Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 597(7878): 726-731, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34526716

RESUMEN

UTX (also known as KDM6A) encodes a histone H3K27 demethylase and is an important tumour suppressor that is frequently mutated in human cancers1. However, as the demethylase activity of UTX is often dispensable for mediating tumour suppression and developmental regulation2-8, the underlying molecular activity of UTX remains unknown. Here we show that phase separation of UTX underlies its chromatin-regulatory activity in tumour suppression. A core intrinsically disordered region (cIDR) of UTX forms phase-separated liquid condensates, and cIDR loss caused by the most frequent cancer mutation of UTX is mainly responsible for abolishing tumour suppression. Deletion, mutagenesis and replacement assays of the intrinsically disordered region demonstrate a critical role of UTX condensation in tumour suppression and embryonic stem cell differentiation. As shown by reconstitution in vitro and engineered systems in cells, UTX recruits the histone methyltransferase MLL4 (also known as KMT2D) to the same condensates and enriches the H3K4 methylation activity of MLL4. Moreover, UTX regulates genome-wide histone modifications and high-order chromatin interactions in a condensation-dependent manner. We also found that UTY, the Y chromosome homologue of UTX with weaker tumour-suppressive activity, forms condensates with reduced molecular dynamics. These studies demonstrate a crucial biological function of liquid condensates with proper material states in enabling the tumour-suppressive activity of a chromatin regulator.


Asunto(s)
Diferenciación Celular , Cromatina , Genes Supresores de Tumor , Histona Demetilasas/genética , Animales , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Células Madre Embrionarias/citología , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Proteínas Intrínsecamente Desordenadas/genética , Ratones , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Procesamiento Proteico-Postraduccional , Células THP-1
2.
Cells ; 10(7)2021 07 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34359837

RESUMEN

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells constitute a perfect tool to study human embryo development processes such as myogenesis, thanks to their ability to differentiate into three germ layers. Currently, many protocols to obtain myogenic cells have been described in the literature. They differ in many aspects, such as media components, including signaling modulators, feeder layer constituents, and duration of culture. In our study, we compared three different myogenic differentiation protocols to verify, side by side, their efficiency. Protocol I was based on embryonic bodies differentiation induction, ITS addition, and selection with adhesion to collagen I type. Protocol II was based on strong myogenic induction at the embryonic bodies step with BIO, forskolin, and bFGF, whereas cells in Protocol III were cultured in monolayers in three special media, leading to WNT activation and TGF-ß and BMP signaling inhibition. Myogenic induction was confirmed by the hierarchical expression of myogenic regulatory factors MYF5, MYOD, MYF6 and MYOG, as well as the expression of myotubes markers MYH3 and MYH2, in each protocol. Our results revealed that Protocol III is the most efficient in obtaining myogenic cells. Furthermore, our results indicated that CD56 is not a specific marker for the evaluation of myogenic differentiation.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Medios de Cultivo/farmacología , Cuerpos Embrioides/efectos de los fármacos , Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/efectos de los fármacos , Desarrollo de Músculos/efectos de los fármacos , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/efectos de los fármacos , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Colforsina/farmacología , Colágeno Tipo I/farmacología , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/genética , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/metabolismo , Cuerpos Embrioides/citología , Cuerpos Embrioides/metabolismo , Factor 2 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/farmacología , Fibroblastos/citología , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Indoles/farmacología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/metabolismo , Insulina/farmacología , Desarrollo de Músculos/genética , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/citología , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/metabolismo , Proteína MioD/genética , Proteína MioD/metabolismo , Factor 5 Regulador Miogénico/genética , Factor 5 Regulador Miogénico/metabolismo , Factores Reguladores Miogénicos/genética , Factores Reguladores Miogénicos/metabolismo , Miogenina/genética , Miogenina/metabolismo , Oximas/farmacología , Selenio/farmacología , Transferrina/farmacología
3.
Cells ; 9(5)2020 04 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354171

RESUMEN

Genome editing (GE) tools and RNA interference technology enable the modulation of gene expression in cancer research. While GE mediated by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) activity can be used to induce gene knockouts, shRNA interacts with the targeted transcript, resulting in gene knockdown. Here, we compare three different methods for SNAI1 knockout or knockdown in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cells. RMS is the most common sarcoma in children and its development has been previously associated with SNAI1 transcription factor activity. To investigate the role of SNAI1 in RMS development, we compared CRISPR/Cas9, TALEN, and shRNA tools to identify the most efficient tool for the modulation of SNAI1 expression with biological effects. Subsequently, the genome sequence, transcript levels, and protein expression of SNAI1 were evaluated. The modulation of SNAI1 using three different approaches affected the morphology of the cells and modulated the expression of myogenic factors and HDAC1. Our study revealed a similar effectiveness of the tested methods. Nevertheless, the low efficiency of the GE tools was a limiting factor in obtaining biallelic gene knockouts. To conclude, we established and characterized three different models of SNAI1 knockout and knockdown that might be used in further studies investigating the role of SNAI1 in RMS.


Asunto(s)
Edición Génica/métodos , Rabdomiosarcoma/genética , Factores de Transcripción de la Familia Snail/genética , Secuencia de Bases , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Línea Celular Tumoral , Expresión Génica , Células HEK293 , Histona Desacetilasa 1/metabolismo , Humanos , Factores de Transcripción de la Familia Snail/metabolismo , Nucleasas de los Efectores Tipo Activadores de la Transcripción
4.
Acta Biochim Pol ; 66(4): 499-507, 2019 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883363

RESUMEN

The MSCs are immature cells that can be found in numerous different tissue types. In recent years, they have gained considerable attention, particularly with regard to their regenerative properties. Due to their paracrine activity, ability to migrate, adhesion and homing, MSCs currently appear to be the most relevant for therapeutic use. Numerous bioactive molecules secreted by MSCs exert paracrine effects and modulate many physiological processes, such as angiogenesis, immunomodulation and neuroprotection. Cell-cell communication may be also mediated by extracellular vesicles released from the cells. Due to these properties, MSCs have been widely studied for evaluation of their therapeutic benefits expected in the clinical applications. For effective tissue regeneration, transplanted MSCs have to exit the circulation and locate at the site of damage, which is possible because of their ability to migrate, adhere and engraft at the target site. Accumulating evidence suggests that MSCs recruitment from remote sites is similar to leukocytes' migration. All of these biological features make MSCs highly investigated stem cells and the most commonly used cells in regenerative medicine. Since environmental factors affect the MSCs behavior, we discuss importance of oxygen concentration as a one of the key factors affecting MSCs properties.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión Celular/genética , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Neovascularización Patológica/terapia , Medicina Regenerativa , Comunicación Celular/genética , Movimiento Celular/genética , Humanos , Leucocitos/citología , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/citología
5.
Cell Death Dis ; 9(6): 643, 2018 05 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29844345

RESUMEN

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a mesenchymal tumor of soft tissue in children that originates from a myogenic differentiation defect. Expression of SNAIL transcription factor is elevated in the alveolar subtype of RMS (ARMS), characterized by a low myogenic differentiation status and high aggressiveness. In RMS patients SNAIL level increases with higher stage. Moreover, SNAIL level negatively correlates with MYF5 expression. The differentiation of human ARMS cells diminishes SNAIL level. SNAIL silencing in ARMS cells inhibits proliferation and induces differentiation in vitro, and thereby completely abolishes the growth of human ARMS xenotransplants in vivo. SNAIL silencing induces myogenic differentiation by upregulation of myogenic factors and muscle-specific microRNAs, such as miR-206. SNAIL binds to the MYF5 promoter suppressing its expression. SNAIL displaces MYOD from E-box sequences (CANNTG) that are associated with genes expressed during differentiation and G/C rich in their central dinucleotides. SNAIL silencing allows the re-expression of MYF5 and canonical MYOD binding, promoting ARMS cell myogenic differentiation. In differentiating ARMS cells SNAIL forms repressive complex with histone deacetylates 1 and 2 (HDAC1/2) and regulates their expression. Accordingly, in human myoblasts SNAIL silencing induces differentiation by upregulation of myogenic factors. Our data clearly point to SNAIL as a key regulator of myogenic differentiation and a new promising target for future ARMS therapies.


Asunto(s)
Diferenciación Celular , Proteína MioD/metabolismo , Factor 5 Regulador Miogénico/metabolismo , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/genética , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/patología , Factores de Transcripción de la Familia Snail/metabolismo , Animales , Sitios de Unión , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular , ADN de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Silenciador del Gen , Histona Desacetilasas/metabolismo , Humanos , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , MicroARNs/genética , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Desarrollo de Músculos , Músculos/metabolismo , Músculos/patología , Fenotipo , Regulación hacia Arriba/genética , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA