Nocardiosis diseminada a punto de partida de infeccion de piel y partes blandas. Serie de casos de un centro de tercer nivel / Disseminated nocardiosis at the starting point of skin and soft parts infection. Series of cases from a third level center

Nocardia es una bacteria grampositiva con amplia distribución en el medio ambiente. Puede producir variadas de infecciones. Si bien, las vías respiratorias son la principal puerta de entrada de Nocardia sp. ­y como consecuencia de lo mismo 50% de los pacientes posee compromiso pulmonar- las infecciones por Nocardia van desde infecciones de piel y partes blandas hasta abscesos cerebrales. La piel puede ser el órgano de afectación primaria y el primer signo clínico de infección o formar parte de una infección diseminada. La nocardiosis diseminada, es una grave enfermedad que involucra a dos sitios no contiguos de infección o el rescate del agente causal en hemocultivos. Afecta a pacientes debilitados con condiciones o con cierto grado de inmunodepresión; particularmente de inmunidad celular; como trasplantados de órganos sólido o hematopoyeticos, uso de corticoides, neoplasias, VIH, alcoholismo ­aunque se describen infecciones en pacientes inmunocompetentes­. El diagnóstico es dificultoso y la sospecha clínica es fundamental para el inicio de la terapéutica. Se describen dos casos de infecciones de piel y partes blandas ocasionadas por Nocardia; de evolución subaguda-cronica;. Una de ellas localizada: micetoma de pie, la segunda, una celulitis abdominal recurrente complicada con compromiso sistémico; en ambas estuvo presente la demora en el diagnóstico.

Nocardia is a gram-positive bacteria with wide distribution in the environment. It can cause a wide range of infections. Although the respiratory tract is the main entry point for Nocardia sp. ­ and as a consequence of the same, 50% of patients have lung involvement ­ nocardia infections range from skin and soft tissue infections to brain abscesses. The skin can be the primary organ of involvement and the first clinical sign of infection or be part of a disseminated infection, secondary to a primary pulmonary form. Disseminated nocardiosis is a serious disease that involves two non-contiguous sites of infection or the recovery of the causative agent in blood cultures. It commonly affects patients with weakened conditions or a certain degree of immunosuppression; particularly cellular immunity, such as solid or hematopoietic organ transplants, use of corticosteroids, neoplasms, HIV, alcoholism - although infections are described in immunocompetent patients. The diagnosis is difficult and clinical suspicion is essential for the initiation of therapy. Two cases of skin and soft tissue infections caused by Nocardia were described of subacute-chronic evolution. One of them localized: mycetoma of the foot, the second, a recurrent abdominal cellulites complicated with systemic involvement; Delay in diagnosis was present in both

Integrated results of 2 phase 3 studies comparing tigecycline and levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia.

Tigecycline (TGC), a glycylcycline, has expanded activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative, anaerobic, and atypical bacteria. Two phase 3 studies were conducted. Hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were randomized to intravenous (IV) TGC (100 mg followed by 50 mg bid) or IV levofloxacin (LEV) (500 mg bid). In 1 study, patients could be switched to oral LEV after at least 3 days intravenously. The coprimary efficacy end points were as follows: clinical response in clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure (TOC). The secondary end points were as follows: microbiologic efficacy and susceptibility to TGC for CAP bacteria. Safety evaluations were included. Eight hundred ninety-one were patients screened: 846 mITT (TGC 424, LEV 422), 574 CE (TGC 282, LEV 292). Most patients had Fine Pneumonia Severity Index II to IV (80.7% TGC, 74.4% LEV, mITT). At TOC (CE), TGC cured 253/282 patients (89.7%) and LEV cured 252/292 patients (86.3%); the absolute difference of TGC-LEV was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.2 to 9.1, noninferior [P < 0.001]). In c-mITT, TGC cured 319/394 patients (81.0%) and LEV cured 321/403 patients (79.7%); the absolute difference of TGC-LEV was 1.3% (95% CI -4.5 to 7.1, noninferior [P < 0.001]). The drug-related adverse events (AEs) of nausea (20.8% TGC versus 6.6% LEV) and vomiting (13.2% TGC versus 3.3% LEV) were significantly higher in TGC; elevated alanine aminotransferase (2.8% TGC versus 7.3% LEV) and aspartate aminotransferase (2.6% TGC versus 6.9% LEV) were significantly higher in LEV. Discontinuations for AEs were low (TGC, 26 patients [6.1%]; LEV, 34 patients [8.1%]). TGC appeared safe and achieved cure rates similar to LEV in hospitalized patients with CAP.

Infección extraintestinal debida a bacterias del género Campylobacter / Extraintestinal infections due to Campylobacter SPP

Campylobacter jejuni causa principalmente enteritis disenteriforme; los casos debidos a C. fetus son raros, mayormente bacteriemiaen inmunosuprimidos. Presentamos dos casos de enfermedad diarreica con bacteriemia, ambos con hemorragia digestiva,debida a C. jejuni, un caso inusual de infección de anerurisma de la arteria femoral y un caso de bacteriemia recurrente conprobable foco en marcapasos en un anciano sin otro factor de inmunosupresión, los dos últimos debidos a C. fetus. Todos lospacientes tuvieron evolución favorable. Recomendamos prestar atención a los hemocultivos que resulten positivos para efectuarlos subcultivos adecuados para recuperar, identificar y determinar la sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de este tipo de bacterias microaerofílicas.

Campylobacter jejuni often causes enteritis; cases due to C. fetus are rare: it causes mostly bacteremia in patients with immunosuppression.We present two cases of diarrheal disease with bacteremia, both with gastrointestinal bleeding due to C. jejuni, an unusual case ofC. fetus infection of an aneurysm in the femoral artery, and one case of recurrent C. fetus bacteremia with probably focus in apacemaker in an elderly patient without another cause of immunosuppression. All patients had a favorable evolution. We recommendspecial attention to the positive blood cultures in order to recover and identify this type of microaerophilic bacteria, and determineantimicrobial susceptibility.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: results from a double-blind randomized phase 3 comparison study with levofloxacin.

Tigecycline exhibits potent in vitro activity against many community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant ones. Its spectrum of activity and ability to penetrate lung tissue suggest it may be effective for hospitalized CAP patients. Hospitalized CAP patients (n=418) were randomized to receive intravenous (i.v.) tigecycline or levofloxacin. Patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin after receiving 6 or more doses of i.v. study medication. Therapy duration was 7 to 14 days. Coprimary efficacy end points were clinical responses in the clinically evaluable (CE: tigecycline, n=138; levofloxacin, n=156) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT: tigecycline, n=191; levofloxacin, n=203) populations at test-of-cure (TOC). Safety was assessed in the mITT population (tigecycline, n=208; levofloxacin, n=210). Cure rates in tigecycline and levofloxacin groups were comparable in CE (90.6% versus 87.2%, respectively) and c-mITT (78% versus 77.8%, respectively) populations at TOC. Nausea and vomiting occurred in significantly more tigecycline-treated patients; elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported in significantly more levofloxacin-treated patients. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, median duration of i.v. or oral antibiotic treatments, hospital readmissions, or number of patients switched to oral levofloxacin. Tigecycline was safe, effective, and noninferior to levofloxacin in hospitalized patients with CAP.