RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures, but limited Canadian data are available about hemiarthroplasty failure. We evaluated the frequency and predictors of hemiarthroplasty failure in Manitoba. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre province-wide study, billing and joint registry databases showed 4693 patients who had hemiarthroplasty for treatment of femoral neck fracture in Manitoba over an 11-year period (2005-2015), including 155 hips with subsequent reoperations (open or closed) for treatment of hemiarthroplasty failure. Hospital records were reviewed to identify modes of hemiarthroplasty failure, comorbidities and reoperations. Data were analyzed using χ2 test and Poisson and γ regression models. RESULTS: During our study period, 155 hips (154 patients [3%]) underwent 230 reoperations. Of these, 131 hips (85%) initially had an uncemented unipolar modular implant. Indications for first-time reoperation included periprosthetic femur fracture (49 hips [32%]), dislocation (45 hips [29%]), acetabular wear (28 hips [18%]) and infection (26 hips [17%]). There were 46 hips (30%) that had 2 or more reoperations. Reoperation for dislocation was associated with presence of dementia; acetabular wear was associated with absence of dementia. Time from hemiarthroplasty to reoperation was associated inversely with age at hemiarthroplasty, dislocation and dementia and was directly associated with acetabular wear. The risk of having 2 or more reoperations was associated independently with dislocation, infection, and alcohol abuse. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in Manitoba had a low frequency of failure. Risk factors for multiple reoperations included dislocation, infection and alcohol abuse.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Demencia , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Prótesis de Cadera , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Alcoholismo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Canadá , Demencia/complicaciones , Demencia/cirugía , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/complicaciones , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Hemiartroplastia/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Humanos , Fracturas Periprotésicas/complicaciones , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Femoral nerve block (NB) and periarticular injection (PI) are 2 common options for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed a prospective triple-blinded randomized trial comparing continuous femoral NB to PI, with follow-up to 1 year. Methods: Patients younger than 70 years of age who were scheduled to undergo elective primary TKA under spinal anesthesia between 2009 and 2010 were randomly allocated to receive either continuous femoral NB or PI. Patients in the NB group received ropivacaine through an NB catheter and a sham saline PI. The PI group received a PI of ropivacaine, morphine, ketorolac and epinephrine, and a sham saline infusion via an NB catheter. Both groups had standardized oral analgesia preoperatively, spinal anesthesia and sedation, and postoperative analgesia. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, patients and assessors were blinded to group assignment. Pain was measured twice daily on postoperative days 1 and 2, at rest and with motion, with a numeric rating scale. Patient satisfaction, pain (Oxford Knee Score) and range of motion were assessed at 1 year. Results: There were 39 participants in the NB group and 35 participants in the PI group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline. Statistically but nonclinically significant reductions in pain scores on postoperative day 2 and in narcotic need on the day of surgery were found in the PI group. Patient-reported satisfaction did not differ at any time point. At 1 year, knee flexion was significantly greater in the NB group than in the PI group (mean range of motion 120° v. 110°, p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no demonstrated improvement in pain control with the use of an NB versus PI when used with multimodal analgesia. Clinicians should opt for the modality that has the best efficiency for their surgical environment. ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00869037
Contexte: Le bloc nerveux (BN) fémoral et l'infiltration périarticulaire (IP) sont 2 options d'usage courant pour maîtriser la douleur après l'arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG). Nous avons procédé à un essai prospectif randomisé à triple insu afin de comparer le BN fémoral et l'IP, avec un suivi allant jusqu'à 1 an. Méthodes: Les patients de moins de 70 ans qui devaient subir une ATG élective sous épidurale entre 2009 et 2010 ont été assignés aléatoirement à un BN fémoral continu ou à une IP. Les patients du groupe soumis au BN recevaient de la ropivacaïne par un cathéter de BN et une IF simulée (solution saline). Le groupe soumis à l'IP recevait de la ropivacaïne, de la morphine, du kétorolac et de l'épinéphrine et une perfusion simulée (solution saline) par un cathéter de BN. Les 2 groupes avaient reçu une analgésie orale standard avant l'intervention, une anesthésie rachidienne avec sédatifs et une analgésie postopératoire. Les chirurgiens, les anesthésiologistes, les patients et les évaluateurs ne connaissaient pas l'assignation des agents aux différents groupes. La douleur a été mesurée 2 fois par jour aux jours 1 et 2 postopératoires, au repos et à la mobilisation, au moyen d'une échelle numérique. La satisfaction des patients, la douleur (questionnaire d'Oxford pour le genou) et l'amplitude de mouvement ont toutes été évaluées après 1 an. Résultats: Le groupe soumis au BN comptait 39 participants et le groupe soumis à l'IP en comptait 35. Il n'y avait aucune différence statistiquement significative entre les groupes au départ. Des réductions statistiquement (et non cliniquement) significatives des scores de douleur au deuxième jour postopératoire et du recours aux narcotiques le jour de la chirurgie ont été notées dans le groupe soumis à l'IP. La satisfaction autodéclarée des patients n'a différé à aucun moment. Au bout de 1 an, la flexion du genou était significativement plus marquée dans le groupe soumis au BN que dans le groupe soumis à l'IP (amplitude de mouvement moyenne 120° c. 110°, p = 0,03) Conclusion: On n'a démontré aucune amélioration de la maîtrise de la douleur avec l'utilisation du BN c. IP avec analgésie multimodale. Les médecins devraient opter pour la modalité qui offre le meilleur degré d'efficience en fonction de leur environnement chirurgical. ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00869037
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Inyecciones/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Nervio Femoral , Humanos , Ketorolaco/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Ropivacaína/administración & dosificación , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A contemporary, porous-coated acetabular implant designed for uncemented insertion was introduced in Europe and Australia in 2007. A similar previous acetabular system was found in several studies at 10 to 15-year follow-up to demonstrate accelerated polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and early failure. The current study was conducted to determine the midterm safety and effectiveness of this contemporary acetabular system using highly crosslinked polyethylene and ceramic liners at 5-year follow-up. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted at 8 sites in Canada and the United States. All 148 study participants received a contemporary acetabular shell with proprietary porous coating. The primary outcome was the requirement for revision surgery at 5 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included a survival analysis, patient-reported outcome measures, radiographic failure, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: At 5-year follow-up there was 1 cup revised for deep infection. No cups were revised for loosening and none were found to be radiographically loose. The overall survival rate with reoperation for any reason was 97.1%. The success rate was 96.8% for polyethylene and 100% for ceramic with no difference in the success rate between either bearing surface (P = 1.0). The mean patient-reported outcome measures all improved significantly between preoperative and 5-year postoperative scores (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Results from this 5-year, multicenter, prospective study indicate excellent survivorship for this acetabular system when used with crosslinked polyethylene or ceramic bearing surfaces.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Acetábulo/cirugía , Australia , Canadá , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Porosidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Literature on the survival rates and function of hinged total knee replacement (HTKR) prostheses is scarce, and to our knowledge there is not yet any published literature on the Legion HK Hinge Knee Replacement prosthesis (Smith & Nephew) with guided-motion articulation. The objective of this study was to establish the early survival rate of this modern HTKR at a single institution and to investigate postoperative patient function and satisfaction. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who received the Legion HTKR prosthesis with guided-motion inserts as a primary or revision implant between October 11 and March 2016 at a tertiary care centre in Manitoba, Canada. Preoperative and postoperative functional scores on the 12-item Oxford Knee Score and postoperative patient satisfaction were assessed. Results: Thirty-nine HTKR implantations (38 patients) were included in this study: 12 primary cases and 27 revision cases. Three revision surgeries and 4 perioperative complications were noted at a mean follow-up of 29.1 months. The 2-year survivorship of the HTKR system was 90.7%. Postoperative functional scores improved significantly and the majority of patients were satisfied or very satisfied at all follow-up time points. Conclusion: The early survival rate of a modern guided-motion HTKR prosthesis is similar to the survival rates of other hinged knee prostheses published in the literature. The prosthesis demonstrated substantial postoperative functional improvement when used in the setting of complex primary or revision total knee replacement.
Contexte: Il existe peu d'études sur le taux de survie et la fonction des prothèses totales de genou (PTG) à charnière, et, à notre connaissance, il n'y a pas encore d'étude publiée sur la prothèse Legion HK Hinge Knee (Smith & Nephew), qui guide le mouvement de l'articulation. Cette étude visait à déterminer le taux de survie à 2 ans de cette PTG à charnière moderne dans un seul établissement et à évaluer la fonction du genou et la satisfaction des patients après l'opération. Méthodes: Cette étude rétrospective portait sur des patients qui avaient reçu la PTG Legion HK guidant le mouvement lors d'une première opération ou d'une chirurgie de révision entre octobre 2011 et mars 2016 dans un centre de soins tertiaires du Manitoba, au Canada. On a évalué la fonction préopératoire et postopératoire du genou à l'aide du score Oxford d'évaluation du genou à 12 questions ainsi que la satisfaction des patients après l'opération. Résultats: Trente-neuf arthroplasties totales du genou (38 patients) ont été retenues pour l'étude : 12 cas de première opération et 27 chirurgies de révision. En tout, 3 chirurgies de révision et 4 complications périopératoires ont été notées lors d'une consultation de suivi se déroulant en moyenne à 29,1 mois. Le taux de survie à 2 ans de la PTG à charnière Legion HK était de 90,7 %. Les scores de fonction du genou se sont grandement améliorés après l'opération, et la majorité des patients se sont dit satisfaits ou très satisfaits lors de tous les suivis. Conclusion: Le taux de survie d'une PTG à charnière moderne guidant le mouvement est similaire à celui des autres prothèses à charnière étudiées dans la littérature. La prothèse a permis une amélioration fonctionnelle importante après l'opération lorsqu'elle était utilisée dans le cadre d'une première arthroplastie totale du genou complexe ou d'une chirurgie de révision.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Masculino , Manitoba/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/mortalidad , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Background: A novel symmetric posterior condylar design and option of a femoral component with an outer zirconium oxide layer were introduced to a successful asymmetric condylar total knee arthroplasty system in 2005. Given the paucity of information on this modified design, we performed a study to determine its early to midterm survivorship and performance. Methods: Patients who received the Genesis II Symmetric Posterior Condyle or Legion Primary total knee (cobaltchromium [CoCr] or oxidized zirconiumniobium [OxZr]) (Smith & Nephew) implanted at the study centre between March 2007 and December 2013 were enrolled into a prospective database. We retrospectively reviewed the database and performed survival analysis using KaplanMeier techniques. Results: There were 2178 patients (1359 women [62.4%]; mean age 64.6 yr; mean body mass index 35.0) with 2815 knee replacements available for analysis. Survival rates were 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.6%98.7%) for failure for any reason at 2 years and 96.8% (95% CI 96.0%97.7%) at 5 years. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.940.997) and female sex (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.270.75) were protective, whereas body mass index (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.991.05) and OxZr implant (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.572.18) did not influence survivorship. Oxford Knee Score values improved from a mean of 40.2 to 21.8 by 2 years (p < 0.001), with no difference between the CoCr and OxZr groups. Conclusion: The symmetric posterior condylar posterior-stabilized knee offers excellent midterm survivorship. Implant bearing surface did not have an influence on survivorship to 5 years, and, thus, use of OxZr implants may not be justified.
Contexte: Un nouveau modèle à condyles postérieurs symétriques et l'option d'un élément fémoral pourvu d'une couche d'oxyde de zirconium ont été introduits avec succès dans un système de prothèse totale du genou à condyles asymétriques en 2005. Compte tenu du manque de renseignements concernant ce modèle modifié, nous avons procédé à une étude pour en déterminer la survie et le rendement à court et à moyen terme. Méthodes: Les patients ayant reçu la prothèse à condyles postérieurs symétriques Genesis II ou une prothèse totale primaire Legion (au cobaltchrome [CoCr] ou au zirconiumniobium oxydé [OxZr]) (Smith & Nephew) au centre de recherche entre mars 2007 et décembre 2013 ont été inscrits dans une base de données prospective. Nous avons procédé à une revue rétrospective de la base de données et effectué une analyse de survie à l'aide de techniques de KaplanMeier. Résultats: On a dénombré 2178 patients (dont 1359 femmes [62,4 %]; âge moyen 64,6 ans; indice de masse corporelle moyen 35,0) totalisant 2815 arthroplasties du genou pour analyse. Les taux de survie ont été de 98,2 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 97,6 %98,7 %) pour le paramètre défaillance de toutes causes à 2 ans et de 96,8 % (IC à 95 % 96,0 %97,7 %) à 5 ans. L'âge (risque relatif [RR] 0,97, IC à 95 % 0,940,997) et le fait d'être de sexe féminin (RR 0,45, IC à 95 % 0,270,75) ont conféré un effet protecteur, tandis que l'indice de masse corporelle (RR 1,02, IC à 95 % 0,991,05) et l'implant OxZr (RR 1,11, IC à 95 % 0,572,18) n'ont eu aucune influence sur la survie. Les scores Oxford d'évaluation du genou se sont améliorés, passant d'une moyenne de 40,2 à 21,8 en l'espace de 2 ans (p < 0,001), sans différence entre les groupes CoCr et OxZr. Conclusion: La prothèse du genou à condyles postérieurs symétriques postéro-stabilisée possède une excellente survie à moyen terme. La surface portant l'implant n'a pas eu d'influence sur la survie à 5 ans et, donc, l'utilisation d'implants OxZr ne sera peutêtre pas justifiée.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Circonio , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background: Patient-specific cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty have been promoted to improve mechanical alignment, reduce alignment outliers and improve patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI) in achieving neutral alignment and accurate component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: We conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either PSI or CI. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the study. No relevant improvement in coronal alignment was found between the PSI and CI groups with post-hoc power of 0.91. Tibial slope was found to be more accurately reproduced to the preoperative target of 3° with PSI than with CI (3.8°± 3.1° v. 7.7°± 3.6°, respectively, p < 0.001). There were no differences found in patient-reported outcome measures, surgical time or length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Given the added cost of the PSI technique, its use is difficult to justify given the small improvement in only a single alignment parameter. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT03416946
Contexte: L'utilisation de guides de coupe sur mesure dans l'arthroplastie totale du genou a été recommandée pour améliorer l'alignement mécanique, réduire les alignements extrêmes et améliorer les résultats des patients. Cette étude cherchait à comparer la capacité des instruments sur mesure et des instruments classiques à engendrer un alignement neutre et un bon positionnement des composants dans le cadre d'une arthroplastie totale du genou. Méthodes: Nous avons mené un essai clinique randomisé à double insu. Les patients étaient répartis aléatoirement entre le groupe de traitement avec instruments sur mesure et le groupe de traitement avec instruments classiques. Résultats: Cinquante-quatre patients ont participé à l'étude. Aucune différence notable de l'alignement coronal entre les groupes n'a été relevée, pour une puissance observée de 0,91. La pente tibiale correspondait plus exactement à la cible préopératoire de 3° avec les instruments sur mesure qu'avec les instruments classiques (3,8° ± 3,1° contre 7,7° ± 3,6°, respectivement; p < 0,001). Il n'y avait aucune différence dans les mesures déclarées par les patients, la durée de l'intervention et la durée d'hospitalisation. Conclusion: Étant donné l'amélioration minime d'un seul paramètre d'alignement et le coût supérieur de la technique sur mesure, son utilisation est difficile à justifier. Enregistrement de l'essai: Clinicaltrials.gov, no NCT03416946.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Satisfacción del Paciente , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited publications examining modular metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip implants in which a comprehensive analysis of retrieved components is performed. This study examines 24 retrieved modular MoM implants from a single manufacturer and compares retrieval analytics; bearing surface damage, wear, and modular taper corrosion against patient, surgical and implant characteristics to elucidate significant associations. METHODS: Clinical, patient, and surgical data were collected including age, body mass index, blood metal ion levels, and cup inclination. Damage assessment was performed visually in addition to surface profilometry. Acetabular liners and femoral heads were measured for volumetric wear. Femoral head taper bores were similarly measured for material removal due to corrosion and fretting. RESULTS: Patients with MoM-related reasons for revision showed significantly higher levels of blood metal ion levels. Bearing wear was strongly associated with blood metal ion levels and was significantly increased in cups placed more vertically. Younger patients tended to have higher body mass indices as well as poorer cup placement. CONCLUSION: This work details a broad range of analyses on a series of modular MoM total hip implants from a single manufacturer of which there are few published studies. Acetabular cup inclination angle was deemed a primary cause of revision surgery through increased MoM wear, high metal ion levels in the blood, and subsequent adverse local tissue reactions. Heavy patients can increase the surgical difficulty which was shown to be related to poor cup placement in this cohort.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis Articulares de Metal sobre Metal/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Acetábulo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Corrosión , Femenino , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A novel revision technique for failed hip resurfacings involves retention of the acetabular cup, if well-fixed, which is mated to dual-mobility (DM) prosthesis in a traditional hip replacement configuration. It is unknown whether existing damage on the retained cup will result in unacceptable wear of the DM prosthesis. METHODS: Thirty retrieved Birmingham (Smith & Nephew) monoblock cups were visually scored for damage features and area of coverage. Surface roughness measurements were obtained within each damage feature as well as reference points on each cup. Analysis of prior metal-on-metal wear was also performed to determine the maximum change in diameter of the cup. RESULTS: Scratching and grooving (deep, singular scratches) were the most common damage features. Overall bearing surface roughness was estimated as 0.059 µm (±0.030 µm) based on percent area coverage of each damage feature. Dimensional change of the bearing surface was negligible for most cups (18 of 30) but ranged from 0.20 to 0.38 mm for the most severely worn samples (5 of 30). CONCLUSION: Average surface roughness of the retrieved Birmingham cups was low, suggesting an expected 10%-20% increase in DM prosthesis wear. Similarly, dimensional change of the cup due to prior wear is not believed to significantly affect wear. Our findings support the use of a DM head in appropriate scenarios but suggest caution when applied to younger, more active patients whom may be adversely affected by increased prosthesis wear in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Metales/química , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Reoperación , Anciano , Femenino , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little research has examined how physicians choose medical devices for treating individual patients to reveal if interventions are needed to support decision-making and reduce device-associated morbidity and mortality. This study explored factors that influence choice of implantable device from among available options. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. Physicians who implant orthopedic and cardiovascular devices were identified in publicly available directories and web sites. They were asked how they decided what device to use in a given patient, sources of information they consulted, and how patients were engaged in decision-making. Sampling was concurrent with data collection and analysis to achieve thematic saturation. Data were analyzed using constant comparative technique by all members of the research team. RESULTS: Twenty-two physicians from five Canadian provinces (10 cardiovascular, 12 orthopedic; 8, 10 and 4 early, mid and late career, respectively) were interviewed. Responses did not differ by specialty, geographic region or career stage. Five major categories of themes emerged that all influence decision-making about a range of devices, and often compromise choice of the most suitable device for a given patient, potentially leading to sub-optimal clinical outcomes: lack of evidence on device performance, patient factors, physician factors, organizational and health system factors, and device and device market factors. In the absence of evidence from research or device registries, tacit knowledge from trusted colleagues and less-trusted industry representatives informed device choice. Patients were rarely engaged in decision-making. Physician preference for particular devices was a barrier to acquiring competency in devices potentially more suitable for patients. Access to suitable devices was further limited to the number of comparable devices on the market, local inventory and purchasing contract specifications. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that decision-making about devices is complex, cognitively challenging and constrained by several factors limiting access to and use of devices that could optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to assess the impact of these constraints on clinical outcomes, and develop interventions that optimize decision-making about device choice for treating given patients.
Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos , Canadá , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Fijadores Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Eight retrieved metal-on-metal total hip replacements displayed corrosion damage along the cobalt-chromium alloy liner taper junction with the Ti alloy acetabular shell. Scanning electron microscopy indicated the primary mechanism of corrosion to be grain boundary and associated crevice corrosion, which was likely accelerated through mechanical micromotion and galvanic corrosion resulting from dissimilar alloys. Coordinate measurements revealed up to 4.3mm(3) of the cobalt-chromium alloy taper surface was removed due to corrosion, which is comparable to previous reports of corrosion damage on head-neck tapers. The acetabular liner-shell taper appears to be an additional source of metal corrosion products in modular total hip replacements. Patients with these prostheses should be closely monitored for signs of adverse reaction towards corrosion by-products.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Falla de Prótesis , Adulto , Anciano , Materiales Biocompatibles , Aleaciones de Cromo , Corrosión , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , TitanioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We previously reported on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that examined the effect of adding tobramycin to bone cement after femoral stem migration. The present study examined femoral head penetration into both conventional and highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular liners in the same group of RCT patients, with a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Linear penetration of the femoral head into an X3 (Stryker) crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) liner was measured in 18 patients (19 hips) using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Femoral head penetration was also measured in 6 patients (6 hips) with a conventional polyethylene liner (CPE), which served as a control group. RESULTS: The median proximal femoral head penetration in the XLPE group after 5.5 years was 0.025 mm with a steady-state penetration rate of 0.001 mm/year between year 1 and year 5. The CPE liner showed a median proximal head penetration of 0.274 mm after 7.2 years, at a rate of 0.037 mm/year. INTERPRETATION: The Trident X3 sequentially annealed XLPE liner shows excellent in vivo wear resistance compared to non-crosslinked CPE liners at medium-term implantation. The rate of linear head penetration in the XLPE liners after > 5 years of follow-up was 0.001 mm/year, which is in close agreement with the results of previous studies.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Polietileno , Falla de Prótesis , Acetábulo/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Cementos para Huesos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Cabeza Femoral/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis RadioestereométricoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and resource utilization of a pilot outpatient surgery program for total hip arthroplasty compared to traditional inpatient total hip arthroplasty performed via the posterolateral approach. METHODS: A cohort of 68 patients from two sites were enrolled in a regional pilot project for outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and matched 1:1 against a cohort of patients undergoing routine inpatient THA. Data was extracted retrospectively from patient and hospital charts including adverse events (AE), readmission within 90 days, emergency room (ER) visits, patient calls, patient-reported outcome measures, length of stay, and multiple surgical variables. RESULTS: The outpatient group had a mean hospital stay of 13 hours, whereas the inpatient group had a mean of 58 hours (p<0.001). Three outpatients and four inpatients experienced post-op complications. Three inpatients and one outpatient visited the ER within 8 weeks of surgery. No difference in pre-operative hemoglobin (p = 0.210), or surgical blood loss (p = 0.550) was found between study groups. There was no difference found between groups regarding Oxford-12 Hip Score improvement, nor satisfaction at six months, one and two years (p>0.125). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that outpatient THA using the posterolateral approach is as safe and effective as inpatient THA for overall healthy and carefully screened patients, based on the low rate of AEs observed and similar patient outcomes reported. Significantly reduced time in hospital demonstrates the reduced healthcare resources associated with outpatient THA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del PacienteRESUMEN
Aims: A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis. Methods: Overall, 50 subjects were randomized (21 EF-TKA and 23 Std-TKA in the final analysis), and had follow-up visits at six weeks, and six, 12, and 24 months to assess migration of the tibial component. Low viscosity bone cement with tobramycin was used in a standardized fashion for all subjects. Patient-reported outcome measure data was captured at preoperative and all postoperative visits. Results: The patient cohort mean age was 66 years (SD seven years), 59% were female, and the mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 6 kg/m2). Mean two-year subsidence of the EF-TKA was 0.056 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.025 to 0.086) versus 0.006 mm (95% CI -0.029 to 0.040) for the Std-TKA, and the two-year maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.285 mm (95% upper confidence limit (UCL) ≤ 0.363) versus 0.346 mm (95% UCL ≤ 0.432), respectively, for a mean difference of -0.061 mm (95% CI -0.196 to 0.074). Inducible displacement also did not differ between groups. The MTPMs between 12 and 24 months for each group was below the published threshold of 0.2 mm for predicting early aseptic loosening (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Both the enhanced fixation and the standard tibial implant design showed fixation with a predicted low risk of long-term aseptic loosening.
RESUMEN
The primary goal of this study was to determine if head size affects corrosion and fretting behaviour at the head-neck taper interface of modular hip prostheses. Seventy-four implants were retrieved that featured either a 28 mm or a 36 mm head with a metal-on-polyethylene articulation. The bore of the heads and the neck of the stems were divided into eight regions each and graded by three observers for corrosion and fretting damage separately using modified criteria as reported in the literature. The 36 mm head size featured a significant difference in the corrosion head scores (p=0.022) in comparison to the 28 mm heads. This may be attributed to a greater torque acting along the taper interface due to activities of daily living.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis de Cadera , Diseño de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Anciano , Corrosión , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Aims: Instability is a common cause of failure after total hip arthroplasty. A novel reverse total hip has been developed, with a femoral cup and acetabular ball, creating enhanced mechanical stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the implant fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and the clinical safety and efficacy of this novel design. Methods: Patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective cohort at a single centre. The cohort consisted of 11 females and 11 males with mean age of 70.6 years (SD 3.5) and BMI of 31.0 kg/m2 (SD 5.7). Implant fixation was evaluated using RSA as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 38-item Short Form survey, and EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores at two-year follow-up. At least one acetabular screw was used in all cases. RSA markers were inserted into the innominate bone and proximal femur with imaging at six weeks (baseline) and six, 12, and 24 months. Independent-samples t-tests were used to compare to published thresholds. Results: Mean acetabular subsidence from baseline to 24 months was 0.087 mm (SD 0.152), below the critical threshold of 0.2 mm (p = 0.005). Mean femoral subsidence from baseline to 24 months was -0.002 mm (SD 0.194), below the published reference of 0.5 mm (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in patient-reported outcome measures at 24 months with good to excellent results. Conclusion: RSA analysis demonstrates excellent fixation with a predicted low risk of revision at ten years of this novel reverse total hip system. Clinical outcomes were consistent with safe and effective hip replacement prostheses.
RESUMEN
Aims: The primary aim of this trial was to compare the subsidence of two similar hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components from different manufacturers. Secondary aims were to compare rotational migration (anteversion/retroversion and varus/valgus tilt) and patient-reported outcome measures between both femoral components. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive one of the two femoral components (Avenir or Corail) during their primary total hip arthroplasty between August 2018 and September 2020. Radiostereometric analysis examinations at six, 12, and 24 months were used to assess the migration of each implanted femoral component compared to a baseline assessment. Patient-reported outcome measures were also recorded for these same timepoints. Overall, 50 patients were enrolled (62% male (n = 31), with a mean age of 65.7 years (SD 7.3), and mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.2)). Results: The two-year subsidence was similar for Avenir (-0.018 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.053 to 0.018) and Corail (0.000 mm (95% CI -0.027 to 0.026; p = 0.428). Both anteversion/retroversion (Avenir 0.139° (95% CI -0.204 to 0.481°); Corail -0.196° (95% CI -0.445 to 0.053°; p = 0.110) and varus/valgus tilt (Avenir -0.024° (95% CI -0.077 to 0.028); Corail -0.049° (95% CI -0.098 to 0.000°; p = 0.473) were not statistically significantly different. After two years, patients reported similar improvements in EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (Avenir 0.22 (SD 0.2); Corail 0.22 (SD 0.18); p = 0.965) and other outcomes scores. Patient satisfaction on a five-point Likert scale was also similar between both groups after two years (Avenir 1.38 (SD 0.88); Corail 1.33 (SD 0.57); p = 0.846). Conclusion: The performance of both femoral components was similar in terms of stability and patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Análisis Radioestereométrico , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Durapatita , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de PrótesisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous in vitro research on addition of antibiotics to bone cement has found no statistically significant deterioration in mechanical properties. However, no clinical studies have compared the performance of tobramycin-laden bone cement with that of standard bone cement (Simplex P). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 patients (25 hips) were randomized to receive an Exeter (Stryker Orthopaedics) femoral stem cemented with either Simplex P (standard) or Simplex T (tobramycin-laden) cement. There were 2 years of follow-up, with scheduled radiostereometric (RSA) examinations. RESULTS: All stems migrated distally and showed some degree of retroversion. No clinically significant differences in stem subsidence or retroversion were found between the Simplex T and Simplex P cement groups after 2 years. Overall subsidence was less than in previous studies, probably due to a postponed initial post-surgical examination. Rates of subsidence in both cement groups were consistent with those from previous studies of Exeter stems. INTERPRETATION: Subsidence of the femoral stem after 2 years was similar in the Simplex T (tobramycin-laden) and Simplex P (standard) groups.
Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos/farmacología , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Prótesis de Cadera , Metilmetacrilato/farmacología , Falla de Prótesis/efectos de los fármacos , Análisis Radioestereométrico , Tobramicina/farmacología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Fémur/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We describe a case of a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty acutely infected with Clostridium septicum. This is the first reported infection of a prosthetic joint with this organism. A search for the source of this infection uncovered a colonic malignancy. This organism is highly associated with gastrointestinal malignancy, and appropriate investigation should be carried out when it is discovered. The importance of full anaerobic bacterial identification by the microbiology laboratory is underscored by this case.