RESUMEN
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in permanent loss of motor and sensory function. After SCI, the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) is disrupted, causing the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, which secrete several kinds of cytokines, as well as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMPs are proteases capable of degrading various extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, as well as many non-matrix substrates. The tissue inhibitor of MMPs (TIMP)-1 is significantly upregulated post-SCI and operates via MMP-dependent and MMP-independent pathways. Through the MMP-dependent pathway, TIMP-1 directly reduces inflammation and destruction of the ECM by binding and blocking the catalytic domains of MMPs. Thus, TIMP-1 helps preserve the BSCB and reduces immune cell infiltration. The MMP-independent pathway involves TIMP-1's cytokine-like functions, in which it binds specific TIMP surface receptors. Through receptor binding, TIMP-1 can stimulate the proliferation of several types of cells, including keratinocytes, aortic smooth muscle cells, skin epithelial cells, corneal epithelial cells, and astrocytes. TIMP-1 induces astrocyte proliferation, modulates microglia activation, and increases myelination and neurite extension in the central nervous system (CNS). In addition, TIMP-1 also regulates apoptosis and promotes cell survival through direct signaling. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of TIMP-1, specifically regarding its contribution to inflammation, ECM remodeling, and scar formation after SCI.
Asunto(s)
Cicatriz , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Inhibidores Tisulares de Metaloproteinasas , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/patología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/metabolismo , Humanos , Animales , Cicatriz/patología , Cicatriz/metabolismo , Inhibidores Tisulares de Metaloproteinasas/metabolismo , Inhibidor Tisular de Metaloproteinasa-1/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: For nerve injuries, not amendable to tensionless epineural coaptation of the nerve, autografts are the preferred treatment. Although absorbable sutures are not recommended for nerve repair, there is no evidence that non-absorbable sutures are superior to absorbable sutures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of non-absorbable monofilament nylon sutures, absorbable monofilament vicryl sutures, and fibrin glue when used for nerve grafting. METHODS: Lewis rats (N = 32) were subjected to a sciatic nerve transection and randomly assigned to a group: graft with Nylon, graft with Vicryl, graft with Fibrin Glue, or no graft. Motor function, sensory function, and thermal pain were assessed during a 12-week recovery period, and immunohistochemistry was used to assess macrophage response. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the Vicryl and Nylon groups had significantly larger ankle angles at to lift off, which is a measure of motor function, compared to injured controls (p < 0.05). Grafted rats displayed no difference in thermal response but hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli compared to the uninjured hindlimb. The Nylon, Vicryl, and Fibrin Glue groups all had significantly less atrophy of the gastrocnemius muscle compared to injured controls (p < 0.0001). In the Fibrin Glue group, 3/9 grafts did not incorporate. The Nylon group had significantly less (p = 0.0004) axon growth surrounding the suture holes compared to the Vicryl group. There were no differences in the axon counts, motor neurons, or sensory neurons between all grafted rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that vicryl sutures work just as well as nylon for nerve recovery after injury and grafting.