IgA coating of vaginal bacteria is reduced in the setting of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and preferentially targets BV-associated species.

Immunoglobulin (Ig) bacterial coating has been described in the gastrointestinal tract and linked to inflammatory bowel disease; however, little is known about Ig coating of vaginal bacteria and whether it plays a role in vaginal health including bacterial vaginosis (BV). We examined Ig coating in 18 women with symptomatic BV followed longitudinally before, 1 week, and 1 month after oral metronidazole treatment. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and/or immunoglobulin G (IgG) coating of vaginal bacteria was assessed by flow cytometry, and Ig coated and uncoated bacteria were sorted and characterized using 16S rRNA sequencing. Despite higher levels of IgG compared to IgA in cervicovaginal fluid, the predominant Ig coating the bacteria was IgA. The majority of bacteria were uncoated at all visits, but IgA coating significantly increased after treatment for BV. Despite similar amounts of uncoated and IgA coated majority taxa ( >1% total) across all visits, there was preferential IgA coating of minority taxa (0.2%-1% total) associated with BV including Sneathia, several Prevotella species, and others. At the time of BV, we identified a principal component (PC) driven by proinflammatory mediators that correlated positively with an uncoated BV-associated bacterial community and negatively with an IgA coated protective Lactobacillus bacterial community. The preferential coating of BV-associated species, increase in coating following metronidazole treatment, and positive correlation between uncoated BV-associated species and inflammation suggest that coating may represent a host mechanism designed to limit bacterial diversity and reduce inflammatory responses. Elucidating the role of Ig coating in vaginal mucosal immunity may promote new strategies to prevent recurrent BV.

Association between postmenopausal vulvovaginal discomfort, vaginal microbiota, and mucosal inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Half of all postmenopausal women report symptoms of vulvar, vaginal, or urinary discomfort with substantial impact on sexual function and quality of life; underlying mechanisms leading to symptoms are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine the possibility that the vaginal microbiota and/or mucosal immune response contributes to the severity of bothersome vaginal symptoms, we conducted a substudy of samples from a randomized trial of vaginal treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause to compare these features between women whose symptoms improved and women whose symptoms did not improve. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of samples collected in a 12-week randomized trial of treatment with vaginal estradiol or moisturizer vs placebo for moderate-severe postmenopausal symptoms of vaginal discomfort. We randomly selected 20 women in each arm with ≥2-point decrease in most bothersome symptom severity (responders) and 20 matched controls with ≤1-point decrease (nonresponders). At 0, 4, and 12 weeks, we characterized vaginal microbiota (16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing), vaginal fluid metabolites (broad-based metabolomic profiling), vaginal fluid-soluble immune markers (Meso Scale Discovery), pH, and vaginal maturation index. We compared responders with nonresponders at baseline and across all visits using linear mixed models to evaluate associations with microbiota, metabolites, and immune markers, incorporating visit and participant-specific random effects while controlling for treatment arm. RESULTS: Here, the mean age of women was 61 years (n=120), and most women (92%) were White. At enrollment, no significant differences were observed between responders and nonresponders in age, most bothersome symptom type or severity, microbiota composition or diversity, Lactobacillus dominance, metabolome, or immune markers. There was a significant decrease in diversity of the vaginal microbiota in both responders and nonresponders (P<.001) over 12 weeks. Although this change did not differ by responder status, diversity was associated with treatment arm: more women in the estradiol arm (63%) had Lactobacillus-dominant, lower diversity bacterial communities than women in the moisturizer (35%) or dual placebo (23%) arms (P=.001) at 12 weeks. The metabolome, vaginal maturation index, and measured immune markers were not associated with responder status over the 12 weeks but varied by treatment arm. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal vaginal symptom severity was not significantly associated with vaginal microbiota or mucosal inflammatory markers in this small study. Women receiving vaginal estradiol experienced greater abundance of lactobacilli and lower vaginal pH at end of treatment.

Vaginal Microbiota and Mucosal Immune Markers in Women With Vulvovaginal Discomfort.

BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of women with vaginal symptoms are not assigned a diagnosis after standard diagnostic assessment. METHODS: We compared premenopausal women with idiopathic vaginitis (IV) or vulvodynia (VVD) to healthy controls. Microbiota were characterized using rRNA sequencing. Cytokines/chemokines (IL-10, IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-2, IL-18, IL-4, IL-9, and IL-13) were measured in vaginal lavage fluid using the Meso Scale Discovery platform or ELISA (IL-1ra). Immunoglobulins were measured in vaginal lavage fluid using a bead-based immunoassay (Millipore). Cases and controls were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, analysis of variance, and linear regression or (for microbiome composition) the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity statistic. RESULTS: We compared 20 women with IV, 30 with VVD, and 52 controls. Most (80%) had greater than 90% 16S rRNA gene sequences from Lactobacillus crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri, or L. iners. In analyses adjusted for age and hormonal contraception (HC), Gardnerella vaginalis was less prevalent and abundant in women with VVD (2/30, 7%) versus controls (16/52, 31%) or IV (5/20, 25%) (P = 0.030). Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was not significantly different between IV and controls or VVD. Fungal sequences were only detected in 5 participants: 2 control, 1 IV, 2 VVD. In univariate analysis, cytokines were not associated with diagnosis. Median vaginal concentration of IgE (but not other immunoglobulins) was lower in women with VVD (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Minimal differences in vaginal microbiota and inflammatory markers between women with IV, VVD or controls suggest no striking association between vaginal bacteria, fungi or inflammation and diagnosis in these women.

Effect of Metronidazole on Concentrations of Vaginal Bacteria Associated with Risk of HIV Acquisition.

Several bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria have been associated with elevated risk of HIV acquisition, however susceptibility of these bacteria to antibiotics is poorly understood. Vaginal samples were collected from 22 persons daily for two weeks following BV diagnosis. Metronidazole treatment was prescribed for 5-7 days. Changes in bacterial concentrations were measured with taxon-specific 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. A culture-based antimicrobial assay confirmed presence of antibiotics in vaginal swab samples. Bacterial DNA concentrations decreased during antibiotic administration for all thirteen bacterial taxa tested. Comparison of bacterial DNA concentrations in samples before administration of antibiotics to samples taken on the last day of antimicrobial assay-confirmed antibiotic presence showed a 2.3-4.5 log10-fold decrease across all taxa. Concentrations were frequently reduced to the qPCR assay's limit of detection, suggesting eradication of bacteria. Mean clearance time varied across taxa (1.2-8.6 days), with several bacteria (e.g., Gemella asaccharolytica, Sneathia spp., Eggerthella-like sp.) taking >7 days to suppress. Metronidazole reduces quantities of bacterial taxa associated with increased HIV acquisition risk. Eradication of high-risk vaginal bacteria using metronidazole is one promising avenue for reducing HIV acquisition risk. A 5-7-day treatment course may not be sufficient to suppress all bacteria.

Impact of Topical Interventions on the Vaginal Microbiota and Metabolome in Postmenopausal Women: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Postmenopausal women with genitourinary symptoms of menopause are often prescribed vaginal estradiol or moisturizer for symptom improvement, but the impact of these treatments on the local microenvironment is poorly understood. Objective: To compare changes in the vaginal microbiota, metabolome, and pH among women using low-dose vaginal estradiol tablet or low pH moisturizer gel for 12-weeks vs low pH placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc prespecified secondary analysis of a 12-week multicenter randomized clinical trial among postmenopausal women with moderate to severe genitourinary symptoms. Women were enrolled between April 2016 and February 2017; final follow-up visits occurred in April 2017. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to July 2021. Interventions: Ten-µg vaginal estradiol plus placebo gel vs placebo tablet plus vaginal moisturizer vs dual placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were changes in the diversity and composition of the vaginal microbiota, changes in the metabolome, and pH. Results: Of 302 postmenopausal women from the parent trial, 144 women (mean [SD] age, 61 [4] years) were included in this analysis. After 12 weeks, the microbiota was dominated with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium communities among 36 women (80%) in the estradiol group, compared with 16 women (36%) using moisturizer and 13 women (26%) using placebo (P < .001). The composition of vaginal fluid metabolites also varied after 12-weeks among women in the estradiol group with significant changes in 90 of 171 metabolites measured (53%) (P < .001), including an increase in lactate. The 12-week pH among women in the estradiol group was lower vs placebo (median [IQR] pH, 5 [4.5-6.0] vs 6 [5.5-7.0]; P = .005) but not the moisturizer group vs placebo (median [IQR] pH, 6 [5.5-6.5]; P = .28). There was a decrease in pH from baseline to 12-weeks within the moisturizer (median [IQR] pH, 7 [6.0-7.5] vs 6 [5.5-6.5]; P < .001) and placebo (median [IQR] pH, 7 [7.0-7.5] vs 6 [5.5-7.0]; P < .001) groups. Women with high-diversity bacterial communities at baseline exhibited greater median change in pH compared with women with low-diversity communities (median [IQR] change, -1 [-2 to -0.5] vs -0.3 [-1.1 to 0], P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that use of vaginal estradiol tablets resulted in substantial changes in the vaginal microbiota and metabolome with a lowering in pH, particularly in women with high-diversity bacterial communities at baseline. Low pH moisturizer or placebo did not significantly impact the vaginal microbiota or metabolome despite lowering the vaginal pH. Estradiol use may offer additional genitourinary health benefits to postmenopausal women. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02516202.