Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Injury ; 55 Suppl 1: 111356, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069351

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Extra-articular open fractures of the leg often result from high energy trauma. After healing, a painful ankle impingement may occur. In the event of anterior and posterior impingements, arthroscopic treatment may require two surgical positions. We propose an operative strategy to treat anterior and posterior ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg. Our hypothesis is that this strategy is simple, effective and with a low risk of complication. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Anterior ankle impingements were treated by anterior arthroscopy in supine position; anterior and posterior impingements were treated by anterior and posterior arthroscopy in supine position; anterior and posterior impingements associated with retraction of gastrocnemius muscles were treated with anterior arthroscopy in supine position followed by posterior arthroscopy in prone position, and an open tendon lengthening of the calcaneal tendon in the same position. The anterior and posterior arthroscopic release was tested in the cadaver laboratory. Then, the surgical strategy was applied to our patients in our clinical practice. After, we analysed retrospectively the results of the strategy in the first patients treated for a painful ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg. The data retrieved were the importance of pain (VAS), the presence of clinical instability, ankle mobility, gastrocnemius retraction and the AOFAS functional score and the post-operative complications. Then, these data were compared before the surgery and at last follow-up. RESULTS: From the cadaver laboratory, anterior and posterior arthroscopic release was possible in all cases without changing position. From our clinical practice, we included 5 patients (3 women and 2 men, mean age 43 years) suffering from an ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg (2 patients with isolated anterior impingement, 1 patient with anterior and posterior impingement, and 2 patients with anterior and posterior impingement plus a gastrocnemius retraction). All post-operative parameters (pain, range of motion and AOFAS score) at mean follow-up of 53 months were improved. No post-operative complication was reported. CONCLUSION: We propose a surgical strategy adapted to the different clinical presentations of ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo , Artroscopía , Fracturas Abiertas , Humanos , Artroscopía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Posición Supina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/fisiopatología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Traumatismos del Tobillo/complicaciones , Traumatismos del Tobillo/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 140: 9-16, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141960

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examines long COVID symptoms course over 12 months, their impact on daily life, and associated factors for symptom relief. METHODS: A prospective cohort study included 231 participants with long COVID at 12-month follow-up. Data on characteristics, symptom course, and remission were collected using a questionnaire and a remission scale. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the prevalence rate ratio (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with symptom improvement. RESULTS: Of the 231 participants, 63.2% developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before COVID-19 vaccination. At 12 months, only 8.7% (95% CI: 5.4-13.1%) reported complete remission, while 28.6% noted significant improvement. Most symptoms remained prevalent: asthenia (83.1%), neurocognitive/neurological (93.9%), cardiothoracic (77.9%), Musculoskeletal (78.8%). During long COVID, 62.2% stopped working, and only 32.5% resumed full-time professional activities. Presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before vaccination increased the probability of improvement (aPRR: 1.60, P = 0.028), while ageusia at initial long COVID phase decreased the probability (aPRR: 0.38, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Long-COVID symptoms persisted in the majority of participants after 12 months, with significant impacts on daily life and work. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were associated with better prognosis, while persistent ageusia indicated a lower probability of improvement. These findings highlight the need for ongoing support and care for individuals with long COVID.


Asunto(s)
Ageusia , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Francia/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales
3.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; : 103886, 2024 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The results of surgical versus conservative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are still controversial. The objective of this study was to compare surgical and conservative treatment at a minimum follow-up of 1 year in terms of the complications, functional outcomes and clinical results. HYPOTHESES: There is no difference in the complications, clinical results and functional outcomes between the two treatment groups. There is no difference in the occurrence of complications or the clinical results due to the immobilization or rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative, multicenter, non-randomized study of acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2019 at 21 study sites in France. All patients who received surgical or conservative treatment were included. The demographics, sports participation, nature of treatment, immobilization parameters (type, duration, position) and rehabilitation protocol were collected. Rerupture, general and specific complications, clinical results (heel-rise test, single-leg hop, calf circumference, ankle dorsiflexion) and the functional outcomes (ATRS, VISA-A, EFAS, SF-12) were collected at the final review. RESULTS: Four hundred five patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 24 (±7) months. Surgical treatment was done in 372 patients (92%) and conservative treatment in 33 patients (8%), with these two sets of patients having comparable preoperative characteristics. There was a similar number of reruptures in the conservative group (3 cases, 9%) as in the surgical group (15 cases, 4%) (p=0.176). There were more general complications in the conservative group (24%) than in the surgical group (11%) (p=0.04). There was a 9% rate of surgery-related complications (infection, nerve damage, anesthesia after-effects). The ATRS (p=0.017), EFAS Total (p=0.013), EFAS daily living (p=0.008), and SF-12 physical (p=0.01) were better in the surgical group. Strict then relative immobilization provided the best balance between functional recovery (EFAS total of 33, p<0.01) and tendon lengthening (0°, p=0.01) without increasing the occurrence of rerupture (2%, p=0.18). Early weightbearing accompanied by immobilization and rehabilitation within 30 days did not lead to more reruptures than if it was started beyond 30 days (p=0.082 and p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no differences in the number of reruptures between surgical treatment and conservative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Surgical treatment led to better clinical results but had a variable effect on improving the functional scores. No matter which treatment is used, in the ideal case, 3 weeks of strict immobilization in equinus should be followed by progressive reduction over the next 3 weeks. Early weightbearing and mobilization within 30 days did not increase the risk of rerupture; it actually optimized the clinical and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative, non-randomized.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA