RESUMEN
We present a case of an arteriovenous fistula that developed in the early postoperative course after wedge resection of the right upper lobe. A 57-year-old man treated for acute myeloid leukemia was referred from the hematology department because of a right upper-lobe tumor. Wedge resection was performed. A recurrent tumor was visualized 3 weeks later on chest roentgenogram. Computed tomographic angiography diagnosed an arteriovenous fistula, and the patient was scheduled for redo operation. Completion upper lobectomy was performed, and the pathologic examination confirmed an iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula, which is a rare early complication.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas , Angiografía , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiología , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/cirugía , Humanos , Pulmón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía/métodosRESUMEN
The authors observed three cases of exogenous lipid pneumonia clinically suspected of lung carcinoma. Histological examination of material after thoracotomy gave the possibility of correct diagnosis. The lesions in lungs were characteristic granulomas around lipid material and with surrounding advanced fibrosis.
Asunto(s)
Granuloma/patología , Pulmón/patología , Aceites/efectos adversos , Neumonía Lipoidea/patología , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Granuloma/inducido químicamente , Granuloma/cirugía , Humanos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Lipoidea/inducido químicamente , Neumonía Lipoidea/cirugía , Radiografía Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION There are no widely accepted standards for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the relative diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EBUS -FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS -FNA), and to compare them with standard diagnostic techniques such as endobronchial biopsy (EBB), transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), and mediastinoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective randomized study including consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of stage I or II sarcoidosis. EBB, TBLB, and TBNA were performed at baseline in all patients. Subsequently, patients were randomized to group A (EBUS -FNA) or group B (EUS -FNA). Next, a crossover control test was performed: all patients with negative results in group A underwent EUS -FNA and all patients with negative results in group B underwent EBUS -FNA. If sarcoidosis was not confirmed, mediastinoscopy was performed. RESULTS We enrolled 106 patients, of whom 100 were available for the final analysis. The overall sensitivity and accuracy of standard endoscopic methods were 64% each. When analyzing each of the standard endoscopic methods separately, the diagnosis was confirmed with EBB in 12 patients (12%), with TBLB in 42 patients (42%), and with TBNA in 44 patients (44%). The sensitivity and accuracy of each endosonographic technique were significantly higher than those of EBB+TBLB+TBNA (P = 0.0112 vs P = 0.0134). CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS -FNA and EUS -FNA are significantly higher than those of standard endoscopic methods. Moreover, the sensitivity and accuracy of EUS -FNA tend to be higher than those of EBUS -FNA.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Fina/métodos , Sarcoidosis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Exactitud de los Datos , Endosonografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries are rare. AIM: To analyse the mechanism of injury, symptoms and treatment of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of hospital records of all patients treated for main airway injuries between 1990 and 2012 was performed. RESULTS: There were 24 patients, including 21 women and 3 men. Mean time between injury and initiation of treatment was 12 hours (range: 2-48). In 16 patients the injury occurred during tracheal intubation, in 1 during rigid bronchoscopy, in 1 during rigid oesophagoscopy, in 1 during mediastinoscopy and in 5 during open surgery. Mean length of airway tear was 3.8 cm (range: 1.5-8). In 1 patient there was an injury to the cervical trachea and in the remaining 23 in the thoracic part of the airway. The treatment included repair of the membranous part of the trachea performed via right thoracotomy in 10 patients (in 1 patient additionally coverage with a pedicled intercostal muscle flap was used), a self-expanding metallic stent in 1 patient, suture of the right main bronchus and the oesophagus in 1, left upper sleeve lobectomy in 1, right upper lobectomy in 1, implantation of a silicone Y stent in 3, mini-tracheostomy in 1, and conservative treatment in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intubation is the most frequent cause of iatrogenic main airway injuries. Patients with these life-threatening complications require an individualised approach and treatment in a reference centre.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sufficiently large, prospective randomized trials comparing suction drainage and nonsuction drainage are lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of suction drainage and nonsuction drainage on the postoperative course in patients who have undergone lung resection. METHODS: This prospective, randomized trial included patients undergoing different types of lung resections. On the day of surgery, suction drainage at -20 cm H2O was used. On the morning of the first postoperative day, patients, in whom the pulmonary parenchyma was fully reexpanded, were randomized in the ratio of 1:1. Patients assigned to group A continued with suction drainage, while those assigned to group B underwent nonsuction drainage. RESULTS: The study included 254 patients, with 127 patients in each group. The drainage volumes were 1098.8 mL and 814.4 mL in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0014). The times to chest tube removal were 5.61 days and 4.49 days in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0014). Prolonged air leakage occurred in 5.55% of patients in group A and in 0.7% of patients in group B (p = 0.032), and asymptomatic residual air spaces were noted in 0.8% of patients in group A and 9.4% of patients in group B (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Nonsuction drainage is more effective than suction drainage with regard to drainage volume, drainage duration, and incidence of persistent air leakage. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of asymptomatic residual air spaces.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Neumonectomía/métodos , Succión/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Tubos Torácicos , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonectomía/mortalidad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare diagnostic utility of combined (i.e. transbronchial and transoesophageal) ultrasound imaging with needle biopsy of the mediastinum in lung cancer (LC) staging, (a) by use of a single ultrasound bronchoscope (CUSb) and (b) by using two scopes (CUS). METHODS: In consecutive LC patients, clinical stage IA-IIIB the CUS or CUSb was performed under mild sedation and, if negative, underwent lung resection with confirmatory systematic lymph node dissection. RESULTS: From 214 LC patients, 110 underwent CUS and 104 underwent CUSb (618 biopsies); both revealed metastases in 50% of cases. There was 'minimal N2' in 11 of 14 false negative patients. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CUS was 91.7%, 98%, 94.6%, 98.2% and 90.7% respectively and of CUSb was 85%, 93.2%, 88.5%, 94.4%, 82%, respectively with no significant difference in yield of CUS vs CUSb (P = 0.255 and P = 0.192). The mean time of CUS (25 ± 4.4 min) was significantly longer as compared to CUSb (14.9 ± 2.3 min) (P < 0.001). No severe complications of either method were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combined ultrasound imaging of the mediastinum by use of CUSb is significantly less time-consuming and equally as effective and safe as the use of CUS for LC staging.