Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 41(2): 287-294, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606044

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in terms of oncological outcomes, and to assess the impact of surgical experience (SE). METHODS: We extracted data of a contemporary cohort of 1359 patients from the prospectively maintained database of the French national network of research on kidney cancer (UROCCR). The primary objective was to assess the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. We also evaluated the oncological outcomes regardless of the surgical experience (SE) by dividing patients into three groups of SE as a secondary endpoints. SE was defined by the caseload of RPN per surgeon per year. For the continuous variables, we used Mann-Whitney and Student tests. We assessed survival analysis according to hilar control approach by Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank tests. A logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the independent factors of PSM. RESULTS: Outcomes of 224 off-clamp RPN for RCC were compared to 1135 on-clamp RPN. PSM rate was not statistically different, with 5.6% in the off-clamp group, and 11% in the on-clamp group (p = 0.1). When assessing survival analysis for overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LR), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to hilar clamping approach, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with p value log rank = 0.2, 0.8, 0.1, respectively. In multivariate analysis assessing SE, hilar control approach, hospital volume (HV), RENAL score, gender, Age, ECOG, EBL, BMI, and indication of NSS, age at surgery was associated with PSM (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.04), 0.02), whereas SE, HV, and type of hilar control approach were not predictive factors of PSM. CONCLUSION: Hilar control approach seems to have no impact on PSM of RPN for RCC. Our findings were consistent with randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía , Riñón/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Prog Urol ; 33(11): 519-525, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295990

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) in the field of pelvic floor diseases in women tend to generalize, as they are required as mandatory before mid-urethral sling implantation or sacrocolpopexy by recent decrees published by the French health authorities. However, access to these meetings is variable in the French territory. The goal of the present study was to describe the existence and the settings of these kinds of meetings in France. MATERIEL AND METHODS: An on-line survey was conducted between June and July 2020 (stage 1) then between November 2021 and January 2022 (stage 2). A 15-item questionnaire was sent to all members of the Association française d'urologie (AFU). A descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two completed questionnaires were sent back during stage 1 and 158 during stage 2. Early 2022, 61.3% of respondents had access to a pelviperineology MTM, with important difference according to geographical areas. Main activity of MTMs was case discussion of complex situations (68% of meetings). At the end of 2021, 22% of the respondents declared willing to stop partially or totally their pelviperineology activity, given the new regulations set in place by the authorities. CONCLUSION: Despite being absolutely mandatory in current clinical practice, MTMs in pelvic floor disease have spread slowly. MTMs implementation was still insufficient in 2022, and variable on the French territory. Some urologists declare having no access to such resources and about 1 out of 5 were considering to voluntary stop of decrease significantly their activity in this difficult context.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Cabestrillo Suburetral , Humanos , Femenino , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/terapia , Urólogos , Francia
3.
Can J Urol ; 27(5): 10394-10401, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33049193

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION To describe the feasibility of total intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic assisted radical cystectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) and the Firefly system of the da Vinci Xi robot and to evaluate the digestive and urinary outcomes of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the Institutional Review Board, we studied all consecutive patients who underwent robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and intracorporeal urinary derivation (ICUD) with the da Vinci Xi robot using ICG and the Firefly system, in our institution from January 1st 2018 to September 15th 2018. Pre, intra and postoperative data were analyzed with a follow up of at least 1 month. RESULTS: We included 25 patients. Preoperative data were the following: 92 % were men, median age was 74 years (IQR 69-76), 64% of patients had an ASA score ≥ 3. Median operative time was 390 min (IQR 360-460). Median return to bowel function was 3 days for gas (IQR 2-5) and 5 days for stool (IQR 3-6). Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 7-10). After a median follow up of 9.6 months (IQR 8.3-12.5), only one patient (4%) presented with postoperative obstructive syndrome. There were 2 (8%) urinary leaks and 1 (4%) uretrero-enteric stricture. There were no digestive fistulas recorded. Eleven patients (44%) were readmitted within 90 days for complications. CONCLUSIONS: Total intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic assisted radical cystectomy using ICG is a feasible technique that might reduce return of bowel function and with low urinary and digestive complications.


Asunto(s)
Colorantes , Cistectomía/métodos , Verde de Indocianina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 299(4): 1007-1013, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30788571

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is increasing. The number of women aged 70-80 years requiring surgical management for POP is also increasing. The purpose of this study was to compare the complications associated with three pelvic organ prolapse repair methods, sacrocolpopexy (SCP), native tissue repair (NTR), and vaginal mesh repair (VMR), in women aged 70-80 years. METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 213 women who underwent POP surgical repairs between December 2012 and December 2017. Treatment-related complications were classified using the ClavienDindo grading system and compared among the three groups. Perioperative data, anatomical success rates, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complication data were collected during the follow-up period, which lasted up to 12 months. RESULTS: Of 213 patients, 70 (33%) underwent SCP, 85 (40%) underwent NTR, and 58 (28%) underwent VMR. By postoperative day 30, the all-inclusive complication rate was lower in the SCP group than in the NTR or VMR group; however, there was no between-group difference in complication grade. The VMR group underwent fewer concomitant hysterectomies than the other groups, and operative time was the longest for SCP. Overall, recovery time, anatomical success rate, and patient satisfaction were comparable for all three repairs. CONCLUSIONS: All three surgical techniques were equivalent in patient satisfaction, anatomical success rate, and complication rate. SCP should be recommended to elderly women who meet criteria for prolonged general anesthesia, as it was associated with fewer perioperative complications than NTR and VMR.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Diafragma Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Transpl Int ; 31(10): 1110-1124, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772613

RESUMEN

Our objective was to compare the outcomes of dual kidney transplanataion (DKT) to single kidney transplantation (SKT) performed with grafts from expanded criteria donors (ECD) in recipients ≥65 years, focusing on surgical complications. All kidney transplantations (KT) performed between 2006 and 2014 in our institution were analysed. DKT was indicated according to the criteria of the French national Agence de la Biomedecine. Thirty-nine DKT and 155 SKT were included, with a median follow-up of 36 and 26.5 months, respectively. The rate of early surgical revisions was not significantly higher after DKT (23.1% vs 15.5% (P = 0.2593)) but more venous graft thromboses (12.8% vs 3.2% (P = 0.02)) were reported. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 24 months after KT was significantly higher after DKT (45.0 ± 16.3 vs 39.8 ± 13.8 ml/min/1.73m2 ; P = 0.04) and allowed shorter waiting time without a significant increased risk of surgical revision, excepted for venous graft thrombosis, more frequent after DKT. Graft survivals were not significantly different and GFR was higher after DKT. DKT seems to remain an appropriate strategy to address the growing graft shortage in elderly patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Insuficiencia Renal/cirugía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Donantes de Tejidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA