Effectiveness of Telepharmacy Versus Face-to-Face Anticoagulation Services in the Ambulatory Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of anticoagulation services managed via telepharmacy (TP) has not been clearly demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of TP anticoagulation services to face-to-face (FTF) anticoagulation services in the ambulatory care setting. METHODS: A literature search for studies assessing the effectiveness of TP services was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases, from inception through November 18, 2020. Studies that compared TP with FTF anticoagulation services in the ambulatory care setting were included. Outcomes of interest included thromboembolic events, major bleeding, minor bleeding, any bleeding, warfarin international normalized ratio (INR) time in therapeutic range (TTR), frequency of extreme INR, anticoagulation-related emergency department visits, anticoagulation-related hospitalization, any hospitalization, and mortality. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies involving 8395 patients were included in the systematic review, and 9 studies were included in the pooled meta-analysis. Compared with FTF service, TP was associated with a lower risk of any bleeding and any hospitalization, with RRs of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.47 to 0.90; P = 0.01) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.39 to 0.87; P = 0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TTR or the risk of extreme supratherapeutic INR, major bleeding, minor bleeding, or thromboembolic events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: TP appears to be at least as effective as FTF anticoagulation services. Findings from this study support the utilization of TP practice models in ambulatory care anticoagulation management.

DOACs in Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: A Narrative Review of Emerging Data and Future Directions.

In the recent years, there has been significant transformation in the management of valvular heart disease (VHD), as a result of new minimally invasive technologies, such as the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Conventionally, mechanical heart valves require anticoagulation with warfarin to prevent thrombogenic events. Lately, there has been an uptrend in the usage of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in both mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves. In clinical practice, there has shown to be notable heterogeneity in the antithrombotic regimen for patients. Recommendations from clinical guidelines and emerging data on DOAC use in these settings will be critically reviewed here. Future large, randomized-controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of DOACs in patients receiving a bioprosthetic valve/TAVI or mechanical heart valve, with and without a baseline indication for anticoagulation or antiplatelets. Until clinical trial data from well-designed studies are available, providers must remain vigilant about DOAC use in patients with VHD, especially in patients with a bioprosthetic or mechanical heart valve.

Effectiveness of telepharmacy diabetes services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Although pharmacist-provided diabetes services have been shown to be effective, the effectiveness of telepharmacy (TP) in diabetes management has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of diabetes TP services. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched (from inception through September 2021) to identify published studies that evaluated the effect of TP services in patients with diabetes mellitus and reported either glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting blood glucose (FBG) outcomes. Mean difference (MD), weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: 36 studies involving 13,773 patients were included in the systematic review, and 23 studies were included in the meta-analysis. TP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c (MD, -1.26%; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.84) from baseline. FBG was not significantly affected (MD, -25.32 mg/dL; 95% CI, -57.62 to 6.98). Compared to non-TP service, TP was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76). In a subset of studies that compared TP to face-to-face (FTF) pharmacy services, no significant difference in HbA1c lowering was seen between the 2 groups (WMD, -0.09%; 95% CI, -1.07 to 0.90). CONCLUSION: Use of TP was associated with reduction of HbA1c and the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the effectiveness of diabetes TP services relative to FTF services.

Key Articles and Guidelines in the Management of Dyslipidemia: 2019 Update.

Although the mortality from cardiovascular disease has declined, it remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor that plays a significant role in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Treating dyslipidemia by lowering cholesterol, predominately low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events. The first article that provided dyslipidemia bibliographies was published in 2006. Since this time, new therapies have become available and older therapies that were once thought to provide benefit have since been shown to lack positive outcomes and have therefore fallen out of favor for routine use. As the body of evidence continues to expand, clinicians are faced with reevaluating their treatment strategies to ensure optimal outcomes and appropriate use of lipid-lowering therapies. Therefore, this compilation was created to serve as a resource for clinicians. This publication provides an update of key articles in dyslipidemia management including various guidelines and practice-changing randomized controlled trials.

Considerations for Optimal Blood Pressure Goals in the Elderly Population: A Review of Emergent Evidence.

Recent hypertension clinical trials and national guideline updates have created a debate on the most appropriate treatment goals in elderly patients with hypertension. In 2014, recommendations by the Eighth Joint National Committee allowed a more lenient goal for patients 60 years and older compared with previous guidelines. Since then, several large clinical trials and meta-analyses have added more information regarding strict versus lenient treatment goals. Most recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Task Force published their highly anticipated hypertension guideline developed in conjunction with nine additional interdisciplinary organizations. This review discusses the culmination of emerging data to provide more insight into the treatment of hypertension in the elderly. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, the Cochrane database, and by hand-searching references from relevant articles. The following key terms were used: hypertension, blood pressure, systolic, and elderly. Available literature suggests that it is reasonable to target an office systolic blood pressure of less than 130 mm Hg in elderly patients with hypertension. An individualized approach is reasonable for those who are institutionalized, with high comorbidity burden, or have a short life expectancy. A diastolic blood pressure of less than 60 mm Hg should be avoided due to the potential for an increase in cardiovascular risk. The method of blood pressure measurement is extremely important to consider when determining the blood pressure goal, and proper procedures for accurate blood pressure measurement must be followed. Other factors important to consider may include the patient's comorbidities, frailty, as well as the patient's potential for adverse drug reactions.

Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of neurologist care on Parkinson disease (PD)-related hospitalizations. Recent data indicate that neurologist treatment in PD may be associated with improved survival, yet is underutilized. Factors contributing to this improved survival remain unknown, but may be due in part to optimal disease treatment or avoidance of disease-related complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with PD in 2002 and still living in 2006. Hospitalization for PD-related (neurodegenerative disease, psychosis, depression, urinary tract infection, and traumatic injury) and general medical (hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, angina, and gastrointestinal obstruction) illnesses was compared by PD treating physician specialty using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for confounders. Secondary analyses included PD-related rehospitalization and cost stratified by frequency of neurologist care. RESULTS: We identified 24,929 eligible incident PD cases; 13,489 had neurologist care. There were 9,112 PD-related hospitalizations, and these occurred and recurred less often among neurologist-treated patients. Neurologist PD care was associated with lower adjusted odds of both initial and repeat hospitalization for psychosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.86), urinary tract infection (HR 0.74, 0.63-0.87), and traumatic injury (HR 0.56, 0.40-0.78). PD-related outcomes improved with frequency of neurologist care in a stepwise manner. Odds of general illness hospitalization or hospitalization did not differ by neurologist involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Regular neurologist care in PD is specifically associated with lower risk of hospitalization and rehospitalization for several PD-related illnesses. This may reflect an improved ability of neurologists to prevent, recognize, or treat PD complications.