RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Are there other pathogenic genes for asthenoteratozoospermia (AT)? SUMMARY ANSWER: DNAH3 is a novel candidate gene for AT in humans and mice. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AT is a major cause of male infertility. Several genes underlying AT have been reported; however, the genetic aetiology remains unknown in a majority of affected men. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A total of 432 patients with AT were recruited in this study. DNAH3 mutations were identified by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Dnah3 knockout mice were generated using the genome editing tool. The morphology and motility of sperm from Dnah3 knockout mice were investigated. The entire study was conducted over 3 years. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: WES was performed on 432 infertile patients with AT. In addition, two lines of Dnah3 knockout mice were generated. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunostaining, and computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) were performed to investigate the morphology and motility of the spermatozoa. ICSI was used to overcome the infertility of one patient and of the Dnah3 knockout mice. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: DNAH3 biallelic variants were identified in three patients from three unrelated families. H&E staining revealed various morphological abnormalities in the flagella of sperm from the patients, and TEM and immunostaining further showed the loss of the central pair of microtubules, a dislocated mitochondrial sheath and fibrous sheath, as well as a partial absence of the inner dynein arms. In addition, the two Dnah3 knockout mouse lines demonstrated AT. One patient and the Dnah3 knockout mice showed good treatment outcomes after ICSI. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a preliminary report suggesting that defects in DNAH3 can lead to asthenoteratozoospermia in humans and mice. The pathogenic mechanism needs to be further examined in a future study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings show that DNAH3 is a novel candidate gene for AT in humans and mice and provide crucial insights into the biological underpinnings of this disorder. The findings may also be beneficial for counselling affected individuals. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201773, 82101961, 82171608, 32322017, 82071697, and 81971447), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2702604), Scientific Research Foundation of the Health Committee of Hunan Province (B202301039323, B202301039518), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2023JJ30716), the Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Province (2020-CXB-051), the Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province (2023D017), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M711119), and Guilin technology project for people's benefit (20180106-4-7). The authors declare no competing interests.
RESUMEN
The webinar series and workshop titled "Trust Your Gut: Establishing Confidence in Gastrointestinal Models An Overview of the State of the Science and Contexts of Use" was co-organized by NICEATM, NIEHS, FDA, EPA, CPSC, DoD, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) and hosted at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD, USA on October 11-12, 2023. New approach methods (NAMs) for assessing issues of gastrointestinal tract (GIT)- related toxicity offer promise in addressing some of the limitations associated with animal-based assessments. GIT NAMs vary in complexity, from two-dimensional monolayer cell line-based systems to sophisticated 3-dimensional organoid systems derived from human primary cells. Despite advances in GIT NAMs, challenges remain in fully replicating the complex interactions and processes occurring within the human GIT. Presentations and discussions addressed regulatory needs, challenges, and innovations in incorporating NAMs into risk assessment frameworks; explored the state of the science in using NAMs for evaluating systemic toxicity, understanding absorption and pharmacokinetics, evaluating GIT toxicity, and assessing potential allergenicity; and discussed strengths, limitations, and data gaps of GIT NAMs as well as steps needed to establish confidence in these models for use in the regulatory setting.
Non-animal methods to assess whether chemicals may be toxic to the human digestive tract promise to complement or improve on animal-based methods. These approaches, which are based on human or animal cells and/or computer models, are faced with their own technical challenges and need to be shown to predict adverse effects in humans. Regulators are tasked with evaluating submitted data to best protect human health and the environment. A webinar series and workshop brought together scientists from academia, industry, military, and regulatory authorities from different countries to discuss how non-animal methods can be integrated into the risk assessment of drugs, food additives, dietary supplements, pesticides, and industrial chemicals for gastrointestinal toxicity.