Management of cervical fractures in ankylosing spondylitis patients: immediate fixation effort via vertebroplasty with one-staged combined anterior and posterior fixation.

The ankylosed spine is prone to fracture even as a result of minor trauma due to its changed biomechanical properties. Fractures in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients are highly unstable and surgical intervention for fixation is warranted. Implant failure rates are high and combined anterior and posterior fixation is required to enhance the fixation outcome. For fusion, anterior interbody fusion or posterior bone graft fusion is often adopted. Here, we introduce a new method which combines vertebroplasty with anterior and posterior approaches to improve pain control, facilitate the long-term fixation outcome and mechanics, and decrease perioperative risks with prompt stabilization, especially in patients with spine curve deformity. Here, we present two AS cases with cervical spine fracture treated with this new method.

Non-missile penetrating brain injury-surgical techniques for removing a long penetrating foreign body: a case report.

PURPOSE: Penetrating brain injury (PBI), a relatively uncommon injury, is associated with remarkable secondary complications such as vascular injury, intracranial haemorrhage, infection, and mortality. Non-missile PBI (NMPBI) due to sharp or blunt objects is usually treated surgically by removing the penetrating object, evacuating the associated haemorrhage, identifying possible bleeders along with haemostasis, and performing debridement. Various approaches are used for different scenarios of non-missile PBI according to the object's characteristics, penetrating site, depth, associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and presence of vascular injury along the penetrating tract. NMPBI cases are rarely reported among civilians. We herein describe a patient who was successfully treated for NMPBI, as well as frontal ICH, by simultaneously removing the heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body. METHODS: We performed corticotomy through a shorter tract instead of a deep penetrating trajectory, which minimizes the extent of damage to the brain and enables immediate management of vascular injury under direct vision while removing the foreign body, and intraoperative sonography, which provides real-time information of the penetrating object and the surrounding brain structure. We did not perform computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) because the stab location was at the frontal region, with low risk of vascular injury. Moreover, DSA is time-consuming, which may delay decompressive surgery. RESULTS: The patient was successfully treated through an alternative approach removing the long, heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body and eliminating the accompanying frontal ICH simultaneously. Focal brain abscess developed 8 days after the injury and resolved completely after antibiotics treatment. Dysphasia gradually improved but right distal limbs weakness with spasticity is still present. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest prompt diagnosis by preoperative imaging, screening of vascular injury, decompression with debridement, and antibiotics treatment are important. The alternative surgical approach we proposed is exceptional and should be considered while treating patients with deep NMPBI.

Mapping the contribution and strategic distribution patterns of neuroimaging features of small vessel disease in poststroke cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES: Individual neuroimaging features of small vessel disease (SVD) have been reported to influence poststroke cognition. This study aimed to investigate the joint contribution and strategic distribution patterns of multiple types of SVD imaging features in poststroke cognitive impairment. METHODS: We studied 145 first-ever ischaemic stroke patients with MRI and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) examined at baseline. The local burdens of acute ischaemic lesion (AIL), white matter hyperintensity, lacune, enlarged perivascular space and cross-sectional atrophy were quantified and entered into support vector regression (SVR) models to associate with the global and domain scores of MoCA. The SVR models were optimised with feature selection through 10-fold cross-validations. The contribution of SVD features to MoCA scores was measured by the prediction accuracy in the corresponding SVR model after optimisation. RESULTS: The combination of the neuroimaging features of SVD contributed much more to the MoCA deficits on top of AILs compared with individual SVD features, and the cognitive impact of different individual SVD features was generally similar. As identified by the optimal SVR models, the important SVD-affected regions were mainly located in the basal ganglia and white matter around it, although the specific regions varied for MoCA and its domains. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple types of SVD neuroimaging features jointly had a significant impact on global and domain cognitive functionings after stroke on top of AILs. The map of strategic cognitive-relevant regions of SVD features may help clinicians to understand their complementary impact on poststroke cognition.