Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacol Res ; 185: 106492, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36228868

RESUMEN

Neuropathic pain, a disease of the somatosensory nervous system, afflicts many individuals and adequate management with current pharmacotherapies remains elusive. The glutamatergic system of neurons, receptors and transporters are intimately involved in pain but, to date, there have been few drugs developed that therapeutically modulate this system. Glutamate transporters, or excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs), remove excess glutamate around pain transmitting neurons to decrease nociception suggesting that the modulation of glutamate transporters may represent a novel approach to the treatment of pain. This review highlights and summarizes (1) the physiology of the glutamatergic system in neuropathic pain, (2) the preclinical evidence for dysregulation of glutamate transport in animal pain models, and (3) emerging novel therapies that modulate glutamate transporters. Successful drug discovery requires continuous focus on basic and translational methods to fully elucidate the etiologies of this disease to enable the development of targeted therapies. Increasing the efficacy of astrocytic EAATs may serve as a new way to successfully treat those suffering from this devastating disease.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia , Animales , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/metabolismo , Sistema de Transporte de Aminoácidos X-AG , Astrocitos/metabolismo , Ácido Glutámico/metabolismo , Neuronas/metabolismo
2.
AANA J ; 92(3): 7-13, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758719

RESUMEN

Aging leads to anatomic and physiologic changes in the brain, making it more sensitive to the depressant effects of anesthetic medications and increasing the risk of postoperative neurocognitive complications such as postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. This article explores the implications of anesthesia on elderly patients' brain health, emphasizing the heightened risk of postoperative neurocognitive disorders, and describes the BIS™ Monitoring System as a neuromonitoring tool for anesthesia professionals to assess the depth of anesthesia. The integration of the BIS Monitoring System into clinical practice can contribute to a more tailored and patient-centered approach to anesthesia management, ultimately improving perioperative outcomes and safety.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Anestesistas , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Monitores de Conciencia
3.
AANA J ; 89(3): 213-220, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042572

RESUMEN

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has a 1-5% risk of periprocedural stroke. The ability to emerge patients from anesthesia quickly to detect neurological abnormalities immediately after surgery is vital in this patient population. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if any of three general anesthetic techniques for CEA are associated with a shorter time to a reliable postoperative neurological exam. Secondary objectives were to assess postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), postoperative delirium (POD), and hemodynamic stability. Twenty-one patients undergoing CEA were enrolled and randomized to different combinations of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: Group A: propofol, remifentanil, and desflurane; Group B: dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and desflurane; Group C: remifentanil and desflurane. Anesthetic depth was titrated using a bispectral index (BIS) monitor to a goal of 50-60. Time was recorded from surgery end to first meaningful neurological exam. Neurocognitive testing was completed preoperatively and up to 1 week postoperatively to assess POD (3D-CAM) and POCD (Short Blessed Test). Time to first reliable neurological exam was 2 minutes longer in group A (9 min ± 4 min) compared to group B and group C (7 min ± 3 min; 7 min ± 4 min), although this was not statistically significant. In addition, extubation time was significantly longer in group A (11 min) compared to group B and group C (5 min; 6 min) (P = 0.03). 3D -CAM and Short Blessed Test data along with hemodynamics did not differ significantly between the groups. Time to first useful neurologic exam and hemodynamics did not differ between the groups. However, extubation time was significantly prolonged in patients who received propofol, but not dexmedetomidine, as part of their anesthetic for CEA. These findings are best verified in an adequately powered prospective randomized study.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Generales , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Propofol , Anestesia General , Anestésicos Generales/farmacología , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Piperidinas/farmacología , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA