Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 28(3): 428-436, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29465505

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers (mEOCs) respond poorly to conventional chemotherapy and have a poor prognosis in advanced stages. The genomic landscape for mEOC in the Asian settings is ill defined. We seek to identify various mutational aberrations present in mEOC and correlate them with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 199 cases of mEOC were identified from a prospectively maintained gynecologic oncology tumor database. DNA was extracted and analyzed for KRAS mutations by using Sanger sequencing. Further MassArray sequencing was performed on 45 samples. Clinicopathologic correlation was performed with the results obtained. FINDINGS: KRAS mutation status was evaluable in 124 cases. Fifty-five percent (68/124) were KRAS negative, whereas 45% (56/124) harbored a KRAS mutation, lower than that in Western populations. Successful ascertainment of both KRAS and HER2 statuses by Sanger sequencing occurred for 105 cases. The proportion of the double-positive subtype (HER2+ and KRAS positive) was 8% (8/105); double-negative subtype (HER2- and KRAS negative), 34% (36/105); and cases with mutation in either KRAS or HER2, 58% (61/105). The KRAS mutation rate was 44%, 50%, and 29% among Chinese, Indians, and Malays, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.952) or progression-free survival (P = 0.635) between KRAS-positive and KRAS-negative patients. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival (P = 0.206) and overall survival (P = 0.440) when outcomes were examined between the 4 groups based on KRAS and HER2 mutation. Patients in the double-negative mutation subgroup had higher risk for death/progression compared with patients in the other 3 mutation subgroups. Further MassARRAY multiplexed profiling was performed in patients with sufficient DNA material (n = 45) and yielded KRAS mutations (n = 16), PDGFRA mutations (n = 3), PIK3CA (n = 1) and KIT (n = 1), and HRAS, FGFR, MET, and NRAS (n = 1 each). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further knowledge about the mutational aberrations in mEOC in Asian populations. Neither the presence of KRAS mutation nor their correlation with HER2 mutations influenced outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/genética , Pueblo Asiatico/genética , Mutación , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adulto , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/aislamiento & purificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación in Situ , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA