Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (both reflux oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease): Prevalence and severity of erosive tooth wear and saliva properties.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence between erosive tooth wear (ETW) in association with reflux oesophagitis (RO) has been reported. However, the severity of both diseases and the relationship between ETW and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and severity of ETW were investigated in RO, NERD and healthy controls. METHODS: 135 patients with RO, 65 with NERD and 40 healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. A modified tooth wear index was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of ETW. Salivary secretion and buffer capacity were assessed prior to endoscopy. The prevalence and severity of ETW, saliva properties among each group were analysed using Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 135 cases (56.3%) were categorised as the patient with ETW (55 with mild RO, 49 with severe RO and 31 with NERD). There was a significant relationship between the prevalence of RO and ETW, while there was no significant correlation between the prevalence of NERD and ETW. There was a significant difference related to the severity between RO and ETW. For salivary secretion, there was a significant difference between with and without ETW in patients with mild RO, severe RO and NERD. There was a significant difference between with and without ETW for salivary buffer capacity in patients with mild and severe RO. CONCLUSION: There was a significant association of the prevalence and severity between RO and ETW. Clinical signs such as ETW and salivary buffer capacity depended on the severity of RO.

Factors associated with prevalence and severity of erosive tooth wear in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Extrinsic factors for erosive tooth wear (ETW) have been widely reported, but the intrinsic factors for wear remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with the prevalence of ETW in patients with reflux oesophagitis (RO). To prevent severe ETW with RO, factors associated with severity of ETW were also evaluated. METHODS: A total of 270 patients with RO were recruited. A modified tooth wear index was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of ETW. Salivary secretion and buffering capacity were assessed prior to endoscopy. Subjects were asked to complete a medical condition and oral self-care questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify factors collectively associated with the prevalence and severity of ETW. RESULTS: A total of 212 cases were categorized as patients with ETW (148 with mild ETW and 64 with severe ETW). Multivariate analyses indicated that saliva secretion, severity of RO and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistance were associated with the prevalence of ETW, whereas age, BMI and severity of RO were associated with the severity of ETW. The odds ratio of saliva secretion and BMI were less than 1, meaning that higher saliva secretion resulted in a lower prevalence of ETW and lower BMI was associated with severe ETW. CONCLUSION: Saliva secretion, severity of RO and PPI resistance were associated with the prevalence of ETW, whereas age, BMI and severity of RO were associated with the severity of ETW. Lower saliva secretion and BMI were significant factors for ETW.

Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion is significantly lower in non-erosive reflux disease patients than in healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Saliva secretion is significantly lower in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) than in healthy controls (HC). A previous study on HC showed that saliva secretion was lower in females than in males. Saliva secretion may be lower in female patients with NERD than in male patients. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with NERD. METHODS: Subjects older than 50 years were included in the present study and consisted of 20 male patients with NERD, 19 male HC, 25 female patients with NERD, and 23 female HC. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. RESULTS: In males, no significant differences were observed in the amount of stimulated saliva secretion or salivary pH between NERD patients and HC. However, the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 6.1 [5.9-6.5], HC: 6.4 [6.2-6.6]) was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. In females, the amount of stimulated saliva secretion (NERD: 2.6 [2.0-4.1], HC: 5.8 [3.7-7.5]), salivary pH (NERD: 7.0 [6.8-7.2], HC: 7.2 [7.0-7.2]), and the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 5.8 [5.4-6.2], HC: 6.2 [6.0-6.5]) were significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. CONCLUSION: Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. This reduction in saliva secretion may contribute to the pathophysiology of NERD in females.

In females, salivary secretion was significantly lower in patients with severe reflux esophagitis than in healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: The salivary secretion in patients with mild reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease is significantly lower in females, but not in males. However, sex differences in salivary secretion in patients with severe RE remain unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with severe RE. METHODS: Subjects consisted of 23 male patients with severe RE, 24 male healthy controls (HCs), 26 female patients with severe RE, and 25 female HCs. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugarless gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva secreted before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. RESULTS: In males, no significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, or the acid-buffering capacity between severe RE patients and HCs. In females, the amount of saliva secretion (severe RE: 2.4 [1.8-4.1], HCs: 5.3 [3.4-7.5], p = 0.0017), salivary pH (severe RE: 7.0 [6.7-7.3], HCs: 7.2 [7.1-7.3], p = 0.0455), and the acid-buffering capacity (severe RE: 5.9 [5.3-6.2], HCs: 6.2 [6.1-6.5], p = 0.0024) were significantly lower in severe RE patients than in HCs. CONCLUSION: Among females, the salivary secretion was significantly lower in severe RE patients than in HCs. This reduction in salivary secretion may contribute to the pathophysiology of severe RE in females.

Saliva Secretion Is Significantly Lower in Female Patients with Mild Reflux Esophagitis than in Female Healthy Controls.

INTRODUCTION: Saliva secretion is significantly lower in patients with mild reflux esophagitis than in healthy controls. A previous study on healthy controls showed that stimulated saliva secretion was lower in females than in males. Saliva secretion may be lower in female patients with mild reflux esophagitis than in male patients. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with mild reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Twenty-five male patients with mild reflux esophagitis, 25 male healthy controls, 24 female patients with mild reflux esophagitis, and 24 female healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 minutes prior to endoscopy, and the volume and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the amount of stimulated saliva secretion, salivary pH, or the acid-buffering capacity between male patients with mild reflux esophagitis and healthy controls. No significant differences were noted in salivary pH between female patients with mild reflux esophagitis and healthy controls; however, the amount of stimulated saliva secretion was significantly lower (p = 0.0023) in the former (2.5 [1.9-4.1]) than in the latter (4.6 [3.2-6.6]), while the acid-buffering capacity was slightly lower (p = 0.0578) in the former (5.9 [5.7-6.2]) than in the latter (6.2 [6.0-6.5]). CONCLUSION: The amount of stimulated saliva secretion was significantly lower in female patients with mild reflux esophagitis than in female healthy controls. This reduction in saliva secretion may affect the pathophysiology of mild reflux esophagitis in females.

Differences in salivary secretion and epidermal growth factor concentrations in mild reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in salivary secretion have been reported among healthy subjects. In the present study, salivary secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) concentrations were investigated in mild reflux esophagitis patients, non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients, and healthy controls by matching the sex ratio. METHODS: Thirty-three (male:female = 11:22) patients with NERD, 33 (11:22) with mild reflux esophagitis, and 33 (11:22) healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. Salivary secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and salivary pH after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. Salivary EGF concentrations were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, or the acid-buffering capacity between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups. However, the amount of saliva secretion and the acid-buffering capacity in the mild reflux esophagitis group and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and the acid-buffering capacity in the NERD group were significantly lower than those in the healthy control group. No significant differences were noted in salivary EGF concentrations between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups. CONCLUSION: After matching the sex ratio, the saliva secretion was significantly lower in patients with mild reflux esophagitis and NERD than in healthy controls. However, no significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion or salivary EGF concentrations between both groups.

Determinants of reflux perception in patients with non-erosive reflux disease who have reflux-related symptoms on potassium-competitive acid blocker therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated potential determinants of reflux perception in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) who had reflux-related symptoms on potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) therapy. METHODS: This study included 23 patients with reflux-related symptoms despite P-CAB therapy. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring was performed on P-CAB and the following potential determinants of reflux perception were investigated: reflux nadir pH value; change in pH (baseline-nadir); bolus clearance time; reflux extent; proportions of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline reflux episodes; and proportions of liquid and mixed reflux episodes. RESULTS: Overall, ≥ 90% of all and symptomatic reflux episodes were weakly acidic reflux and 63% of symptomatic reflux episodes were reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5. There were no significant differences regarding potential determinants between symptomatic and asymptomatic reflux episodes. However, the proportion of symptomatic reflux episodes was significantly greater with pH < 5 (13.8%) than with pH ≥ 5 (9.5%) (P = 0.0431). In reflux episodes with pH < 5, the proportion of symptomatic reflux episodes was significantly greater in proximal sites (20.6%) than in distal sites (10.6%) (P = 0.0178). Conversely, in reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5, there was no significant difference regarding reflux perception according to reflux extent (proximal: 9.6% vs. distal: 9.0%, P = 0.9337). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with P-CAB-resistant NERD, reflux symptoms were mainly caused by reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5 on P-CAB therapy. The proportions of symptomatic reflux episodes among reflux sites differed according to reflux pH value; thus, the mechanisms of reflux perception may differ according to reflux pH value.

Saliva secretion is reduced in mild reflux esophagitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Salivary secretion in patients with mild reflux esophagitis has not been examined. In this study, saliva secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) in patients with mild reflux esophagitis were investigated. METHODS: Thirty-eight mild reflux esophagitis patients and 38 control subjects were recruited for this case-control study. Saliva secretion testing was performed. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the volume and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. The salivary EGF concentration was assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: The volume of saliva secreted was significantly (p = 0.0412) lower in the mild reflux esophagitis group than in the control group, with medians (25th-75th percentile) of 4.2 mL/3 min [2.6-6.2] and 6.0 [3.9-8.0], respectively. No significant differences were observed in salivary pH (the mild reflux esophagitis group: 7.1 [6.9-7.2], the control group 7.2 [7.1-7.3]). Salivary pH after acid loading was significantly (p = 0.0009) lower in the mild reflux esophagitis group (5.9 [5.5-6.3]) than in the control group (6.3 [6.2-6.5]). No significant differences were noted in salivary EGF concentrations (the mild reflux esophagitis group: 1739.0 pg/mL [1142.3-3329.0], the control group: 1678.0 [1091.8-2122.5]. CONCLUSION: The secretion volume and acid-buffering capacity of stimulated saliva were reduced in patients with mild reflux esophagitis.

Saliva secretion is reduced in proton pump inhibitor-responsive non-erosive reflux disease patients.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the relationship between saliva secretion and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). In this study, saliva secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) in patients with NERD were examined. METHODS: Thirty-one PPI-responsive NERD patients and 31 control subjects were recruited for this case-control study. Saliva secretion testing was performed. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. The salivary EGF concentration was assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in the NERD group than in the control group, with medians (25th-75th percentile) of 4.0 mL/3 min (2.0-6.0) and 6.0 (3.9-8.0), respectively (p = 0.0131). Salivary pH was significantly lower in the NERD group (7.0 [6.8-7.2]) than in the control group (7.2 [7.0-7.3], p = 0.0100). Salivary pH after acid loading was significantly lower in the NERD group (5.8 [5.4-6.2]) than in the control group (6.3 [6.1-6.5], p = 0.0002). The difference in pH of stimulated saliva after acid loading (1.2 [0.9-1.5], p = 0.0021) was significantly higher in the NERD group than in the control group (0.8 [0.7-1.1]). The salivary EGF concentration was significantly higher in the NERD group (2513.0 pg/mL [1497.5-5005.0] than in the PPI-responsive group (1641.0 [1139.8-2092.0], p = 0.0032). CONCLUSION: Stimulated saliva secretion was reduced in PPI-responsive NERD patients.

Stimulated saliva secretion is reduced in proton pump inhibitor-resistant severe reflux esophagitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Salivary secretion in patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant severe reflux esophagitis has not been examined. In this study, saliva secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) in patients with PPI-resistant severe reflux esophagitis were investigated. METHODS: We recruited 22 PPI-resistant and 22 PPI-responsive severe reflux esophagitis patients who were not infected with Helicobacter pylori. Saliva secretion testing and esophageal manometry using high-resolution manometry were performed. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy and the amount and pH of saliva as well as the pH of saliva after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. The salivary EGF concentration was assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in the PPI-resistant group than in the PPI-responsive group, with medians (25th-75th percentile) of 3.7 (2.2-6.8) and 4.9 (4.0-7.8) mL, respectively (p = 0.029). Salivary pH was significantly lower in the PPI-resistant group [6.9 (6.7-7.2)] than in the PPI-responsive group [7.2 (7.1-7.4), p = 0.001]. Salivary pH after acid loading was significantly lower in the PPI-resistant group [5.6 (5.3-5.9)] than in the PPI-responsive group [6.4 (6.1-6.5), p = 0.002]. The salivary EGF concentration was significantly higher in the PPI-resistant group [3211.5 (1865.0-4121.5)] than in the PPI-responsive group [1816.0 (1123.5-2792.3), p = 0.041]. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of esophageal motility abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Stimulated saliva secretion was reduced in PPI-resistant severe reflux esophagitis patients.

Differences in clinical characteristics between conservative-treatment-response group and refractory (surgical-treatment) group in patients with jackhammer esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare disease with unclear clinical features. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical characteristics of patients with JE whose symptoms were controlled with conservative treatment, such as observation or medication, versus those who were required surgical treatment, such as surgical myotomy or per oral endoscopic myotomy. METHODS: Eighteen patients with JE were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who responded to conservative treatment (C group) and patients who were refractory to conservative treatment and underwent surgery (S group). Patient age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness on computed tomography, number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis in 10 water swallows, and maximum distal contractile integral (DCI) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) were in the C group and five of 18 (28%) were in the S group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, EGD findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness, or number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis between the groups. On Starlet high-resolution manometry, the median maximum DCI value was significantly higher in the S group (32,651 mmHg-s-cm) than in the C group (17,926 mmHg-s-cm) (P = 0.0136). CONCLUSIONS: JE treatment should be carefully considered because some patients require surgery, whereas others are controlled with conservative treatment alone. A higher DCI value in patients with JE may predict resistance to conservative treatment.

Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation: laxative use is common in GERD patients.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation has not yet been examined in Japan. We herein analyzed the use of laxatives by GERD and non-GERD patients to clarify the relationship between GERD and constipation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study designed to examine the use of laxatives by GERD and non-GERD patients. A total of 118 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 50 males) with reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) who received maintenance acid-suppressive therapy for more than 1 year were included in the GERD group (83 RE patients, 35NERD patients). Similarly, 61 patients (mean age 69.4 years, 28 males) who received regular acid-suppressive therapy for reasons other than GERD were included in the non-GERD group. We also investigated demographic factors associated with the onset of GERD, including body mass index (BMI), age, and sex. RESULTS: The frequency of laxative use was significantly higher in the GERD group (38.1%) than in the non-GERD group (21.3%). No significant differences were observed in dose frequencies between the groups. The type of laxative used also did not significantly differ between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in sex, age, or BMI between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of laxatives was significantly more common in GERD patients than in non-GERD patients. The present results suggest that a relationship exists between GERD and constipation.

Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign".

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of achalasia can occasionally be difficult because of the low prevalence of apparent endoscopic abnormal findings, such as dilation and food residue, and lack of "esophageal rosette" in some patients. We have found a new endoscopic finding "Gingko leaf sign", which consists of not being able to see the full extent of the esophageal palisade vessels and a Gingko leaf-shaped morphology of a longitudinal section of the esophagogastric junction at the end of a deep inspiration, in some achalasia patients without "esophageal rosette". The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of "Gingko leaf sign" in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the prevalence of "Gingko leaf sign" between 11 achalasia patients without "esophageal rosette" and 22 age-/gender-matched healthy subjects. The diagnoses of achalasia were based on the results of high-resolution manometry. We also investigated the characteristics of the patients with "Gingko leaf sign". RESULTS: All the patients had "Gingko leaf sign", in contrast to none of the healthy subjects (p < 0.001). Four of 11 patients did not require any therapy. Six of seven patients did not relapse after balloon dilatation, but one patient required per-oral endoscopic myotomy 8 months after balloon dilatation. CONCLUSION: All our achalasia patients without "esophageal rosette" had "Gingko leaf sign". It is possibly a useful endoscopic finding in achalasia patients without "esophageal rosette".

Risk of hemorrhage and stricture significantly increases in elderly patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant reflux esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: To examine the clinical characteristics, including complications, of patients older than 75 years of age with proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Patients who were resistant to standard-dose proton pump inhibitors were enrolled in the present study. Eligible patients (n = 26) were divided into those who were older (n = 11) and younger (n = 15) than 75 years of age. Clinical characteristics including complications (hemorrhage and stricture), body mass index, the severity of reflux esophagitis, Helicobactor pylori infection, gastric mucosal atrophy, hiatal hernia, kyphosis, and the use of antithrombotic agents were examined. The efficacy of 20 mg vonoprazan for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis was also investigated. RESULTS: The severity of reflux esophagitis was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group. No other significant differences were observed between the groups. The proportion of patients with hemorrhage was significantly larger in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group. Similarly, the proportion of patients with stricture was significantly larger in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group. Nine out of 10 patients in the elderly group and all patients in the non-elderly group achieved healing after the 4-week administration of 20 mg vonoprazan. No significant differences were observed in healing rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis, the rates of severe reflux esophagitis and complications (hemorrhage and/or stricture) were significantly higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients. Regardless of age, 20 mg vonoprazan was effective for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis.

Efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for non-erosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for non-erosive reflux disease. METHODS: On-demand therapy by taking one 20-mg tablet of vonoprazan only when reflux symptoms occurred was performed for 8 weeks by 30 patients (11 men, mean age: 67.8) with non-erosive reflux disease who responded well to maintenance therapy using proton pump inhibitor and answered "very satisfied" or "satisfied" to an overall satisfaction survey (5-grade scale). The degree of overall satisfaction with the treatment, score of symptoms, and fasting gastrin levels before breakfast was examined before and after on-demand therapy. The number of vonoprazan tablets taken and the frequency (regular, temporary, rare) of its administration were also investigated. RESULTS: All patients completed 8-week on-demand therapy with 20-mg vonoprazan. Comparisons of patient satisfaction levels before and after therapy revealed no significant differences in the number of patients who were very satisfied and satisfied with the therapy. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in score of symptoms or gastrin levels before and after therapy. During 8-week on-demand therapy, patients took 11 tablets (median) (7.0-18.0 tablets: 25-75 percentiles), and 30.0% of patients (n = 9) took vonoprazan on a regular basis (at least 2 tablets a week). CONCLUSION: On-demand therapy with 20-mg vonoprazan exerted equivalent effects to continuous PPI maintenance therapy for patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

Efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy with 10-mg vonoprazan for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of long-term (52 weeks) maintenance therapy by 10-mg vonoprazan administration for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis continued from the preceding study. METHODS: Sixteen patients with proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis (mean age 70.9 years, eight males) in whom endoscopic healing was achieved by 20-mg vonoprazan administration for 4 weeks and maintenance of remission was maintained by 10-mg vonoprazan administration for 8 weeks were enrolled. Endoscopy was performed at 52 weeks after the initiation of maintenance therapy with 10-mg vonoprazan to evaluate whether there was any recurrence of reflux esophagitis. Changes in the gastric mucosa were investigated at 52 weeks. Symptoms were assessed using the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and the fast gastrin level at 8 and 52 weeks following the maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Endoscopic remission was maintained at 52 weeks in 15 (93.8%) of the 16 patients with proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis. One patient relapsed with grade C of reflux esophagitis. There were no significant differences in the symptom score at 8 and 52 weeks, nor the gastrin level at 8 and 52 weeks. There was no change in the stomach on endoscopy at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Long-term maintenance therapy by 10-mg vonoprazan administration is very effective for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis patients in whom endoscopic healing was maintained by 8 weeks maintenance therapy with 10-mg vonoprazan administration.

Characteristics of proton pump inhibitor-resistant severe reflux esophagitis and efficacy of vonoprazan in elderly (older than 75 years) and non-elderly groups.

Background and Aim: Previous studies on age differences in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant reflux esophagitis (RE) have found that stenosis and bleeding complications were significantly more common in the elderly than in the non-elderly. We sought to examine differences between two groups of elderly (75 years or older) and non-elderly (<75 years) patients with (PPI)-resistant severe RE and also the efficacy of vonoprazan (VPZ) in these patients. Methods: There were 14 patients in the elderly group and 15 in the non-elderly group. Information was obtained on patient background (sex, body mass index [BMI], gastric mucosal atrophy, and the presence of hernia and collagen disease), and all patients underwent the saliva secretion test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The saliva secretion test (amount of saliva secreted, salivary pH, and the acid-buffering capacity) was performed by chewing sugar-free gum for 3 min before EGD. The efficacy of VPZ in both groups was also assessed. Results: Saliva secretion, sex, BMI, and the presence of gastric mucosal atrophy did not significantly differ between the two groups. The number of hernias larger than 4 cm was significantly higher in the elderly PPI-resistant group, and significantly more patients had collagen disease in the non-elderly group. The efficacy of VPZ was not significantly different between the two groups; however, 10 patients in the non-elderly group had collagen disease, and 4 did not achieve esophageal mucosal healing even with VPZ 20 mg. Conclusion: The number of large hernias (>4 cm) was significantly higher in the elderly group, while significantly more non-elderly patients had collagen disease. In the non-elderly group with scleroderma, the efficacy of VPZ 20 mg may not be sufficient.

New information technology tools for a medical command system for mass decontamination.

In a mass decontamination during a nuclear, biological, or chemical (NBC) response, the capability to command, control, and communicate is crucial for the proper flow of casualties at the scene and their subsequent evacuation to definitive medical facilities. Information Technology (IT) tools can be used to strengthen medical control, command, and communication during such a response. Novel IT tools comprise a vehicle-based, remote video camera and communication network systems. During an on-site verification event, an image from a remote video camera system attached to the personal protective garment of a medical responder working in the warm zone was transmitted to the on-site Medical Commander for aid in decision making. Similarly, a communication network system was used for personnel at the following points: (1) the on-site Medical Headquarters; (2) the decontamination hot zone; (3) an on-site coordination office; and (4) a remote medical headquarters of a local government office. A specially equipped, dedicated vehicle was used for the on-site medical headquarters, and facilitated the coordination with other agencies. The use of these IT tools proved effective in assisting with the medical command and control of medical resources and patient transport decisions during a mass-decontamination exercise, but improvements are required to overcome transmission delays and camera direction settings, as well as network limitations in certain areas.

Significantly Lower Saliva Secretion in Females With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Healthy Subjects Than in Males.

OBJECTIVE: Saliva secretion in healthy subjects is lower in females than in males. The present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. METHODS: This case-control study included 39 (male/female: 16/23) with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 49 (25/24) patients with mild reflux esophagitis, 45 (23/22) with severe reflux esophagitis (A1), and 46 (24/22) healthy controls. Saliva secretion was examined as follows: before endoscopy, patients chewed sugar-free gum for three minutes, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of acid-buffering capacity were evaluated. The relationships between saliva secretion and body mass index, height, and weight were also examined. RESULTS: The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in females than in males in all four groups (NERD, mild reflux esophagitis, severe reflux esophagitis, and healthy controls). Salivary pH and acid-buffering capacity were similar in all groups. The amount of saliva secreted positively correlated with height and body weight, albeit more strongly with height. CONCLUSION: A sex difference in saliva secretion exists in GERD patients, similar to healthy controls. Saliva secretion was significantly lower in female GERD patients than in male GERD patients.

Orientation of Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure Using Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Manometry in Patients with Achalasia: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the orientation of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in patients with untreated achalasia using three-dimensional high-resolution manometry (3D-HRM). METHODS: The study involved 20 patients with untreated achalasia (10 men, 60 [47-74] years of age). The 3D-HRM assembly had 32 standard channels and 12 3D channels. During basal LES pressure measurements, the orientations of the LES high- and low-pressure zones were evaluated at end-expiration. The directional relationships between the orientation of the LES high- and low-pressure zones were also evaluated. RESULTS: The LES high-pressure zones were located on the greater curvature side in nine (45%) patients, from the greater curvature to posterior wall side in six (30%), and from the greater curvature to anterior wall side in five (25%). The LES high-pressure zones were located mainly on the greater curvature side, but there were some variations of the orientation among the patients. The LES low-pressure zones were most frequently located from the lesser curvature to the posterior wall side in 11 (55%) patients, from the lesser curvature to anterior wall side in 6 (30%), on the posterior wall side in 2 (10%), and on the anterior wall side in 1 (5%). Significant differences were found in the directional relationships between the orientation of the LES high- and low-pressure zones (P = 0.0053). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report from Japan focusing on the LES pressure orientation using 3D-HRM. Such evaluation may be useful for clarifying the pathophysiology of achalasia.