RESUMEN
PURPOSE: An important challenge in epidemiology is to ensure the reliability of collected data. Very few studies have been conducted in farming populations. We assessed the reliability of self-reported data on lifestyle, reproductive history, health and agricultural activities and tasks from the AGRICAN cohort. METHODS: Our analysis focused on 739 individuals from the 181,842 cohort members who completed the questionnaire twice between 2005 and 2007 with a median time interval of 452 days. Consistency in the responses to questionnaire items (lifestyle, health and agricultural activities including pesticide treatments) was assessed by the percentage of exact agreement (PA), Cohen's Kappa value (K) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Agreement was substantial to almost perfect for education, smoking, reproductive history and most health indicators (K/ICC > 0.61). Agreement was moderate for alcohol consumption and fair for diet. Agreement was substantial for animal and crop farming activities and tasks such as pesticide use on crops and protective equipment use (PA 81-99%, K/ICC 0.61-0.96). Most tasks showed moderate to substantial agreement, except a few with low agreement. Substantial to perfect agreement was observed for the duration of tasks, based on exact years of beginning and ending. CONCLUSION: Farmers' answers appeared reliable for most occupational data, including data used to assess individual exposure to specific pesticides, and for most potential confounders.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Femenino , Humanos , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autoinforme , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There remains uncertainty about the impact of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on women's health. A systematic, comprehensive assessment of the effects on multiple outcomes is lacking. We conducted an umbrella review to comprehensively summarize evidence on the benefits and harms of MHT across diverse health outcomes. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and 10 other databases from inception to November 26, 2017, updated on December 17, 2020, to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating effects of MHT, including estrogen-alone therapy (ET) and estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT), in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women in all countries and settings. All health outcomes in previous systematic reviews were included, including menopausal symptoms, surrogate endpoints, biomarkers, various morbidity outcomes, and mortality. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality of systematic reviews using the updated 16-item AMSTAR 2 instrument. Random-effects robust variance estimation was used to combine effect estimates, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated whenever possible. We used the term MHT to encompass ET and EPT, and results are presented for MHT for each outcome, unless otherwise indicated. Sixty systematic reviews were included, involving 102 meta-analyses of RCTs and 38 of observational studies, with 102 unique outcomes. The overall quality of included systematic reviews was moderate to poor. In meta-analyses of RCTs, MHT was beneficial for vasomotor symptoms (frequency: 9 trials, 1,104 women, risk ratio [RR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.57, p < 0.001; severity: 7 trials, 503 women, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.50, p = 0.002) and all fracture (30 trials, 43,188 women, RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.84, p = 0.002, 95% PI 0.58 to 0.87), as well as vaginal atrophy (intravaginal ET), sexual function, vertebral and nonvertebral fracture, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular mortality (ET), and colorectal cancer (EPT), but harmful for stroke (17 trials, 37,272 women, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.29, p = 0.027) and venous thromboembolism (23 trials, 42,292 women, RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.58, p = 0.052, 95% PI 1.03 to 2.99), as well as cardiovascular disease incidence and recurrence, cerebrovascular disease, nonfatal stroke, deep vein thrombosis, gallbladder disease requiring surgery, and lung cancer mortality (EPT). In meta-analyses of observational studies, MHT was associated with decreased risks of cataract, glioma, and esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancer, but increased risks of pulmonary embolism, cholelithiasis, asthma, meningioma, and thyroid, breast, and ovarian cancer. ET and EPT had opposite effects for endometrial cancer, endometrial hyperplasia, and Alzheimer disease. The major limitations include the inability to address the varying effects of MHT by type, dose, formulation, duration of use, route of administration, and age of initiation and to take into account the quality of individual studies included in the systematic reviews. The study protocol is publicly available on PROSPERO (CRD42017083412). CONCLUSIONS: MHT has a complex balance of benefits and harms on multiple health outcomes. Some effects differ qualitatively between ET and EPT. The quality of available evidence is only moderate to poor.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Menopausia/fisiología , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A historical cohort study of cancer mortality is being conducted among workers in a chrysotile mine and its enrichment factories in the town of Asbest, Russian Federation. Because individual-level information on tobacco use is not available for Asbest Chrysotile Cohort members, a cross-sectional survey of smoking behaviours was conducted among active and retired workers. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires were completed by active workers during meetings organised by occupational safety personnel. Retired workers completed questionnaires during meetings of the Veterans Council or were interviewed via telephone or in person. Of the respondents, 46% could be linked to the Asbest Chrysotile Cohort. Among those, logistic regression models were used to assess associations between smoking and cumulative dust exposure. RESULTS: Among men, smoking prevalence was high and relatively consistent across birth decades (average, 66%), and was similar in workers across all levels of cumulative dust exposure (p trend, 0.44). Among women, the prevalence increased from <10% in those born before 1960 to 30% in those born after 1980, and smoking was associated with exposure to dust versus not exposed to dust (p value, 0.006), but did not vary appreciably across workers in different cumulative dust exposure categories (p trend, 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that cross-sectional surveys may be a useful tool for understanding the potential health impact from smoking in occupational cohorts, including possible confounding by smoking. This survey showed that adjustment at the age group level among women is needed to reduce residual confounding and account for smoking patterns, which have changed substantially over time.
Asunto(s)
Asbestos Serpentinas , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar Tabaco , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Polvo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mineros/estadística & datos numéricos , Material Particulado , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Previously published studies on parental occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in their offspring were inconsistent. We therefore evaluated this question within the Childhood Leukemia International Consortium. METHODS: We pooled 11 case-control studies including 9723 childhood leukaemia cases and 17 099 controls. Parental occupational ELF-MF exposure was estimated by linking jobs to an ELF-MF job-exposure matrix (JEM). Logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs in pooled analyses and meta-analyses. RESULTS: ORs from pooled analyses for paternal ELF-MF exposure >0.2 microtesla (µT) at conception were 1.04 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.13) for ALL and 1.06 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.29) for AML, compared with ≤0.2 µT. Corresponding ORs for maternal ELF-MF exposure during pregnancy were 1.00 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) for ALL and 0.85 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.16) for AML. No trends of increasing ORs with increasing exposure level were evident. Furthermore, no associations were observed in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this large international dataset applying a comprehensive quantitative JEM, we did not find any associations between parental occupational ELF-MF exposure and childhood leukaemia.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/epidemiología , Campos Magnéticos/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Paterna/estadística & datos numéricos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Exposición Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of occupational solvent exposure on the risk of adult chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The current case-control study was nested in the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA) cohort. 20,615 CLL cases diagnosed in 1961-2005 in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, and 103,075 population-based controls matched by year of birth, sex, and country were included. Occupational histories for cases and controls were obtained from census records in 1960, 1970, 1980/1981, and 1990. Exposure to selected solvents was estimated by using the NOCCA job-exposure matrix (NOCCA-JEM). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by using conditional logistic regression models. Overall, nonsignificant CLL risk elevations were observed for methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Compared to unexposed, significantly increased risks were observed for cumulative perchloroethylene exposure ≤13.3 ppm-years (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.16-2.96) and average life-time perchloroethylene exposure ≤2.5 ppm (1.61, 95% CI 1.01-2.56) among women, and cumulative methylene chloride exposure ≤12.5 ppm-years (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41) and 12.5-74.8 ppm-years (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.51) among men in an analysis with 5 years lag-time, though without dose-response pattern. Decreased CLL risk was observed for aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon solvents and toluene. This study did not support associations for solvent exposure and CLL. Observed weak associations for methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane exposures, aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons and toluene were not consistent across sexes, and showed no gradient with amount of exposure.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocarburos Clorados/envenenamiento , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Cloruro de Metileno/envenenamiento , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Tetracloroetileno/envenenamiento , Tricloroetanos/envenenamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Job-exposure matrices (JEM) are used for exposure assessment in occupational studies, but they can involve errors. We assessed agreement between the Nordic Occupational Cancer Studies JEM (NOCCA-JEM) and aggregate and individual dose estimates for cosmic radiation exposure among Finnish airline personnel. METHODS: Cumulative cosmic radiation exposure for 5,022 airline crew members was compared between a JEM and aggregate and individual dose estimates. RESULTS: The NOCCA-JEM underestimated individual doses. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.37, proportion of agreement 64%, kappa 0.46 compared with individual doses. Higher agreement was achieved with aggregate dose estimates, that is annual medians of individual doses and estimates adjusted for heliocentric potentials. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial disagreement between NOCCA-JEM and individual dose estimates of cosmic radiation may lead to exposure misclassification and biased risk estimates in epidemiological studies. Using aggregate data may provide improved estimates. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:386-393, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Radiación Cósmica , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We studied the association between occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and electrical shocks and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Nordic Occupational Cancer cohort (NOCCA). METHODS: We included 5,409 adult AML cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005 in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden and 27,045 controls matched by age, sex, and country. Lifetime occupational ELF-MF exposure and risk of electrical shocks were assigned to jobs reported in the censuses using job-exposure matrices. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) using conditional logistic regression adjusted for concurrent occupational exposures relevant for AML risk (e.g., benzene, ionizing radiation). We conducted sensitivity analyses with different assumptions to assess the robustness of our results. RESULTS: Approximately 40 % of the subjects were ever occupationally exposed to low levels and 7 % to high levels of ELF-MF, whereas 18 % were ever at low risk and 15 % at high risk of electrical shocks. We did not observe an association between occupational exposure to neither ELF-MF nor electrical shocks and AML. The HR was 0.88 (95 % CI 0.77-1.01) for subjects with high levels of ELF-MF exposure and 0.94 (95 % CI 0.85-1.05) for subjects with high risk of electrical shocks as compared to those with background-level exposure. Results remained materially unchanged in sensitivity analyses with different assumptions. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support an association between occupational ELF-MF or electric shock exposure and AML.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Electricidad/epidemiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/epidemiología , Campos Magnéticos , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones , Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Specific farming types and tasks have rarely been studied in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated associations between 5 types of livestock and 13 types of crops in relation to CRC and its subsites within the Agriculture and Cancer (AGRICAN) study. METHODS: AGRICAN cohort includes 181,842 agricultural workers living in 11 French geographical areas. Data on farming types and tasks was collected by self-administered questionnaires. We identified 2 609 CRC, 972 right colon, 689 left colon and 898 rectal incident cancer cases during follow-up from 2005 to 2015. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Significantly increased CRC risk was observed for farmers producing horses (HR=1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.31), sunflower (HR=1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.45) and field vegetables (HR=1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.36). Positive associations were also observed for pig, poultry and wheat/barley. Some associations were observed only for specific subsites: left colon cancer was associated with fruit growing (HR=1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.70) and potato (HR=1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.57). Tasks related to livestock (animal care, insecticide treatment, disinfection of milking equipment and building) or to crop (haymaking, sowing, pesticide treatment, seed treatment, harvesting) were also associated with CRC. Duration and size of farming types/task increased the risk for some of the associations. Analysis stratified by sex suggested an interaction with several farming types/task. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed original and positive findings for several farming types and tasks and CRC risk, overall and by subsites.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Exposición Profesional , Agricultura , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Agricultores , Caballos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence on associations between occupational diesel exhaust and gasoline exposure and colorectal cancer is limited. We aimed to assess the effect of workplace exposure to diesel exhaust and gasoline on the risk of colorectal cancer. METHODS: This case-control study included 181,709 colon cancer and 109,227 rectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005 in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Cases and controls were identified from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study cohort and matched for country, birth year, and sex. Diesel exhaust and gasoline exposure values were assigned by country-specific job-exposure matrices. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using conditional logistic regression models. The results were adjusted for physical strain at work and occupational exposure to benzene, formaldehyde, ionizing radiation, chlorinated hydrocarbons, chromium, and wood dust. RESULTS: Diesel exhaust exposure was associated with a small increase in the risk of rectal cancer (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.08). Gasoline exposure was not associated with colorectal cancer risk. CONCLUSION: This study showed a small risk increase for rectal cancer after workplace diesel exhaust exposure. However, this finding could be due to chance, given the limitations of the study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and understudied disease. There is limited evidence on association between environmental and occupational agents and MBC. Some similarities in risk factors may be shared with female breast cancer. We evaluated solvents, metals, exhaust gases and other agents in relation to MBC within the large Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA). METHODS: The study included 1469 MBC cases and 7345 controls from Finland, Iceland and Sweden, matched for the date of birth, sex and country. Cases were identified through national cancer registries. Data on occupation and other demographic indicators were collected from census records and population registries. Overall, 24 occupational exposures were assessed. Exposure estimates were assigned by linking job titles to job-exposure matrices (NOCCA-JEM). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Significantly decreased overall OR was observed for physical workload (ORâ¯=â¯0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91). Protective effect of physical workload was stronger by increasing exposure level with significant dose-response relationship (p-trend<0.01). Non-significantly increased ORs were observed for trichloroethylene, iron, lead, chromium, welding fumes and wood dust, and decreased ORs for asbestos, silica dust and perchloroethylene. However, these results were not consistent across all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed 20-25% protective effect for physical workload at work, while no strong evidence for other agents was observed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
The evidence that prostate cancer is associated to physical inactivity is inconsistent. We studied the association of perceived physical workload (PPWL) at work and incidence of prostate cancer in a case-control setting. We used data from the Nordic Occupational Cancer study from Finland and Sweden. Five population controls were selected for each prostate cancer patient, matched on age and country. We had 239,835 cases and 1,199,175 controls in our study. For each case and control we estimated cumulative PPWL based on probability, level and duration of PPWL using the NOCCA Job Exposure Matrix. We then stratified individuals as having no exposure (reference category), low physical activity (below 50th percentile of the exposed), moderate exposure (50th-90th percentile) and high exposure (90th percentile and higher). The hazard ratios for prostate cancer from the lowest to highest cumulative PPWL levels were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.91), 0.88 (0.87-0.89) and 0.93 (0.92-0.95). There was no statistically significant dose response effect of PPWL on prostate cancer incidence. Inclusion of socioeconomic status in the model did not substantially change the result. The results were similar before Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing and during the years of PSA testing in these countries. In summary, individuals with physical strain at work had a lower risk of invasive prostate cancer as compared to individuals without physical strain at work.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Esfuerzo Físico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Percepción , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objective The aim of this case-control study was to assess the effect of night-shift work on the risk of hematological cancers. Methods The study included 39 371 leukemia, 56 713 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 9322 Hodgkin lymphoma, and 26 188 multiple myeloma cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005 in Finland, Sweden, and Iceland. Five controls for each case were selected from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA) cohort, matched by year of birth, sex and country. Night-shift exposure was assessed by using the NOCCA job-exposure matrix (JEM). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated from conditional logistic regression models. Results Overall, night work was not associated with a risk of hematological cancers. We observed a small but non-significantly increased risk for leukemia (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.16), especially for acute myeloid leukemia (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.36) among workers exposed to a high level of cumulative night work exposure. Night work exposure was not associated with lymphatic cancers and multiple myeloma. Conclusion This study did not support associations between night-shift work and hematological cancers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas/etiología , Leucemia/etiología , Linfoma/etiología , Mieloma Múltiple/etiología , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Leucemia/epidemiología , Linfoma/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case-control study was to assess the effect of occupational benzene exposure on the risk of colorectal cancer, including its subtypes. METHODS: The study included 181,709 colon cancer and 109,227 rectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005 in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Cases were identified from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA) cohort. Five controls per case were selected from the same cohort, matched for country, birth year, and sex. Occupational benzene exposure for each study participant was estimated by linking their job titles to country specific job-exposure matrices. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by using conditional logistic regression models. The results were adjusted for physical strain at work, formaldehyde, ionizing radiation and wood dust. RESULTS: Increased risk was observed for all colorectal cancer (ORâ¯=â¯1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.18) for the high decile of cumulative benzene exposure, indicating a statistically significant dose-response relationship. This excess risk was mainly seen in ascending colon (ORâ¯=â¯1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.43), and transversal colon (ORâ¯=â¯1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.41). The ORs in the highest exposure category were markedly higher in women than in men in all subsites of colon and rectum. CONCLUSION: This study showed an association between workplace benzene exposure and colorectal cancer. The risk was restricted to ascending and transversal colon, and was the strongest among women.
Asunto(s)
Benceno/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
The evidence for a relationship between colon cancer incidence and physical activity is not fully convincing, and the association between physical activity and rectal cancer is also unclear. We studied the association between perceived physical workload (PPWL) at work and colorectal cancer, stratified by subsite, in a nested case-control setting in the Nordic Occupational Cancer (NOCCA) data from Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Five population controls were selected for each cancer patient. PPWL showed a bigger protective effect on colon cancer for males (odds ratio [OR] 0.74 in the highest PPWL decile as compared with the lowest PPWL category, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.72-0.77) than for females (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.95), with a significant trend for different levels of PPWL for both males and females. In males, the OR of cancer in the descending colon for the highest PPWL decile of males was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.54-0.69). For females the protective effect was most notable in the transversal part of the colon (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67-1.03). The OR for rectal cancer in the highest PPWL decile for males was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.90) and for females 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.04). Inclusion of further agents in multivariate analyses did not alter the ORs for PPWL. The incidence of colon cancer and, to a lesser extent, rectal cancer is lowest in professions with the highest PPWL. The association is clearer in males than in females. The biggest protective effect appears to be in the descending colon in males.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to assess the relation between occupational exposure to solvents and the risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Altogether, this study comprises 15 332 incident cases of AML diagnosed in Finland, Norway, Sweden and Iceland from 1961-2005 and 76 660 controls matched by year of birth, sex, and country. Occupational records were linked with Nordic Occupational Cancer Study job exposure matrix (JEM) to estimate quantitative values for 26 occupational exposure factors. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: We did not observe statistically significantly increased risk for exposure to any of the solvents. HR estimates for high levels of toluene (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.74-2.46), aromatic hydrocarbon solvents (ARHC) (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.76-1.86), and moderate-to-high levels of trichloroethylene were slightly but non-significantly elevated. We did not observe an association between benzene exposure and AML in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not provide clear evidence for an association between occupational solvent exposure and AML. There was some indication for an excess risk in the groups of workers exposed to toluene, trichloroethylene and ARHC.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/inducido químicamente , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Solventes/toxicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benceno/toxicidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Medición de Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Tolueno/toxicidad , Tricloroetileno/toxicidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We studied occupational variation of the risk of acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and other leukemia in Nordic countries. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 15 million persons older than 30 years who participated in the population censuses in 1960, 1970, 1980/1981, 1990, or all of these years in five Nordic countries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated for 53 occupations and one group of economically inactive persons. RESULTS: Significantly increased risks were observed for acute myeloid leukemia among drivers (SIR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.26) and food workers (SIR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27); for chronic lymphocytic leukemia among farmers (SIR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14) and clerical workers (SIR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14); and for other leukemia among seamen (SIR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49), "other health workers" (SIR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47), chemical process workers (SIR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38), and sales agents (SIR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25). CONCLUSION: Observed modest occupational variation of leukemia risk might be associated with occupational or lifestyle factors.