Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(9): e16335, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965709

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Various electrodiagnostic criteria have been developed in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Their performance in a broad representation of GBS patients has not been evaluated. Motor conduction data from the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort were used to compare two widely used criterion sets and relate these to diagnostic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis criteria. METHODS: From the first 1500 patients in IGOS, nerve conduction studies from 1137 (75.8%) were available for the current study. These patients were classified according to nerve conduction studies criteria proposed by Hadden and Rajabally. RESULTS: Of the 1137 studies, 68.3% (N = 777) were classified identically according to criteria by Hadden and Rajabally: 111 (9.8%) axonal, 366 (32.2%) demyelinating, 195 (17.2%) equivocal, 35 (3.1%) inexcitable and 70 (6.2%) normal. Thus, 360 studies (31.7%) were classified differently. The areas of differences were as follows: 155 studies (13.6%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally; 122 studies (10.7%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and equivocal by Rajabally; and 75 studies (6.6%) classified as equivocal by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally. Due to more strictly defined cutoffs fewer patients fulfilled demyelinating criteria by Rajabally than by Hadden, making more patients eligible for axonal or equivocal classification by Rajabally. In 234 (68.6%) axonal studies by Rajabally the revised El Escorial (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) criteria were fulfilled; in axonal cases by Hadden this was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: This study shows that electrodiagnosis in GBS is dependent on the criterion set utilized, both of which are based on expert opinion. Reappraisal of electrodiagnostic subtyping in GBS is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Electrodiagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/clasificación , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/fisiopatología , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/clasificación , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/fisiopatología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes
2.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 29(2): 135-160, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600691

RESUMEN

Nerve conduction studies are usually the first diagnostic step in peripheral nerve disorders and their results are the basis for planning further investigations. However, there are some commonplaces in the interpretation of electrodiagnostic findings in peripheral neuropathies that, although useful in the everyday practice, may be misleading: (1) conduction block and abnormal temporal dispersion are distinctive features of acquired demyelinating disorders; (2) hereditary neuropathies are characterized by uniform slowing of conduction velocity; (3) axonal neuropathies are simply diagnosed by reduced amplitude of motor and sensory nerve action potentials with normal or slightly slow conduction velocity. In this review, we reappraise the occurrence of uniform and non-uniform conduction velocity slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies attempting, with a translational approach, a correlation between electrophysiological and pathological features as derived from sensory nerve biopsy in patients and animal models. Additionally, we provide some hints to navigate in this complex field.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Conducción Nerviosa , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/patología , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/patología , Animales , Axones/fisiología , Axones/patología , Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Electrodiagnóstico
3.
J Neurol ; 271(3): 1063-1071, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Case-reports/series and cohorts of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of GBS after COVID-19 vaccination was carried out. Incidence and incidence rate ratio for a number of vaccine doses and risk of GBS, also considering the specific vaccine technology, were calculated in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 554 citations retrieved, 518 were discarded as irrelevant. We finally included 15 studies. The random effect model yielded, regardless of the vaccine technology, 1.25 (95%CI 0.21; 2.83) GBS cases per million of COVID-19 vaccine doses, 3.93 (2.54; 5.54) cases per million doses for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.69 (0.38; 1.06) cases per million doses for mRNA vaccines. The GBS risk was 2.6 times increased with the first dose. Regardless of the vaccine technology, the GBS risk was not increased but disaggregating the data it was 2.37 (1.67; 3.36) times increased for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.32 (0.23; 0.47) for mRNA vaccines. Mortality for GBS after vaccination was 0.10 per million doses and 4.6 per GBS cases. CONCLUSIONS: Adenovirus-vectored vaccines showed a 2.4 times increased risk of GBS that was about seven times higher compared with mRNA-based vaccines. The decreased GBS risk associated with mRNA vaccines was possibly due to an elicited reduction of infections, including SARS-CoV-2, associated with GBS during the vaccination period. How adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines may trigger GBS is unclear and further studies should investigate the relationship between vaccine technologies and GBS risk.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Vacunas de ARNm/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de ARNm/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA