Effect of Switching from Low-Dose Simvastatin to High-Dose Atorvastatin on Glucose Homeostasis and Cognitive Function in Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity statin is recommended in high-risk type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, statin dose dependently increases the risk of developing new-onset diabetes, can potentially worsen glycemic control in T2D, and may cause cognitive impairment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of statin intensification on glucose homeostasis and cognitive function in T2D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2D patients who were taking simvastatin ≤20 mg/day were randomized to continue taking the same dosage of simvastatin (low-dose simvastatin group; LS, n=63) for 12 weeks, or to change to atorvastatin 40 mg/day for 6 weeks, and if tolerated, atorvastatin was increased to 80 mg/day for 6 weeks (high-dose atorvastatin group; HS, n=62). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and of ß-cell function (HOMA-B), cognitive functions using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Trail Making Test (TMT) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 58.8±8.9 years, and 72% were female. Mean baseline FPG and HbA1c were 124.0±27.5 mg/dl and 6.9±0.8%, respectively. No differences in baseline characteristics between groups were observed. Change in HbA1c from baseline in the LS and HS groups was -0.1% and +0.1% (p=0.03) at 6 weeks, and -0.1% and +0.1% (p=0.07) at 12 weeks. There were no significant differences in FPG, fasting plasma insulin, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR, MoCA score, or TMT between groups at 6 or 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Switching from low-dose simvastatin to high-dose atorvastatin in T2D resulted in a slight increase in HbA1c (0.1%) without causing cognitive decline.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Low-Dose Statin to High-Intensity Statin for Primary Prevention in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Statin intensification is required in patients who have high-risk for cardiovascular events. However, it is unclear if this is needed in whom plasma LDL-C target was achieved with low-dose statin for primary prevention. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from low-dose statin to high-intensity statin among type 2 diabetes (T2D) who had achieved plasma LDL-C <100 mg/dl with low-dose statin treatment. METHODS: T2D patients with no atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who had plasma LDL-C level <100 mg/dl while taking simvastatin ≤20 mg/day were randomized to continue using the same dosage of simvastatin (low-dose statin group; LS) for 12 weeks, or to switch to atorvastatin 40 mg/day for 6 weeks, and then, if tolerated, to atorvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks (high-intensity statin group; HS). Biochemical test and adverse events were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (76 LS, 74 HS, mean age 58.9±8.9 years, 72% female) were included. The mean baseline plasma LDL-C level on statin was slightly higher in the HS group (71.9±13.6 vs. 68.1±14.2 mg/dl, p=0.09). The HS group had a significantly lower plasma LDL-C level at both 6 and 12 weeks (both p<0.001). Plasma LDL-C <40 mg/dl was found more frequently in the HS group (23.0% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001). Discontinuation of statin due to adverse effects was more frequent in the HS group (5.4% vs. 1.3%, p=0.38 for atorvastatin 40 mg/day, 12.2% vs. 1.3%, p=0.03 for atorvastatin 80 mg/day). No serious adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Switching from low-dose statins to high-intensity statins resulted in a significant reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and was fairly well tolerated during a 12-week study period.

Clinical, Radiologic, and Endoscopic Manifestations of Small Bowel Malignancies: a First Report from Thailand.

BACKGROUND: The symptoms of small bowel malignancies are mild and frequently nonspecific, thus patients are often not diagnosed until the disease is at an advanced stage. Moreover, the lack of sufficient studies and available data on small bowel cancer makes diagnosis difficult, further delaying proper treatment for these patients. In fact, only a small number of published studies exist, and there are no studies specific to Thailand. Radiologic and endoscopic studies and findings may allow physicians to better understand the disease, leading to earlier diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic characteristics of small bowel cancer patients in Thailand's Siriraj Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 185 adult patients (97 men, 88 women; mean age = 57.6±14.9) with pathologically confirmed small bowel cancer diagnosed between January 2006 and December 2013. Clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings were collected and compared between each subtype of small bowel cancer. RESULTS: Of the 185 patients analyzed, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) was the most common diagnosis (39.5%, n=73). Adenocarcinoma was the second most common (25.9%, n = 48), while lymphoma and all other types were identified in 24.3% (n = 45) and 10.3% (n = 19) of cases, respectively. The most common symptoms were weight loss (43.2%), abdominal pain (38.4%), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (23.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on radiology and endoscopy, this study revealed upper gastrointestinal bleeding, an intra-abdominal mass, and a sub-epithelial mass as common symptoms of GIST. Obstruction and ulcerating/circumferential masses were findicative of adenocarcinoma, as revealed by radiology and endoscopy, respectively. Finally, no specific symptoms were related to lymphoma.