RESUMEN
We report the outcome of 27 children with de novo acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) (excluding Down syndrome) enrolled in the French multicenter prospective study ELAM02 (2005-2011). There was no difference in gender, initial leukocyte count, CNS involvement, and complete remission rate (88.9%), as compared to other acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes. AMKL patients had a significantly poorer outcome (5-year overall survival 54% [CI 95% 33%-71%] than children with other AML subtypes (5-year overall survival 73% [CI 95% 68%-77%] p = 0.02). Gender, age, CNS leukemia, hyperleukocytosis, complete remission or cytogenetic subgroups were not significant prognostic factors of disease-free survival. AMKL (excluding Down syndrom) remains an AML subgroup with inferior outcome.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Megacarioblástica Aguda/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Síndrome de Down , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Leucemia Megacarioblástica Aguda/sangre , Leucemia Megacarioblástica Aguda/terapia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment strategy for patients with inborn errors of immunities (IEIs). Objective of this study was to assess the optimal busulfan exposure prior to allogeneic HCT for patients with an IEI who received an intravenous busulfan-based conditioning regimen between 2000 and 2023. Patients from 17 international centers were included. Main outcome of interest was event-free survival (EFS). Patients were categorized into 4 IEI subgroups: combined-immunodeficiency (CID), severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), neutrophil disorders and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-related disorders. Busulfan exposure was calculated by individual centers (AUCCENTER) and was re-estimated using a validated model (AUCNONMEM). Overall, 562 patients were included: 173 (30.8%) CID, 154 (27.4%) SCID, 101 (18.0%) HLH-related disorders, and 134 (23.8%) neutrophil disorders. Median busulfan AUCNONMEM was 69.0 mg×h/L and correlated poorly with AUCCENTER (r2=0.54). Patients with SCID, HLH-related, and neutrophil disorders were analyzed together (n=389), because CID disease subtype was an effect modifier (p=0.03). Estimated 2-year EFS was 78.5%. In patients with the found optimal busulfan AUCNONMEM of 70-90 mg×h/L, 2-year EFS was superior to <70 mg×h/L (adj-HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.49, p=0.02), and >90 mg×h/L (adj-HR 5.05, 95% CI 2.43-10.49, p<0.0001). Full donor chimerism increased with higher busulfan AUCNONMEM, plateauing at 90 mg×h/L. For CID patients, optimal AUCNONMEM for donor chimerism was found to be >70 mg×h/L. Improved EFS and higher donor chimerism may be achieved by targeting a cumulative busulfan AUCNONMEM of 80 mg×h/L (range 70-90). Our study stresses the importance to uniformly using a validated population PK-model to estimate the AUCNONMEM.
RESUMEN
We previously reported results of a French randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the risk of transplantation failure (including transplant-related mortality [TRM], engraftment failure, and autologous recovery) in single and double unrelated cord blood (UCB) transplantation in children and young adults with hematologic malignancies. We concluded that single-UCB transplantation with an adequate cell dose is the standard of care, leading to a 70% two-year overall survival (OS). It remains unclear, however, whether RCT participants have better outcomes than comparable patients not treated in the setting of a clinical trial. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of RCT participants (n = 137) to a Francophone population-based registry of patients (real-world [RW] group) fulfilling the eligibility criteria used in our RCT and transplanted with 1 or 2 UCB units after a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen between March 2015 (end of inclusion in the RCT) and February 2019 (n = 141). The primary endpoint was the 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) of transplantation strategy failure as defined in our RCT. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of age, disease distribution, hematologic status at transplantation, follow-up, and HLA compatibility. Patients in the RW group were more likely to be transplanted with a single-unit UCB (87.9% versus 49.6%, P< .001) and to receive a radiation-free regimen (39.0% versus 60.6%, P< .001). The 2-year CI of transplantation strategy failure, TRM, and the 2-year probability of OS were similar between the 2 groups, although the relapse risk was higher in the RW group (31.2% ± 7.7% versus 20.4% ± 6.8%, P= .01), resulting in a significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) (59.2% ± 8.4% versus 69.3% ± 8.0%, P= .047). This difference remained statistically significant only in the group of patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) who did not receive the conditioning regimen recommended by the RCT (fludarabine 75 mg/m2, total body irradiation 12 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg). The results of our RCT appear to be reproducible in real-world conditions, provided that the same cord blood selection criteria and conditioning regimen are used.