Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 9: 110, 2011 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22152107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can seriously affect patients' health-related quality of life and their self-rated health. Most often, evaluation of diabetes interventions assess effects on glycemic control with little consideration of quality of life. The aim of the current study was to study the effectiveness of group-based rehabilitation versus individual counselling on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and self-rated health in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: We randomised 143 type 2 diabetes patients to either a six-month multidisciplinary group-based rehabilitation programme including patient education, supervised exercise and a cooking-course or a six-month individual counselling programme. HRQOL was measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and self-rated health was measured by Diabetes Symptom Checklist - Revised (DCS-R). RESULTS: In both groups, the lowest estimated mean scores of the SF36 questionnaire at baseline were "vitality" and "general health". There were no significant differences in the change of any item between the two groups after the six-month intervention period. However, vitality-score increased 5.2 points (p = 0.12) within the rehabilitation group and 5.6 points (p = 0.03) points among individual counselling participants.In both groups, the highest estimated mean scores of the DSC-R questionnaire at baseline were "Fatigue" and "Hyperglycaemia". Hyperglycaemic and hypoglycaemic distress decreased significantly after individual counselling than after group-based rehabilitation (difference -0.3 points, p = 0.04). No between-group differences occurred for any other items. However, fatigue distress decreased 0.40 points within the rehabilitation group (p = 0.01) and 0.34 points within the individual counselling group (p < 0.01). In the rehabilitation group cardiovascular distress decreased 0.25 points (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A group-based rehabilitation programme did not improve health-related quality of life and self-rated health more than an individual counselling programme. In fact, the individual group experienced a significant relief in hyper- and hypoglycaemic distress compared with the rehabilitation group.However, the positive findings of several items in both groups indicate that lifestyle intervention is an important part of the management of type 2 diabetes patients.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Varianza , Culinaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Autorrevelación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
BMC Public Health ; 9: 166, 2009 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19480671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend education, physical activity and changes in diet for type 2 diabetes patients, yet the composition and organization of non-pharmacological care are still controversial. Therefore, it is very important that programmes aiming to improve non-pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes are developed and evaluated. The Copenhagen Type 2 Diabetes Rehabilitation Project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a new group-based lifestyle rehabilitation programme in a Health Care Centre in primary care. METHODS/DESIGN: The group-based diabetes rehabilitation programme consists of empowerment-based education, supervised exercise and dietary intervention. The effectiveness of this multi-disciplinary intervention is compared with conventional individual counselling in a Diabetes Outpatient Clinic and evaluated in a prospective and randomized controlled trial. During the recruitment period of 18 months 180 type 2 diabetes patients will be randomized to the intervention group and the control group. Effects on glycaemic control, quality of life, self-rated diabetes symptoms, body composition, blood pressure, lipids, insulin resistance, beta-cell function and physical fitness will be examined after 6, 12 and 24 months. DISCUSSION: The Copenhagen Type 2 Diabetes Rehabilitation Project evaluates a multi-disciplinary non-pharmacological intervention programme in a primary care setting and provides important information about how to organize non-pharmacological care for type 2 diabetes patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov) registration number: NCT00284609.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/rehabilitación , Ejercicio Físico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Adulto , Glucemia/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Consejo , Dinamarca , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/dietoterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Aptitud Física , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA