Rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19: a multi-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Before the pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mostly defined by early extubation, had been recognized as an increasingly prevalent subphenotype (making up 15-24% of all ARDS cases), associated with good prognosis (10% mortality in ARDSNet trials). We attempted to determine the prevalence and prognosis of rapidly improving ARDS and of persistent severe ARDS related to COVID-19. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in three intensive care units (ICU) during the second pandemic wave in Greece. We defined rapidly improving ARDS as extubation or a partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) greater than 300 on the first day following intubation. We defined persistent severe ARDS as PaO2:FiO2 of equal to or less than 100 on the second day following intubation. RESULTS: A total of 280 intubated patients met criteria of ARDS with a median PaO2:FiO2 of 125.0 (interquartile range 93.0-161.0) on day of intubation, and overall ICU-mortality of 52.5% (ranging from 24.3 to 66.9% across the three participating sites). Prevalence of rapidly improving ARDS was 3.9% (11 of 280 patients); no extubation occurred on the first day following intubation. ICU-mortality of patients with rapidly improving ARDS was 54.5%. This low prevalence and high mortality rate of rapidly improving ARDS were consistent across participating sites. Prevalence of persistent severe ARDS was 12.1% and corresponding mortality was 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly improving ARDS was not prevalent and was not associated with good prognosis among patients with COVID-19. This is starkly different from what has been previously reported for patients with ARDS not related to COVID-19. Our results on both rapidly improving ARDS and persistent severe ARDS may contribute to our understanding of trajectory of ARDS and its association with prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

Ventilatory Ratio Threshold for Unassisted Breathing: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ventilatory ratio (VR) is a simple index of ventilatory efficiency and dead space. Because increased dead space and high ventilatory demands impose a limitation to unassisted ventilation, and may predispose patients to injurious strong efforts during assisted ventilation, evaluation of the VR could provide helpful information during weaning. We hypothesize that there is a threshold of VR associated with tolerance of unassisted breathing. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we included subjects ventilated in a control mode for at least 24 h, who were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation, without use of noninvasive ventilation, and discharged alive from the ICU. We focused on the successful weaning attempts (the last, if more than one was performed) and evaluated the VR at the beginning and at the end of the assisted ventilation period. RESULTS: We examined 2,000 medical records and included in our analysis 572 subjects (age: 68 y, R5-95 = 25-85, 68% male) with main admission diagnosis of respiratory failure (23%), sepsis (11%), brain injury (34%), and postoperative (14%). The VR at the beginning and the end of the assisted ventilation period was 1.5 (R5-95 = 1-2.1) and 1.4 (R5-95 = 1-2), respectively. The median duration of assisted ventilation in subjects with a VR ≥ 2 at the beginning of the assisted ventilation period was 3 d (R5-95 = 0-14 d), significantly longer than in those with a VR < 2, 0.5 d (R5-95 = 0-8 d, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Successful liberation from assisted ventilation was associated with a VR < 2. A VR > 2 was associated with longer duration of weaning. The VR could be used as an additional tool to facilitate the decision-making process during weaning.