Terminating motor events for TLESR are influenced by the presence and distribution of refluxate.

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is frequently associated with reflux events and terminates with a primary or secondary peristaltic wave. However, it is unclear whether the presence and properties of the refluxate affect TLESR-termination events. The aims of this study were to determine the pattern of terminating esophageal motor activity after TLESR in healthy subjects and factors affecting the type of terminating motor event. Fifteen healthy subjects (7 men, age 18-56) were studied. High-resolution manometry and impedance/pH monitoring were performed simultaneously in supine position for 2 h after subjects took a 1,000-kcal meal (Awake Study). This procedure was repeated during the night under polysomnographic recording for 6-8 h after consuming a 1,000-kcal meal (Sleep Study). We categorized three types of TLESR-terminating motor events, primary peristalsis (PP), full secondary contraction (FSC), which propagated the entire esophagus, and partial secondary contractions (PSC), which started distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Overall, 289 TLESR events were found. The percentages of TLESR events terminated by PP, FSC, and PSC were 22%, 14%, and 64%, respectively. TLESR events terminated by PP were less likely to be accompanied by reflux events. TLESR events terminated by FSC were significantly more likely to have evidence for proximal esophageal reflux and esophago-pharyngeal reflux. Findings were similar in awake and sleep states. We concluded that, in healthy recumbent subjects, the most common TLESR-termination event is a secondary contraction, rather than PP. Presence and distribution of the refluxate is a major influence on the type of terminating contraction.

Upper esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal junction pressure changes act to prevent gastroesophageal and esophagopharyngeal reflux during apneic episodes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is thought to be induced by decreasing intraesophageal pressure during obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, pressure changes in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) pressure during OSA events have not been measured. The aim of this study was to determine UES and GEJ pressure change during OSA and characterize the GER and esophagopharyngeal reflux (EPR) events during sleep. METHODS: We studied 15 controls, nine patients with GER disease (GERD) and without OSA, six patients with OSA and without GERD, and 11 patients with both OSA and GERD for 6 to 8 h postprandially during sleep. We concurrently recorded the following: (1) UES, GEJ, esophageal body (ESO), and gastric pressures by high-resolution manometry; (2) pharyngeal and esophageal reflux events by impedance and pH recordings; and (3) sleep stages and respiratory events using polysomnography. End-inspiration UES, GEJ, ESO, and gastric pressures over intervals of OSA were averaged in patients with OSA and compared with average values for randomly selected 10-s intervals during sleep in controls and patients with GERD. RESULTS: ESO pressures decreased during OSA events. However, end-inspiratory UES and GEJ pressures progressively increased during OSA, and at the end of OSA events were significantly higher than at the beginning (P < .01). The prevalence of GER and EPR events during sleep in patients with OSA and GERD did not differ from those in controls, patients with GERD and without OSA, and patients with OSA and without GERD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decrease in ESO pressure during OSA events, compensatory changes in UES and GEJ pressures prevent reflux.

Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex.

The mechanism against entry of gastric content into the pharynx during high-intensity vocalization such as seen among professional singers is not known. We hypothesized that phonation-induced upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contraction enhances the pressure barrier against entry of gastroesophageal contents into pharynx. To determine and compare the effect of phonation on luminal pressures of the esophagus and its sphincters, we studied 17 healthy volunteers (7 male, 10 female) by concurrent high-resolution manometry and voice analysis. We tested high- and low-pitch vowel sounds. Findings were verified in six subjects by UES manometry using a water-perfused sleeve device. Eight of the volunteers (2 male, 6 female) had concurrent video fluoroscopy with high-resolution manometry and voice recording. Fluoroscopic images were analyzed for laryngeal movement. To define the sex-based effect, subgroup analysis was performed. All tested phonation frequencies and intensities induced a significant increase in UES pressure (UESP) compared with prephonation pressure. The magnitude of the UESP increase was significantly higher than that of the distal esophagus, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and the stomach. Concurrent videofluoroscopy did not show posterior laryngeal movement during phonation, eliminating a purely mechanical cause for phonation-induced UESP increase. Subgroup analysis demonstrated phonation-induced UESP increases in males that were significantly greater than those of females. Phonation induces a significant increase in UESP, suggesting the existence of a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex. UESP increase due to this reflex is significantly higher than that of the distal esophagus, LES, and stomach. The phonation-induced UESP increase is influenced by sex.

Neurocognitive processing of esophageal central sensitization in the insula and cingulate gyrus.

The cingulate and insular cortices are parts of the limbic system that process and modulate gastrointestinal sensory signals. We hypothesized that sensitization of these two limbic area may operate in esophageal sensitization. Thus the objective of the study was to elucidate the neurocognitive processing in the cingulate and insular cortices to mechanical stimulation of the proximal esophagus following infusion of acid or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) into the esophagus. Twenty-six studies (14 to acid and 12 to PBS infusion) were performed in 20 healthy subjects (18-35 yr) using high-resolution (2.5 x 2.5 x 2.5 mm(3) voxel size) functional MRI (fMRI). Paradigm-driven, 2-min fMRI scans were performed during randomly timed 15-s intervals of proximal esophageal barostatically controlled distentions and rest, before and after 30-min of distal esophageal acid or PBS perfusion (0.1 N HCl or 0.1 M PBS at 1 ml/min). Following distal esophageal acid infusion, at subliminal and liminal levels of proximal esophageal distentions, the number of activated voxels in both cingulate and insular cortices showed a significant increase compared with before acid infusion (P < 0.05). No statistically significant change in cortical activity was noted following PBS infusion. We conclude that 1) acid stimulation of the esophagus results in sensitization of the cingulate and insular cortices to subliminal and liminal nonpainful mechanical stimulations, and 2) these findings can have ramifications with regard to the mechanisms of some esophageal symptoms attributed to reflux disease.