Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Nonendoscopic Biomarker-Driven Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Preliminary data suggest that an encapsulated balloon (EsoCheck), coupled with a 2 methylated DNA biomarker panel (EsoGuard), detects Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with high accuracy. The initial assay requires sample freezing upon collection. The purpose of this study was to assess a next-generation EsoCheck sampling device and EsoGuard assay in a much-enlarged multicenter study clinically enhanced by using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988-compliant assay and samples maintained at room temperature. METHODS: Cases with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), dysplastic BE (indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia), EAC, junctional adenocarcinoma, plus endoscopy controls without esophageal intestinal metaplasia, were prospectively enrolled. Medical assistants at 6 institutions delivered the encapsulated balloon per orally with inflation in the stomach. The inflated balloon sampled the distal 5 cm of the esophagus and then was deflated and retracted into the capsule, preventing sample contamination. EsoGuard bisulfite sequencing assayed levels of methylated vimentin and methylated cyclin A1. RESULTS: A total of 243 evaluable patients-88 cases (median age 68 years, 78% men, 92% White) and 155 controls (median age 57 years, 41% men, 88% White)-underwent adequate EsoCheck sampling. The mean procedural time was approximately 3 minutes. Cases included 31 with NDBE, 16 with indefinite for dysplasia/low-grade dysplasia, 23 with high-grade dysplasia, and 18 with EAC/junctional adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven NDBE and dysplastic BE cases (53%) were short-segment BE (<3 cm). Overall sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.93) and specificity was 85% (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.90). Sensitivity for NDBE was 84%. EsoCheck/EsoGuard detected 100% of cancers (n = 18). DISCUSSION: EsoCheck/EsoGuard demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting BE and BE-related neoplasia.

Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With Prior Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Are Similar to Those Without Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) do not report gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. This study aimed to compare the risk factor profiles and cancer stage at presentation of patients with EAC with and without prior GERD. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, patients with EAC were divided into 2 cohorts: (i) EAC with prior GERD: patients who reported typical GERD symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) ≥1 year before cancer diagnosis and (ii) EAC without prior GERD: patients who did not report prior GERD symptoms or reported symptoms within 1 year of their cancer diagnosis. Baseline demographics, risk factors, and cancer stage at presentation were compared between the 2 cohorts. In addition, the distribution of patients based on numbers of BE/EAC-associated risk factors (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more) was examined in the symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. RESULTS: Over 13 years, 388 patients with EAC with prior GERD and 245 patients with EAC without prior GERD were recruited. Both groups had similar baseline demographics and risk factors, but patients with EAC with prior GERD were more likely to have a history of BE. Asymptomatic patients had more advanced disease. Patients with 3 or more BE/EAC-related risk factors formed the largest proportion of patients in both the symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. DISCUSSION: Patients with EAC with and without prior GERD symptoms are phenotypically similar, suggesting that BE screening efforts to prevent or detect early EAC should not be restricted to just those with GERD.

Massively Parallel Sequencing of Esophageal Brushings Enables an Aneuploidy-Based Classification of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Aneuploidy has been proposed as a tool to assess progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), but has heretofore required multiple biopsies. We assessed whether a single esophageal brushing that widely sampled the esophagus could be combined with massively parallel sequencing to characterize aneuploidy and identify patients with disease progression to dysplasia or cancer. METHODS: Esophageal brushings were obtained from patients without BE, with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or adenocarcinoma (EAC). To assess aneuploidy, we used RealSeqS, a technique that uses a single primer pair to interrogate ∼350,000 genome-spanning regions and identify specific chromosome arm alterations. A classifier to distinguish NDBE from EAC was trained on results from 79 patients. An independent validation cohort of 268 subjects was used to test the classifier at distinguishing patients at successive phases of BE progression. RESULTS: Aneuploidy progression was associated with gains of 1q, 12p, and 20q and losses on 9p and 17p. The entire chromosome 8q was often gained in NDBE, whereas focal gain of 8q24 was identified only when there was dysplasia. Among validation subjects, a classifier incorporating these features with a global measure of aneuploidy scored positive in 96% of EAC, 68% of HGD, but only 7% of NDBE. CONCLUSIONS: RealSeqS analysis of esophageal brushings provides a practical and sensitive method to determine aneuploidy in BE patients. It identifies specific chromosome changes that occur early in NDBE and others that occur late and mark progression to dysplasia. The clinical implications of this approach can now be tested in prospective trials.

Prediction of neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus using nanoscale nuclear architecture mapping: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nanoscale nuclear architecture mapping (nanoNAM), an optical coherence tomography-derived approach, is capable of detecting with nanoscale sensitivity structural alterations in the chromatin of epithelial cell nuclei at risk for malignant transformation. Because these alterations predate the development of dysplasia, we aimed to use nanoNAM to identify patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who might progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: This is a nested case-control study of 46 BE patients, of which 21 progressed to HGD/EAC over 3.7 ± 2.37 years (cases/progressors) and 25 patients who did not progress over 6.3 ± 3.1 years (control subjects/nonprogressors). The archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks collected as part of standard clinical care at the index endoscopy were used. nanoNAM imaging was performed on a 5-µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section, and each nucleus was mapped to a 3-dimensional (3D) depth-resolved optical path difference (drOPD) nuclear representation, quantifying nanoscale-sensitive alterations in the 3D nuclear architecture of the cell. Using 3D-drOPD representation of each nucleus, we computed 12 patient-level nanoNAM features summarizing the alterations in intrinsic nuclear architecture. A risk prediction model was built incorporating nanoNAM features and clinical features. RESULTS: A statistically significant differential shift was observed in the drOPD cumulative distributions between progressors and nonprogressors. Of the 12 nanoNAM features, 6 (mean-maximum, mean-mean, mean-median, entropy-median, entropy-entropy, entropy-skewness) showed a statistically significant difference between cases and control subjects. NanoNAM features based prediction model identified progression in independent validation sets, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 80.8% ± .35% (mean ± standard error), with an increase to 82.54% ± .46% when combined with length of the BE segment. CONCLUSIONS: NanoNAM can serve as an adjunct to histopathologic evaluation of BE patients and aid in risk stratification.

Wide-area transepithelial sampling for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Seattle protocol forceps biopsy sampling (FB) is currently recommended for surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE) but limited by sampling error and lack of compliance. Wide-area transepithelial sampling with 3-dimensional analysis (WATS3D; CDx Diagnostics, Suffern, NY, USA) is reported to increase BE dysplasia detection. We assessed the incremental yield and clinical significance of WATS3D for dysplasia detection over FB in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We queried major scientific databases for studies using WATS3D and FB from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was the incremental yield of WATS3D-detected dysplasia (defined as a composite of indefinite for dysplasia, low- and high-grade dysplasia [HGD] and esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]) over FB. Secondary outcomes were incremental yields of HGD/EAC and rate of reconfirmation of WATS3D dysplasia on subsequent FB. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 7 eligible studies demonstrated that FB diagnosed dysplasia in 15.9% of cases, whereas the incremental yield with WATS3D was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.9%-11.5%; I2= 92.1%). Meta-analysis of 6 studies demonstrated that FB diagnosed HGD/EAC in 2.3% of patients, whereas the incremental yield with WATS3D was 2.1% (95% confidence interval, .4%-5.3%; I2= 92.7%). Notably, WATS3D was negative in 62.5% of cases where FB identified dysplasia. Two studies reported reconfirmation of WATS3D dysplasia with FB histology in only 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: WATS3D increases dysplasia detection; however, the clinical significance of this increased dysplasia detection remains uncertain. Data from endoscopic follow-up to ascertain FB histology in patients with dysplasia based solely on WATS3D are needed to determine the optimal clinical application and significance of WATS3D-only dysplasia.

Clinical Risk Prediction Model for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Clinical staging with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) is used to identify esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients with locally advanced disease and therefore, benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. However, EUS is operator dependent and subject to interobserver variability. Therefore, we aimed to identify clinical predictors of locally advanced EAC and build a predictive model that can be used as an adjunct to current staging methods. STUDY: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with EAC who underwent preoperative staging with EUS and PET scan followed by definitive therapy at our institution from January 2011 to December 2017. Demographic data, symptoms, endoscopic findings, EUS, and PET scan findings were obtained. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients met the study criteria, of which 86 (20.2%) patients had limited stage EAC and 340 (79.8%) had locally advanced disease. The mean age was 65.4±10.3 years of which 356 (83.6%) were men and 393 (92.3%) were White. On multivariable analysis, age (above 75 or below 65 y), dysphagia [odds ratio (OR): 2.84], weight loss (OR: 2.06), protruding tumor (OR: 2.99), and tumor size >2 cm (OR: 3.3) were predictive of locally advanced disease, while gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.36) and presence of visible Barrett's esophagus (OR: 0.4) were more likely to be associated with limited stage. A nomogram for predicting the risk of locally advanced EAC was constructed and internally validated. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a nomogram to facilitate an individualized prediction of the risk of locally advanced EAC. This model can aid in decision making for neoadjuvant therapy in EAC.

Pneumatic dilation for esophageal achalasia: patient selection and perspectives.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is palliative, aimed at decreasing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. Several other invasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities, such as Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), also have a comparable safety and efficacy profile to PD. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes of PD in various patient populations and its comparison to LHM and POEM. This review also provides relevant information to help endoscopists identify those patients who will benefit the most from PD.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Safe and Highly Effective Treatment for Advanced Achalasia With Sigmoid Esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In advanced achalasia patients with sigmoid esophagus, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) might be technically challenging and its outcomes are not well known in western population. Hence, our study aims were to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in achalasia patients with and without sigmoid esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of achalasia patients who had POEM at our institution between April 2014 and December 2019 were reviewed. Patients who underwent work-up comprising timed barium esophagram (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) before POEM along with 2-month post-POEM esophageal pH study, TBE and HREM were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized as either sigmoid or no sigmoid esophagus based on the morphology of esophagus on TBE as per Japan Esophageal Society guidelines. Treatment success was defined as reduction of post-POEM Eckardt score to ≤3. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (sigmoid esophagus=20; no sigmoid esophagus=148) were included. Esophageal width on TBE at 1 minute was significantly higher in sigmoid esophagus group compared with no sigmoid esophagus group (4.9 vs. 3.0 cm, P<0.001). Procedural outcomes and complications were similar in both groups. At 2-month follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in Eckardt scores, TBE, and HREM parameters. Treatment success was high and similar in both sigmoid and no sigmoid groups (94.4% vs. 93.2%, P=0.84). The rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that POEM is safe and highly effective treatment for achalasia patients with sigmoid esophagus similar to those without sigmoid esophagus in western population. POEM should be considered as the treatment of choice in advanced achalasia with sigmoid esophagus.

Post-ablation buried neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) with maximal acid suppression is the cornerstone for the management of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) associated dysplasia. The occurrence of buried dysplastic glands after re-epithelialization of a neo-squamous epithelium is of concern for endoscopists. Here, we present a patient with BE and high-grade dysplasia successfully treated by EET who developed buried dysplastic BE during surveillance. A review of literature on buried dysplasia after successful endoscopic therapy of BE is also discussed.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is highly effective for achalasia patients with recurrent symptoms after pneumatic dilatation.

BACKGROUND: Previous interventions in achalasia such as pneumatic dilation (PD) might lead to difficulties with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) along with sub-optimal outcomes. There are limited data in the literature on outcomes of POEM after PD, especially from the western hemisphere. Hence, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of POEM for recurrent symptoms after PD compared to treatment naïve achalasia patients. METHODS: Medical records of achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and October 2019 were reviewed. Patients who had POEM for recurrent symptoms after prior PD were matched at 1:2 ratio with treatment naïve achalasia patients using propensity score matching. Patients who had prior Heller myotomy were excluded. Patient demographics, Eckardt scores, timed barium swallow (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), and pH study findings were compared between the two groups, pre- and 2 months post-POEM. Treatment success was defined as reduction of Eckardt score to ≤ 3. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (prior PD = 13; treatment naïve = 26) were included. Patient demographics, procedural, and peri-procedural outcomes were similar in both groups. Treatment success was similar in both groups, 100.0% in prior PD vs 91.7% in treatment naïve group (p = 0.53). On adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in the pre-post-POEM improvement in Eckardt scores, TBE, and HREM parameters in the two groups. Gastroesophageal reflux disease rates were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In achalasia with recurrent symptoms after PD, POEM is a safe and highly effective treatment modality. Prior PD does not seem to influence the outcomes or efficacy of POEM.

Trends and risk factors for 30-day readmissions in patients with acute cholangitis: analysis from the national readmission database.

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholangitis (AC) can be associated with significant mortality and high risk of readmissions, if not managed promptly. We used national readmission database (NRD) to identify trends and risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions in patients with AC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted with AC from 2010-2014 and Q1-Q3 of 2015 by extracting data from NRD. Initial admission with a primary diagnosis of acute cholangitis (ICD-9 code: 576.1) was considered as the index admission and any admission after index admission was considered a readmission regardless of the primary diagnosis. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the association. RESULTS: From 52,906 AC index admissions, overall 30-day readmission rate was 21.48% without significant differences in the readmission rates across the study period. There was significant increase in the overall hospital charges for readmissions, while a significant reduction in the death rate was observed during the first readmission. Recurrent cholangitis (14%), septicemia (6.4%), and mechanical complication of bile duct prosthesis (3%) were the most common reasons for readmissions. The risk of readmission was significantly higher in patients with pancreatic neoplasm (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.8), those who underwent percutaneous biliary procedures (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6), and who had an acute respiratory failure (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.15). Other factors contributing to increased risk of readmissions included patients with Charleston comorbidity index > 3, diabetes, and length of stay > 3 days. Readmission risk was significantly lower in patients who underwent ERCP (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88) or cholecystectomy (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: AC is associated with a high 30-day readmission rate of over 21%. Patients with malignant biliary obstruction, increased comorbidities, and those who undergo percutaneous drainage rather than ERCP seem to be at the highest risk.

Allaying uncertainty in diagnosing buried Barrett's esophagus.

Subsquamous intestinal metaplasia (SSIM) in the setting of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a technically challenging diagnosis. While the risk for progression of BE involving the surface mucosa is well documented, the potential risk for development of advanced neoplasia associated with SSIM has been controversial. This study aimed to determine the effects of specimen adequacy, presence of dysplasia, and interobserver agreement for SSIM interpretation. Adult patients (n = 28) who underwent endoscopic therapy for BE with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma (HGD/IMC) between October 2005 and June 2013 were included. Initial evaluation (n = 140 slides) by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist was followed by an interobserver study by 8 pathologists. Forty-seven (34%) slides had insufficient subsquamous tissue to assess for SSIM. SSIM was found in 19% of all slides and 29% of slides with sufficient subsquamous tissue. At least one slide had SSIM in 54% to 64% of patients. Subsquamous low grade dysplasia (LGD) was found in 4 (15%) slides with SSIM and subsquamous HGD/IMC was found in 5 (19%) slides with SSIM. At the patient level, 8 (53%) had no dysplasia, 4 (27%) had LGD and 3 (20%) had HGD/IMC. Overall agreement for SSIM by slide was 92% to 94% (κ = 0.73 to κ = 0.82, moderate to strong agreement), and by patient was 82% to 94% (κ = 0.65 to κ = 0.87, moderate to strong agreement). This study confirms the need for assessing specimen adequacy and assessing the prevalence of SSIM and is the first to assess interobserver agreement for SSIM and dysplasia within SSIM.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is equally safe and highly effective treatment option in achalasia patients with both lower and higher ASA classification status.

INTRODUCTION: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system was developed as a simple categorization of patients' physiological status that predicts the operative risk. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive alternative to surgical myotomy in achalasia. As such, POEM seems to be an appealing option for high-risk patients with achalasia. However, there are no studies which systematically analyzed the outcomes of POEM among patients with different ASA classes. Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in patients with lower and higher ASA classes. METHODS: Medical records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized arbitrarily into two groups, lower ASA class (ASA I and II combined) and higher ASA class (ASA class III and IV combined). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium swallow (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square test and two-sample t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients met our study criteria (lower ASA class, n = 44; and higher ASA class, n = 100). Patients in higher ASA class were significantly more obese and older. More patients in lower ASA class had prior Heller myotomy and more patients in higher ASA Class had prior botulinum toxin injections. Procedural parameters were similar in both groups. Procedural complications were infrequent and were also similar in the two groups. The length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, reflux symptoms and esophageal pH study findings were also comparable between the two groups. Treatment success was similar in both groups, 97.7% in lower ASA class versus 92% in higher ASA class (p = 0.19). At 2-month follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in HREM and TBE parameters. CONCLUSION: POEM is a very safe and highly effective treatment option for achalasia patients with advanced ASA class similar to lower ASA class patients. POEM may be considered as the preferred choice for myotomy in these high-risk achalasia patients due to its low morbidity and high efficacy.

Changes in esophageal physiology after paraesophageal hernia repair and Collis gastroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach and technique for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair is much debated. The changes in the esophageal physiology after PEH repair with a concomitant Collis gastroplasty (PEH-CG) are not clearly known. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and esophageal pH testing after PEH-CG. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PEH-CG at our institution between 2006 and 2013 was performed. Patients had esophageal pH testing, HREM, barium swallow and an upper endoscopy before and after PEH-CG. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients underwent PEH-CG during the study period. Majority of patients had Nissen fundoplication (176, 96.7%) with Toupet in 6 (3.3%). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was lower after fundoplication (20.3 mmHg ± 11.3 vs. 25.8 mmHg ± 15.6, p < 0.001), whereas residual LESP was noted to be higher after fundoplication (7.7 mmHg ± 4.9 vs. 6.1 mmHg ± 6.7, p < 0.009). There were no significant changes in the esophageal motility patterns. There was an improvement in total pH and upright pH but not supine pH post PEH-CG. Normalization of total acid exposure after fundoplication was noted in 31 (59.6%) of the 52 patients who had abnormal total acid exposure prior to fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: Objective clinical assessment in patients undergoing PEH-CG demonstrates an effective operation for this complex problem. There was an increase in residual LESP but interestingly, decrease in basal LESP. Additionally, there was an improvement in esophageal acid exposure afterwards. These findings will facilitate future management of PEH.

Independent Blinded Validation of a Tissue Systems Pathology Test to Predict Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

INTRODUCTION: A risk prediction test was previously validated to predict progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of our study was to independently validate this test to predict the risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients with nondysplastic (ND), indefinite for dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). METHODS: A single-blinded, case-control study was conducted to stratify patients with BE as low, intermediate, or high risk for progression to HGD/EAC within 5 years using a previously described risk prediction test. Patients with BE who progressed to HGD/EAC after at least 1 year (n = 58) were matched to patients undergoing surveillance without progression (n = 210, median surveillance 7 years). Baseline biopsies with subspecialist diagnoses of ND, indefinite for dysplasia, or LGD were tested in a blinded manner, and the predictive performance of the test was assessed. RESULTS: This risk prediction test stratified patients with BE based on progression risk with the high-risk group at 4.7-fold increased risk for HGD/EAC compared with the low-risk group (95% confidence interval 2.5-8.8, P < 0.0001). Prevalence-adjusted positive predictive value at 5 years was 23%. The high-risk class and male sex provided predictive power that was independent of pathologic diagnosis, age, segment length, and hiatal hernia. Patients with ND BE who scored high risk progressed at a higher rate (26%) than patients with subspecialist-confirmed LGD (21.8%) at 5 years. DISCUSSION: A risk prediction test identifies patients with ND BE who are at high risk for progression to HGD/EAC and may benefit from early endoscopic therapy or increased surveillance.

Quality of Colonoscopy: A Comparison Between Gastroenterologists and Nongastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy performance by gastroenterologists has been shown to be associated with lower rates of developing interval colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear if this difference among specialists stems from a difference in meeting colonoscopy quality indicators. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the rates of colonoscopy quality indicators between different specialties. DESIGN: This is a cohort study of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy investigating quality metrics as compared by the proceduralist specialty. SETTING: All screening colonoscopies performed at the Cleveland Clinic between 2012 and 2014 were followed by manual chart review. PATIENTS: Average-risk patients, ≥50 years of age, who had a complete screening colonoscopy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, and other nonestablished overall and segment-specific rates were calculated and compared using t tests. RESULTS: A total of 4151 patients were included in the analysis. Colonoscopies were performed by 54 (64.3%) gastroenterologists, 21 (25%) colorectal surgeons, and 9 (10.7%) general surgeons. Gastroenterologists had the highest overall adenoma detection rate (28.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.001), followed by colorectal surgeons (24.3 ± 1.5) and general surgeons (18.4 ± 2.3), as well as the highest adenoma detection rate in men (34.7 ± 1.3; p < 0.001), followed by colorectal surgeons (28.2 ± 1.6) and general surgeons (23.7 ± 2.6). Similarly, gastroenterologists had the highest adenoma detection rate in women (24.3 ± 1.1; p < 0.001), followed by colorectal surgeons (21.6 ± 1.4) and general surgeons (12.9 ± 2.0). Withdrawal time was the longest among general surgeons (11.1 ± 5.5; p = 0.041), followed by colorectal surgeons (10.94 ± 5.2) and gastroenterologists (10.16 ± 1.26). LIMITATIONS: We could not adjust for some procedure-related details such as retroflexion in the right colon and the use of end-of-scope devices. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, only gastroenterologists met the currently accepted overall and sex-specific adenoma detection rate benchmarks. They also outperformed nongastroenterologists in many other nonestablished quality metrics. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B232. CALIDAD DE LA COLONOSCOPIA: UNA COMPARACIÓN ENTRE GASTROENTERÓLOGOS Y NO GASTROENTERÓLOGOS: Se ha demostrado que el rendimiento de la colonoscopia por parte de los gastroenterólogos, se asocia con tasas más bajas de cáncer colorrectal en intervalos de desarrollo. Sin embargo, no está claro si esta diferencia entre especialistas, se deriva de una diferencia en el cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad de la colonoscopia.El propósito del estudio, es determinar y comparar las tasas de indicadores de calidad de colonoscopia entre diferentes especialidades.Este es un estudio de cohorte de pacientes sometidos a una colonoscopia de detección, que investiga métricas de calidad en comparación con la especialidad de procesos.Todas las colonoscopias de detección realizadas en la Clínica Cleveland entre 2012 y 2014, fueron seguidas por una revisión manual del expediente.Pacientes de riesgo promedio, ≥50 años de edad que se sometieron a una colonoscopia de detección completa.La tasa de detección de adenomas, tasa de intubación cecal, tiempo de retirada y otras tasas generales y específicas de segmento no establecidas, se calcularon y compararon usando pruebas t.Un total de 4,151 pacientes fueron incluidos en el análisis. Las colonoscopias fueron realizadas por 54 (64.3%) gastroenterólogos, 21 (25%) cirujanos colorrectales y 9 (10.7%) cirujanos generales. Los gastroenterólogos tuvieron la tasa de detección más alta de adenomas en general (28.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.001), seguidos por los cirujanos colorrectales (24.3 ± 1.5) y los cirujanos generales (18.4 ± 2.3), así como la tasa de detección más alta de adenoma en hombres (34.7 ± 1.3; p < 0.001) seguido por cirujanos colorrectales (28.2 ± 1.6) y cirujanos generales (23.7 ± 2.6). Del mismo modo, los gastroenterólogos tuvieron la tasa más alta de detección de adenoma en mujeres (24.3 ± 1.1; p < 0.001), seguidos por los cirujanos colorrectales (21.6 ± 1.4) y los cirujanos generales (12.9 ± 2.0). El tiempo de extracción fue el más largo entre los cirujanos generales (11.1 ± 5.5; p = 0.041) seguido por los cirujanos colorrectales (10.94 ± 5.2) y los gastroenterólogos (10.16 ± 1.26).No pudimos ajustar algunos detalles relacionados con el procedimiento, tales como la retroflexión en el colon derecho y el uso de accesorios endoscópicos.En este estudio, solo los gastroenterólogos cumplieron con los índices de referencia actualmente aceptados, de detección de adenomas en general y específicas de género. También superaron a los no gastroenterólogos en muchas otras métricas no establecidas de calidad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B232. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Clinical Outcomes Based on the Timing of Appearance of Visible Lesions in Barrett's Esophagus During Endoscopic Eradication Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Visible lesions (VLs) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) are seen in 70% to 90% of patients presenting for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). It is not known if there are any differences in outcomes of patients with flat dysplasia versus patients with VL. Our aim was to assess outcomes of EET in BE patients with VL and BE patients with flat dysplasia. STUDY: This is a single center study with data drawn from a prospective registry of patients referred for EET of BE between 2011 and 2015. Demographic data, endoscopic findings, histologic findings, and response to EET were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 264 patients of which 34 had flat dysplasia, 180 had VL before initiating EET (prevalent lesions) and 50 who developed VL during EET (incident lesions). Compared with patients with flat dysplasia, patients with VL had longer segments of BE (5 vs. 4 cm, P=0.002) and greater prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (63.6% vs. 29.4%, P<0.001). Incident lesions are less likely to harbor HGD/EAC compared with prevalent lesions (28.1% vs. 61.8%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in eradication of metaplasia/dysplasia between the groups. No progression or recurrences were observed in flat dysplasia group. In VL group, 14 patients progressed (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=3) and 15 had recurrences (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=4). CONCLUSIONS: About 19% of BE patients developed VL during EET. There is higher prevalence of HGD/EAC in prevalent VL compared with incident VL. However, the outcomes did not differ.

Obesity Does Not Impact Outcomes or Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy in obese patients with achalasia are suboptimal along with the increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The impact of obesity on treatment success and GERD after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are not well known. Hence, our study aims were to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of GERD after POEM in nonobese versus obese patients with achalasia. METHODS: Chart review of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and June 2018. Patients with timed barium esophagram (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) before POEM along with post-POEM TBE, HREM, and esophageal pH study were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups, nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m) and obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m). Patient demographics, TBE, HREM, pH study findings, and Eckardt scores were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients (46 nonobese; 43 obese) met the study criteria. There were no significant differences in age, gender, achalasia subtype, operative time, length of stay and complication rates between the 2 groups. Treatment success (Eckardt score ≤3) was similar in both groups (97.7% nonobese vs. 92.7% obese, P=0.35). Abnormal DeMeester scores on pH study (>14.72) were similar in nonobese and obese patients (58.7% vs. 46.5%, P=0.25). Symptomatic GERD was also similar in both groups (17.8% in nonobese vs. 20% in obese, P=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: POEM is an equally safe and effective treatment option for both nonobese and obese patients with achalasia in the short-term. Interestingly, POEM does not lead to higher rates of GERD in obese compared with nonobese patients.

Esophageal dysmotility and other preoperative factors associated with acid suppressive therapy after fundoplication.

Background and aims: Acid suppressive therapy (AST) is frequently used after fundoplication. Prior studies show that most patients requiring AST after fundoplication have normal esophageal acid exposure and therefore do not need AST. Our aim was to determine the indications for AST use following fundoplication and the associated factors.Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent fundoplication at our institution between 2006 and 2013 with pre and postoperative esophageal physiologic studies was performed. Demographic data, symptoms, and findings on high resolution manometry, esophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy were collected.Results: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients were included with a median follow up time of 12.8[2.6, 47.7] months. Mean age was 59.6 ± 13.3 years and 71.4% were women. Of those, 39.5% went on AST following fundoplication with a median time to AST use of 15.7[2.8, 36.1] months. The most common reason for AST use was heartburn. Only 29% of patients had objective evidence of acid reflux. Preoperative factors associated with AST use following fundoplication were male gender (HR1.6, p = 0.019), esophageal dysmotility (HR1.7, p = 0.004), proton pump inhibitor use (HR2.3, p < 0.001) and prior history of fundoplication (HR1.8, p = 0.006). In those with paraesophageal hernia repair with Collis gastroplasty (N = 182), esophageal dysmotility (HR1.7, p = 0.047) and NSAID use (HR1.9, p = 0.023) were associated with AST use postoperatively.Discussion: AST use is common after fundoplication. Male gender, preoperative esophageal dysmotility, proton pump inhibitor use and redo fundoplication were associated with AST use following fundoplication. In those undergoing combined Collis gastroplasty, preoperative NSAID use and esophageal dysmotility predicted AST use.

Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adenoma detection rate (ADR), a validated quality indicator (QI) of colonoscopy, does not take into account risk stratification of adenomas. Low-risk adenomas are not associated with a significantly increased risk of future colorectal cancer (CRC). On the other hand, high-risk adenomas (HRA) are associated with up to six fold higher risk of future CRC. Therefore, HRA detection rate (HR-ADR) as a QI in addition to ADR may further enhance the efficacy of screening colonoscopy. Our aim was to calculate ADR and HR-ADR in a large cohort of average risk screening colonoscopy patients and propose HR-ADR which correlates with current threshold ADR. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of all colonoscopies performed in patients aged ≥ 50 years at our institution between 2012 and 2014. Average risk patients who had complete colonoscopy with good, excellent and adequate bowel preparation were included. Overall and gender-specific ADR and HR-ADR were calculated. HR-ADR was defined as proportion of colonoscopies with HRA. RESULTS: Among 4158 colonoscopies included, ADR was 26.4 ± 10.9% overall, 32.7 ± 14.5% in men, and 22.1 ± 12.6% in women. HR-ADR was 8.0 ± 5.7% overall, 10.2 ± 8.6% in men, and 6.1 ± 6% in women. There was only moderate correlation between ADR and HR-ADR [r = 0.57 (0.40-0.70)]. HR-ADR corresponding with minimum threshold ADR of 30% in men and 20% in women were calculated to be 7% in men and 4% in women. CONCLUSIONS: HR-ADR correlates only moderately with ADR. Based on the current threshold ADRs, we propose a benchmark HR-ADR of 7% in men and 4% in women as complementary QI to ADR.