Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in women with antecedent breast cancer.

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (tr-ALL) is a disease entity attributed to previous exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation for antecedent malignancy. There is observed female predominance for tr-ALL, likely due to high prevalence and excellent curable rate for non-metastatic breast cancer as well as the frequent use of carcinogenic agents as part of adjuvant therapy. Here, we reviewed 37 women with diagnosis of ALL following breast cancer treatment with focus on cytogenetic categorization. Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph+), KMT2A alterations and other cytogenetic change groups were observed in 32%, 22% and 46% of patients respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 19.4 and 12.9 months, overall while both OS and RFS were superior in tr-ALL with Ph+ disease compared to KMT2Ar and other cytogenetics respectively. Seventeen (45.9%) patients underwent consolidative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1 out of which 4 (24%) relapsed following transplant. Both OS and RFS were superior in the KMT2Ar cytogenetics group following alloHCT. Ph chromosome represents the largest genetic entity of tr-ALL following breast cancer therapy, and it may be associated with superior survival outcomes while KMT2Ar may be associated with poorer outcomes that can perhaps be mitigated by alloHSCT.

Blinatumomab-induced macrophage activating syndrome (MAS) in adult with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

Blinatumomab as a single agent has demonstrated superiority over salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with manageable safety and efficacy. Though known to have anticipated drug toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, there is only one prior report of macrophage activating syndrome (MAS) due to blinatumomab. Case Presentation: We report the first case of blinatumomab-induced MAS in an adult. The patient presented with fever, cough, and weakness on the second cycle of blinatumomab. Complete blood count was notable for severe leukopenia, with comprehensive metabolic panel notable for elevated alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT, LDH, and hyperferritinemia consistent with MAS. The patient was already in MRD-negative remission at presentation with MAS. She responded rapidly to withholding the drug and administration of both tocilizumab and dexamethasone. She was able to restart therapy with blinatumomab dosed at 9 mcg/day with no recurrence of symptoms. Though MAS is not an expected association with blinatumomab, the risk for CRS is. Secondary MAS in this case likely shares a mechanism with other hyperinflammatory conditions. Management includes holding the offending agent, like blinatumomab, and administering tocilizumab and dexamethasone. Future research will be needed to predict which patients are at highest risk to develop MAS after similar T-cell therapies.

Concomitant use of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists with azole antifungals in patients with hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists such as rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant have been approved for migraine treatment and/or prevention. These molecules are metabolized by cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzymes in vivo, hence they are contraindicated or recommended to be avoided in combination with strong/moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, namely posaconazole (strong) and isavuconazonium (moderate). However, no literature has been published on the impact this interaction has on patient safety and tolerability. In this case series, we report five cases in which CGRP antagonists and azole antifungal therapy were given concurrently, to provide real-world outcomes of this interaction. DATA SOURCES: Electronic medical records at our hospital system were reviewed between January 2021 and December 2023 to find patients who met the criteria of hematological malignancy, taking CGRP-antagonist and azole antifungal therapy. Records were then further investigated to find cases where CGRP antagonists and azole antifungals were used concomitantly. DATA SUMMARY: Concurrent use of CGRP antagonists and azole antifungal therapy was feasible for patients with migraines and hematological malignancies. None of the patients experienced any grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity from the proposed over-exposure to CGRP antagonist. The combination was well tolerated without any need for therapy discontinuation or dose modifications. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended to follow the manufacturers' guidance on drug interactions, however, in the setting where there are no other options, concomitant use of CGRP antagonists with azole antifungals is possible with monitoring and observation for adverse effects.

Pacritinib and concurrent azole antifungal therapy is deliverable in patients with hematologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Pacritinib is a novel kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with intermediate or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as some azole antifungals, are contraindicated or recommended to be avoided in combination with pacritinib, respectively. We aim to report our experience in patients who received pacritinib with concurrent azole antifungal therapy. DATA SOURCES: We queried for patients with hematologic malignancies in the electronic medical record who received concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungal therapy. DATA SUMMARY: There were five cases of concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungal therapy in which none of the patients experienced grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities. Some patients required dose modifications and/or interruptions in pacritinib therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical experience describing concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungals. Our experience shows that in the setting where this interaction cannot be avoided, concurrent administration is feasible with close monitoring and possible empiric dose reductions in select patients.

Concurrent versus sequential or no triazole anti-fungal therapy in patients undergoing 7 + 3 plus midostaurin induction for FLT-3 acute myelogenous leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutated (FLT3m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Azole antifungal medications are commonly used in AML and are known to interact with anti-cancer drugs such as midostaurin through the CYP3A pathway. However, there are no midostaurin related dose modifications recommended with strong CYP3A inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients between 2017-2022 and compared efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who received azole antifungals concurrently to those who did not receive an azole or received it sequentially to midostaurin for treatment of FLT3m AML. RESULTS: Median age of both groups was approximately 55 years and 70% of patients harbored FLT-3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Most patients in the concurrent arm were on either posaconazole (33%) or isavuconazole (50%) for antifungal prophylaxis and micafungin (72%) for the sequential/no azole arm. Overall CR/CRi rate with concurrent versus sequential/no azole were 72% and 77%, and non-hematologic grade 3 toxicities were 22% and 40% (p = 0.21), respectively. Rates of dose reductions (6% vs. 0%, p = 0.26) and held doses (17% vs. 14%, p = 0.79) were not different between concurrent and sequential/no azole. There were no differences in the rates of new fungal infection during induction between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Azoles given concurrently or sequentially with midostaurin were found to be equally safe and effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. Additional confirmatory studies are needed due to our limited sample size.

Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Etoposide-Based Regimens Are Safe and Tolerable In Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Intensive treatment regimens for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) generally include an anthracycline, cytarabine, with or without a purine analog. In patients who cannot tolerate an anthracycline due to comorbidities, one may consider using etoposide. Given the ongoing fludarabine shortage, it has prompted the switch to other purine analogs, such as cladribine, in combination with cytarabine and etoposide in patients who may be eligible for intensive chemotherapy but not able to tolerate an anthracycline due to comorbidities or cardiotoxicity risks. Here, we present 4 patients who received a cladribine, cytarabine, and etoposide (CCE) based regimen for R/R AML. There were no significant therapy-related adverse events, dose holds, or delays. Two out of 3 evaluable patients were successfully bridged to allogeneic transplant, and one is pending another cycle of chemotherapy as a bridge to transplant. The CCE regimen offers a potential option for patients with R/R AML in need of an anthracycline-free salvage regimen during a fludarabine shortage.

Treatment Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy: A Single-Center Experience.

Patients living with HIV are now living longer due to increased access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and a decrease in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining cancer (ADC). However, increasing age and previous chemotherapy exposure for ADC (e.g., anthracyclines and topoisomerase inhibitors) are factors that may increase the risk of developing therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and highlight an unmet need. There are no established guidelines for the treatment of AML in patients with HIV and the literature is limited to treatment outcomes and experience. In addition, cladribine, a purine analog used in AML, has a package insert warning to avoid administration with concurrent agents that undergo phosphorylation, which include HIV ART backbones (e.g., nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]). Whether concurrent NRTI-based ART is deliverable with AML induction chemotherapy has not been reported previously. In our single-center experience of seven HIV-AML patients, all patients continued concurrent ART with induction chemotherapy. In 6 evaluable patients, three (50%) of patients went into complete remission (CR). Five (71.4%) patients were able to proceed to allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Median OS was 16.6 months, with patients who received HCT having longer median OS compared to those who were unable to proceed to HCT (49.6 months vs. 3.4 months). Interestingly, none of the patients who received AML regimens that included fludarabine were able to obtain a response. On the contrary, 4 patients who received AML regimens that utilized cytarabine given over a prolonged period of time (e.g., 7 + 3, liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine) achieved a CR rate of 75%. Concurrent HIV ART and AML induction chemotherapy is deliverable, although much remains to be investigated on potential drug interactions between purine analog-based chemotherapy and HIV ART.

Clinical review of substitutions or alternatives for critical chemotherapy drug shortages in hematologic malignancies.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Over the past decade, drug shortages have become increasingly more problematic for clinicians, with over 300 drug shortages reported in the first quarter of 2023. Shortages of chemotherapy drugs can have a negative impact on patient care, as omission or delay of treatment can lead to worse outcomes. Although many articles have been published on this topic, currently no review articles discuss strategies for using alternative regimens or substitutions in the event of severe chemotherapy drug shortages. SUMMARY: In this article, we review the literature on antineoplastic agents used to treat hematologic malignancies that experienced a drug shortage from 2010 through 2023, providing recommendations for substitutions and alternative regimens in the event of a critical shortage. In particular, we discuss how shortages of fludarabine, cytarabine, daunorubicin, methotrexate, and platinum agents may be addressed, including supporting clinical evidence. CONCLUSION: Further publications assessing possible alternatives and substitutions for chemotherapy agents and examining the efficacy of previous strategies are needed to mitigate potentially devastating interruptions to care for patients with cancer during severe drug shortages.

The characterization and the impact of CSF pleocytosis during blinatumomab therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Reactive pleocytosis in the CSF has been observed with blinatumomab but has not been well-described. We performed a retrospective study of 88 patients who received intrathecal chemotherapy (IT) while on blinatumomab with CSF analyzed to determine if pleocytosis had an impact efficacy and safety. Blinatumomab was used for relapsed/refractory 62.5%, MRD-positive 31.8%, and consolidation in MRD-negative 5.7%. The incidence of pleocytosis in CSF was 51% and was more frequent after day 15 (55.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.025). Pleocytosis did not impact CR, clearance of MRD positivity, PFS and OS rates. Lower incidence of non-CNS extramedullary relapse was seen (3.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.011) with pleocytosis in CSF. Analysis of CSF by flow cytometry showed median CD4:CD8 ratio of 1.34. In conclusion, CSF pleocytosis is prevalent with blinatumomab but only demonstrated lower rates of non-CNS extramedullary relapse but no impact on CNS relapse or neurotoxicity.

Treatment of relapsed or refractory FLT-3 acute myelogenous leukemia with a triplet regimen of hypomethylating agent, venetoclax, and gilteritinib.

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations remains a difficult and hard to treat entity. Gilteritinib is a potent oral FLT-3 inhibitor that improves overall survival in R/R AML, but studies are limited in combining gilteritinib with a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax treatment backbone (HMA-VEN-GILT). Here we report our experience with HMA-VEN-GILT for 22 R/R FLT3 AML patients. HMA-VEN-GILT yielded an ORR of 77.3% (17/22), CR 4.5% (1/22), CRi 13.6% (3/22), MLFS 59.1% (13/22). Median follow-up was 10.4 months with a relapse rate of 29.4% (5/17), median time to relapse of 69 days (range 35-298 days), 6-month overall survival of 84%, and median OS of 10.1 months. Additionally, 36.4% (8/22) of patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, HMA-VEN-GILT for the treatment of R/R FLT3 AML is feasible and can be used as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation.

Dosing of 3 Targeted Agents in Novel Drug Combinations Used at the Precision Medicine Clinic of the University of California San Diego.

BACKGROUND: The diversity in the genomic landscape of advanced and metastatic tumors calls for combination therapies based on the genomic signature associated with each tumor. Determining safe and tolerable doses for novel combinations of oncology drugs is essential for a precision medicine approach, but can also require dose reductions. Trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus are among the targeted therapies most often used in novel combinations at our precision medicine clinic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safe, tolerable dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus when used as part of novel combinations with other agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib plus other therapies as a part of novel combinations between December 2011 and July 2018 at the University of California San Diego. Patients were excluded if they received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib in standard combinations, such as dabrafenib plus trametinib, everolimus plus fulvestrant, everolimus plus letrozole, and palbociclib plus letrozole. Dosing and adverse events were determined through a review of the electronic medical records. A safe, tolerable drug combination dose was defined as being tolerated for at least 1 month, with no clinically significant serious adverse events. RESULTS: A safe, tolerable dose was determined for 76% of the 71 patients who received trametinib, 88% of the 48 patients who received everolimus, and 73% of the 41 patients receiving palbociclib when used in combination with other therapies. For patients with clinically significant adverse events, dose reductions were attempted in 30% of the trametinib recipients, in 17% of everolimus recipients, and in 45% of palbociclib recipients. When used in combination with other therapies, the optimal dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus was lower than the standard single-agent dosing: it was 1 mg daily for trametinib; 5 mg daily for everolimus; and 75 mg daily, for 3 weeks on and 1 week off for palbociclib. Of note, everolimus could not be given concomitantly with trametinib at these doses. CONCLUSION: Safe and tolerable dosing of novel combination therapies that includes trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib is feasible for a precision medicine approach. However, neither results from this study nor results from previous studies could support the use of everolimus in combination with trametinib, even at reduced doses.

The impact of SARS-CoV2 vaccines on the incidence of graft versus host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective study.

This study reports the incidence of chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) recipients who received SARS-CoV2 vaccination. The overall rates of new and worsening chronic GvHD combined were 14%, with median time from vaccination to GVHD being approximately three to four weeks. A majority of the cases were of mild to moderate severity and primarily localized to either the skin, mouth, or joints. Prior chronic GVHD and recent transplant were associated with higher GVHD rates following COVID-19 vaccination. More prospective studies are needed to provide a definitive mechanism for the impact of SARS-CoV2 vaccination on alloHCT patients.

Teleneuropsychology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: the perspective from a middle-income country.

INTRODUCTION: The use of teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, there have been no studies of the benefits and difficulties with this modality in middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the current use of TeleNP in Mexico. METHOD: Mexican neuropsychologists were invited to participate in an online survey regarding the use of TeleNP during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was based on issues from a literature review and consisted of 36 questions requiring yes/no, multiple choice, or ordinal answers. The survey was created using Google Forms and asked respondents to provide informed consent. A total of 107 clinical neuropsychologists completed the survey. RESULTS: 82% of participants currently use TeleNP, and most reported learning about TeleNP through personal experience, literature research, and colleagues. Brief evaluations, delivery of results, and intervention were the principal services provided, most frequently on a home-to-home basis. Almost 30% of clinicians reported not requiring informed consent for use of the modality. Consultations included children, adolescents, and adults in similar numbers; older adults were less frequent. Technological limitations were the most frequent reason for ruling out the modality with particular patients. Perceived benefits included the ability to continue consultations despite social distancing measures, lesser risk of COVID-19 infection, and the possibility of seeing patients with limited access to neuropsychological services. Reasons for not using TeleNP included a lack of standardized instruments, not feeling comfortable with the modality, and lack of technological resources and skills. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the socioeconomic differences between Mexico and high-income countries, most of our findings were similar to reports from those countries. However, technological limitations were common, and smartphones were commonly used, contrary to recommendations in the literature. The future use of TeleNP in Mexico should include formal training and ethical guidelines.

A Systematic Review and a Latin American Clinical Model for Teleneuropsychological Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to propose a TeleNP model for remote assessment and offer practical recommendations for clinical practice with patients in Mexico and Latin America, based on a systematic literature review and clinical experience. METHOD: A systematic review of studies from 2011 to 2021 in English and Spanish used TeleNP, teleneuropsychology, telepsychology, online, assessment, teleneuropsicología, and evaluación for the search; the databases examined included PubMed, BiDi UNAM, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Wiley One Library; the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine system was used to grade the levels of evidence. The experience of the last two years of students and faculty in the Master's and Doctoral Programs in Psychology, Clinical Neuropsychology Residency Program, was also used as a basis for this guide. RESULTS: We propose a clinical model for TeleNP assessment in Mexico and Latin America based on the review of 31 articles and the practice of professors and students of clinical neuropsychology. CONCLUSION: The proposed model describes a procedure and adaptations for home-to-home clinical practice in the neuropsychological assessment of Mexican patients that could also be used in other Latin American countries. Its reliability remains to be assessed, but this model and the suggestions proposed could be used in future studies and clinical trials for Mexican and Latin American populations.

Arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia in a patient on chronic hemodialysis.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a rare acute leukemia generally considered curable with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Some patients have co-morbidities that may limit the use of these agents and therefore impact curability. Adverse effects of ATO include life-threatening electrocardiographic abnormalities. ATO and its metabolites are partially excreted in the urine, and it is unclear to what extent ATO pharmacokinetics are impacted by hemodialysis. We present a patient on chronic hemodialysis successfully treated with ATO and ATRA for newly diagnosed APL. Complete molecular remission was achieved after induction and several drug-related toxicities were managed.

BRAF V600E/V600K Mutations versus Nonstandard Alterations: Prognostic Implications and Therapeutic Outcomes.

BRAF and MEK inhibitors are standard of care for BRAF V600E/K-mutated melanoma, but the benefit of BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors for nonstandard BRAF alterations for melanoma and other cancers is unclear. Patients with diverse malignancies whose cancers had undergone next-generation sequencing were screened for BRAF alterations. Demographics, treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors, clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined from review of the electronic medical records for patients with standard BRAF V600E/K versus nonstandard BRAF alterations. A total of 213 patients with BRAF alterations (87 with nonstandard alterations) were identified; OS from diagnosis was significantly worse with nonstandard BRAF versus standard alterations, regardless of therapy [HR (95% confidence interval), 0.58 (0.38-0.88); P = 0.01]. Overall, 45 patients received BRAF/MEK-directed therapy (eight with nonstandard alterations); there were no significant differences in clinical benefit rate [stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete response (74% vs. 63%; P = 0.39) or PFS (P = 0.24; BRAF V600E/K vs. others)]. In conclusion, patients with nonstandard versus standard BRAF alterations (BRAF V600E/K) have a worse prognosis with shorter survival from diagnosis. Even so, 63% of patients with nonstandard BRAF alterations achieved clinical benefit with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Larger prospective studies are warranted to better understand the prognostic versus predictive implication of standard versus nonstandard BRAF alterations.