Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 100
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 713-719, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036765

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease affects a significant portion of the Australian and world population. Minimally invasive laparoscopic fundoplication is a highly effective treatment in appropriately selected patients, with a 90% satisfaction rate. However, up to 5% will undergo revisional surgery. Endoscopy is an important investigation in the evaluation of persistent or new symptoms after fundoplication. Our study sought to evaluate the inter-rater reliability and variability in assessing fundoplication with endoscopy. METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons and gastroenterologists were invited to join the cohort study through their professional membership with two societies based in Australia. Participants completed a two part 25-item multiple choice questionnaire, involving the analysis of ten static endoscopic images post-fundoplication. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were included in the study (64 UGI surgeons and 37 gastroenterologists). Over 95% of participants were consultant level, working in non-rural tertiary hospitals. Total accuracy for all 10 cases combined was 76% for UGI surgeons and 69.9% for gastroenterologists. In three of the 10 cases, UGI surgeons performed significantly better than gastroenterologists (p < 0.05). When assessing performance across each of the 4 questions for each case, UGI surgeons were more accurate than gastroenterologists in describing the integrity of the wrap (p = 0.014). Inter-rater reliability was low across both groups for most domains (kappa < 1). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms low inter-rater reliability between endoscopists and large variations in reporting. UGI surgeons performed better than gastroenterologists in certain cases, usually when describing the integrity of the fundoplication. Our study provides further support for the use of a standardized reporting system in post-fundoplication patients.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Laparoscopía/métodos , Australia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Surg ; 48(6): 1448-1457, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629870

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of prosthetic mesh in laparoscopic repair of large hiatus hernias remains controversial. Clinical and quality of life outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of mesh versus suture repair previously showed few differences at early follow-up. This study evaluated longer-term quality of life outcomes from that trial. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, double blind randomized controlled trial assessed three methods of repair for large hiatus hernias: sutures-only versus absorbable mesh versus non-absorbable mesh. Quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire which was completed preoperatively and then at 3, 6, 12 months following surgery and annually thereafter. SF-36 outcomes were compared across the three repair techniques at longer-term follow-up (3-6 years), and to earlier baseline and 12-month outcomes. RESULTS: 126 patients were randomized; 43-suture-only, 41-absorbable mesh and 42-non-absorbable mesh. Questionnaires were completed by 118 patients preoperatively, 115 at 12 months and 98 at longer-term follow-up (median 5 years). There were no significant differences between the repair techniques for the subscale and composite scores at longer-term follow-up. The mental component score improved significantly after surgery and was sustained across follow-up for all techniques. The physical component score also improved significantly but was lower at longer-term follow-up compared to the 12-month follow up in both mesh groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of large hiatus hernias provides sustained long-term improvement in quality of life. The addition of mesh does not improve quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12605000725662.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Calidad de Vida , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto
3.
Dis Esophagus ; 2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670809

RESUMEN

Mucosal impedance is a marker of esophageal mucosal integrity and a novel technique for assessing esophageal function and pathology. This article highlights its development and clinical application for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, and eosinophilic esophagitis. A narrative review of key publications describing the development and use of mucosal impedance in clinical practice was conducted. A low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) has been shown to be an independent predictor of response to anti-reflux therapy. MNBI predicts medication-responsive heartburn better than distal esophageal acid exposure time. Patients with equivocal evidence of GERD using conventional methods, with a low MNBI, had an improvement in symptoms following the initiation of PPI therapy compared to those with a normal MNBI. A similar trend was seen in a post fundoplication cohort. Strong clinical utility for the use of mucosal impedance in assessing eosinophilic esophagitis has been repeatedly demonstrated; however, there is minimal direction for application in Barrett's esophagus. The authors conclude that mucosal impedance has potential clinical utility for the assessment and diagnosis of GERD, particularly when conventional investigations have yielded equivocal results.

4.
Dis Esophagus ; 37(5)2024 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281990

RESUMEN

Obesity is a chronic and multifactorial condition characterized by abnormal weight gain due to excessive adipose tissue accumulation that represents a growing worldwide challenge for public health. In addition, obese patients have an increased risk of hiatal hernia, esophageal, and gastric dysfunction, as well as gastroesophageal reflux disease, which has a prevalence over 40% in those seeking endoscopic or surgical intervention. Surgery has been demonstrated to be the most effective treatment for severe obesity in terms of long-term weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life improvements and overall mortality decrease. The recent emergence of bariatric endoscopic techniques promises less invasive, more cost-effective, and reproducible approaches to the treatment of obesity. With the endorsement of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, we started a Delphi process to develop consensus statements on the most appropriate diagnostic workup to preoperatively assess gastroesophageal function before bariatric surgical or endoscopic interventions. The Consensus Working Group comprised 11 international experts from five countries. The group consisted of gastroenterologists and surgeons with a large expertise with regard to gastroesophageal reflux disease, bariatric surgery and endoscopy, and physiology. Ten statements were selected, on the basis of the agreement level and clinical relevance, which represent an evidence and experience-based consensus of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Humanos , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones
5.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 403, 2023 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37843694

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Synchronous and metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity are increasingly common. There is limited data to guide the combined or staged surgical approaches to these conditions. METHODS: A systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and patient-level meta-analysis of published cases were performed to examine the most effective surgical approach for patients with synchronous or metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies with 93 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients underwent concurrent achalasia and bariatric surgery, with the most common (n = 12, 72.2%) being laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This combination achieved 68.9% excess weight loss and 100% remission of achalasia (mean follow-up: 3 years). Seven (6 RYGB, 1 biliopancreatic diversion) patients had bariatric surgery following achalasia surgery. Of these, all 6 RYGBs had satisfactory bariatric outcomes, with complete remission of their achalasia (mean follow-up: 1.8 years). Sixty-eight patients underwent myotomy following bariatric surgery; the majority (n = 55, 80.9%) were following RYGB. In this scenario, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieved higher treatment success than LHM (n = 33 of 35, 94.3% vs. n = 14 of 20, 70.0%, p = 0.021). Moreover, conversion to RYGB following a restrictive bariatric procedure during achalasia surgery was also associated with higher achalasia treatment success. CONCLUSION: In patients with concurrent achalasia and obesity, LHM and RYGB achieved good outcomes for both pathologies. For those with weight gain post-achalasia surgery, RYGB provided satisfactory weight loss, without adversely affecting achalasia symptoms. For those with achalasia after bariatric surgery, POEM and conversion to RYGB produced greater treatment success.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Laparoscopía/métodos , Pérdida de Peso
6.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): 39-44, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214480

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine very late clinical outcomes at up to 20 years follow-up from a randomized controlled trial of Nissen versus anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux can be followed by troublesome side effects. To address this, partial fundoplications have been proposed. Previously reports from a randomized controlled trial of Nissen versus anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication at up to 10 years follow-up showed good outcomes for both procedures. METHODS: One hundred seven participants were randomized to Nissen versus anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication. Fifteen to 20 year follow-up data was available for 79 (41 Nissen, 38 anterior). Outcome was assessed using a standardized questionnaire with 0 to 10 analog scores and yes/no questions to determine reflux symptoms, side-effects, and satisfaction with surgery. RESULTS: After anterior fundoplication heartburn (mean score 3.2 vs 1.4, P = .001) and proton pump inhibitor use (41.7% vs 17.1%, P = .023) were higher, offset by less dysphagia for solids (mean score 1.8 vs 3.3, P = .015), and better ability to belch (84.2% vs 65.9%, P = .030). Measures of overall outcome were similar for both groups (mean satisfaction score 8.4 vs 8.0, P = .444; 86.8% vs 90.2% satisfied with outcome). Six participants underwent revision after anterior fundoplication (Nissen conversion for reflux - 6), and 7 underwent revision after Nissen fundoplication (Nissen to partial fundoplication for dysphagia - 5; redo Nissen for reflux - 1; paraesophageal hernia -1). CONCLUSIONS: At 15 to 20 years follow-up Nissen and anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication achieved similar success, but with trade-offs between better reflux control versus more side-effects after Nissen fundoplication.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/prevención & control , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/prevención & control , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Ann Surg ; 276(6): e770-e776, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630444

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Determine the utility of routine esophagograms after hiatus hernia repair and its impact on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: Hiatus hernia repairs are common. Early complications such asre-herniation, esophageal obstruction and perforation, although infrequent, incur significant morbidity. Whether routine postoperative esophagograms enable early recognition of these complications, expedite surgical management, reduce reoperative morbidity, and improve functional outcomes are unclear. METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively-maintained database of hiatus hernia repairs in 14 hospitals, and review of esophagograms in this cohort. Results: A total of 1829 hiatus hernias were repaired. Of these, 1571 (85.9%) patients underwent a postoperative esophagogram. Overall, 1 in 48 esophagograms resulted in an early (<14 days) reoperation, which was undertaken in 44 (2.4%) patients. Compared to those without an esophagogram, patients who received this test before reoperation (n = 37) had a shorter time to diagnosis (2.4 vs 3.9 days, P = 0.041) and treatment (2.4 vs 4.3 days, P = 0.037) of their complications. This was associated with lower rates of open surgery (10.8% vs 42.9%, P = 0.034), gastric resection (0.0% vs 28.6%, P = 0.022), postoperative morbidity (13.5% vs 85.7%, P < 0.001), unplanned intensive care admission (16.2% vs 85.7%, P < 0.001), and decreased length-of-stay (7.3 vs 18.3 days, P = 0.009). Furthermore, we identified less intraoperative and postoperative complications, and superior functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients who underwent early reoperations for an esophagogram-detected asymptomatic re-herniation than those who needed surgery for late symptomatic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative esophagograms decrease the morbidity associated with early and late reoperations, and should be considered for routine use after hiatus hernia surgery.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Laparoscopía/métodos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Morbilidad , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos
8.
World J Surg ; 46(1): 147-153, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34590163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with scleroderma often suffer from dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Partial fundoplication is a validated anti-reflux procedure for GERD but may worsen dysphagia in scleroderma patients. Its utility in these patients is unknown. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of partial fundoplication for the treatment of medically refractory GERD in patients with scleroderma. METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent fundoplication across 14 hospitals between 1991 and 2019. Perioperative outcomes, reintervention rates, heartburn, dysphagia, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months, 1- and 3-years post-surgery. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients with scleroderma were propensity score matched to 526 non-scleroderma controls. All underwent a partial fundoplication. Perioperative outcomes including complication rate, length of stay, and need for reoperation were similar between the two groups. Compared to baseline, both groups reported significantly improved heartburn at 3 months, 1- and 3-years following partial fundoplication. Surgery was equally effective at controlling heartburn across all follow-up timepoints in patients with or without scleroderma. Dysphagia to solids was more common in patients with scleroderma than controls at 3-months post-surgery, but was not significantly different to controls at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Satisfaction scores were high and comparable between both groups across all postoperative timepoints, with 100% of patients with scleroderma reporting that their initial choice to undergo surgery was correct. CONCLUSIONS: Partial fundoplication controls reflux and is associated with a transient period of dysphagia to solids in patients with scleroderma. This approach is safe, effective and acceptable for patients with scleroderma and medically refractory GERD.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Pirosis/etiología , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
World J Surg ; 45(6): 1819-1827, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33608845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only effective treatment strategy for a symptomatic pharyngeal pouch. However, octo- and nonagenarians are often denied referral to a surgeon because of perceived increased risks. Here, we compare the outcomes of pharyngeal pouch surgery in octo- and nonagenarians with patients under 80 years-of-age and determine the factors which predict post-operative complications and improvement in swallowing. METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent pharyngeal pouch surgery across seven hospitals over 15 years. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients (≥80 years-of-age: 27, <80 years-of-age: 86) underwent endoscopic or open pharyngeal pouch surgery. Despite more comorbidities and a longer hospital stay (median: one extra day), patients ≥80 years-of-age had comparable operative time, complication profile, intensive care admission, emergency reoperation, and revisional pouch surgery as their younger counterparts. Furthermore, the severity of complications was not significantly different between the two age cohorts. No surgical mortality was recorded. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diverticulectomy combined with cricopharyngeal myotomy independently predicted higher rates of complications (OR: 4.53, 95% CI: 1.43-14.33, p = 0.010), but also greater symptomatic improvement (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.50-12.67, p = 0.007). Importantly, a greater proportion of octo- and nonagenarians experienced improved swallowing than patients <80 years-of-age (96.3% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.013). Moreover, advanced age was not predictive of post-operative complications on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal pouch surgery in octo- and nonagenarians is safe and effective. Surgical correction in this age group alleviates symptoms and improves quality-of-life for most patients. These patients should not be denied surgery on the basis of advanced age alone.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Faringe , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Faringe/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 241-247, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675536

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether absorbable or nonabsorbable mesh repair of large hiatus hernias is followed by less recurrences at late follow-up compared to sutured repair. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiological recurrences have been reported in up to 30% of patients after repair of large hiatus hernias, and mesh repair has been proposed as a solution. Earlier trials have revealed mixed outcomes and early outcomes from a trial reported previously revealed no short-term advantages for mesh repair. METHODS: Multicentre prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh. Primary outcome - hernia recurrence assessed by barium meal X-ray and endoscopy at 3-4 years. Secondary outcomes - clinical symptom scores at 2, 3, and 5 years. RESULTS: 126 patients were enrolled - 43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh, and 42 nonabsorbable mesh. Clinical outcomes were obtained at 5 years in 89.9%, and objective follow-up was obtained in 72.3%. A recurrent hernia (any size) was identified in 39.3% after suture repair, 56.7% - absorbable mesh, and 42.9% - nonabsorbable mesh (P = 0.371). Clinical outcomes were similar at 5 years, except chest pain, diarrhea, and bloat symptoms which were more common after repair with absorbable mesh. CONCLUSIONS: No advantages were demonstrated for mesh repair at up to 5 years follow-up, and symptom outcomes were worse after repair with absorbable mesh. The longer-term results from this trial do not support mesh repair for large hiatus hernias.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura , Implantes Absorbibles , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Australia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico por imagen , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Reoperación/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
11.
Dis Esophagus ; 32(8)2019 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31323089

RESUMEN

Antireflux surgery aims to improve quality of life. However, whether patients and clinicians agree on what this means, and what is an acceptable outcome following fundoplication, is unknown. This study used clinical scenarios pertinent to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux to define acceptable outcomes from the perspective of patients, surgeons, and general practitioners (GPs). Patients who had previously undergone a laparoscopic fundoplication, general practitioners, and esophagogastric surgeons were invited to rank 11 clinical scenarios of outcomes following laparoscopic fundoplication for acceptability. Clinicopathological and practice variables were collated for patients and clinicians, respectively. GPs and esophagogastric surgeons additionally were asked to estimate postfundoplication outcome probabilities. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were undertaken to examine for associations with acceptability. Reponses were received from 331 patients (36.4% response rate), 93 GPs (13.4% response), and 60 surgeons (36.4% response). Bloating and inability to belch was less acceptable and dysphagia requiring intervention more acceptable to patients compared to clinicians. On regression analysis, female patients found bloating to be less acceptable (OR: 0.51 [95%CI: 0.29-0.91]; P = 0.022), but dysphagia more acceptable (OR: 1.93 [95%CI: 1.17-3.21]; P = 0.011). Postfundoplication estimation of reflux resolution was higher and that of bloating was lower for GPs compared to esophagogastric surgeons. Patients and clinicians have different appreciations of an acceptable outcome following antireflux surgery. Female patients are more concerned about wind-related side effects than male patients. The opposite holds true for dysphagia. Surgeons and GPs differ in their estimation of event probability for patient recovery following antireflux surgery, and this might explain their differing considerations of acceptable outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/psicología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/psicología , Médicos Generales/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Cirujanos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Ann Surg ; 268(2): 228-232, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29303805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate late outcomes from a randomized trial of division versus no division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at up to 20 years follow-up. BACKGROUND: Nissen fundoplication is an established procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Controversy about whether side effects such as dysphagia could be reduced by division of the short gastric vessels led to the establishment of a randomized trial in 1994. Early results showed equivalent reflux control and dysphagia, but more bloating after vessel division. METHODS: A total of 102 patients underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between May 1994 and October 1995, and were randomized to short gastric vessel division (50) versus nondivision (52). Follow-up was obtained yearly to 20 years using a standardized questionnaire administered by a blinded investigator. Clinical outcomes at 20 years or most recent follow-up were determined. RESULTS: No significant differences for heartburn symptom and satisfaction scores or medication use were found between treatment groups. At 15 to 20 (mean 19.6) years follow-up, significant differences persisted for epigastric bloating: 26% versus 50% for nondivision versus division groups (P = 0.046). Heartburn symptom scores were low and not different for nondivision versus division groups (mean analog scores 1.4 vs 2.1/10, P = 0.152). Overall satisfaction after surgery was high in both groups (mean analog scores 8.1 vs 8.6/10, P = 0.989). CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has durable efficacy for heartburn symptom control at up to 20 years follow-up, division of short-gastric vessels failed to confer any reduction in side effects, and was associated with persistent epigastric bloat symptoms at late follow-up in this trial.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estómago/irrigación sanguínea , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Método Simple Ciego , Estómago/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(9): 2731-2738, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials report improved overall survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma, with a 10-15% survival improvement. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that are known to direct the behavior of cancers, including response to treatment. We investigated the ability of miRNAs to predict outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Endoscopic biopsies from esophageal adenocarcinomas were obtained before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. miRNA levels were measured in the biopsies using next generation sequencing and compared with pathological response in the surgical resection, and subsequent survival. miRNA ratios that predicted pathological response were identified by Lasso regression and leave-one-out cross-validation. Association between miRNA ratio candidates and relapse-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression and Harrell's C analyses were performed to assess the predictive performance of the miRNAs. RESULTS: Two miRNA ratios (miR-4521/miR-340-5p and miR-101-3p/miR-451a) that predicted the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were found to be associated with relapse-free survival. Pretreatment expression of these two miRNA ratios, pretreatment tumor differentiation, posttreatment AJCC histopathological tumor regression grading, and posttreatment tumor clearance/margins were significant factors associated with survival in Cox regression analysis. Multivariate analysis of the two ratios together with pretherapy factors resulted in a risk prediction accuracy of 85% (Harrell's C), which was comparable with the prediction accuracy of the AJCC treatment response grading (77%). CONCLUSIONS: miRNA-ratio biomarkers identified using next generation sequencing can be used to predict disease free survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , MicroARNs/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
15.
World J Surg ; 47(5): 1151-1152, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802231

Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje , Cirujanos , Humanos
16.
World J Surg ; 47(12): 2947-2948, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37805924
17.
World J Surg ; 42(6): 1833-1840, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29159599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following hiatus hernia surgery may affect a substantial number of patients with adverse clinical consequences. Here, we aim to evaluate the impact of DGE following laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernias on patients' quality of life, gastrointestinal symptomatology, and daily function. METHODS: Analysis of data collected from a multicenter prospective randomised trial of patients who underwent laparoscopic mesh versus sutured repair of very large hiatus hernias (>50% of stomach in chest). DGE was defined as gastric food retention visualised at endoscopy after 6 h of fasting at 6 months post-surgery. Quality of life (QOL), gastrointestinal symptomatology, and daily function were assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, Visick scoring and structured surveys administered prior to surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen of 102 (18.6%) patients had DGE 6 months after surgery. QOL questionnaires were completed in at least 80% of patients across all time points. Compared with controls, the DGE group demonstrated significantly lower SF-36 physical component scores, delayed improvement in health transition, more adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, higher Visick scores and a slower rate of return to normal daily activities. These differences were still present 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DGE following large hiatus hernia repair is associated with a negative impact on quality of life at follow-up to 12 months after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Vaciamiento Gástrico/fisiología , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Hiatal/fisiopatología , Hernia Hiatal/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
18.
J Mater Sci Mater Med ; 29(6): 76, 2018 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845339

RESUMEN

Accuracy of sentinel lymph node identification using radioactive tracers in non-superficial cancers can be limited by radiation shine through and low spatial resolution of detection systems such as intraoperative gamma probes. By utilising a dual radioactive/magnetic tracer, sensitive lymphoscintigraphy can be paired with high spatial resolution intraoperative magnetometer probes to improve the accuracy of sentinel node detection in cancers with complex multidirectional lymphatic drainage. Dextran-coated magnetite nanoparticles (33 nm mean hydrodynamic diameter) were labelled with 99mTc and applied as a lymphotropic tracer in small and large animal models. The dual tracer could be radiolabelled with 98 ± 2% efficiency after 10 min of incubation at room temperature. Biodistribution studies of the tracer were conducted in normal rats (subdermal and intravenous tail delivery, n = 3) and swine (subdermal hind limb delivery, n = 5). In rats the dual tracer migrated through four tiers of lymph node, 20 min after subdermal injection. Results from intravenous biodistribution test for radiocolloids demonstrated no aggregation in vivo, however indicated the presence of some lower-molecular weight radioactive impurities (99mTc-dextran). In swine, the dual tracer could be effectively used to map lymphatic drainage from hind hoof to popliteal and inguinal basins using intraoperative gamma and magnetometer probes. Of the eight primary nodes excised, eight were positively identified by gamma probe and seven by magnetometer probe. The high-purity dual tracer shows early promise for sentinel node identification in complex lymphatic environments by combining sensitive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with a high-resolution intraoperative magnetometer probe.


Asunto(s)
Nanopartículas de Magnetita/química , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Tecnecio/química , Animales , Coloides/química , Dextranos/química , Femenino , Óxido Ferrosoférrico , Linfocintigrafia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Microscopía Electrónica de Transmisión , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Cintigrafía , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Porcinos , Temperatura , Distribución Tisular
19.
Ann Surg ; 266(6): 1000-1005, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27735829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy of antireflux surgery on Barrett's esophagus (BE) using BRAVO wireless pH monitoring. BACKGROUND: BE is associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal cancer. Till date, studies have failed to demonstrate that preventing gastroesophageal reflux with antireflux surgery halts the progression of BE, often because of difficulties in objectively proving an effective antireflux barrier. METHODS: Since 1991, all patients undergoing antireflux surgery across 2 hospital sites have been followed in a prospective database. Patients with BE and at least 5 years follow up after antireflux surgery were identified. All patients completed a clinical outcome questionnaire and underwent endoscopic assessment and histological evaluation of their BE. Fourty-eight hours pH monitoring was then performed with the wireless BRAVO system. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (40 males:10 females) were included in the study, with an average follow up of 11.9 years. Approximately, 92% (46/50) reported their outcome of surgery as "excellent" or "good" and 86% (43/50) reported "none" or "mild" symptoms. Histological regression of BE was seen in 41% (20/49). Lower esophageal acid exposure (percentage time pH < 4) was significantly greater in those with no pathological regression (P = 0.008). Moreover, 64% (32/50) showed endoscopic reduction in the length of BE. Acid exposure was also significantly less in the group showing endoscopic reduction of BE (%time pH < 4, 0.2 vs 3.6, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery is safe and effective in patients with Barrett's esophagus. An intact fundoplication, as assessed with BRAVO wireless pH monitoring, suggests that antireflux surgery may halt the progression of Barrett's esophagus, and this might reduce the risk of cancer development.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Monitorización del pH Esofágico , Esofagoscopía , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(3): 360-365, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27266979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Achalasia is a disorder of esophageal motility with a reported incidence of 0.5 to 1.6 per 100,000 persons per year in Europe, Asia, Canada, and America. However, estimates of incidence values have been derived predominantly from retrospective searches of databases of hospital discharge codes and personal communications with gastroenterologists, and are likely to be incorrect. We performed a cohort study based on esophageal manometry findings to determine the incidence of achalasia in South Australia. METHODS: We collected data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the South Australian population. Cases of achalasia diagnosed by esophageal manometry were identified from the 3 adult manometry laboratory databases in South Australia. Endoscopy reports and case notes were reviewed for correlations with diagnoses. The annual incidence of achalasia in the South Australian population was calculated for the decade 2004 to 2013. Findings were standardized to those of the European Standard Population based on age. RESULTS: The annual incidence of achalasia in South Australia ranged from 2.3 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons. The mean age at diagnosis was 62.1 ± 18.1 years. The incidence of achalasia increased with age (Spearman rho, 0.95; P < .01). The age-standardized incidence ranged from 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.3) to 2.5 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a cohort study of esophageal manometry, we determined the incidence of achalasia in South Australia to be 2.3 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons and to increase with age. South Australia's relative geographic isolation and the population's access to manometry allowed for more accurate identification of cases than hospital code analyses, with a low probability of missed cases.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Acalasia del Esófago/epidemiología , Manometría/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA