Comparisons and correlations of 1-month recall vs 24-hour recall in patient-reported outcomes of an exploratory, phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sildenafil cream, 3.6% for the treatment of female sexual arousal disorder.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy assessments in clinical trials of treatments for female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) and other female sexual dysfunction (FSD) diagnoses rely on various patient-reported outcomes (PROs). AIMS: We sought to compare 1-month recall PRO measures among participants enrolled in a clinical trial who provided these data without (test population) vs with (control population) use of an at-home, 24-hour recall electronic diary (eDiary), capturing similar data. METHODS: Preplanned subset analysis as performed during a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream, 3.6% (sildenafil cream) among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD. Preliminary product efficacy was assessed via 1-month recall and 24-hour recall questionnaires. A subset of the participants, the Evaluation of Recall Subset [ERS] provided PROs via the 1-month recall instruments but did not provide data via the 24-hour recall eDiary. OUTCOMES: Responses to the 1-month recall instruments were compared among ERS (test) vs non-ERS (control) participants. Among the non-ERS population, correlations between 1-month and 24-hour recall endpoints were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the study co-primary 1-month recall efficacy endpoints, the Arousal Sensation (AS) domain of the 28-item Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ28) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale - Desire, Arousal, Orgasm question 14, among ERS vs non-ERS participants during the initial 1-month no-drug run-in period or the 1-month single-blind placebo run-in period (P values > .47). Scores on these 1-month recall PROs continued to be similar after randomization for sildenafil cream (P values > .30) and placebo cream (P values > .20) assigned ERS and non-ERS participants during the 3-month double-blind dosing period. There were strong correlations between the SFQ28 AS and eDiary AS scores during the no-drug run-in (R = 0.79, P < .01) and the single-blind run-in (R = 0.73 P < .001). During the double-blind dosing period, the SFQ28 AS score continued to be highly correlated with the eDiary AS score among sildenafil cream users (R = 0.83; P < .001) and placebo cream users (R = 0.8; 2 P < .001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There was no evidence that 1-month recall PRO instruments introduce recall bias; assessing arousal sensations with 24-hour vs 1-month PRO instruments is similar and either method could be used to assess efficacy depending on study objectives. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This preplanned subset analysis compared efficacy of PROs based on recall duration. While the subset was preplanned, the study was powered to detect significant differences in the primary efficacy objectives, not among this subset analyses. CONCLUSION: These data will be used in planning future efficacy assessments of sildenafil cream for FSAD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04948151.

Safety of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial for the treatment of female sexual arousal disorder.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), which is physiologically analogous to male erectile dysfunction. AIMS: The study sought to test the systemic and local genital safety of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% (sildenafil cream) among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD and their sexual partners over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD. Safety was assessed by the frequency and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among participants and their sexual partners. Participants recorded the incidence of TEAEs in a daily eDiary (electronic diary). Sexual partners were contacted within 72 hours of each sexual event in which investigational product was used. All participants used placebo cream for 1 month, during a single-blind run-in period, and then if eligible, were randomized 1:1 to sildenafil cream or placebo cream. Participants used their assigned investigational product over a 12-week double-blind dosing period. They attended monthly follow-up visits, in which their eDiary TEAE data were reviewed by the study staff and graded for severity and relationship to study product. OUTCOMES: The frequency and incidence of TEAEs among participants and their sexual partners. RESULTS: During the 12-week double-blind dosing period, there were 78 TEAEs reported by 29 of 99 sildenafil-assigned participants and 65 TEAEs reported by 28 of 94 placebo-assigned participants (P = .76). All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common treatment-related TEAE among active and placebo-assigned participants was application site discomfort. There were no differences in the number of treatment-related TEAEs among sildenafil cream vs placebo cream users (P > .99). Four sildenafil cream participants and 3 placebo cream participants discontinued the study due to TEAEs involving application site discomfort (P > .99). There were 9 TEAEs reported by 7 of 91 sexual partners exposed to sildenafil cream vs 4 TEAEs reported by 4 of 84 sexual partners exposed to placebo cream (P = .54). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data support further clinical development of topical sildenafil cream for the treatment of FSAD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Safety was assessed among participants and their sexual partners after 1357 and 1160 sexual experiences in which sildenafil cream or placebo cream were used, respectively. The phase 2b study was powered for the primary objectives of efficacy, rather than safety. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that topically applied sildenafil cream was safe and well tolerated by exposed users and their sexual partners.

ZB-06, a vaginal film containing an engineered human contraceptive antibody (HC4-N), demonstrates safety and efficacy in a phase 1 postcoital test and safety study.

BACKGROUND: With an unplanned pregnancy rate of 50% or more in many countries, there is an urgent need for contraceptives that are more accessible and acceptable. To meet the growing demand for new contraceptives, ZabBio developed ZB-06, a vaginal film containing HC4-N, a human contraceptive antibody that inactivates sperm. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the potential contraceptive activity of the ZB-06 film using a surrogate assessment for contraceptive efficacy, the postcoital test. We also assessed clinical safety of film use among healthy heterosexual couples. Serum, cervical mucus, and vaginal fluid HC4-N antibody concentrations and sperm agglutination potency were determined after single film use. Changes in the concentration of soluble proinflammatory cytokines and vaginal Nugent score after film use were measured as subclinical safety endpoints. STUDY DESIGN: This was a phase 1, first-in-woman, open-label, proof-of-concept, postcoital test and safety study. RESULTS: A total of 20 healthy women were enrolled in the study, and 8 heterosexual couples completed all study visits. The product was safe for both female participants and their male sexual partners. The postcoital test performed on ovulatory cervical mucus at baseline (no product use) revealed a mean of 25.9 (±30.6) progressively motile sperm per high-power field. After use of a single ZB-06 film before intercourse, this number dropped to 0.04 (±0.06) progressively motile sperm per high-power field (P<.0001). At the follow-up postcoital test visit approximately 1 month later (no product use), a mean of 47.4 (±37.4) progressively motile sperm per high-power field was observed, indicating contraceptive reversibility. CONCLUSION: A single dose of the ZB-06 film applied before intercourse was safe and met efficacy surrogate benchmarks of excluding progressively motile sperm from ovulatory cervical mucus. These data indicate that ZB-06 is a viable contraceptive candidate warranting further development and testing.

Changes in concentrations of cervicovaginal immune mediators across the menstrual cycle: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle play a key role in shaping immunity in the cervicovaginal tract. Cervicovaginal fluid contains cytokines, chemokines, immunoglobulins, and other immune mediators. Many studies have shown that the concentrations of these immune mediators change throughout the menstrual cycle, but the studies have often shown inconsistent results. Our understanding of immunological correlates of the menstrual cycle remains limited and could be improved by meta-analysis of the available evidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cervicovaginal immune mediator concentrations throughout the menstrual cycle using individual participant data. Study eligibility included strict definitions of the cycle phase (by progesterone or days since the last menstrual period) and no use of hormonal contraception or intrauterine devices. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using inverse-variance pooling to estimate concentration differences between the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, we performed a new laboratory study, measuring select immune mediators in cervicovaginal lavage samples. RESULTS: We screened 1570 abstracts and identified 71 eligible studies. We analyzed data from 31 studies, encompassing 39,589 concentration measurements of 77 immune mediators made on 2112 samples from 871 participants. Meta-analyses were performed on 53 immune mediators. Antibodies, CC-type chemokines, MMPs, IL-6, IL-16, IL-1RA, G-CSF, GNLY, and ICAM1 were lower in the luteal phase than the follicular phase. Only IL-1α, HBD-2, and HBD-3 were elevated in the luteal phase. There was minimal change between the phases for CXCL8, 9, and 10, interferons, TNF, SLPI, elafin, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and interleukins 1ß, 2, 10, 12, 13, and 17A. The GRADE strength of evidence was moderate to high for all immune mediators listed here. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variability of cervicovaginal immune mediator measurements, our meta-analyses show clear and consistent changes during the menstrual cycle. Many immune mediators were lower in the luteal phase, including chemokines, antibodies, matrix metalloproteinases, and several interleukins. Only interleukin-1α and beta-defensins were higher in the luteal phase. These cyclical differences may have consequences for immunity, susceptibility to infection, and fertility. Our study emphasizes the need to control for the effect of the menstrual cycle on immune mediators in future studies.

Recurrent bacterial vaginosis following metronidazole treatment is associated with microbiota richness at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis-a condition defined by a shift from Lactobacillus dominance to a polymicrobial, anaerobic bacterial community-increases the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections and other complications of the female reproductive tract. Antibiotic treatment frequently fails to return the microbiome to an optimal Lactobacillus-dominated state. No criteria currently exist to identify the patients likely to experience treatment failure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the pretreatment community signatures associated with treatment failure through 16S ribosomal RNA gene analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-eight women who were enrolled in an oral metronidazole treatment trial of bacterial vaginosis were studied. Cervicovaginal lavage samples were collected before metronidazole treatment and at 7 and 30 days posttreatment. Cervicovaginal lavage DNA was amplified and sequenced using a paired-end, V4 region 2×150 MiSeq run. RESULTS: Of the 28 women, 25% failed to clear bacterial vaginosis; 35.7% demonstrated a transient clearance, shifting to community-type 2 (Lactobacillus iners dominant) at visit 2 only; 7.1% demonstrated a delayed clearance, reaching community-type 2 at the final visit only; and 32.1% of patients experienced sustained bacterial vaginosis clearance. Examination of the community composition and structure demonstrated that both the richness and the evenness were significantly lower for the women who experienced sustained clearance, whereas the women who failed to clear bacterial vaginosis possessed the highest median levels of richness, evenness, and diversity pretreatment. Soluble immune factors in the lower reproductive tract improved significantly following a shift from community-type 4 to a Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome, with the samples categorized as community-type 2 possessing significantly higher levels of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, growth-regulated alpha protein, and macrophage inflammatory protein-3 and significantly lower levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Although the shifts to Lactobacillus dominance improved the markers of mucosal tissue health, these gains were only temporary among the women who experienced recurrence. CONCLUSION: Assemblies of highly diverse microbiota are associated with the enhanced resilience of bacterial vaginosis to standard metronidazole treatment. These communities may be foundational to treatment resistance or simply an indication of a well-established community made possible by canonical biofilm-forming taxa. Future studies must target the transcriptional activity of these communities under the pressure of antibiotic treatment to resolve the mechanisms of their resistance.

HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for individuals at risk of HIV. To explore stated preferences for a long-acting PrEP implant, we conducted a quantitative survey and discrete choice experiment with AG (ages 15-17), YW (18-34), and female sex workers (FSW; ≥ 18) in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We completed 600 quantitative surveys across the three subgroups of women. Respondents stated preference for an implant that provided longer HIV protection (24 months versus 6 months) and required a single insertion. They stated that they preferred a biodegradable implant that could be removed within 1 month of insertion. Respondents had no preference for a particular insertion location. Overall, 78% of respondents said they would be likely (33%) or very likely (45%) to use a PrEP implant were one available, with the majority (82%) stating preference for a product that would provide dual protection against HIV and unintended pregnancies. To reduce their risk of HIV, AG, YW, and FSW in our survey reported a strong willingness to use long-acting, highly-effective, dissolvable PrEP implants.

RESUMEN: Las niñas adolescentes (NA) y mujeres jóvenes (MJ), pueden enfrentar barreras de adherencia que limitan la eficacia de la profilaxis oral previa a la exposición al VIH (PrEP). Ya que el implante de PrEP es un producto que requiere de poca intervención de la usuaria y es de larga duración, podría eliminar algunas de las barreras de adherencia más importantes en el uso de los productos orales de PrEP para aquellas personas en riesgo de infección de VIH. Para explorar las preferencias declaradas en cuanto al implante de PrEP de acción prolongada, llevamos a cabo una encuesta cuantitativa y un experimento de elección discreta (DCE) con NA (de 15 a 17 años), MJ (de 18 a 34 años) y mujeres trabajadoras del sexo (MTS; ≥ 18 años) en la provincia de Gauteng, Sudáfrica. Administramos 600 encuestas cuantitativas en los tres subgrupos de mujeres. Los resultados indican la preferencia por un implante que proporciona una protección contra el VIH más prolongada (24 meses a comparación con 6 meses) y que requiere de una única inserción. Las participantes afirmaron que prefieren un implante biodegradable que puede retirarse un mes después de su inserción. Las participantes no tenían preferencia por un sitio específico de inserción. En general, el 78% de las participantes indicaron que probablemente (33%) o muy probablemente (45%) utilizarían un implante de PrEP si estuviera disponible, y la mayoría (82%) manifestó su preferencia por un producto que proporcionaba una doble protección contra el VIH y el embarazo no deseado. Para reducir el riesgo de contraer el VIH, las NA, MJ y MTS participantes se mostraron muy dispuestas a utilizar implantes de PrEP de larga duración, altamente eficaces y disolubles.

End-user research in support of long-acting systemic antiretroviral delivery systems: insights from qualitative research with providers and target users in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: While oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV, challenges such as adhering to a daily-dosing regimen and persistence have emerged as barriers for at-risks populations in South Africa. This qualitative research sought to investigate perceptions of and preferences for a long-acting, biodegradable implantable PrEP product designed to address these barriers. METHODS: To identify and understand motivators, barriers, and preferences for the PrEP implant, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) among health care providers (HCPs) and target end-users (young women, adolescent girls, and female sex workers) in urban and rural/peri-urban regions of Gauteng Province, South Africa. The IDIs focused on defining values, beliefs, habits, lifestyles, influencers, and information channels for potential PrEP implant end-users. RESULTS: We conducted 36 IDIs across health care providers and target end-user respondent segments. Respondents had generally positive reactions to the PrEP implant. Most end-users felt that some undesirable aspects of the implant (e.g., side effects, pain during insertion, potential scarring, and inability to remove implant) would be offset by having a highly effective, and long-lasting HIV prevention product. Although some HCPs believed the implantable PrEP would lead to increases in promiscuity and risky sexual behavior, most HCPs saw value in the PrEP implant's long duration of protection, its biodegradability, and the likelihood of higher adherence relative to oral PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: This study is a first step toward further research needed to demonstrate the demand for a biodegradable, long-acting implantable PrEP and suggests such a product would be accepted by end-users and HCPs in South Africa. This study indicates the need to develop more convenient, discreet, long-acting, and highly effective biomedical HIV prevention options for at-risk populations.

Clinical safety and pharmacology trial.

Guidelines for establishing clinical safety of microbicides in early clinical studies have evolved significantly since the first trials. In addition, because of the difficulty of establishing efficacy of a microbicide prior to Phase III testing, there has been an increasing emphasis on establishing pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships using genital samples collected in vivo in Phase I studies. A healthy pipeline is critical to success; however, it is unlikely that the majority of microbicide candidates will progress to clinical testing. Those that do enter clinical testing may have different mechanisms of action than early candidates. Given this, drug-specific modifications for early clinical assessment will need to be considered. These emerging issues associated with early clinical trials of microbicides will be reviewed, along with recommendations for future clinical safety and PK/PD evaluation.

Vaginal cytokines do not correlate with postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: Exploratory pilot study to determine the correlation between postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms and vaginal cytokine levels. METHODS: Postmenopausal women (n = 34) not using menopausal hormone therapy and presenting with or without symptoms of vulvovaginal irritation were screened. Each participant underwent a vaginal examination and screening for vaginitis. A cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) with sterile saline and a peripheral blood sample were obtained. Main outcome measures were assessed by Luminex® X-map method on the Bio-Plex® platform. Main outcome measures were cervicovaginal and serum interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, TNF-α, GM-CSF, MIP-1-alpha and RANTES level. Cervicovaginal cytokines were adjusted to total protein concentration [pg/mcg protein]. RESULTS: Twenty-six postmenopausal women were enrolled (symptomatic: n = 15; asymptomatic: n = 11). There were no significant differences between groups: age, age at menopause, vaginal pH and all CVL and serum cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, TNF-α, GM-CSF, MIP-1-alpha and RANTES). GM-CSF was the most abundant vaginal cytokine (symptomatic: 146.5 ± 165.6 pg/mcg protein; asymptomatic: 146.0 ± 173.5 pg/mcg protein; p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms did not correlate with vaginal inflammatory marker. There was no difference in serum or CVL cytokines between symptomatic and asymptomatic postmenopasual women. Vaginal symptoms after menopause are not related to the vaginal cytokine changes associated with loss of estrogen.

Comparison of visual and ultraviolet light inspection versus DNA/protein biomarkers to assess product adherence with vaginal microbicide applicators.

BACKGROUND: Objective biomarkers of product use and protocol compliance are urgently needed. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of DNA and protein-based biomarkers, obtained from used vaginal gel applicators, to visual inspection of those applicators under ambient light (visual inspection of returned applicator [VIRA]) and ultraviolet light (UVL). METHODS: Forty women inserted hydroxyethylcellulose placebo gel vaginal applicators under direct observation. Applicators were evaluated by VIRA, UVL, and DNA/protein-based methods at 2 time points: within 7 days of the visit and after storing applicators for approximately 30 days. Semen biomarkers were assayed from vaginal swabs and returned applicators. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of DNA and protein-based biomarkers in determining vaginal insertion versus sham handling of returned applicators were 98.3% and 100%, respectively, at both 7- and 30-day evaluations. The overall sensitivity and specificity of VIRA at 7 and 30 days after collection were significantly lower than those of DNA and protein-based biomarkers. Ultraviolet light inspection also had significantly lower overall sensitivity and overall specificity compared with DNA and protein biomarkers. The sensitivity of DNA and protein-based biomarkers for detecting insertion of wiped applicators was 95%, whereas the sensitivity of VIRA (range of 24%-28%) and UVL inspection (range, 38%-84%) was low for this subset. It was feasible to obtain semen biomarkers from vaginal swabs and returned used applicators. CONCLUSIONS: DNA and protein-based biomarkers offer significantly higher sensitivity and specificity compared with VIRA and UVL assessment. The accuracy of these objective biomarkers is maintained despite storage of returned products for approximately 30 days and under conditions potentially modeling field use.

Preliminary Efficacy of Topical Sildenafil Cream for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% among healthy premenopausal women with female sexual arousal disorder. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline to week 12 in the Arousal Sensation domain of the SFQ28 (Sexual Function Questionnaire) and question 14 of the FSDS-DAO (Female Sexual Distress Scale-Desire, Arousal, Orgasm). RESULTS: Two hundred women with female sexual arousal disorder were randomized to sildenafil cream (n=101) or placebo cream (n=99). A total of 174 participants completed the study (sildenafil 90, placebo 84). Among the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which included women with only female sexual arousal disorder and those with female sexual arousal disorder with concomitant sexual dysfunction diagnoses or genital pain, although the sildenafil cream group demonstrated greater improvement in the SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain scores, there were no statistically significant differences between sildenafil and placebo cream users in the coprimary and secondary efficacy endpoints. An exploratory post hoc subset of the ITT population with an enrollment diagnosis of female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire randomized to sildenafil cream reported significant increases in their SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain score (least squares mean 2.03 [SE 0.62]) compared with placebo cream (least squares mean 0.08 [SE 0.71], P =.04). This subset achieved a larger mean improvement in the SFQ28 Desire and Orgasm domain scores. This subset population also had significantly reduced sexual distress and interpersonal difficulties with sildenafil cream use as measured by FSDS-DAO questions 3, 5, and 10 (all P ≤.04). CONCLUSION: Topical sildenafil cream improved outcomes among women with female sexual arousal disorder, most significantly in those who did not have concomitant orgasmic dysfunction. In particular, in an exploratory analysis of a subset of women with female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire, topical sildenafil cream increased sexual arousal sensation, desire, and orgasm and reduced sexual distress. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04948151.

Safety testing of Ovaprene: An investigational nonhormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety of Ovaprene, an investigational nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive designed for monthly use. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception who underwent assessments during five menstrual cycles: baseline postcoital test cycle, diaphragm postcoital test cycle, Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, colposcopies, Nugent scores, determination of community state types of vaginal microbiota, and anti-Escherichia coli activity and inflammatory markers in cervicovaginal fluids. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants. Of these, 33 used Ovaprene and completed 77 Ovaprene cycles. The most common product-related urogenital treatment-emergent adverse events were bacterial vaginosis and vaginal odor. The frequency of transitioning from Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV (not Lactobacillus-dominated) was similar before Ovaprene use and afterwards. Mean Nugent scores were <4 at each visit without a discernible upward trend. Inflammatory markers showed wide variation but no upward trend, and E. coli inhibitory activity of cervical secretions did not change. We found no Staphylococcus aureus, the causative agent in toxic shock syndrome, on used Ovaprenes or in vaginal samples. No clinically important changes in systemic laboratory findings, pelvic examinations, or colposcopies occurred during Ovaprene use. CONCLUSIONS: Ovaprene use did not result in cervicovaginal irritation or adverse effects on resident vaginal microbiota and did not impact transitions from a Lactobacillus-dominated community state type to community state type IV. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that the use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly user-controlled nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive, does not appear to result in adverse changes in vaginal health during short-term use supports further evaluation of the contraceptive potential of the device.

Successful postcoital testing of Ovaprene: An investigational non-hormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate reduction in progressively motile sperm per high power field (HPF) in midcycle cervical mucus after intercourse with Ovaprene: an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive consisting of a vaginal ring and mechanical barrier, releasing spermiostatic ferrous gluconate. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter study enrolling heterosexually-active women with previous permanent contraception. Participants underwent a baseline postcoital test cycle with no device to confirm the presence of sperm, followed by one diaphragm postcoital test cycle, one Ovaprene safety cycle, and two Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. In each postcoital test cycle, participants underwent a midcycle cervical mucus evaluation to confirm an Insler score ≥10 and absence of sperm, and then returned two to four hours after vaginal intercourse for repeat cervical mucus evaluation. We considered <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF indicative of preliminary contraceptive effectiveness. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 participants; 23 completed the study. All participants had ≥5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in the baseline cycle and <5 progressively motile sperm/HPF in all 49 Ovaprene cycles and all 35 diaphragm cycles, meeting the definition of a successful postcoital test. This was true regardless of examiner blinding, prior vaginal delivery or vaginal ring use, body mass index, or dislodgements noted by the participant or investigator. The mean of 27.2 (±17.9) progressively motile sperm/HPF in baseline postcoital test cycles was reduced to 0.5 (±1.1) and 0.5 (±1.3) progressively motile sperm/HPF in the first and second Ovaprene cycles, respectively. Ovaprene fit all participants and all could insert, position, and remove it. CONCLUSION: Use of Ovaprene resulted in meeting the prespecified criterion for contraceptive effect by all participants during all postcoital test cycles. IMPLICATIONS: The finding that use of Ovaprene, an investigational monthly non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive, resulted in postcoital testing of cervical mucus that met the pre-specified definition of success (<5 progressively motile sperm/HPF) supports further evaluation of contraceptive efficacy of the device in users at risk for pregnancy.

Phase 1 randomized pharmacokinetic and safety study of a 90-day tenofovir vaginal ring in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Tenofovir-based oral pre-exposure prophylaxis is currently approved for HIV prevention; however, adherence in women has been low. A vaginal gel containing tenofovir (TFV) demonstrated partial protection to HIV but protection was not confirmed in additional studies. Vaginal rings offer user-controlled long-acting HIV prevention that could overcome adherence and protection challenges. TFV may also help prevent herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition when delivered intravaginally. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, adherence and acceptability of a 90-day TFV ring. METHODS: Between January and June 2019, Microbicide Trials Network (MTN)-038 enrolled 49 HIV-negative participants into a phase 1, randomized (2:1) trial comparing a 90-day ring containing 1.4 grams (g) TFV to a placebo ring. TFV concentrations were quantified in plasma, cervicovaginal fluid (CVF), rectal fluid and cervical tissue, and TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) in cervical tissue. Used rings were analysed for residual TFV. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs); acceptability and adherence by self-report. RESULTS: Mean age was 29.5; 46 identified as cisgender-female and three gender non-conforming. There were no differences in the proportion of participants with grade ≥2 genitourinary AEs in the TFV versus placebo arms (p = 0.41); no grade ≥3 AEs were reported. Geometric mean TFV concentrations increased through day 34 in CVF/rectal fluid and day 59 in plasma, but declined across compartments by day 91. Geometric mean TFV-DP tissue concentrations exceeded the 1000 fmol/mg target through day 56, but fell to 456 fmol/mg at day 91. Among 32 rings returned at the end of the study, 13 had no or low (<0.1 g) residual TFV. Residual TFV did not differ by socio-demographics, sexual activity, Nugent Score or vaginal microbiota. Most participants reported being fully adherent to ring use: 85% and 81% in the TFV and placebo arms, respectively (p = 1.00). A majority of participants reported liking the ring (median 8 on a 10-point Likert scale) and reported a high likelihood of using the ring in the future, if effective (median 9). CONCLUSIONS: The 90-day TFV ring was well-tolerated, acceptable and exceeded target cervical tissue concentrations through day 56, but declined thereafter. Additional studies are needed to characterize the higher release from TFV rings in some participants and the optimal duration of use.

Preferred product attributes of a multipurpose vaginal ring: Findings from a phase 1 trial.

Introduction: Most women face multiple and co-occurring risks from unwanted pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at some point during their lifetime. While a range of contraceptive methods exist and options for HIV prevention are increasing, to date, only male and female condoms provide multipurpose protection from both pregnancy and disease. Methods: From September 2017 to December 2018, 60 women from the United States and the Dominican Republic, randomized 1:1 to continuous or interrupted use and 4:1 to active vs. placebo ring, participated in a Phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerability of a three-month multipurpose intravaginal ring (IVR) containing the antiviral tenofovir and the contraceptive levonorgestrel. This study examines survey responses from all participants and qualitative data from a subset of 17 women to assess acceptability of and preferences for IVR characteristics. Results: Overall, women liked the concept of a multipurpose IVR and found it easy to insert and remove. Initial concerns about the size or thickness of the ring generally disappeared with use experience. Women weighed trade-offs between the ease of continuous use for a longer duration against concerns about hygiene and discoloration of the ring when left in place during menses. Whether randomized to continuous or interrupted use, most women found ring attributes (size, thickness, flexibility) very acceptable. They provided recommendations via survey and qualitative interviews for ring modifications that would further increase acceptability. Insights into women's use experiences also suggest the need for clear counseling messages and introduction strategies that can facilitate women's choice and use of prevention methods. Discussion: Study findings suggest that a multipurpose IVR would make a valuable contribution to women's sexual and reproductive health options, and that both continuous and interrupted use strategies may be preferred.

Effect of sterile vs clean gloves for cervical checks in labor on maternal infection at term: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum infection usually warrants immediate delivery and impacts 5-12% of term pregnancies, with the most commonly identified pathogenic organism being of the Ureaplasma genus. When performing cervical examinations during labor, providers in the United States commonly use sterile gloves, although there are no data currently to support that this practice reduces rates of infection. Furthermore, in nearly all other settings of Gynecologic care, aside from surgery in an operating room, nonsterile gloves are used. Even though the uterus could be sterile in normal pregnancies, the provider performing the cervical examination must traverse the milieu of vaginal bacteria in order to reach the cervix to perform the exam, introducing vaginal microbiota into the uterus regardless of the type of glove used. This prospective randomized controlled study examines whether the type of glove used (sterile vs clean) impacts the rates of intrapartum infection in patients receiving cervical examinations during labor or induction of labor at term.. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if the glove type (sterile vs clean) used for cervical examinations during labor affects the rates of intrapartum and postpartum infection. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial assigned eligible and consenting participants to receive cervical examinations during labor with either sterile powder-free polyvinyl chloride examination gloves (current routine practice, control group) or clean powder-free nitrile examination gloves (nonsterile, experimental group). The primary outcome was rates of intrapartum infection (chorioamnionitis). Sample size calculations estimated that 300 participants would be needed with a rate of infection of 10% in the control group and 20% in the experimental group to demonstrate difference between the groups; however, the rates of infection were much lower than expected, at 5.4% and 4.4% in the sterile and clean glove group, respectively. At this point, it was determined futile to continue the study because a sample size of >29,000 participants would be needed, which would not be achievable at a single tertiary care referral center with approximately 3500 deliveries per year. The study was approved by the Eastern Virginia Medical School Institutional Review Board (IRB 21-09-FB-0206), and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT05603624; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05603624). RESULTS: A total of 163 participants with singleton pregnancies completed the study; 74 (45%) were randomized to the sterile glove group, and 89 (55%) were randomized to the clean glove group. In the sterile glove group, 4 (5.4%) developed intrapartum infection (chorioamnionitis) and 1 (1.3%) developed postpartum infection (endometritis). In the clean glove group, 4 (4.4%) developed intrapartum infection and 2 (2.2%) developed postpartum infection. There was no significant difference in rates of intrapartum infection (P=1.0) or postpartum infection (P=1.0), or combined rates of infection (including both chorioamnionitis and endometritis; P=.99) between the sterile and the clean glove group. When comparing the participants from both groups who had any intrapartum or postpartum infection (n=11) with those who had no infection (n=152), the former were more likely to be nulliparous (P=.01), have lower gravidity (P<.01) and parity (P<.01), have longer times from first cervical examination to delivery (P=.02), have longer times from rupture of membranes to delivery (P=.0001), undergo cesarean delivery (P=.0002), and experience postpartum hemorrhage (P=.001). Although participants who were in labor for a longer time also likely had more cervical examinations, these data could suggest that duration of labor (P=.02) is more closely associated with infectious morbidity compared with the number of cervical examinations (P=.15). CONCLUSION: Using clean gloves for cervical examinations during labor is unlikely to increase risk of infection, and could reduce cost by up to 92.4% at our institution, saving over $25,000 annually.

A phase 1/2, open-label, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of DARE-HRT1 (80 µg estradiol/4 mg progesterone and 160 µg estradiol/8 mg progesterone intravaginal rings) over 12 weeks in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of DARE-HRT1, an intravaginal ring (IVR), which releases 17ß2-Estradiol (E2) with progesterone (P4) for 28 days in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel group study in 21 healthy postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. Women were randomized (1:1) to either DARE-HRT1 IVR1 (E2 80 µg/d with P4 4 mg/d) or DARE-HRT1 IVR2 (E2 160 µg/d with P4 8 mg/d). They used the IVR for three 28-day cycles, inserting a new IVR monthly. Safety was measured by treatment emergent adverse events and changes in systemic laboratories and the endometrial bilayer width. Baseline adjusted plasma PK of E2, P4, and estrone (E1) was described. RESULTS: Both DARE-HRT1 IVR were safe. All treatment emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and were distributed similarly among IVR1 versus IVR2 users. Month 3 median maximum plasma ( Cmax ) P4 concentrations were 2.81 and 3.51 ng/mL and Cmax E2 was 42.95 and 77.27 pg/mL for IVR1 and IVR2 groups, respectively. Month 3 median steady state ( Css ) plasma P4 concentrations were 1.19 and 1.89 ng/mL, and Css E2 was 20.73 and 38.16 pg/mL for IVR1 and IVR2 users, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both DARE-HRT1 IVRs were safe and released E2 in systemic concentrations, which were in the low, normal premenopausal range. Systemic P4 concentrations predict endometrial protection. Data from this study support further development of DARE-HRT1 for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

A phase 1/2, open-label, parallel group study to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and usability DARE-HRT1 (80 µg estradiol/4 mg progesterone and 160 µg estradiol/8 mg progesterone intravaginal RinGSM) over 12 weeks in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: The exploratory objectives of this study were to evaluate the usability and acceptability and to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of DARE-HRT1. DARE-HRT1 is an intravaginal ring (IVR) that releases 17ß2-estradiol (E2) with progesterone (P4) over 28 days. It is the first combination E2 and P4 IVR being developed for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in healthy postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel group study in 21 healthy postmenopausal women. Women were randomized (1:1) to either DARE-HRT1 IVR1 (E2 80 µg/d with P4 4 mg/d) or DARE-HRT1 IVR2 (E2 160 µg/d with P4 8 mg/d). They used the assigned IVR for three 28-day cycles, inserting a new IVR monthly. Preliminary genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) treatment efficacy was estimated by measuring changes from baseline in vaginal pH, vaginal maturation index (VMI), and changes in the severity of GSM symptoms. Preliminary systemic VMS efficacy was measured by changes in responses to the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire. Acceptability was assessed by product experience surveys. RESULTS: Preliminary local GSM treatment efficacy was supported by significant decreases in vaginal pH and % parabasal cells, and significant increases in the overall VMI and % superficial cells for both IVR groups (all P values <0.01). Preliminary VMS efficacy was supported by significant decreases in all domains of the MENQOL questionnaire from baseline for both dosing groups (all P values <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study support further development of DARE-HRT1 for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

A phase I study to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a vaginal insert containing tenofovir alafenamide and elvitegravir.

Background: New multi-purpose prevention technology (MPT) products are needed to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2). In this study, we evaluated a fast-dissolve insert that may be used vaginally or rectally for prevention of infection. Objective: To describe the safety, acceptability, multi-compartment pharmacokinetics (PK), and in vitro modeled pharmacodynamics (PD) after a single vaginal dose of an insert containing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and elvitegravir (EVG) in healthy women. Methods: This was a Phase I, open-label, study. Women (n=16) applied one TAF (20mg)/EVG (16mg) vaginal insert and were randomized (1:1) to sample collection time groups for up to 7 days post dosing. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). EVG, TAF and tenofovir (TFV) concentrations were measured in plasma, vaginal fluid and tissue, and TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentration in vaginal tissue. PD was modeled in vitro by quantifying the change in inhibitory activity of vaginal fluid and vaginal tissue against HIV and HSV2 from baseline to after treatment. Acceptability data was collected by a quantitative survey at baseline and post treatment. Results: The TAF/EVG insert was safe, with all TEAEs graded as mild, and acceptable to participants. Systemic plasma exposure was low, consistent with topical delivery, while high mucosal levels were detected, with median TFV vaginal fluid concentrations exceeding 200,000 ng/mL and 1,000 ng/mL for up to 24 hours and 7 days post dosing, respectively. All participants had vaginal tissue EVG concentrations of > 1 ng/mg at 4 and 24 hours post dosing. The majority had tissue TFV-DP concentrations exceeding 1000 fmol/mg by 24 - 72 hours post dosing. Vaginal fluid inhibition of HIV-1 and HSV-2 in vitro significantly increased from baseline and was similarly high at 4 and 24 hours post dosing. Consistent with high tissue TFV-DP concentrations, p24 HIV antigen production from ectocervical tissues infected ex vivo with HIV-1 significantly decreased from baseline at 4 hours post dosing. HSV-2 production from tissue also decreased post treatment. Conclusions: A single dose of TAF/EVG inserts met PK benchmarks, with PK data supporting an extended window of high mucosal protection. PD modeling supports mucosal protection against both HIV-1 and HSV-2. The inserts were safe and highly acceptable. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03762772.

Randomized controlled phase IIa clinical trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tenofovir and tenofovir plus levonorgestrel releasing intravaginal rings used by women in Kenya.

Introduction: Globally, many young women face the overlapping burden of HIV infection and unintended pregnancy. Protection against both may benefit from safe and effective multipurpose prevention technologies. Methods: Healthy women ages 18-34 years, not pregnant, seronegative for HIV and hepatitis B surface antigen, not using hormonal contraception, and at low risk for HIV were randomized 2:2:1 to continuous use of a tenofovir/levonorgestrel (TFV/LNG), TFV, or placebo intravaginal ring (IVR). In addition to assessing genital and systemic safety, we determined TFV concentrations in plasma and cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) and LNG levels in serum using tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We further evaluated TFV pharmacodynamics (PD) through ex vivo CVF activity against both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2, and LNG PD using cervical mucus quality markers and serum progesterone for ovulation inhibition. Results: Among 312 women screened, 27 were randomized to use one of the following IVRs: TFV/LNG (n = 11); TFV-only (n = 11); or placebo (n = 5). Most screening failures were due to vaginal infections. The median days of IVR use was 68 [interquartile range (IQR), 36-90]. Adverse events (AEs) were distributed similarly among the three arms. There were two non-product related AEs graded >2. No visible genital lesions were observed. Steady state geometric mean amount (ssGMA) of vaginal TFV was comparable in the TFV/LNG and TFV IVR groups, 43,988 ng/swab (95% CI, 31,232, 61,954) and 30337 ng/swab (95% CI, 18,152, 50,702), respectively. Plasma TFV steady state geometric mean concentration (ssGMC) was <10 ng/ml for both TFV IVRs. In vitro, CVF anti-HIV-1 activity showed increased HIV inhibition over baseline following TFV-eluting IVR use, from a median of 7.1% to 84.4% in TFV/LNG, 15.0% to 89.5% in TFV-only, and -27.1% to -20.1% in placebo participants. Similarly, anti-HSV-2 activity in CVF increased >50 fold after use of TFV-containing IVRs. LNG serum ssGMC was 241 pg/ml (95% CI 185, 314) with rapid rise after TFV/LNG IVR insertion and decline 24-hours post-removal (586 pg/ml [95% CI 473, 726] and 87 pg/ml [95% CI 64, 119], respectively). Conclusion: TFV/LNG and TFV-only IVRs were safe and well tolerated among Kenyan women. Pharmacokinetics and markers of protection against HIV-1, HSV-2, and unintended pregnancy suggest the potential for clinical efficacy of the multipurpose TFV/LNG IVR. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03762382 [https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03762382].