Rapid molecular diagnostic tests in patients with bacteremia: evaluation of their impact on decision making and clinical outcomes.

We performed a systematic review of the data regarding rapid diagnostic tests and their advantages or limitations on patients' clinical outcomes. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched independently by two reviewers. Mortality was the primary outcome. Most studies compared rapid tests with blood cultures. Although not observed in all studies, only studies comparing rapid tests in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) showed a mortality benefit. A reduction in hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was also observed in almost all studies when the rapid tests, with or without ASPs, were used. Finally, treatment decisions were taken earlier in the rapid test groups. Despite a faster treatment decision, a clear mortality benefit was not seen when rapid tests were used. It is crucial to differentiate the influence of rapid tests from that of ASPs and clarify the actual effect of each factor separately.

Accuracy of T2 magnetic resonance assays as point-of-care methods in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Novel molecular diagnostic methods are being evaluated in order to expedite pathogen identification in patients with bacteraemia. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of the T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) assays - T2 Bacteria (T2B) and T2 Resistance (T2R) - as point-of-care tests in the intensive care unit compared with blood-culture-based tests. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with suspected bacteraemia. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using blood culture as the reference method. FINDINGS: In total, 208 cases were included in the study. The mean time from sampling to report was lower for the T2MR assays compared with blood-culture-based methods (P<0.001). The rate of invalid reports was 6.73% for the T2B assay and 9.9% for the T2R assay. For the T2B assay, overall positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 84.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 71.9-93.1%], negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 64.3% (95% CI 55.4-72.6%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 48.9% (95% CI 42.5-55.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 91.2% (95% CI 84.4-95.2%). Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.402. For the T2R assay, overall PPA was 80% (95% CI 51.9-95.7%), NPA was 69.2% (95% CI 54.9-81.3%), PPV was 42.9% (95% CI 31.7-54.8%) and NPV was 92.3% (95% CI 81.1-97.1%). Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.376. CONCLUSION: T2MR assays have high NPV for rapid exclusion of bacteraemia, and could potentially assist with antimicrobial stewardship when applied as point-of-care diagnostic tests in the intensive care unit.

Fluoroquinolones or macrolides in combination with ß-lactams in adult patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The best treatment option for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been defined. The effectiveness of ß-lactam/fluoroquinolone (BLFQ) versus ß-lactam/macrolide (BLM) combinations for the treatment of patients with CAP was evaluated. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for observational cohort studies, non-randomized and randomized controlled trials providing data for patients with CAP receiving BLM or BLFQ. Mortality was the primary outcome. A meta-analysis was performed. MINORS and GRADE were used for data quality assessment. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (16 684 patients) were included. Randomized trials were not identified. A variety of ß-lactams, fluoroquinolones and macrolides were used within and between the studies. Mortality was reported at different time points. The available body of evidence had very low quality. In the analysis of unadjusted data, mortality with BLFQ was higher than with BLM (risk ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54, I2 28%). BLFQ was associated with higher mortality regardless of the study design, mortality recording time, study period and study BLM group mortality. BLFQ was associated with higher mortality in American but not European studies. No difference was observed in patients with bacteraemia and septic shock. In the meta-analysis of adjusted mortality data, a non-significant difference between the two regimens was observed (eight studies, adjusted risk ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.95-1.67, I2 43%). CONCLUSION: In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials recommendations cannot be made for or against either of the studied regimens in this group of hospitalized patients with CAP. Well designed randomized controlled trials comparing the two regimens are warranted.