The Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: Results From the SUCCESS Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: This study used a retrospective, multicenter, multinational consortium of UST-treated CD patients. Data included patient demographics, disease phenotype, disease activity, treatment history, and concomitant medications. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions were assessed using time-to-event analysis, and clinical predictors were assessed by using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Serious infections and adverse events were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 1,113 patients (51.8% female, 90% prior antitumor necrosis factor exposure) were included, with a median follow-up of 386 days. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions at 12 months were 40%, 32%, 39%, and 30%, respectively. Biologic-naive patients achieved significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remissions at 63% and 55%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, prior antitumor necrosis factor (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.99) and vedolizumab exposure (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.88) were independently associated with lower likelihoods of achieving endoscopic remission. In patients who experienced loss of remission, 77 of 102 (75%) underwent dose optimization, and 44 of 77 (57%) achieved clinical response. An additional 152 of 681 patients (22.3%) were dose-optimized because of primary nonresponse incomplete response to UST, of whom 40.1% (61 of 152) responded. Serious infections occurred in 3.4% of patients while other noninfectious adverse events (lymphoma [n = 1], arthralgia [n = 6], rash [n = 6], headache [n = 3], hepatitis [n = 3], hair loss [n = 3], neuropathy [n = 1], and vasculitis [n = 1]) occurred in 2.4% of patients. DISCUSSION: UST represents a safe and effective treatment option for CD, with 40% of patients from a highly refractory cohort achieving clinical remission by 12 months. The greatest treatment effect of UST was seen in biologic-naive patients, and dose escalation may recapture clinical response.

Drug Adherence and Persistence of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treated with Biologic Medications in a US Commercially Insured Population.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CER), etanercept (ETA), guselkumab (GUS), ixekizumab (IXE), secukinumab (SEC), and ustekinumab (UST) are biologic medications approved in the USA for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. We examined drug adherence and persistence of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who initiated these seven biologic medications. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy/medical claim for any of the seven psoriasis medications and ≥1 diagnosis of psoriasis in the previous 6 months between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019 were selected from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription fill. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment during the 6 months prior to their index date and ≥9 months after. Patients were grouped into seven study cohorts based upon their index biologic medication. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined by a PDC ≥80%. Adherence and persistence with index biologic medications were examined during fixed follow-up periods of 3, 6, and 9 months, with a subpopulation analysis carried out among patients with 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Among psoriasis patients with ≥9 months of continuous enrollment included in the study population, the number of those who initiated each biologic medication was 10,324 for ADA, 431 for CER, 3,092 for ETA, 821 for GUS, 1,766 for IXE, 4,132 for SEC, and 5,441 for UST. The mean age at the time of initiating biologic treatment was 46.9 years. During the 9-month follow-up period, the proportions of adherent patients (i.e., PDC ≥80%) were numerically higher among those treated with UST (59.9%) and GUS (56.9%), followed by those treated with SEC (46.1%), IXE (45.5%), ADA (44.7%), ETA (33.9%), and CER (22.0%). The proportions of patients who were persistent with their index biologic medication during the 9-month follow-up period were numerically higher among those treated with UST (70.1%) and GUS (67.8%), followed by those treated with IXE (47.3%), SEC (46.9%), ADA (28.7%), CER (14.8%), and ETA (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large healthcare claims database analysis of psoriasis patients treated with seven different biologic medications, adherence was numerically higher among those treated with UST or GUS. UST and GUS were also associated with numerically greater persistence.

Characteristics of Patients Initiating Guselkumab for Plaque Psoriasis in the Symphony Health Claims Database.

Guselkumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, characteristics of patients initiating guselkumab in a real-world setting are not well characterized. The present study described baseline characteristics of patients with psoriasis initiating guselkumab in the first year after approval using data from the Symphony Health Claims database. Adult patients with psoriasis with ≥1 claim for guselkumab between 7/13/2017 and 7/2/2018 were included. The index date was defined as the date of the first pharmacy claim for guselkumab. Outcomes of interest included demographics, frequency of prior biologic and non-biologic psoriasis treatments, and frequency of diagnoses or procedures during the year before guselkumab initiation (baseline period). A total of 1,520 patients were included. Mean age was 51.2 (SD 13.4) years and 53.7% of patients were female. During the baseline period, 63.9% of patients had ≥1 biologic drug claim and 66.9% were prescribed topical corticosteroids/combinations. The most common non-psoriasis diagnoses among patients with ≥1 medical claim were hypertension (25.1%), type 2 diabetes (13.4%), and hyperlipidemia (13.4%). The most common procedures reflected routine medical care. These findings describing the baseline characteristics of patients initiating guselkumab provide insights regarding variables that may impact observed treatment outcomes and may ultimately help with treatment decision making. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(10):1127-1131. doi:10.36849/JDD.6024.

Determinants of patient and physician treatment satisfaction in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a multinational survey of psoriasis patients.

There is a lack of validated information of both physician and patient-reported treatment satisfaction, and association with outcomes in psoriasis. Data from the 2015 Adelphi Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme were used to compare self-reported satisfaction with biologic and non-biologic therapy for psoriasis in physicians and their consulting patients in the United States (USA) and five European countries (EU5). Disease severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed using Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), respectively. Patients satisfied with biologic therapy reported better HRQoL than unsatisfied patients, whereas a greater proportion of unsatisfied patients on biologic therapy had moderate-to-severe psoriasis (USA: 95.1% versus 52.4%, EU5; 86.4% versus 43.1%, P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that having a BSA affected by psoriasis of >10% was associated with lower likelihoods of physician and patient treatment satisfaction versus <3% (P<0.0001). A one-unit increase in the DLQI score lowered the likelihood of a patient being satisfied by approximately 20% (P<0.0001). Patients were ~60% more likely to be satisfied on biologic therapy than non-biologic therapy (P=0.0012). Physician and patient-reported treatment satisfaction was associated with greater HRQoL and lesser disease severity.

Access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among patients with treatment-resistant depression covered by private or public insurance.

OBJECTIVE: To describe access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with private or public insurance. METHODS: Adults with ≥1 claim for esketamine nasal spray were selected from Clarivate's Real World Data product (January 2016-March 2021). Patients with evidence of TRD initiating esketamine (index date) after 05 March 2019 were included. Esketamine access, as measured by pharmacy claim approval rate for each treatment session, and use patterns were described post-index (follow-up period). RESULTS: Among 535 patients with pharmacy claims for esketamine nasal spray (mean age 49.1 years; 65.4% females), 534 had the first esketamine claim being a pharmacy claim, of which 34.6% were approved, 46.3% were rejected, and 19.1% were abandoned. Main reasons for rejection included "claim not covered by plan" (57.1%), "claim errors" (52.6%), and "prior authorization required" (22.7%). The approval rate increased to 85.2% by the second esketamine treatment session. A total of 273 patients initiated esketamine (mean age 49.3 years; 66.3% females). Patients had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 11.8 ± 13.3 esketamine sessions over a mean ± SD of 11.8 ± 6.4 months; 47.6% of patients completed ≥8 sessions (i.e. the number of sessions in induction phase) over a mean ± SD of 80.1 ± 71.9 days (per label, 28 days); 48 (17.6%) patients completed induction per label, and among them 93.8% continued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Initial access to esketamine nasal spray may be hindered by prior authorization or claim filing errors. Among patients who initiated esketamine, treatment compliance generally deviates from label recommendations; yet, most of those who received induction per label successfully transition to maintenance with esketamine.

Esketamine nasal spray is a novel therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In the United States, insurance plans often regulate access to esketamine. Additionally, for patients, it may be challenging to comply to the treatment schedule, because patients must receive esketamine in a certified treatment center, be monitored for 2 h for potential side effects, and they cannot drive until the next day. This real-world study used insurance claims data and found that patients with TRD had difficulties accessing esketamine. Among those with access, esketamine use patterns were suboptimal.

Esketamine nasal spray for major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior: description of treatment access, utilization, and claims-based outcomes in the United States.

AIMS: To describe real-world esketamine nasal spray access and use as well as healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among adults with evidence of major depressive disorder (MDD) with suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI). METHODS: Adults with ≥1 claim for esketamine nasal spray and evidence of MDSI 12 months before/on the date of esketamine initiation (index date) were selected from Clarivate's Real World Data product (01/2016-03/2021). Patients initiated esketamine on/after 03/05/2019 (esketamine approval for treatment-resistant depression; later approved for MDSI on 08/05/2020) were included in the overall cohort. Esketamine access (measured as approved/abandoned/rejected claims) and use were described post-index; HRU and healthcare costs (2021 USD) were described over 6 months pre- and post-index. RESULTS: Among 269 patients in the overall cohort with esketamine pharmacy claims, 46.8% had the first pharmacy claim approved, 38.7% had it rejected, and 14.5% abandoned their claim; 169 patients were initiated on esketamine in the overall cohort (mean age 40.9 years, 62.1% female); 45.0% had ≥8 esketamine treatment sessions (recommended per label) with a mean [median] of 85.0 [58.5] days from index to 8th session (per label 28 days). Among 115 patients with ≥6 months of data post-index, in the 6-month pre- and post-index, respectively, 37.4 and 19.1% had all-cause inpatient admissions, 42.6 and 33.9% had emergency department visits, 92.2 and 81.7% had outpatient visits; mean ± standard deviation all-cause monthly total healthcare costs were $8,371±$15,792 and $6,486±$7,614, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This was a descriptive claims-based analysis; no formal statistical comparisons were performed due to limited sample size as data covered up to 24 months of esketamine use in the US clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients experience access issues with first esketamine nasal spray treatment session. All-cause HRU and healthcare costs trend lower in the 6 months after relative to 6 months before esketamine initiation.

Major depressive disorder (MDD), or clinical depression, can sometimes be accompanied by preoccupation with suicide along with suicidal behavior. Patients diagnosed with MDD with suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI) can vary in their reactions to this condition, and some never seek treatment. This study investigated treatment patterns in real-world clinics of a recently approved nasal spray therapy, esketamine, which helps improve depressive symptoms in patients with MDSI. The study results highlight challenges related to esketamine treatment access, particularly for the first treatment session. Still, healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs trended lower following treatment initiation with esketamine in MDSI, suggesting the potential benefits of esketamine in mitigating the clinical and economic burden of MDSI among those who gain access to the drug. Streamlining the approval process by health plan providers to remove hindrances related to compliance with plan requirements may ensure more timely access to esketamine for MDSI.

Effectiveness of Guselkumab Therapy among Patients with Plaque Psoriasis with Baseline IGA Score ≥ 2 in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: In clinical trials, treatment with the interleukin-23 inhibitor guselkumab was associated with significantly improved disease severity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, limited information is available regarding the real-world effectiveness of guselkumab among patients with psoriasis of mild, moderate, and severe Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) severities living in the USA and Canada. METHODS: Patients participating in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry between 18 July 2017 and 10 July 2019 who met the following criteria were included: IGA ≥ 2 (mild or greater disease severity), initiated guselkumab at a registry (index) visit, and had a registry follow-up visit after persistent guselkumab treatment for 9 to 12 months. Data were collected for patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, disease activity, and PROMs. At follow-up, outcome measure response rates and mean changes from the index visit were calculated. RESULTS: Among 130 patients, the mean age was 50.2 years, 39.2% were female, and 56.9% had a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2. Mean psoriasis duration was 17.5 years and 79.2% of patients had previously received one or more biologic therapy. At the index visit, mean IGA, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were 3.0, 9.9, and 8.0, respectively. At follow-up, IGA 0/1 and IGA 0 were achieved by 64.6% and 36.2% of patients, respectively. PASI 75, 90, and 100 were achieved by 61.5%, 46.9%, and 36.9% of patients; 55.4% had maintained or achieved DLQI 0/1. Mean improvements were observed in all evaluated disease activity outcomes and PROMs, with all differing significantly from zero except for the percent of work hours missed due to psoriasis. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, patients with a baseline IGA score ≥ 2 experienced improvements in disease activity and PROMs after 9-12 months of persistent guselkumab treatment.

Real-World Effectiveness of 9-12 Months of Guselkumab Therapy among Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 biologic therapy, has been shown to significantly reduce disease activity and improve patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in clinical trials. However, characterization of the real-world effectiveness of guselkumab among patients living in the USA and Canada is warranted. METHODS: Patients who participated in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry between 18 July 2017 and 10 March 2020 were included if they met the following criteria: Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3 and body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% (moderate-to-severe psoriasis), initiated guselkumab at a registry (index) visit, and had a registry follow-up visit after 9-12 months of persistent guselkumab therapy. Data were retrieved for baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics, treatment history, disease activity, and PROMs. Outcomes were assessed at index and follow-up visits; response rates and mean changes were calculated. RESULTS: Among 113 patients, mean age was 49.7 years, mean psoriasis duration was 17.5 years, and 65.5% of patients were biologic experienced. At baseline, mean IGA score was 3.3, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score was 13.6, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was 9.6. At follow-up, IGA 0/1, PASI 90, and DLQI 0/1 were achieved by 62.2%, 56.8%, and 54.7% of patients, respectively. Statistically significant improvements were observed in all disease activity scores and PROMs, including the EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, Patient Global Assessment, fatigue, skin pain, and itch (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who received 9-12 months of persistent guselkumab therapy experienced improvements in disease severity and PROMs.

The Effectiveness of Guselkumab by BMI Category Among Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have demonstrated guselkumab improves disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, the real-world effectiveness of guselkumab across different subgroups [e.g., body mass index (BMI) categories] remains an area of active research. METHODS: This study included patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry between July 18, 2017 and March 10, 2020 who had moderate-to-severe psoriasis [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3], initiated guselkumab at a registry visit (index date), and had a follow-up registry visit after persistent guselkumab therapy for 9-12 months. Patients were stratified into three BMI categories: obese (≥ 30 kg/m2), overweight (25- < 30 kg/m2), and underweight/normal weight (< 25 kg/m2). Response rates and mean changes for disease activity outcomes and PROs at follow-up were assessed within each BMI category. RESULTS: Of the 180 patients included in the study, 101 (56%) were obese, 52 (29%) were overweight, and 27 (15%) were underweight/normal weight. Among the obese, overweight, and underweight/normal weight patients, 57%, 58%, and 72%, respectively, achieved an IGA score of 0/1 after 9-12 months of persistent guselkumab treatment. An IGA score of 0 was achieved by 33%, 35%, and 48% of obese, overweight, and underweight/normal weight patients, respectively. A 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was achieved by 46%, 46%, and 56% in these respective subgroups. Mean improvements in disease activity and PRO scores were similar among BMI subgroups. CONCLUSION: The results of this real-world study showed improvements in disease severity and several PRO scores within all BMI categories among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab. These unadjusted findings suggest that obese and overweight patients have comparable absolute improvements to those with lower BMI; however, they may be less likely to achieve relative endpoints. Additional analyses are needed to fully characterize this relationship.

Cost per responder for guselkumab versus secukinumab in the United States based on a head-to-head trial of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

AIMS: To estimate cost per response (CPR) in the United States and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) among subjects receiving guselkumab or secukinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from ECLIPSE, a double-blind, head-to-head, 48-week study of guselkumab compared with secukinumab were used to estimate 48-week, annual induction, and maintenance year CPRs for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90, and 100 responses for all patients and for PASI 90 response in patients according to previous systemic treatment. RESULTS: Week 48 PASI 90 response rates were 84.5% for guselkumab and 70.0% for secukinumab. The CPR for PASI 90 response at 48 weeks was $89,960 for guselkumab versus $110,977 for secukinumab, and for the maintenance year it was $77,109 for guselkumab versus $88,781 for secukinumab. The NNT for a PASI 90 response was 1.18 for guselkumab and 1.43 for secukinumab. CPR and NNT values were also lower for guselkumab than for secukinumab, for PASI 75 and PASI 100 for the three time periods, and for PASI 90 at 48-weeks, regardless of previous systemic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results from a head-to-head study showed that, compared with secukinumab, guselkumab had lower NNTs and CPRs for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses.

Treatment persistence and maintenance dose titration among ulcerative colitis patients on biologics: a pooled study of three United States claim databases.

OBJECTIVE: This real-world study evaluated biologic treatment patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: IQVIA PharMetrics, IBM MarketScan, and Optum Clinformatics were pooled to identify UC patients with ≥1 claim for UC and ≥1 claim for adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), or vedolizumab (VDZ). The index date for each biologic was the first claim for that biologic. Patients could be included in >1 cohort if they switched biologics during the identification period. Continuous eligibility for medical/pharmacy benefits was required for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. Patients lacking claims for any biologic during baseline were categorized as bio-naïve; those with any biologic claim were categorized as bio-experienced. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap between claims of >28 days for ADA, >56 days for GOL, and >112 days for IFX and VDZ. Dose titration was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, GOL, and VDZ patients. RESULTS: In total, 6,106 bio-naïve UC patients and 1,027 bio-experienced UC patients were identified. Patients treated with VDZ and IFX had the highest persistence followed by ADA and GOL patients for bio-naïve and bio-experienced, respectively. ADA patients had a numerically higher proportion of patients with 50% dose escalation, followed by VDZ and GOL; 50% dose reduction was observed in ≤1% patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive study of UC patients without confounder adjustment, VDZ persistence was numerically highest followed by IFX, GOL, and ADA across both populations.

Treatment adherence and persistence of seven commonly prescribed biologics for moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a U.S. commercially insured population.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CER), etanercept (ETA), guselkumab (GUS), ixekizumab (IXE), secukinumab (SEC), and ustekinumab (UST) are biologics approved for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We examined adherence and persistence among PsO patients with comorbid PsA who initiated treatment with any of these biologics. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy/medical claim for any of these seven biologics, and ≥1 diagnosis of both PsO and PsA were selected from the MarketScan Commercial database (July 2014-June 2019). Adherence and persistence rates were examined among the seven study cohorts during fixed follow-up periods (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). RESULTS: Among patients with ≥9 months of continuous enrollment, 3,251 initiated ADA, 418 CER, 1,563 ETA, 126 GUS, 422 IXE, 1,596 SEC, and 1,267 UST. During the 9-month follow-up period, the proportions of adherent patients were numerically highest among those treated with GUS (59.5%) and UST (57.0%), followed by SEC (47.9%), IXE (47.6%), ADA (46.8%), ETA (37.4%), and CER (22.0%); persistence rates were also numerically highest among those treated with GUS (65.9%) and UST (65.7%). LIMITATIONS: Adjustment for potential confounders was not conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence and persistence rates were numerically highest among patients who initiated GUS and UST.

Characteristics of New Biologic Users Among the Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Population-Retrospective Cohort Study Leveraging the Modernizing Medicine Data Services Database.

INTRODUCTION: Biologics have expanded the treatment options in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The objective of this study was to describe patient characteristics and previous treatments in psoriasis patients newly treated with guselkumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients ≥ 18 years old with psoriasis in the USA who were newly treated with guselkumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab between 1 July 2017 and 31 March 2019 in the Modernizing Medicine Data Services database (MMDS). Patients were indexed on their first prescription or injection record of guselkumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab, and three mutually exclusive cohorts were created. Patients were required to have evidence of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, defined as Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 3 or 4, or body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% on index date or within 12 months before index. Baseline characteristics, including treatment history, were reported for each cohort. RESULTS: The study population included 461 guselkumab, 619 secukinumab, and 375 ixekizumab patients. The median age across cohorts was 51-52 years. Median baseline BSA ranged from 15% to 20%; 16.1-29.3% of patients had a PGA of 4 and over half of patients were obese prior to index. Approximately 40% of patients had comorbid cardiovascular disease and 20.8-24.2% of patients had a psychiatric disorder. About half of patients in each cohort had prior biologic use, of which adalimumab was most common (28.2-34.9%) across the cohorts. CONCLUSION: This real-world study describes the characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic treatments.

Risk of Treatment Discontinuation among Patients with Psoriasis Initiated on Ustekinumab and Other Biologics in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Biologics are a standard therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, yet treatment persistence is essential to achieve disease control. Compared with other biologics, ustekinumab has been associated with lower rates of discontinuation and better adherence among patients with psoriasis, but prior studies have included limited data from the period after approval of self-administration for ustekinumab. This study was conducted to assess discontinuation risk among patients with plaque psoriasis initiating ustekinumab or other biologics. METHODS: Adults with psoriasis and one or more claim for ustekinumab, secukinumab, adalimumab, or ixekizumab were identified in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019). Treatment discontinuation was defined as a gap in days of therapy supply based on (1) each drug's per-label frequency of administration (main analysis) or (2) > 90 days (sensitivity analysis). Differences in baseline characteristics between the ustekinumab and other cohorts were adjusted with entropy balancing. Risk of discontinuation was compared with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Overall, 2230 patients were included in the ustekinumab cohort, with 1807 in the secukinumab, 4483 in the adalimumab, and 535 in the ixekizumab cohorts (mean age 49.0 years, 49.3% female for all cohorts). In the main analysis, risk of discontinuation for the ustekinumab cohort was 62.2% lower than for adalimumab, 46.4% lower than for secukinumab, and 43.8% lower than for ixekizumab cohorts (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses revealed no significant differences between the ustekinumab and other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with psoriasis initiating ustekinumab had lower risk of treatment discontinuation compared with other biologics when discontinuation was based on each drug's per-label frequency of administration. This finding may help inform choice of biologic based on compliance.

Predicting Poor Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Care for Major Depressive Disorder.

Objective: To develop and validate algorithms to identify individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at elevated risk for suicidality or for an acute care event. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among adults with MDD diagnosed between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2019. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to predict emergency department (ED) visit, inpatient hospitalization, acute care visit (ED or inpatient), partial-day hospitalization, and suicidality in the year following diagnosis. Outcomes (per 1000 patients per month, PkPPM) were categorized as all-cause, psychiatric, or MDD-specific and combined into composite measures. Predictors included demographics, medical and pharmacy utilization, social determinants of health, and comorbid diagnoses as well as features indicative of clinically relevant changes in psychiatric health. Models were trained on data from 1.7M individuals, with sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) derived from a validation dataset of 0.7M. Results: Event rates were 124.0 PkPPM (any outcome), 21.2 PkPPM (psychiatric utilization), and 7.6 PkPPM (suicidality). Among the composite models, the model predicting suicidality had the highest AUC (0.916) followed by any psychiatric acute care visit (0.891) and all-cause ED visit (0.790). Event-specific models all achieved an AUC >0.87, with the highest AUC noted for partial-day hospitalization (AUC = 0.938). Select predictors of all three outcomes included younger age, Medicaid insurance, past psychiatric ED visits, past suicidal ideation, and alcohol use disorder diagnoses, among others. Conclusions: Analytical models derived from clinically-relevant features identify individuals with MDD at risk for poor outcomes and can be a practical tool for health care organizations to divert high-risk populations into comprehensive care models.

Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients with Psoriasis Who Initiated Guselkumab in CorEvitas' Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Guselkumab is approved for the treatment of both moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the USA. However, little is known about patients initiating guselkumab in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to describe baseline characteristics among patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated guselkumab at or after enrollment in CorEvitas' Psoriasis Registry. METHODS: Adult patients who initiated guselkumab in the Psoriasis Registry between July 18, 2017 and November 6, 2018 were included. Demographics, disease characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at the time of guselkumab initiation (baseline). Patients with psoriasis were stratified according to the number of previously received biologics (0 to 4+) for comparison. A subset of patients with psoriasis and concomitant dermatologist-diagnosed PsA were stratified into biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced groups. RESULTS: Among 687 patients with psoriasis who initiated guselkumab, biologic-naïve patients and those with four or more prior biologics had the most severe disease and the worst PROM scores at baseline. Among 251 patients with concomitant dermatologist-diagnosed PsA, biologic-naïve patients had more severe disease and worse PROM scores than biologic-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight important differences in baseline characteristics according to biologic experience among patients with plaque psoriasis with or without concomitant PsA initiating guselkumab in a real-world setting.

Treatment adherence and persistence of five commonly prescribed medications for moderate to severe psoriasis in a U.S. commercially insured population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medication discontinuation, persistence, and adherence of moderate to severe psoriasis patients treated with adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis and ≥1 psoriasis pharmacy or medical claim of any of the five psoriasis medications (index date) and continuous insurance enrollment were included from the Optum Clinformatics database during the intake period (7/1/2014-9/30/2017). Medication discontinuation, persistence, medication possession ratio (MPR), and proportion of days covered (PDC) were evaluated during a 12-month post-index follow-up period, using three gap definitions. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 8524), 34.4% initiated adalimumab, 25.7% apremilast, 9.0% etanercept, 7.1% secukinumab, and 23.7% ustekinumab. Mean age ranged from 48.7 to 52.2 years. For all three gap definitions, discontinuation was lowest and persistence greatest among ustekinumab treated patients (48.4% and 59.8%, respectively using the default definition). A greater proportion of ustekinumab patients had an MPR ≥80% (81.8%) than adalimumab (67.9%), apremilast (54.9%), etanercept (56.4%), and secukinumab (68.0%) patients. Also, 50.6% of ustekinumab patients had a PDC ≥80% versus 35.6%, 23.9%, 19.5%, and 41.7% of adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, and secukinumab patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although heterogeneity across cohorts may explain some medication utilization differences, ustekinumab was associated with lower discontinuation and greater persistence and adherence.

Persistence, Dosing, and Other Treatment Patterns Among Crohn's Disease Patients Initiating Biologics in United States.

Background: This study examined biologic persistence, dosing, and other treatment patterns among Crohn's disease (CD) patients that initiated adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), infliximab (IFX), ustekinumab (UST), and vedolizumab (VDZ). Methods: This descriptive study pooled data from IBM MarketScan, IQVIA PharMetrics, and Optum databases and identified CD patients who initiated the above biologics. Due to low sample size, CZP was not included in the analyses. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap of >30 days for ADA and >120 days for UST, IFX, and VDZ between two claims. A sensitivity analysis using fixed gap (90-day) was also conducted. Dose titration (based upon mean maintenance dose) including 50% dose escalation, and 50% dose reduction was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, UST, and VDZ patients. Results: After applying all selection criteria, patients were selected into bio-naive (ADA: 2047; IFX: 1127; UST: 296; VDZ: 342) and bio-experienced cohorts (ADA: 300; IFX: 341; UST: 801; VDZ: 593) based on the biologics used. Unadjusted persistence was numerically higher among bio-naive and bio-experienced UST (87.2%, 86.3%) patients followed by VDZ (78.9%, 80.8%), IFX (79.0%, 77.4%), and ADA (64.9%, 60.7%). Similar trends were observed using sensitivity analysis. Dose escalation was numerically higher for ADA patients (16.1%-16.4%) followed by UST (13.4%-16.9%), and VDZ (12.4%-14.7%). Dose reduction followed a similar trend. Conclusions: Among CD patients, unadjusted persistence using variable and fixed gap definition was numerically highest for UST patients whereas dose escalation was numerically highest among ADA patients. Further research is needed to examine treatment patterns after adjusting for confounders and baseline differences among biologic users.

Cost per response for guselkumab versus adalimumab in the United States using data from a head-to-head trial in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Aims: To estimate annual cost per response (CPR) in the US and number needed to treat (NNT) among patients receiving guselkumab or adalimumab treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO).Materials and methods: Results from VOYAGE 1, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, head-to-head, 48-week study of guselkumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO were used to estimate annual CPR for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90, and 100 responses. Drug dosing followed US label recommendations and drug costs were based on US annual wholesale acquisition costs. Number needed to treat (NNT) and annual CPR analyses were estimated, and week 48 response rates were assumed to be maintained for both the induction and maintenance years.Results: Week-48 PASI 90 response rates were 76.3% for guselkumab and 47.9% for adalimumab. The CPR for PASI 90 in the induction year for guselkumab was $113,861 vs $151,226 for adalimumab. Both drugs had lower CPRs for PASI 90 in the maintenance year: $85,395 for guselkumab and $140,424 for adalimumab for adalimumab. The NNT for a PASI 90 response was 1.3 for guselkumab and 2.1 for adalimumab; CPRs and NNT were also lower for guselkumab than for adalimumab for PASI 75 and PASI 100 for both induction and maintenance years.Limitations and conclusions: In this analysis, extrapolating 48-week results from a single head-to-head study, guselkumab was more cost-effective with lower NNT than adalimumab in both the induction and maintenance years for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses.

Prevalence and economic burden of comorbid anxiety and depression among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Objective: To describe the prevalence and costs of anxiety and depression among moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) patients in a commercially-insured US population.Methods: The IBM MarketScan Commercial database was used to select adults with moderate-to-severe PsO (≥1 PsO diagnosis and ≥1 systemic or biologic medication) within each calendar year from 2014 to 2016. Adults with no diagnosis of PsO or similar disorders were randomly selected (2014-2016) and matched 1:1 to PsO patients to compare the prevalence of anxiety and depression each year. Moderate-to-severe PsO patients identified in 2014 with continuous enrollment through 2015 were stratified into those with treated anxiety and/or depression (≥1 anxiety or depression diagnosis plus any anxiolytics, antidepressants, or antipsychotics within 30 days) vs those without anxiety/depression, and then matched 1:1 to determine the incremental burden of treated anxiety/depression among PsO patients. All-cause and PsO-related healthcare costs were compared between the matched cohorts using generalized linear models.Results: In total, 69,644 matched PsO and non-PsO patients were identified in 2014, 61,478 in 2015, and 66,880 in 2016. The prevalence of anxiety/depression among PsO patients increased more than for matched controls, from 18.2% vs 12.2% in 2014 (p < 0.01) to 19.6% vs 13.1% in 2016 (p < 0.01). Prevalence of treated anxiety/depression followed the same trend, with increases from 14.5% vs 8.9% in 2014 (p < 0.01) to 15.9% vs 9.9% in 2016 (p < 0.01). For patients with moderate-to-severe PsO, unadjusted incremental all-cause healthcare costs associated with treated anxiety/depression were $8,077 (p < 0.01); 91% was due to utilization of medical services such as hospitalizations, ER visits, office visits, and other outpatient services (all p < 0.01).Conclusions: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders is higher among PsO patients than the general population, and the incremental burden of treated anxiety/depression is substantial. Further research is needed, but PsO treatments that improve psychiatric symptoms such as anxiety/depression may benefit patients and reduce their economic burden.