Safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the octogenarian population.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The complication rates and outcomes among octogenarians remain poorly studied. We aimed to compare trends, morbidity, and mortality associated with CA for AF among octogenarians versus those less than 80 years old. METHODS: Using weighted sampling from the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of AF and a primary procedure of CA (2004-2013). Our primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of major and minor complications. RESULTS: Among 86,119 patients who underwent CA for AF, 3,482 were 80 years old or older. Complications were significantly more frequent in octogenarians; [16.2% (564 of 3,482) versus 9.8% (8,092 of 82,637), P < 0.001]. Of note, there was no significant difference for the composite of major complications; [3.6% (124 of 3482) in octogenarians versus 2.8% (2286 of 82637), P = 0.20]. The total mortality rate was not significant in a multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-2.64; P = .94). The presence of chronic renal failure (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.75-6.36; P < 0.001), anemia (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.03-2.97; P = .04), and chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.62; P = .015) were predictors of major complications in octogenarians. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation for AF in octogenarians does not confer a higher mortality risk than in those less than 80 years old. The procedure is associated with a higher rate of overall complications but there was no difference in terms of major complications or death. The presence of anemia, CKD or pulmonary disease were predictors of major complications in octogenarians.

RETRACTED:B-PO04-095 ESOPHAGEAL TEMPERATURE MONITORING DURING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION WITH THE PULSED FIELD ABLATION SYSTEM.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the authors. The authors inadvertently specified some ablation settings in the methods section that should not have been reported because they can be potentially linked to a specific pulsed field ablation technology that is currently under investigation for FDA approval. The Authors apologize for the inconvenience caused by this oversight, http://dx.doi.org/.

RETRACTED:B-AB03-04 CEREBRAL MICROEMBOLIC SIGNAL BURDEN DURING PULSED FILED ABLATION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the authors. The authors inadvertently specified some ablation settings in the methods section that should not have been reported because they can be potentially linked to a specific pulsed field ablation technology that is currently under investigation for FDA approval. The Authors apologize for the inconvenience caused by this oversight, http://dx.doi.org/.

Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations.

BACKGROUND: Many centers use radiofrequency (RF) energy at 25-35 W for 30-60 seconds. There is a safety concern about using higher power, especially on the posterior wall. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine complication rates for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations performed with high-power, short-duration RF energy. METHODS: We examined the complication rates of 4 experienced centers performing AF ablations at RF powers from 45-50 W for 2-15 seconds per lesion. In total, 13,974 ablations were performed in 10,284 patients. On the posterior wall, 11,436 ablations used 45-50 W for 2-10 seconds, and 2538 ablations used power reduced to 35 W for 20 seconds. Esophageal temperature monitoring was used in 13,858 (99.2%). RESULTS: Demographics were age 64 ± 11 years, male 68%, left atrial size 4.4 ± 0.7 cm, paroxysmal AF 37%, persistent AF 42%, longstanding AF 20%, antiarrhythmic drugs failed 1.4 ± 0.7, hypertension 54%, diabetes 15%, previous cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack 7%, and CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.1 ± 1.4. Procedural time was 116 ± 41 minutes. Complications were death in 2 (0.014%; 1 due to stroke and 1 due to atrioesophageal fistula), pericardial tamponade in 33 (0.24%; 26 tapped, 7 surgical), strokes <48 hours in 6 (0.043%), strokes 48 hours-30 days in 6 (0.043%), pulmonary vein stenosis requiring intervention in 2 (0.014%), phrenic nerve paralysis in 2 (0.014%; both resolved), steam pops 2 (0.014%) without complications, and catheter char 0 (0.00%). There was 1 atrioesophageal fistula in 11,436 ablations using power 45-50 W on the posterior wall and 3 in 2538 ablated with 35 W on the posterior wall (P = .021), although 2 of the 3 had no esophageal monitoring during a fluoroless procedure. CONCLUSION: AF ablations can be performed at 45-50 W for short durations with very low complication rates. High-power, short-duration ablations have the potential to shorten procedural and total RF times and create more localized and durable lesions.