US$/QALY). Therefore, VAD implantation surgery was cost effective considering the disease specificities.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Dilatada/economía , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Corazón Auxiliar/economía , Adulto , Cardiomiopatía Dilatada/cirugía , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
17.
J Orthop Sci ; 21(3): 273-81, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The financial burden of medical insurance on the government of Japan has recently become severe, which has led to the control of outpatient orthopedic reimbursements for common procedures. On the other hand, the overall disease burden for total hip or knee arthroplasty, decompression for cervical myelopathy or lumbar spinal canal stenosis, and new surgical technologies to treat other painful conditions and the post-surgical care related to these procedures has been reduced. METHODS: Medical insurance systems in Japan are generally influenced by budget-balancing action. Consequently, the further development of interventional evaluation methods should be promoted. From the viewpoint of health economics, the value (meaning) of medical intervention can partly be explained by its cost-effectiveness. In order for appropriate medical reimbursement levels to be set for orthopedic surgery, the financial status of medical institutions needs to be concurrently reviewed. In particular, the relationship between the expense structure and medical reimbursement must be discussed to evaluate its role in community medicine system. RESULTS: Over the past 10 years, medical expenditures have increased by 9.6% in all fields, whereas the monthly medical reimbursements per patient have dropped by an average of 17.5%. Remarkably, surgery-related costs have increased by 36.5%, while other medical costs have decreased by 19.8%. There are a few reports of cost-utility analyses which investigate interventions such as total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis patients (US$ 4,600-70,500/QALY) and laminectomy for patients with spinal canal stenosis. Interventions may be an inevitable part of relative expense control under the current trend; however, there has been a slight increase in other parameters in response to changes in medical reimbursement evaluations - specifically, in the total income of medical institutions. CONCLUSIONS: If medical professionals such as orthopedic surgeons contribute to the economic value of orthopedic surgery, it is crucial to clearly establish interventions among the different performances of medical reimbursement to motivate the increased allocation of management resources. To further develop this concept, discussions between stakeholders should involve the value of medicine based on cost and benefit.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Femenino , Predicción , Gastos en Salud/normas , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
J Anesth ; 30(4): 553-61, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002511

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of pain treatments in two pain centers in Japan. METHODS: The study population comprised 91 patients receiving various treatments for chronic pain, which were divided into three categories: (1) medication, (2) medication + nerve block, and (3) other modalities (exercise and/or pain education). Pain was assessed using the Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS) score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score, and EQ-5D score. First, the reliability of the EQ-5D score first assessed by evaluating the correlation this score with those of the other pain-related evaluation instruments, and then the cost effectiveness of the pain treatments was evaluated. Evaluation of medical costs was based on data provided from the Management Services of the hospital, which in turn were based on national health scheme medical treatment fees. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) value was calculated from the EQ-5D score, converted to 12 months, and then used for cost-benefit analysis along with medical treatment fees. RESULTS: According to the recent IASP classification, more patients had chronic neuropathic pain (41) than chronic primary pain (37 patients) or chronic musculoskeletal pain (27 patients). There was a significant correlation between the EQ-5D score and the PDAS, HADS, and PCS scores, which demonstrated the reliability of the EQ-5D score. Significant improvement in the HADS, PCS, and EQ-5D scores was noted after 3 months of pain treatment. Calculation of the cost-effectiveness based on the estimated annual medical treatment cost and QALY revealed a mean value of US $45,879 ± 103,155 per QALY (median US $16,903), indicating adequate socioeconomic utility. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, the EQ-5D is reliable for evaluating chronic pain in patients. The medico-economic balance was appropriate for all treatments provided in two comprehensive pain centers in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
19.
J Orthop Sci ; 20(4): 750-60, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25963609

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain affects between 10-20 % of the population of Japan and several specific types of chronic pain have been found to be associated with worse health outcomes. The aim of the current study was to investigate the economic burden of chronic pain as well as the health status among Japanese patients. METHODS: Data from the Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a cross-sectional health survey of adults, were used (N = 30,000). Respondents with chronic pain (N = 785) were compared with respondents without chronic pain (N = 29,215) with respect to health status (using the SF-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI questionnaire), and healthcare resource use using regression modeling, controlling for demographic and health history covariates. Indirect costs were calculated using wage rates and the human capital method. RESULTS: Back pain (72.10 %) and shoulder pain/stiffness (54.90 %) were the most prevalent pain types. Adjusting for demographic and health history differences, respondents with chronic pain reported lower health status [mental component summary (MCS): 44.26 vs. 51.14; physical component summary (PCS): 44.23 vs. 47.48; both p < 0.05], greater absenteeism (4.74 vs. 2.74 %), presenteeism (30.19 vs. 15.19 %), overall work impairment (31.70 vs. 16.82 %), indirect costs (¥ 1488,385 vs. ¥ 804,634), activity impairment (33.45 vs. 17.25 %), physician visits (9.31 vs. 4.08), emergency room (ER) visits (0.19 vs. 0.08), and hospitalizations (0.71 vs. 0.34) (all p < 0.05). Nearly 60 % of respondents with chronic pain were untreated. The mean level of pain severity in the last week was 5.26 (using a 0-11 scale); being female, being elderly, having low income, and having multiple pain types were significantly associated with greater pain severity (all p < 0.05). Regular exercise was associated with lower pain severity (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that chronic pain has a significant association in an individual's health status, work productivity, daily activity impairment, healthcare resource use, and economic burden in Japan. Along with low treatment rates, a multidisciplinary approach may lead to an improved quality of life and reduce the economic burden among patients with chronic pain in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Dolor Crónico/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Internet , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
20.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 9(4): 101441, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778825

RESUMEN

Purpose: Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that results in better outcomes with fewer side effects despite its high cost. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CIRT for HCC from medical and economic perspectives by comparing CIRT and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with localized HCC who were ineligible for surgery or radiofrequency ablation. Methods and Materials: This study included 34 patients with HCC who underwent either CIRT or TACE at Gunma University between 2007 and 2016. Patient characteristics were employed to select each treatment group using the propensity score matching method. Life years were used as the outcome indicator. The CIRT technical fee was ¥3,140,000; however, a second CIRT treatment on the same organ within 2 years was performed for free. Results: Our study showed that CIRT was dominant over TACE, as the CIRT group had a higher life year (point estimate, 2.75 vs 2.41) and lower total cost (mean, ¥4,974,278 vs ¥5,284,524). We conducted a sensitivity analysis to validate the results because of the higher variance in medical costs in the TACE group, which demonstrated that CIRT maintained its cost effectiveness with a high acceptability rate. Conclusions: CIRT is a cost-effective treatment option for localized HCC cases unsuitable for surgical resection.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA