Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the tolerability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy (VUH) with that of conventional diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in the workup of patients who are infertile. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery Unit of Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria in Negrar, Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 120 consecutive women who underwent hysterosalpingosonography and subsequent VUH and conventional hysteroscopy for infertility evaluation were included. The inclusion criterion was infertility for at least 1 year, with evaluation in the early or intermediate follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. INTERVENTIONS: After the placement of an intracervical catheter, a Ringer Lactate solution was injected into the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and a 3D volume was obtained. The ultrasound volume acquired was successively elaborated offline, and a VUH was performed. Subsequently, a variable amount of air was introduced into the uterine cavity, and the patency of the salpinges was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VUH findings were compared with those of conventional hysteroscopy performed in the subsequent month. For the detection of endometrial pathology in the overall pool, the sensitivity and specificity of VUH in comparison with conventional hysteroscopy were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.3%-100%), respectively. For the detection of uterine cavity pathology and uterine malformations in the overall pool, the sensitivities of VUH were 80% (95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with specificities of 100% (95% CI, 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%), respectively, when compared with conventional hysteroscopy. The positive predictive values for endometrial pathology, uterine cavity alterations, and uterine malformations were 100% (95% CI, 84.6%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 39.8%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area of 100%, 90% (95% CI, 70%-100%), and 100%, respectively. There were no cases of severe vasovagal reactions or other complications. Most patients (67%, 81 of 120 women) described the examination as "less painful than expected," 25% (30 of 120 women) "just as expected," and only 7% (9 of 120 women) as "more painful than expected." CONCLUSION: VUH was well tolerated and showed a high accuracy (100%) in the study of the uterine cavity when compared with conventional hysteroscopy.

Estimation of birthweight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness improves the detection of macrosomic fetuses.

The accuracy of sonographic estimation of birthweight in suspected macrosomic fetuses is compromised by the imprecision of the biometrical measurements. This prospective study evaluated the performance of an equation based on linear measurement of the soft tissue above the external side of the fetal femur. The performance of this algorithm was compared with two classical algorithms. Sonographic measurements were taken within 48 h before of delivery. Sixty-two patients with fetuses with suspected macrosomia were enrolled. The studied formulas were compared between them and showed a significant correlation with birthweight (p < 0.0001) and satisfactory statistical performances (r > 0.9). The new formula showed a reduced standard deviation that means a lower internal error in the prediction. This study supports the potential of this new approach for the estimation of birthweight in large fetuses based on sonographic linear measurements only.

Transvaginal sonography for preoperative assessment of deep endometriosis.

PURPOSE: To determinate transvaginal scan (TVS) accuracy in the preoperative evaluation of deep endometriosis in a large cohort of patients with subsequent laparoscopic assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary referral center for endometriosis. Transvaginal scan reports were retrieved from an electronic database of all patients who underwent laparoscopy for pelvic pain or infertility in 2009. The accuracy of TVS was assessed for 10 different sites of pelvic endometriosis. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty women were included in the study. Sensitivity and specificity of TVS were 61% and 99%, respectively, for bladder endometriosis, 52% and 96% for endometriosis of rectovaginal septum, 65% and 99% for rectum endometriosis, and 69% and 98% for endometriosis of the sigmoid colon. CONCLUSIONS: TVS appears to be useful for the detection of endometriosis located in the bladder and involving the sigmoid colon, the rectovaginal septum, and the rectum.

Four-dimensional and Doppler sonography in the diagnosis and surveillance of a true cord knot.

Prenatal diagnosis of a true knot of the umbilical cord is often an incidental observation at ultrasound with a difficult differential diagnosis between true and false knots. Furthermore, little is known about the optimal management of these cases. We report the importance of color Doppler and four-dimensional ultrasound for the differential diagnosis in the case of true cord knot and the role of Doppler flow velocimetry in the management of that case.

Role of ultrasonographic parameters for predicting tubal involvement in infertile patients affected by endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Transvaginal ultrasound is fundamental for the mapping of endometriosis, and the imaging criteria have been clearly described for different organs study. However, no specific ultrasonographic signs of tubal endometriosis have been reported, with the exception of hydrosalpinx, which is the expression of an extreme tubal damage and obstruction. The detection of tubal pathology in infertile patients is fundamental, therefore the aim of the study was to evaluate incidence of tubal endometriosis in infertile patients, and to analyze ultrasonographic signs useful for detection of this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All 500 consecutive infertile women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis were included. The preoperative workup included transvaginal ultrasound and was compared to intraoperative findings and histologic study. RESULTS: The incidence of tubal endometriosis in our study was 8%. Using hydrosalpinx as the ultrasonographic marker for tubal involvement the overall pooled, sensitivity and specificity of TVU were 12% (95%CI, 5-23%) and 99% (95%CI, 98-100%), respectively. If at least one ultrasonographic parameter like hydrosalpinx, periadnexal adhesions or ovarian cyst was considered as a sign of tubal endometriosis, a sensitivity, VPN and specificity were 94% (95% IC, 85-98%), 97% (95%IC, 93-99%) and 31% (95%CI, 27-36%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Hydrosalpinx as ultrasonographic sign alone is characterized by a high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of tubal endometriosis; its sensitivity can be improved by the addition of other markers such as endometrioma and/or periadnexal adhesions.

Sonographic Differential Diagnosis in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: The Bowel.

Up to one-third of fertile-age women with severe endometriosis suffer from colonic involvement. Transvaginal ultrasonography has become a first-line diagnostic tool for the study of the pelvis and more specifically for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. Accuracy of pelvic ultrasound for deep endometriosis increases with operator experience, but the difficulties in the differential diagnosis with diseases that can afflict the bowel tract remain a challenge. We reviewed noteworthy cases referred for secondary level diagnosis suspected of bowel endometriosis in which the subsequent ultrasound led to an alternative diagnosis. This case series aims to highlight awareness for both experts and less-experienced operators the possible differential diagnoses of bowel lesions that initially resemble endometriosis.