Lung cancer in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. A retrospective multicenter study in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Abundant evidence supports an association between Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and lung cancer development. Data on diagnosis and management of patients with IPF and lung cancer are still scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study, enrolling 1016 patients with IPF from eight different centers between 2011 and 2018 in Greece. Our aim was to estimate prevalence of lung cancer in patients with IPF in Greece. RESULTS: We identified 102 cases of patients with IPF and lung cancer (prevalence = 10.03% n = 102/1016, mean age±SD = 71.8 ± 6.9, 96 males, mean FVC±SD = 72.7 ± 19.7, mean DLCO±SD = 44.5 ± 16.3). We identified 85 cases (83.3%) of non-small cell lung cancer (35 squamous, 28 adenocarcinoma), and 15 cases (14.7%) of small cell lung cancer. Primary lesion was localized in lower lobes in 57.1% of cases. Lung cancer was diagnosed post IPF diagnosis (mean latency time + SD = 33.2 + 36.1 months) in 57.6% of patients and synchronously in 36.5% of patients. Chemotherapy was applied in 26.7% of cases, while 34.7% of patients underwent surgery. Median survival of patients with IPF and lung cancer was 27.4 months (95% CI: 20.6 to 36.8). CONCLUSIONS: IPF is a risk factor for lung cancer development. In line with current literature, squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype in patients with IPF. Large randomized controlled studies on the management of patients with IPF and lung cancer are sorely needed.

The Role of Microbiome and Virome in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

The interest in the lung microbiome and virome and their contribution to the pathogenesis, perpetuation and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been increasing during the last decade. The utilization of high-throughput sequencing to detect microbial and/or viral genetic material in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or lung tissue samples has amplified the ability to identify and quantify specific microbial and viral populations. In stable IPF, higher microbial burden is associated with worse prognosis but no specific microbe has been identified to contribute to this. Additionally, no causative relation has been established. Regarding viral infections, although in the past they have been associated with IPF, causation has not been proved. Although in the past the diagnosis of acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF) was not considered in patients with overt infection, this was amended in the last few years and infection is considered a cause for exacerbation. Besides this, a higher microbial burden has been found in the lungs of patients with AE-IPF and an association with higher morbidity and mortality has been confirmed. In contrast, an association of AE-IPF with viral infection has not been established. Despite the progress during the last decade, a comprehensive knowledge of the microbiome and virome in IPF and their role in disease pathogenesis are yet elusive. Although association with disease severity, risk for progression and mortality has been established, causation has not been proven and the potential use as a biomarker or the benefits of antimicrobial therapeutic strategies are yet to be determined.

Autoimmune Biomarkers, Antibodies, and Immunologic Evaluation of the Patient with Fibrotic Lung Disease.

This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on experimental and clinical biomarkers of autoimmunity and aims to highlight important aspects of the immunologic evaluation of a patient with fibrotic lung disease.