Automated Bio-AFM Generation of Large Mechanome Data Set and Their Analysis by Machine Learning to Classify Cancerous Cell Lines.

Mechanobiological measurements have the potential to discriminate healthy cells from pathological cells. However, a technology frequently used to measure these properties, i.e., atomic force microscopy (AFM), suffers from its low output and lack of standardization. In this work, we have optimized AFM mechanical measurement on cell populations and developed a technology combining cell patterning and AFM automation that has the potential to record data on hundreds of cells (956 cells measured for publication). On each cell, 16 force curves (FCs) and seven features/FC, constituting the mechanome, were calculated. All of the FCs were then classified using machine learning tools with a statistical approach based on a fuzzy logic algorithm, trained to discriminate between nonmalignant and cancerous cells (training base, up to 120 cells/cell line). The proof of concept was first made on prostate nonmalignant (RWPE-1) and cancerous cell lines (PC3-GFP), then on nonmalignant (Hs 895.Sk) and cancerous (Hs 895.T) skin fibroblast cell lines, and demonstrated the ability of our method to classify correctly 73% of the cells (194 cells in the database/cell line) despite the very high degree of similarity of the whole set of measurements (79-100% similarity).

Indentation of living cells by AFM tips may not be what we thought!

The models used to calculate Young's moduli from atomic force microscopy (AFM) force curves consider the shape of the indentation. It is then assumed that the geometry of the indentation is identical to the geometry of the indenter, which has been verified for hard materials (E > 1 MPa). Based on this assumption, the force curves calculated by these models, for the same object with a given Young's modulus, are different if the indenter geometry is different. On the contrary, we observe experimentally that the force curves recorded on soft living cells, with pyramidal, spherical, or tipless indenters, are almost similar. This indicates that this basic assumption on the indentation geometry does not work for soft materials (E of the order of 5 kPa or less). This means that, in this case, the shape of the indentation is therefore different from the shape of the indenter. Indentation of living cells by AFM is not what we thought!