Shoulder MCID and PASS Metrics Provide a Foundation for Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Limited data have been previously published on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and patient acceptable symptomatic states (PASS) after the treatment of shoulder instability. MCIDs and PASS are useful in understanding how well one treatment performs against another and whether the differences in outcomes between treatments is clinically important to patients supporting either one, performing power calculations for clinical studies and trials and making an assessment as to whether a patient's final clinical state after treatment is reasonable. Anchor-based and distribution methods of MCID calculations have been performed for a variety of patient reported outcome measures after the treatment of shoulder instability. In general, there is a high degree of variability of the MCIDs and PASS metrics reported in a relatively limited number of studies. Because of the importance of these metrics in interpreting clinical data, an emphasis should be placed on improved research to further define these metrics, along with others including substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) for a variety of different shoulder instability pathologies as well as treatments. Nevertheless, the initial set of MCIDs and PASS metrics published provide a solid foundation for interpreting patient reported outcome measures in the treatment of shoulder instability.

Common Complication From Routine Shoulder Surgery: Postoperative Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Rotator cuff repair is commonly performed, and stiffness represents one of the most common complications. Unique characteristics of postoperative stiffness, including its natural history and pathoanatomy, differentiate it from other etiologies of shoulder stiffness. Patient risk factors that have been associated with postoperative stiffness should be reviewed to better help clinicians tailor their presurgical risk assessment. Although stiffness in this setting has clinical consequences for patients' postoperative shoulder function, it is important to discuss the important implications of stiffness as it relates to rotator cuff healing. Multiple strategies have been proposed to decrease the incidence of postoperative stiffness. There is evidence to support these preventive strategies, and it has led to author recommendations for treatment of refractory cases and prevention.

Biomechanical comparison of suture bridge rotator cuff repair with and without dermal allograft pledgets.

BACKGROUND: One method to augment rotator cuff repair is to pass dermal allograft pledgets along the sutures that bridge from the medial to the lateral row. It remains unclear whether this augmentation method alters repair biomechanics. METHODS: This was a controlled laboratory study. After an a priori power analysis, 9 pairs of rotator cuffs underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair, half randomized to augmentation with dermal allograft pledgets passed along the suture bridge sutures. Repairs were then mounted on a material testing system and loaded cyclically 500 cycles to measure applied force and displacement. Repairs then underwent ultimate failure testing, and stiffness, ultimate failure force, and ultimate failure displacement were measured. Paired t tests were performed to compare between groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in construct gapping with cyclic loading after 500 cycles (P = .885). There were no differences between the augmented and control groups in yield force (103.5 ± 5.0 vs. 101.4 ± 5.9 N, respectively, P = .183), stiffness (94.2 ± 13.9 vs. 90.9 ± 13.8, P = .585), or ultimate failure force (255.3 ± 65.8 vs. 285.3 ± 83.2, P = .315). There were no differences between groups in failure modes, with most specimens failing by cuff tissue tearing within or medial to the construct. CONCLUSION: The addition of dermal allograft pledgets does not positively or negatively influence the time-zero biomechanical characteristics of double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

The effect of lateralization and distalization after Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between multiple radiographic measures of lateralization and distalization and clinical outcome scores after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all RTSAs performed by the senior author between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2017. We then evaluated the visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and complication and reoperation rates at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We measured preoperative and postoperative (2-week) radiographs for the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA), lateral humeral offset, and the distance from the glenoid to the lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity. A multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the postoperative radiographic measurements on final patient-reported outcomes (ASES scores, SST, and VAS pain). RESULTS: The cohort included 216 shoulders from unique patients who had patient-reported outcome scores available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (average, 4.0 ± 1.9 years) for a total follow-up rate of 70%. In the multivariable models, more lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final ASES scores -0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.88, -0.17; P = .004), and more distalization (DSA) was associated with better final ASES scores 0.40 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.69; P = .007). More lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final SST scores -0.06 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.003; P = .039). Finally, greater distalization (DSA) was associated with lower final VAS pain scores, ratio = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Greater distalization and less lateralization are associated with better function and less pain after a Grammont-style RTSA. When using a Grammont-style implant, remaining consistent with Grammont's principles of implant placement will afford better final clinical outcomes.

Comparison of 3D computer-assisted planning with and without patient-specific instrumentation for severe bone defects in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning is an integral aspect of managing complex deformity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to compare the success of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and 3D computer-assisted planning with standard instrumentation (non-PSI) in achieving planned corrections of the glenoid among patients undergoing RSA with severe bony deformity requiring glenoid bone grafts. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed, including all patients that underwent RSA with combined bone grafting procedures (BIO-RSA or structural bone grafting) for severe glenoid deformity by a single study between June 2016 and July 2023. Patients were required to have preoperative and postoperative CT scans as well as preoperative 3D planning performed for inclusion. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of 3D computer-assisted planning with or without PSI (PSI vs. non-PSI). The corrected inclination and version were measured by two separate reviewers on preoperative and postoperative 2D CT scans and compared to their corresponding preoperative planning goals utilizing bivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 45 patients that met our inclusion criteria (22 PSI and 23 non-PSI). Preoperative inclination (mean ± SD) (PSI 10.12° ± 15.86°, non-PSI 9.43° ± 10.64°; P = .864) and version (PSI -18.78° ± 18.3°, non-PSI -17.82° ± 11.49°; P = .835) measurements were similar between groups. No significant differences in the mean deviation (error) between the postoperative and planned inclination (PSI 5.49° ± 3.72; non-PSI 6.91° ± 5.05; P = .437) and version (PSI 8.37° ± 5.7; non-PSI 5.37° ± 4.43; P = .054) were found between groups. No difference in the rate of outliers (>10° error) was noted in inclination (P = .135) or version (P = .445) between groups. Greater planned version correction was correlated with greater error when PSI was utilized (PSI r = 0.519, P = .013; non-PSI r = 0.362, P = .089). CONCLUSION: Both PSI and 3D computer-assisted planning without PSI (non-PSI) appear to be useful techniques to achieve version and inclination correction among patients undergoing RSA with severe glenoid deformity required glenoid bone grafting with no clear superiority of one method over the other. Surgeons should be aware that when utilizing PSI, slightly greater error in achieving version goals may occur as version correction is increased.

A transitional pain management program is associated with reduced opioid dependence after major shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Overprescription of opioids in the United States increases risks of opioid dependence, overdose, and death. Increased perioperative and postoperative opioid use during orthopedic shoulder surgery is a significant risk factor for long-term opioid dependence. The authors hypothesized that a multidisciplinary perioperative pain management program (Transitional Pain Service [TPS]) for major shoulder surgery would lead to a reduced amount of opioids required postoperatively. METHODS: A TPS was implemented at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center focused on nonopioid pain management and cessation support. Opioid consumption during the implementation of the TPS was compared to a historical cohort. All patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or rotator cuff repair (RCR) were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients continuing opioid use at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, time to opioid cessation, and median opioid tablets consumed at 90 days. A multivariable model was developed to predict total opioid use at 90 days postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated for time to opioid cessation. RESULTS: The TPS group demonstrated decreased persistent opioid use at 90 days postdischarge (12.6% vs. 28.6%; P = .018). Independent predictors associated with increased total opioid tablet prescriptions at 90 days included length of stay (ß = 19.17), anxiety diagnosis (ß = 37.627), and number of tablets prescribed at discharge (ß = 1.353). TSA was associated with decreased 90-day opioid utilization (ß = -32.535) when compared to RCR. Median time to cessation was shorter in TSA (6 days) when compared with RCR (8 days). Pain scores were reduced compared with population mean by postdischarge day 2 for TSA and by postdischarge day 7 for RCR. Median number of postdischarge opioid tablets (oxycodone 5 mg) consumed under TPS management was 25 in both RCR and TSA surgery groups (180 morphine milligram equivalents). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a TPS reduces the amount of opioid use of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or cuff repair at 90 days when compared with a historical control. Multivariable regression indicated that fewer opioid tablets at discharge was a modifiable factor that may aid in reducing opioid consumption and that anxiety diagnosis, increased length of stay, and cuff repair surgery were other factors independently associated with increased opioid consumption. These data will assist surgeons in counseling patients, setting narcotic use expectations, and minimizing overprescribing. Use of a similar multidisciplinary perioperative pain management program may greatly reduce opioid overprescriptions nationally.

Diagnosis and Management of Early Complications After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become the predominant shoulder arthroplasty procedure. Despite newer design modifications, complications still occur after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Early complications include instability, acromial and scapular spine stress fractures, periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic joint infections, and neurologic injury. It is important to discuss the diagnosis and management of these early complications.

My Reverse Has Failed: Top Five Complications and How to Manage Them.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implantation has increased dramatically over the past 4 decades since it was first introduced in France in 1985. It has greatly improved the ability to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy, proximal humeral fractures, and osteoarthritis with severe bone loss. However, with the increased implementation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, there has been a corresponding rise in complications. Five of the most common complications following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are instability, scapular fractures, periprosthetic humeral fractures, glenoid baseplate loosening, and infection.

A shared genetic architecture between adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of adhesive capsulitis involves inflammation, thickening, and fibrosis of the shoulder capsule. The underlying genetic factors are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to identify genetic variants associated with adhesive capsulitis using the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort and compare them with variants associated with Dupuytren disease investigating a common etiology between the 2 fibrotic disorders. METHODS: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using data from UKB with 10,773 cases of adhesive capsulitis, and a second GWAS was performed with 8891 cases of Dupuytren disease. Next, a comparison of association statistics was performed between adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease using the data from both GWAS. Finally, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported from candidate gene studies for adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease were tested for association with adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease using the summary statistics from their respective GWAS. RESULTS: The UKB GWAS for adhesive capsulitis identified 6 loci that reached genome-wide statistical significance: a cluster of 11 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 1; a single SNP on chromosome 2; a single SNP on chromosome 14; 2 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 21; 33 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 22; and 3 closely linked SNPs on the X chromosome. These SNPs were associated with 8 different genes including TSPAN2/NGF, SATB2, MRPL52/MMP14, ERG, WNT7B, and FGF13. A GWAS for Dupuytren disease was performed and a comparison to the adhesive capsulitis GWAS showed 13 loci significantly associated with both phenotypes. A validation attempt of 6 previously reported SNPs associated with adhesive capsulitis using UKB summary statistics was unable to confirm any of the previously reported SNPs (all P > .19). All 23 previously reported SNPs associated with Dupuytren disease were confirmed using the UKB summary statistics (P < 2.1 × 10-3) CONCLUSION: This GWAS investigating adhesive capsulitis has identified 6 novel loci involving 8 different genes to be associated with adhesive capsulitis. A GWAS investigating Dupuytren disease was performed and compared to the adhesive capsulitis GWAS, and 13 common loci were identified between the 2 disorders with genes involved in pathologic fibrosis. We were unable to validate the SNPs in candidate genes previously reported to be associated with adhesive capsulitis although we were able to confirm all previously reported SNPs associated with Dupuytren disease. The strong genetic overlap between the adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease loci suggests a similar etiology between the 2 diseases.

Inlay vs. onlay humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study.

BACKGROUND: Both inlay and onlay humeral implants are available for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but biomechanical data comparing these components remain limited. This study investigated the effects of inlay and onlay rTSA humeral components on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator. METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested before and after rTSA with either an inlay or onlay humeral implant. Comparisons were performed between the most commonly implanted configurations for each implant (baseline) and with a modification to provide equivalent neck-shaft angles (NSAs) for the inlay and onlay configurations. Specimens underwent passive range-of-motion (ROM) assessment with the scapula held static, and scapular-plane abduction was performed, driven by previously collected human-subject scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics. Passive ROM glenohumeral joint angles were compared using t tests, whereas muscle force and excursion data during scapular-plane elevation were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t tests. RESULTS: Maximum passive elevation was reduced for the inlay vs. onlay humeral components, although both implants caused reduced passive elevation vs. the native joint. Inlay rTSA also demonstrated reduced passive internal rotation at rest and increased external rotation at 90° of humerothoracic elevation vs. the native joint. All preoperative planning estimates of ROM differed from experiments. Rotator cuff forces were elevated with an onlay vs. inlay humeral implant, but simulated muscle excursions did not differ between systems. Compared with the native joint, rotator cuff forces were increased for both inlay and onlay implants and deltoid forces were reduced for inlay implants. Muscle excursions were dramatically altered by rTSA vs. the native joint. Comparisons of inlay and onlay humeral implants with equivalent NSAs were consistent with the baseline comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction increase following rTSA using both inlay and onlay implants. Rotator cuff forces are lower with inlay implants compared with onlay implants, although inlay implants also result in reduced passive-elevation ROM. Deltoid forces are lower with inlay implants in comparison to the native joint but not with onlay implants. The differences between inlay and onlay components are largely unaffected by NSA, indicating that these differences are inherent to the inlay and onlay designs. In those patients with an intact rotator cuff, decreased rotator cuff forces to perform abduction with an inlay humeral implant compared with an onlay implant may promote improved long-term outcomes owing to reduced deltoid muscle fatigue when using an inlay implant.