RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Almost two decades after the description of robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair (R-VVF), the literature remains limited. The aims of this study are to report the outcomes of R-VVF and to compare the transvesical versus extravesical techniques. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study, including all patients who underwent R-VVF from March 2017 to September 2021 at four academic institutions. All abdominal VVF repair over the study period were performed using a robotic approach. The success of R-VVF was defined as the absence of clinical recurrence. The outcomes of the extravesical versus transvesical techniques were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included. The median age was 43 years old (IQR 38-50). Fistulas were supratrigonal and trigonal in 18 and 4 cases respectively. Five patients had undergone previous attempts of fistula repair (22.7%). The fistulous tract was systematically excised, and an interposition flap was used in all but two cases (90.9%). The transvesical and extravesical techniques were used in 13 and 9 cases respectively. There were four postoperative complications, three minor and one major. None of the patients had vesicovaginal fistula recurrence after a median follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present series, one of the largest R-VVF reported to date, is consistent with the few series already published with a 100% cure rate. Systematic excision of the fistulous tract and the high rate of flap interposition may explain the high success rate. The transvesical and extravesical approaches yielded similar outcomes.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal (EXTRA) vs intracorporeal (INTRA) urinary diversion in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder in six centers between 2011 and 2020 were included in a retrospective study. Four centers performed exclusively INTRA urinary diversion all over the study period, one center performed exclusively EXTRA urinary diversion, and the last center performed EXTRA urinary diversion during a first period and INTRA during the subsequent period. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included: 66 in the EXTRA group and 31 in the INTRA group. There were 11 major (Clavien grade ≥3) postoperative complications in the overall population (11.3%) with no statistically significant difference between both groups (EXTRA = 12.1% vs INTRA = 9.7%; p = 0.99). The mean length of stay did not differ significantly between INTRA and EXTRA (13.1 vs 14.1 days; p = 0.44). The mean times to oral feeding and to return of bowel function were similar in the two groups (3.9 vs 3.5 days; p = 0.28 and 4.1 vs 4.1 days; p = 0.51, respectively). There was no incisional hernia in the INTRA group vs five in the EXTRA group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.17). Conclusion: The perioperative morbidity of robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder appears to be relatively limited compared with the historical open series. Possibly due to the relatively small sample size, no difference was found between INTRA and EXTRA urinary diversion in terms of perioperative outcomes.