RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In medical education there has been increasing emphasis on faculty development programs aimed at the professionalization of teaching and increasing students' learning. However, these programs have been shown to have an impact beyond improvement in teaching skills. The medical school of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (EMUC) has been running a faculty development program (DEM) since 2000. AIM: To explore the perception of graduates on the effects of having participated in DEM on their development as teachers and clinicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative design, the 79 teachers who graduated from DEM from 2004-2008 were sent a questionnaire containing three open questions. Their answers were analyzed using the Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis of Glaser and Strauss by four researchers. RESULTS: Faculty development, becoming a better clinician, personal development, appreciation of the value of teaching and strengthening of the academic community were the five categories that emerged from the answers. Graduates felt that, besides learning new educational skills, they changed their attitude towards teaching. DEM was perceived as facilitating self-awareness and reflection about the graduates' role as doctors and teachers. The graduates also valued meeting other faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty development programs can have an impact far beyond the learning objectives. The planning and design of programs contributes to their wider impact. This should be taken into consideration in the design, planning, and evaluation of faculty development programs. Care should be taken to protect time for participation, reflection and for interaction with other academics.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/normas , Docentes Médicos , Desarrollo de Programa/normas , Desarrollo de Personal , Chile , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few medical teaching institutions provide faculty development in curriculum development to program directors of medical specialties (PD), despite the increased demand for renewal of residency programs and the evaluation of outcomes. AIM: To describe and evaluate a training program in curriculum development for PD developed in 2008 and 2009. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty PD attended an on campus course of fifteen hours. Evaluation was done using Kirkpatrick model through an end-of-course questionnaire, a retrospective pre/post self-assessment test of skills, the assessment of learning and the final projects developed by PD. RESULTS: All PD finished the course and answered the questionnaire. In level 1 (Reaction), 100% reported high satisfaction and would recommend it highly to others, with perceived mean achievement of course objectives of 81%. In level 2 (Learning), all the differences between the retrospective pre and posttest were statistically significant (p < 0.01), and achievement of learning was in average 82.9%. In level 3 (Behavior), 100% felt they would apply what was learnt and 17 PD (57%) sent projects. CONCLUSIONS: This model of faculty development was highly accepted by PD and had a positive evaluation based in high satisfaction, the improvement in pre/posttest assessment, the achievement of learning objectives and the development of projects.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Docentes Médicos , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Narrative medicine has showed to be a powerful instrument to reinforce relationships, identity, and self-knowledge among health professionals. Subjective issues have been recently recognized as relevant for faculty development in addition to the technical aspects. Since 2006 a creative writing workshop has been included as part of the Diploma in Medical Education at the medical school of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. AIM: To describe the experience and results of the creative writing workshop (2006-2010). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive and retrospective study with a qualitative and quantitative design. Thirty-six teachers of the School of Medicine attended a 12-hour workshop. The Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of educational outcomes was used to report the data obtained in the course evaluation survey and in the stories produced. RESULTS: There were positive results at the four levels of Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The learning objectives of the workshop were achieved and 83 stories were created, compiled and published. CONCLUSIONS: The creative writing workshop can provide faculty with protected time for reflective practice about academic experiences and produce educational outcomes at different levels of the Kirkpatrick model.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos , Personal de Salud/educación , Narración , Escritura , Adulto , Chile , Educación Profesional , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since 2000, the medical school of the Catholic University of Chile (EMUC) has offered courses for its faculty as part of a Diploma in Medical Education (DEM). However by 2009, 41% of faculty had never taken any courses. AIM: To explore the reasons why faculty choose not to participate in these courses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews to seven faculty members, all of whom have an active role in teaching but who had not taken any DEM courses. The sampling was intentional and guided by theory. Based on Grounded theory, the data was analyzed using open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: Three categories emerged from the analysis. First, the characteristics of a "good teacher" and what it means to be a good teacher. Second, the current status of teaching. Third, the barriers to participate in courses of DEM. Non-attendance is multifactorial; teaching is seen as a natural skill that is difficult to be trained, teaching has a lower priority than other activities, and there are many barriers perceived for attendance. CONCLUSIONS: With these results we developed a model to explain the reasons why faculty choose not to participate in these courses. The lower value of teaching and the multiple roles that teachers have, are highlighted.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Docentes Médicos/normas , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Facultades de Medicina , Desarrollo de Personal/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Chile , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The medical school of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile offers a Diploma on Medical Education (DME) for its faculty since 2000. However its impact had never been evaluated. AIM: To determine the perception of the graduates of the impact of DME, using the Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of educational outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire containing closed and pre-post retrospective questions that represented Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation, was sent to all the graduates in 2009. RESULTS: Eighty two of 91 graduates returned the questionnaire. Ninety one percent had a high level of satisfaction at Kirkpatrick Level 1 (Reaction), and perceived an average of 81.8% completed objectives. Most respondents reported modification of attitudes and perceptions about teaching, at Kirkpatrick Level 2 (Learning). All the differences between the pre and posttest retrospective questionnaire were statistically significant. More than 98% of responded stated that they improved their role as teacher using the skills learned during DME, according to Kirkpatrick Level 3 (Behavior). According to Kirkpatrick Level 4 (Outcomes), 66% stated that the DME contributed to appreciate the value of teaching at an institutional level. CONCLUSIONS: According to the perception of the respondents, the DME has had a positive impact at all the levels described in the Kirkpatrick model.
Asunto(s)
Certificación , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacitación en Servicio/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Enseñanza/normas , Chile , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience and results of the implementation of a faculty development program for professors of Medicine in the Medical Education Certificate program developed at the School of Medicine, Pontificia Uniersidad Catolica de Chile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study. The population consisted of all graduates of the program until 2011. A questionnaire with open and closed-ended questions was applied, exploring different levels of impact using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. RESULTS: Over 97% expressed a high degree of satisfaction (Kirkpatrick level 1). Most respondents reported changes in learning, knowledge and teaching skills (Kirkpatrick Level 2) with statistically significant differences in retrospective pre-post questionnaires 93% reported having improved their teaching performance generally, and 85% in a specific performance (Kirkpatrick Level 3). At level 4 of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, most perceived an increased interest in teaching and 69% reported being valued more highly at the institutional level. Five categories emerged from the qualitative analysis: value given to teaching and of training in teaching, importance of teaching skills, the contribution of teaching to the professional role, contribution to personal development and strengthening of the academic community. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of this faculty development program in medical education have been positive. Professors of Medicine, in addition to improving their teaching performance, perceived changes in personal development, in their role as physicians, in the academic community and in the institution.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Docentes Médicos , Desarrollo de Personal , Chile , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desarrollo de Programa , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
Simulated patients (SPs) have participated successfully in nursing and medical education. The SPs portraying stressful situations may have psychological or physiological effects for several days after their performance; however, long-term effects have not been well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of interpreting roles related to HIV among SPs. A qualitative descriptive approach was used for this study. Questionnaires with open-ended questions were conducted immediately after the interpretation of HIV-related roles and a year later by 10 SPs. In addition, a focus group was run a year later using a preestablished interview guide. As a result of direct content analysis, 2 major themes emerged: effects of interpreting roles relating to HIV and complexity of the roles. The findings of this study stress that interpreting an HIV-related role produces emotional, behavioral, and physical effects in SPs, at any stage during the training or performance, and has a long-term impact on their perception of their personal health and risk.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Simulación de Paciente , Rol , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudiantes , Adulto , Chile , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Empleos en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , AutoeficaciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze three tools used in the assessment system applied to the pediatric internship over a 7-year period at the School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. METHODS: Retrospective observational research design for the assessment modalities implemented in the pediatric internship from 2001 through 2007. The tools were as follows: objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), written examination and daily clinical practice observation guidelines (DCPOG). The assessment methods were applied to the sixth-year pediatric internship with a total of 697 students. Statistical analysis included a descriptive assessment, with correlation and simple linear and multiple regressions (ANOVA), Bonferroni test and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: OSCE success scores were reached in 75.7+/-8%, with a better mean among females (p < 0.001). OSCE scores improved after the third year of implementation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.11-0.78. Written examination had a mean score of 79.8+/-10% and there were no sex differences. Mean DCPOG score was 97.1+/-3% and the results were better among females (p < 0.005). Correlation between the three assessment methods showed a moderate positive relationship except in the year of 2007, where the correlation was higher (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the learning assessment system was performed using OSCE, written examination and DCPOG, which are complementary to each other, and yielded good results.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Pediatría/educación , Chile , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Effective clinical teaching is an imperative of medical education. Clinical teachers and faculty development initiatives as well as Medical Schools, need to focus their efforts to pursue common outcomes: effective learning in students, future competent physicians and healthy patients. Excellence in quality of teaching needs scholars in education. To achieve this objective, institutions must recruit a core of medical faculty according to its mission, define the attributes and teaching competences, implement faculty development programs, and finally, support academic vitality. This article describes the three main issues of medical teaching: faculty, faculty development and its organization.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/normas , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Enseñanza/normas , Educación Médica/normas , Humanos , Rol ProfesionalRESUMEN
Objetivos. Describir la experiencia y resultados de la implementación de un programa de formación en docencia para profesores de Medicina del Diplomado en Educación Médica, desarrollado en la Escuela de Medicina de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Materiales y métodos. Estudio descriptivo, transversal, de carácter cuantitativo y cualitativo. La población estuvo compuesta por todos los graduados del programa hasta el 2011. Se aplicó un cuestionario con preguntas abiertas y cerradas explorando diferentes niveles de impacto, utilizando el modelo de evaluación de Kirkpatrick. Resultados. Sobre el 97% expresó un alto grado de satisfacción (nivel 1 Kirkpatrick). La mayoría reportó cambios en el aprendizaje de conocimientos y competencias docentes (nivel 2 Kirkpatrick) con diferencias pre y posretrospectivas estadísticamente significativas. El 93% refirió haber mejorado globalmente su desempeño docente y sobre el 85% en desempeños específicos (nivel 3 Kirkpatrick). En el nivel 4 de Kirkpatrick, la mayoría percibió un incremento del interés por la docencia y 69% reconoció una mayor valoración a nivel institucional. Del análisis cualitativo emergieron cinco categorías: valoración de la docencia y de la formación en docencia, relevancia de las habilidades docentes, aporte de la docencia al rol profesional, contribución al desarrollo personal y fortalecimiento de la comunidad académica. Conclusiones. Los efectos de este programa de formación en educación médica han sido positivos. Los profesores de Medicina, además de perfeccionar sus desempeños docentes, perciben cambios en el desarrollo personal, en su rol de médico, en la comunidad académica y en la institución...
Objectives. To describe the experience and results of the implementation of a faculty development program for professors of Medicine in the Medical Education Certificate program developed at the School of Medicine, Pontificia Uniersidad Catolica de Chile. Materials and methods. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study. The population consisted of all graduates of the program until 2011. A questionnaire with open and closed-ended questions was applied, exploring different levels of impact using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Results. Over 97% expressed a high degree of satisfaction (Kirkpatrick level 1). Most respondents reported changes in learning, knowledge and teaching skills (Kirkpatrick Level 2) with statistically significant differences in retrospective pre-post questionnaires 93% reported having improved their teaching performance generally, and 85% in a specific performance (Kirkpatrick Level 3). At level 4 of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, most perceived an increased interest in teaching and 69% reported being valued more highly at the institutional level. Five categories emerged from the qualitative analysis: value given to teaching and of training in teaching, importance of teaching skills, the contribution of teaching to the professional role, contribution to personal development and strengthening of the academic community. Conclusions. The effects of this faculty development program in medical education have been positive. Professors of Medicine, in addition to improving their teaching performance, perceived changes in personal development, in their role as physicians, in the academic community and in the institution...
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Desarrollo de Personal , Docentes Médicos , Educación Médica , Enseñanza , Chile , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
Background: In medical education there has been increasing emphasis on faculty development programs aimed at the professionalization of teaching and increasing students' learning. However, these programs have been shown to have an impact beyond improvement in teaching skills. The medical school of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (EMUC) has been running a faculty development program (DEM) since 2000. Aim: To explore the perception of graduates on the effects of having participated in DEM on their development as teachers and clinicians. Material and Methods: Using an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative design, the 79 teachers who graduated from DEM from 2004-2008 were sent a questionnaire containing three open questions. Their answers were analyzed using the Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis of Glaser and Strauss by four researchers. Results: Faculty development, becoming a better clinician, personal development, appreciation of the value of teaching and strengthening of the academic community were the five categories that emerged from the answers. Graduates felt that, besides learning new educational skills, they changed their attitude towards teaching. DEM was perceived as facilitating self-awareness and refection about the graduates' role as doctors and teachers. The graduates also valued meeting other faculty. Conclusions: Faculty development programs can have an impact far beyond the learning objectives. The planning and design of programs contributes to their wider impact. This should be taken into consideration in the design, planning, and evaluation of faculty development programs. Care should be taken to protect time for participation, refection and for interaction with other academics.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Educación Médica/normas , Docentes Médicos , Desarrollo de Programa/normas , Desarrollo de Personal , Chile , Investigación Cualitativa , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
Background: Narrative medicine has showed to be a powerful instrument to reinforce relationships, identity, and self-knowledge among health professionals. Subjective issues have been recently recognized as relevant for faculty development in addition to the technical aspects. Since 2006 a creative writing workshop has been included as part of the Diploma in Medical Education at the medical school of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Aim: To describe the experience and results of the creative writing workshop (2006-2010). Material and Methods: Descriptive and retrospective study with a qualitative and quantitative design. Thirty-six teachers of the School of Medicine attended a 12-hour workshop. The Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of educational outcomes was used to report the data obtained in the course evaluation survey and in the stories produced. Results: There were positive results at the four levels of Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The learning objectives of the workshop were achieved and 83 stories were created, compiled and published. Conclusions: The creative writing workshop can provide faculty with protected time for reflective practice about academic experiences and produce educational outcomes at different levels of the Kirkpatrick model.
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Docentes Médicos , Personal de Salud/educación , Narración , Escritura , Chile , Educación ProfesionalRESUMEN
Background: Since 2000, the medical school of the Catholic University of Chile (EMUC) has offered courses for its faculty as part of a Diploma in Medical Education (DEM). However by 2009, 41% of faculty had never taken any courses. Aim: To explore the reasons why faculty choose not to participate in these courses. Material and Methods: Semi-structured interviews to seven faculty members, all of whom have an active role in teaching but who had not taken any DEM courses. The sampling was intentional and guided by theory. Based on Grounded theory, the data was analyzed using open, axial and selective coding. Results: Three categories emerged from the analysis. First, the characteristics of a "good teacher" and what it means to be a good teacher. Second, the current status of teaching. Third, the barriers to participate in courses of DEM. Non-attendance is multifactorial; teaching is seen as a natural skill that is difficult to be trained, teaching has a lower priority than other activities, and there are many barriers perceived for attendance. Conclusions: With these results we developed a model to explain the reasons why faculty choose not to participate in these courses. The lower value of teaching and the multiple roles that teachers have, are highlighted.
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación Médica , Docentes Médicos/normas , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Facultades de Medicina , Desarrollo de Personal/normas , Chile , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Descrever e analisar três ferramentas usadas no sistema de avaliação aplicado ao internato em pediatria por um período de 7 anos na Faculdade de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. MÉTODOS: Pesquisa observacional retrospectiva projetada para as modalidades de avaliação usadas de 2001 a 2007 que foram implementadas no internato em pediatria. As ferramentas foram as seguintes: exame clínico objetivo estruturado (objective structured clinical examination, OSCE), exame escrito e diretrizes de observação de prática clínica diária (DOPCD). Os métodos de avaliação foram aplicados ao internato em pediatria do sexto ano, com um total de 697 alunos. A análise estatística incluiu uma avaliação descritiva, com correlação e regressões linear simples e múltipla (ANOVA), teste de Bonferroni e coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. O nível de significância foi de 5 por cento. RESULTADOS: Escores de sucesso com a OSCE foram atingidos em 75,7±8 por cento, com melhor média entre o sexo feminino (p < 0,001). Os escores de OSCE melhoraram após o terceiro ano de implementação. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach foi de 0,11-0,78. O exame escrito teve escore médio de 79,8±10 por cento, e não houve diferenças quanto a gênero. O escore médio de DOPCD 97,1±3 por cento, com melhores resultados entre as mulheres (p < 0,005). A correlação entre os três métodos de avaliação mostrou uma relação positiva moderada, exceto no ano de 2007, quando a correlação foi maior (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÕES: Análise do sistema de avaliação da aprendizagem foi realizada usando OSCE, exame escrito e DOPCD, que são complementares entre si, gerando bons resultados.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze three tools used in the assessment system applied to the pediatric internship over a 7-year period at the School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. METHODS: Retrospective observational research design for the assessment modalities implemented in the pediatric internship from 2001 through 2007. The tools were as follows: objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), written examination and daily clinical practice observation guidelines (DCPOG). The assessment methods were applied to the sixth-year pediatric internship with a total of 697 students. Statistical analysis included a descriptive assessment, with correlation and simple linear and multiple regressions (ANOVA), Bonferroni test and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: OSCE success scores were reached in 75.7±8 percent, with a better mean among females (p < 0.001). OSCE scores improved after the third year of implementation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.11-0.78. Written examination had a mean score of 79.8±10 percent and there were no sex differences. Mean DCPOG score was 97.1±3 percent and the results were better among females (p < 0.005). Correlation between the three assessment methods showed a moderate positive relationship except in the year of 2007, where the correlation was higher (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the learning assessment system was performed using OSCE, written examination and DCPOG, which are complementary to each other, and yielded good results.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Competencia Clínica/normas , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Pediatría/educación , Chile , Métodos EpidemiológicosRESUMEN
Effective clinical teaching is an imperative of medical education. Clinical teachers and faculty development initiatives as well as Medical Schools, need to focus their efforts to pursue common outcomes: effective learning in students, future competent physicians and healthy patients. Excellence in quality of teaching needs scholars in education. To achieve this objective, institutions must recruit a core of medical faculty according to its mission, define the attributes and teaching competences, implement faculty development programs, and finally, support academic vitality. This article describes the three main issues of medical teaching: faculty, faculty development and its organization.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/normas , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Enseñanza/normas , Educación Médica/normas , Rol ProfesionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has become a respected and widely used tool for the assessment of clinical competence in medical education. AIM: To describe the first experience of an OSCE as a summative assessment in undergraduate Pediatric Internship, in two universities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The OSCE was structured by a committee of faculty members of the 5 campi of University of Chile and I campus of the Catholic University. A 21 station OSCE was administered simultaneously to 124 Pediatric Interns (University of Chile = 104, Catholic University = 20), in 3 centers. A total of 50 faculty members participated in the examination. The OSCE consisted of 20 clinical problems, including videotape recordings, photographs, x-rays and laboratory exams, phantoms and 7 simulated standardized parents. RESULTS: The average total OSCE score was 67.3% (range: 84.5%-43.5%). The maximum theoretic score was achieved in 19 stations. A significant correlation between station and total score, was found for 18 of the 20 clinical problems. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of using OSCE has been a success. The OSCE was an adequate procedure to assess a large number of interns simultaneously and it allowed us to measure the main objectives in all domains and a wide range of clinical competence of Pediatric Internship Programs.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Internado y Residencia , Pediatría/educación , Curriculum , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo averiguar la frecuencia y presentación clínica de la toxocarosis en una población infantil. Para ello se realizó entre febrero y agosto de 1997, un estudio descriptivo en una población menor de 15 años, consultante a la Unidad de pediatría Ambulatoria del Centro Médico San Joaquín de la Universidad Católica de Chile. Los niños con eosinofilia (400 o más cel/mm) fueron elegidos para el estudio. La infección por toxocara se diagnosticó mediante la medición del antígeno somático por técnica de ELISA, con dilución de al menos 1/64. Durante el período se realizaron 7.898 consultas, tomándose 364 hemogramas. Se encontró eosinofilia en 24 niños (6,6 por ciento) (rango: 400-9.135 cel/mm). Ocho de éstos fueron positivos para toxocara (30 por ciento). El promedio de edad del grupo de estudio fue 4 años 6 meses (rango: 2 años 4 meses). Todos vivían en centros urbanos y habían tenido contacto con perros, gatos y 5 de los ocho practicaban geofagia. El hemograma fue tomado por adenitis (n=2), mal incrementado ponderal (n=2), bronquitis obstructiva (n=2), exatema (n=1). Sólo en un caso fue positivo el examen oftalmológico, 6/8 pacientes tenían otra parasitosis
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Eosinofilia/epidemiología , Toxocariasis/epidemiología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/estadística & datos numéricos , Morbilidad , Toxocariasis/complicacionesRESUMEN
En 30 niños de 4 años 5 meses a 13 años 6 meses de edad con antecedentes de infección urinaria e incontinencia, enuresis o ambas, se midió la capacidad vesicalintentando relacionarla con el peso, la estatura y la superficie corporal. La mejor relación ocurrió con la estatura (r= 0,406; p < 0.05), que con el peso (r=0,389; p < 0.05) y la edad (r= 0,217; p > 0.05). La ecuación que relaciona la capacidad vesical con la estatura, está representada en la fórmula: Capacidad Vesical (ml) = 1,7 x talla (cm) - 0,4
Asunto(s)
Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Composición Corporal , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiología , Estatura , Superficie Corporal , Peso CorporalRESUMEN
Se presentan 21 niños con vejiga hiperactiva y 9 con vejiga hipertónica que consultaron por enuresis, incontinencia o encopresis en forma aislada o asociada y que recibieron durante 90 días tratamiento con sulfato de N-Metil Hioscina. Todos aquellos pacientes que presentaban infección urinaria recurrente se trataron durante todo el estudio con Nitrofurantoína 2mg. x kg/día. En todos se efectuó registro urodinámico al inicio y al término del tratamiento farmacológico. El estudio clínico se prolongó durante 90 días de suspendido el tratamiento. Se comprobó un aumento no significativo (P > 0.005) en la capacidade vesical y en el residuo promedio, una menor amplitud del segmento de reflexia y desaparición o disminución de las contracciones no inhibidas en las vejigas hiperactivas, al término de la terapia. Se observó una respuesta clínica satidfactoria en los pacientes con vejigas hiperactivas independientes del registro urodinámico al término del tratamiento sobre incontinencia, enuresis y encompresis, resultado que se prolongó hasta los 90 días de seguimiento. En los pacientes con vejiga hipertónica, la respuesta clínica fue satisfactoria sobre la enuresis. Esta respuesta se matuvo durante todo el tiempo de observación. No se apreció efectos colaterales indeseables por acción del medicamento